Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1
Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavior science research 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-4 |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Behavior science research |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Fleising, Usher Goldenberg, Sheldon |
description | Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social
structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been
argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and
that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness
hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno
graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical
ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship
between ecology, feud, and social structure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/106939718702100107 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1987643044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_106939718702100107</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1987643044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRMFb_gKuAO2nse_M9Sy2tCgUX1XWYTCalJXbqTLLovzclLgRx9Tbn3Pu4hNwiPCAqNUOQhhmFWgFFAAR1RjIUghZMKH1OMgDDCyYVuyRXKe1gYKSAjNwvXGjD5jjN18FtbZuvu9i7ro9-mtt9nT-1IdT50vc1XpOLxrbJ3_zcCflYLt7nL8Xq7fl1_rgqHGXQFa4yANJKKypbMbAUHFaOasO18254sWGcCZQoWNVoWnMByKU10laUeW_ZhNyNuYcYvnqfunIX-rgfKks0WknOgPOBoiPlYkgp-qY8xO2njccSoTxtUv7dZJBmo5Tsxv-K_d_4Br7uXhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987643044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social
structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been
argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and
that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness
hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno
graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical
ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship
between ecology, feud, and social structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-3673</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/106939718702100107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Blood ; Cross cultural studies ; Ecology ; Environmental aspects ; Human ecology ; Social networks ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>Behavior science research, 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 1987</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><title>Behavior science research</title><description>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social
structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been
argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and
that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness
hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno
graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical
ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship
between ecology, feud, and social structure.</description><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0094-3673</issn><issn>1069-3971</issn><issn>1552-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRMFb_gKuAO2nse_M9Sy2tCgUX1XWYTCalJXbqTLLovzclLgRx9Tbn3Pu4hNwiPCAqNUOQhhmFWgFFAAR1RjIUghZMKH1OMgDDCyYVuyRXKe1gYKSAjNwvXGjD5jjN18FtbZuvu9i7ro9-mtt9nT-1IdT50vc1XpOLxrbJ3_zcCflYLt7nL8Xq7fl1_rgqHGXQFa4yANJKKypbMbAUHFaOasO18254sWGcCZQoWNVoWnMByKU10laUeW_ZhNyNuYcYvnqfunIX-rgfKks0WknOgPOBoiPlYkgp-qY8xO2njccSoTxtUv7dZJBmo5Tsxv-K_d_4Br7uXhA</recordid><startdate>198702</startdate><enddate>198702</enddate><creator>Fleising, Usher</creator><creator>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198702</creationdate><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><author>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Behavior science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleising, Usher</au><au>Goldenberg, Sheldon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</atitle><jtitle>Behavior science research</jtitle><date>1987-02</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>160-181</pages><issn>0094-3673</issn><issn>1069-3971</issn><eissn>1552-3578</eissn><abstract>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social
structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been
argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and
that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness
hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno
graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical
ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship
between ecology, feud, and social structure.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/106939718702100107</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-3673 |
ispartof | Behavior science research, 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181 |
issn | 0094-3673 1069-3971 1552-3578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1987643044 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Journals |
subjects | Blood Cross cultural studies Ecology Environmental aspects Human ecology Social networks Social structure |
title | Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology,%20Social%20Structure,%20and%20Blood%20Feud1&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20science%20research&rft.au=Fleising,%20Usher&rft.date=1987-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=160-181&rft.issn=0094-3673&rft.eissn=1552-3578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/106939718702100107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1987643044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987643044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_106939718702100107&rfr_iscdi=true |