Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored
Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business strategy and the environment 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-81 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 81 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Business strategy and the environment |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Dooley, Kenneth |
description | Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity in the discussion on environmental sustainability. A qualitative approach employs a logic model to analyse two sequences of events and tracks the implementation of innovations that had been overlooked for some time. The evidence shows that the selected organizational innovations were previously inhibited by a failure to change the organization's formal processes and informal cultural norms. This is especially true of innovations that altered the daily routines of the focal firm's employees and of innovations that potentially alienated customers. The characteristics of the innovations (high impact and low barrier to implementation) indicate that firms are now less able to justify inaction through the traditional barriers of environmentally focused innovation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bse.1984 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1988880312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1988880312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-1798522d32bbd4e3bb54df1296f1eedeb3556d34a798d665f4d43223cad9317d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs4p-CcEvHjpzK92jTcdVQcDYVM8hmRJZ0aXzKTd6H9vtnk1l0fe--QRvgDcYjTCCJEHFc0I85KdgQFGnGeopMU5GCBesIyNKb0EVzGuEUoNUg6AnPuutc7AuV1ZbdseSqdh5XY2eLcxrpUNXHSxldZJZZsEHuHXdw_nsrXepeHUOb87XiKUIe0xq66RoenhdOV8MPoaXNSyiebmrw7B50v1MXnLZu-v08nTLFtSTliGx7zMCdGUKKWZoUrlTNeY8KLGxmijaJ4XmjKZnC6KvGaaUULoUmpO8VjTIbg77d0G_9OZ2Iq170L6YhQpj3QQxSSp-5NaBh9jMLXYBruRoRcYiUOAIgV4eMASzU50bxvT_-vE86I6-l8lBnKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988880312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dooley, Kenneth</creator><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><description>Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity in the discussion on environmental sustainability. A qualitative approach employs a logic model to analyse two sequences of events and tracks the implementation of innovations that had been overlooked for some time. The evidence shows that the selected organizational innovations were previously inhibited by a failure to change the organization's formal processes and informal cultural norms. This is especially true of innovations that altered the daily routines of the focal firm's employees and of innovations that potentially alienated customers. The characteristics of the innovations (high impact and low barrier to implementation) indicate that firms are now less able to justify inaction through the traditional barriers of environmentally focused innovation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bse.1984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Customers ; Empirical analysis ; environmental policy ; Innovations ; Norms ; organizational inertia ; organizational innovation ; Qualitative analysis ; Rigidity ; routine rigidity ; Sequences ; stakeholder engagement ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Business strategy and the environment, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-81</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-1798522d32bbd4e3bb54df1296f1eedeb3556d34a798d665f4d43223cad9317d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-1798522d32bbd4e3bb54df1296f1eedeb3556d34a798d665f4d43223cad9317d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbse.1984$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbse.1984$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><title>Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored</title><title>Business strategy and the environment</title><description>Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity in the discussion on environmental sustainability. A qualitative approach employs a logic model to analyse two sequences of events and tracks the implementation of innovations that had been overlooked for some time. The evidence shows that the selected organizational innovations were previously inhibited by a failure to change the organization's formal processes and informal cultural norms. This is especially true of innovations that altered the daily routines of the focal firm's employees and of innovations that potentially alienated customers. The characteristics of the innovations (high impact and low barrier to implementation) indicate that firms are now less able to justify inaction through the traditional barriers of environmentally focused innovation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</description><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>environmental policy</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>organizational inertia</subject><subject>organizational innovation</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Rigidity</subject><subject>routine rigidity</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>0964-4733</issn><issn>1099-0836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs4p-CcEvHjpzK92jTcdVQcDYVM8hmRJZ0aXzKTd6H9vtnk1l0fe--QRvgDcYjTCCJEHFc0I85KdgQFGnGeopMU5GCBesIyNKb0EVzGuEUoNUg6AnPuutc7AuV1ZbdseSqdh5XY2eLcxrpUNXHSxldZJZZsEHuHXdw_nsrXepeHUOb87XiKUIe0xq66RoenhdOV8MPoaXNSyiebmrw7B50v1MXnLZu-v08nTLFtSTliGx7zMCdGUKKWZoUrlTNeY8KLGxmijaJ4XmjKZnC6KvGaaUULoUmpO8VjTIbg77d0G_9OZ2Iq170L6YhQpj3QQxSSp-5NaBh9jMLXYBruRoRcYiUOAIgV4eMASzU50bxvT_-vE86I6-l8lBnKE</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Dooley, Kenneth</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored</title><author>Dooley, Kenneth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3924-1798522d32bbd4e3bb54df1296f1eedeb3556d34a798d665f4d43223cad9317d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>environmental policy</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>organizational inertia</topic><topic>organizational innovation</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Rigidity</topic><topic>routine rigidity</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dooley, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dooley, Kenneth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored</atitle><jtitle>Business strategy and the environment</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>81</epage><pages>70-81</pages><issn>0964-4733</issn><eissn>1099-0836</eissn><abstract>Rigidities describe the sluggishness of an organization's response in the face of discontinuous external change, and routine rigidity is the failure to change the organization's processes. This article aims to provide empirical evidence that substantiates the relevance of routine rigidity in the discussion on environmental sustainability. A qualitative approach employs a logic model to analyse two sequences of events and tracks the implementation of innovations that had been overlooked for some time. The evidence shows that the selected organizational innovations were previously inhibited by a failure to change the organization's formal processes and informal cultural norms. This is especially true of innovations that altered the daily routines of the focal firm's employees and of innovations that potentially alienated customers. The characteristics of the innovations (high impact and low barrier to implementation) indicate that firms are now less able to justify inaction through the traditional barriers of environmentally focused innovation. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/bse.1984</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-4733 |
ispartof | Business strategy and the environment, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.70-81 |
issn | 0964-4733 1099-0836 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1988880312 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Customers Empirical analysis environmental policy Innovations Norms organizational inertia organizational innovation Qualitative analysis Rigidity routine rigidity Sequences stakeholder engagement Sustainability Sustainable development |
title | Routine Rigidity and Environmental Sustainability: Why Rational Innovations are Regularly Ignored |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A32%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Routine%20Rigidity%20and%20Environmental%20Sustainability:%20Why%20Rational%20Innovations%20are%20Regularly%20Ignored&rft.jtitle=Business%20strategy%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Dooley,%20Kenneth&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=81&rft.pages=70-81&rft.issn=0964-4733&rft.eissn=1099-0836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bse.1984&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1988880312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988880312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |