Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1

Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior science research 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181
Hauptverfasser: Fleising, Usher, Goldenberg, Sheldon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue 1-4
container_start_page 160
container_title Behavior science research
container_volume 21
creator Fleising, Usher
Goldenberg, Sheldon
description Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship between ecology, feud, and social structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/106939718702100107
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1987643044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_106939718702100107</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1987643044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRMFb_gKuAO2nse_M9Sy2tCgUX1XWYTCalJXbqTLLovzclLgRx9Tbn3Pu4hNwiPCAqNUOQhhmFWgFFAAR1RjIUghZMKH1OMgDDCyYVuyRXKe1gYKSAjNwvXGjD5jjN18FtbZuvu9i7ro9-mtt9nT-1IdT50vc1XpOLxrbJ3_zcCflYLt7nL8Xq7fl1_rgqHGXQFa4yANJKKypbMbAUHFaOasO18254sWGcCZQoWNVoWnMByKU10laUeW_ZhNyNuYcYvnqfunIX-rgfKks0WknOgPOBoiPlYkgp-qY8xO2njccSoTxtUv7dZJBmo5Tsxv-K_d_4Br7uXhA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987643044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><description>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship between ecology, feud, and social structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-3673</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1069-3971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/106939718702100107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Blood ; Cross cultural studies ; Ecology ; Environmental aspects ; Human ecology ; Social networks ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>Behavior science research, 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 1987</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><title>Behavior science research</title><description>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship between ecology, feud, and social structure.</description><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cross cultural studies</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Human ecology</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0094-3673</issn><issn>1069-3971</issn><issn>1552-3578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AURQdRMFb_gKuAO2nse_M9Sy2tCgUX1XWYTCalJXbqTLLovzclLgRx9Tbn3Pu4hNwiPCAqNUOQhhmFWgFFAAR1RjIUghZMKH1OMgDDCyYVuyRXKe1gYKSAjNwvXGjD5jjN18FtbZuvu9i7ro9-mtt9nT-1IdT50vc1XpOLxrbJ3_zcCflYLt7nL8Xq7fl1_rgqHGXQFa4yANJKKypbMbAUHFaOasO18254sWGcCZQoWNVoWnMByKU10laUeW_ZhNyNuYcYvnqfunIX-rgfKks0WknOgPOBoiPlYkgp-qY8xO2njccSoTxtUv7dZJBmo5Tsxv-K_d_4Br7uXhA</recordid><startdate>198702</startdate><enddate>198702</enddate><creator>Fleising, Usher</creator><creator>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198702</creationdate><title>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</title><author>Fleising, Usher ; Goldenberg, Sheldon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c230t-cb9006a6a5bab30a20c1bc28948cec718f343516153bf82d450146a96ab23eea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cross cultural studies</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Human ecology</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleising, Usher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldenberg, Sheldon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Behavior science research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleising, Usher</au><au>Goldenberg, Sheldon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1</atitle><jtitle>Behavior science research</jtitle><date>1987-02</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>160-181</pages><issn>0094-3673</issn><issn>1069-3971</issn><eissn>1552-3578</eissn><abstract>Cross-cultural research has indicated a correlation between social structural indicators of close-knit networks and feud. It has been argued by other investigators that such a relationship is spurious and that ecological variables account for the covariation. This spuriousness hypothesis is tested, employing ecological measures from the Ethno graphic Atlas and two foraging indicators derived from theoretical ecology. A conditional model is found to account for the relationship between ecology, feud, and social structure.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/106939718702100107</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-3673
ispartof Behavior science research, 1987-02, Vol.21 (1-4), p.160-181
issn 0094-3673
1069-3971
1552-3578
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1987643044
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Journals
subjects Blood
Cross cultural studies
Ecology
Environmental aspects
Human ecology
Social networks
Social structure
title Ecology, Social Structure, and Blood Feud1
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A43%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecology,%20Social%20Structure,%20and%20Blood%20Feud1&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20science%20research&rft.au=Fleising,%20Usher&rft.date=1987-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=160-181&rft.issn=0094-3673&rft.eissn=1552-3578&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/106939718702100107&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1987643044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987643044&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_106939718702100107&rfr_iscdi=true