Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax
In this paper, we study the impact of carbon tax on carbon emission and retail price in a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Specifically, by adopting two types of contracts, i.e., the modified wholesale price (MW) and the modified cost-sharing contract (MS), suppl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2017-12, Vol.9 (12), p.2360 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2360 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yu, Wei Han, Ruizhu |
description | In this paper, we study the impact of carbon tax on carbon emission and retail price in a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Specifically, by adopting two types of contracts, i.e., the modified wholesale price (MW) and the modified cost-sharing contract (MS), supply chain coordination is achieved, which promotes the supply chain efficiency. Our study shows that: (1) with the increase of carbon tax, both the optimal emission reduction level and the optimal retail price increase, and then keep unchanged; (2) neither MW nor MS benefits the manufacturer after the supply chain coordination; and (3) to effectively coordinate the supply chain, we propose an innovative supply chain contract that integrates the firms’ optimal decisions under MW or MS with a two part tariff contract (TPT) and a fixed fee the retailer can pay to ensure a win-win solution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su9122360 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1988508517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1988508517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bb703ab41f3be1e04ea79fd45f355870255a1e52f263e457c792788cc0f4cc9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1KxDAYDKLgsu7BNwh48lD9kjRNcpSy_sCCB-s5pGnidqlJTbbovr2VFXEuMzDDDAxClwRuGFNwmydFKGUVnKAFBUEKAhxO_-lztMp5BzMYI4pUCyTrGFPXB7Pvwxs2uPmMxdpu3RADfpnGcTjgemv6gKfQuYRrk9rZaczXBTrzZshu9ctL9Hq_burHYvP88FTfbQpLFd0XbSuAmbYknrWOOCidEcp3JfeMcymAcm6I49TTirmSCysUFVJaC760Vjm2RFfH3jHFj8nlvd7FKYV5UhMlJQfJiZhT18eUTTHn5LweU_9u0kET0D_f6L9v2DeJulRK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988508517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yu, Wei ; Han, Ruizhu</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wei ; Han, Ruizhu</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we study the impact of carbon tax on carbon emission and retail price in a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Specifically, by adopting two types of contracts, i.e., the modified wholesale price (MW) and the modified cost-sharing contract (MS), supply chain coordination is achieved, which promotes the supply chain efficiency. Our study shows that: (1) with the increase of carbon tax, both the optimal emission reduction level and the optimal retail price increase, and then keep unchanged; (2) neither MW nor MS benefits the manufacturer after the supply chain coordination; and (3) to effectively coordinate the supply chain, we propose an innovative supply chain contract that integrates the firms’ optimal decisions under MW or MS with a two part tariff contract (TPT) and a fixed fee the retailer can pay to ensure a win-win solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su9122360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Emission analysis ; Emissions control ; Environmental tax ; Retail stores ; Supply chains ; Sustainability ; Tariffs ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2017-12, Vol.9 (12), p.2360</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bb703ab41f3be1e04ea79fd45f355870255a1e52f263e457c792788cc0f4cc9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bb703ab41f3be1e04ea79fd45f355870255a1e52f263e457c792788cc0f4cc9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6262-1289</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ruizhu</creatorcontrib><title>Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In this paper, we study the impact of carbon tax on carbon emission and retail price in a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Specifically, by adopting two types of contracts, i.e., the modified wholesale price (MW) and the modified cost-sharing contract (MS), supply chain coordination is achieved, which promotes the supply chain efficiency. Our study shows that: (1) with the increase of carbon tax, both the optimal emission reduction level and the optimal retail price increase, and then keep unchanged; (2) neither MW nor MS benefits the manufacturer after the supply chain coordination; and (3) to effectively coordinate the supply chain, we propose an innovative supply chain contract that integrates the firms’ optimal decisions under MW or MS with a two part tariff contract (TPT) and a fixed fee the retailer can pay to ensure a win-win solution.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUM1KxDAYDKLgsu7BNwh48lD9kjRNcpSy_sCCB-s5pGnidqlJTbbovr2VFXEuMzDDDAxClwRuGFNwmydFKGUVnKAFBUEKAhxO_-lztMp5BzMYI4pUCyTrGFPXB7Pvwxs2uPmMxdpu3RADfpnGcTjgemv6gKfQuYRrk9rZaczXBTrzZshu9ctL9Hq_burHYvP88FTfbQpLFd0XbSuAmbYknrWOOCidEcp3JfeMcymAcm6I49TTirmSCysUFVJaC760Vjm2RFfH3jHFj8nlvd7FKYV5UhMlJQfJiZhT18eUTTHn5LweU_9u0kET0D_f6L9v2DeJulRK</recordid><startdate>20171218</startdate><enddate>20171218</enddate><creator>Yu, Wei</creator><creator>Han, Ruizhu</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-1289</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171218</creationdate><title>Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax</title><author>Yu, Wei ; Han, Ruizhu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-bb703ab41f3be1e04ea79fd45f355870255a1e52f263e457c792788cc0f4cc9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ruizhu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Wei</au><au>Han, Ruizhu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2017-12-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2360</spage><pages>2360-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we study the impact of carbon tax on carbon emission and retail price in a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Specifically, by adopting two types of contracts, i.e., the modified wholesale price (MW) and the modified cost-sharing contract (MS), supply chain coordination is achieved, which promotes the supply chain efficiency. Our study shows that: (1) with the increase of carbon tax, both the optimal emission reduction level and the optimal retail price increase, and then keep unchanged; (2) neither MW nor MS benefits the manufacturer after the supply chain coordination; and (3) to effectively coordinate the supply chain, we propose an innovative supply chain contract that integrates the firms’ optimal decisions under MW or MS with a two part tariff contract (TPT) and a fixed fee the retailer can pay to ensure a win-win solution.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su9122360</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-1289</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2017-12, Vol.9 (12), p.2360 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1988508517 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Carbon Emission analysis Emissions control Environmental tax Retail stores Supply chains Sustainability Tariffs Taxation |
title | Coordinating a Two-Echelon Supply Chain under Carbon Tax |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coordinating%20a%20Two-Echelon%20Supply%20Chain%20under%20Carbon%20Tax&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Yu,%20Wei&rft.date=2017-12-18&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2360&rft.pages=2360-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su9122360&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1988508517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988508517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |