Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa
Objective: This mixed-methods process evaluation examined the feasibility of a parenting program delivered by community facilitators to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in low-income families with children aged 3–8 years in Cape Town, South Africa (N = 68). Method: Quantitative measures include...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Research on social work practice 2018-02, Vol.28 (2), p.188-202 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 202 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 188 |
| container_title | Research on social work practice |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Lachman, Jamie M. Kelly, Jane Cluver, Lucie Ward, Catherine L. Hutchings, Judy Gardner, Frances |
| description | Objective:
This mixed-methods process evaluation examined the feasibility of a parenting program delivered by community facilitators to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in low-income families with children aged 3–8 years in Cape Town, South Africa (N = 68).
Method:
Quantitative measures included attendance registers, fidelity checklists, satisfaction surveys, and engagement in home practice activities. Qualitative data included parent interviews, facilitator focus groups, and transcripts from parent groups and facilitator supervision sessions.
Results:
Quantitative results show high levels of participant involvement, implementation, and acceptability. Thematic analyses identified seven themes related to program feasibility: (a) supporting participant involvement, (b) engagement in collaborative learning, (c) strengthening facilitator competency, (d) delivering nonviolent discipline skills, (e) contextualizing content, (f) receptivity to existing practices, and (g) resistance to new skills.
Discussion:
Findings suggest that parenting programs derived from evidence-based principles may be feasible in South Africa when situated within a culturally relevant context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049731516645665 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1987205636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1166313</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1049731516645665</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1987205636</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-27008c4b70ad6d54d5f9d22c28275d706b9b121051a9ba5a20b3a2073c9cc2e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKfvvggBn6O5pEnaxzG2ORk4UZ9LmqazY21m0ir-92ZURARf7g6-3_cddwhdAr0BUOoWaJIpDgKkTISU4giNQAhGlEjhOM5RJgf9FJ2FsKUUOJPZCD2uvTM2BDx717ted7VrsauwxmvtbdvV7QZHYuN1gyvn8cp9kGVrXGPxXDf1rrYB1y1-cn33iieVr40-RyeV3gV78d3H6GU-e57ekdXDYjmdrIjhHDrCFKWpSQpFdSlLkZSiykrGDEuZEqWissgKYEAF6KzQQjNa8FgUN5kxzFI-RtdD7t67t96GLt-63rdxZQ5ZqhgVkstI0YEy3oXgbZXvfd1o_5kDzQ-Py_8-LlquBouN5_zgs3uIBAcedTLoQW_sr6X_5X0B3qZ0rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1987205636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Lachman, Jamie M. ; Kelly, Jane ; Cluver, Lucie ; Ward, Catherine L. ; Hutchings, Judy ; Gardner, Frances</creator><creatorcontrib>Lachman, Jamie M. ; Kelly, Jane ; Cluver, Lucie ; Ward, Catherine L. ; Hutchings, Judy ; Gardner, Frances</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
This mixed-methods process evaluation examined the feasibility of a parenting program delivered by community facilitators to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in low-income families with children aged 3–8 years in Cape Town, South Africa (N = 68).
Method:
Quantitative measures included attendance registers, fidelity checklists, satisfaction surveys, and engagement in home practice activities. Qualitative data included parent interviews, facilitator focus groups, and transcripts from parent groups and facilitator supervision sessions.
Results:
Quantitative results show high levels of participant involvement, implementation, and acceptability. Thematic analyses identified seven themes related to program feasibility: (a) supporting participant involvement, (b) engagement in collaborative learning, (c) strengthening facilitator competency, (d) delivering nonviolent discipline skills, (e) contextualizing content, (f) receptivity to existing practices, and (g) resistance to new skills.
Discussion:
Findings suggest that parenting programs derived from evidence-based principles may be feasible in South Africa when situated within a culturally relevant context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049731516645665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Attendance ; Check Lists ; Child Abuse ; Child abuse & neglect ; Child poverty ; Childrearing practices ; Children ; Collaborative learning ; Competence ; Competency based learning ; Cooperative Learning ; Cultural Awareness ; Discipline ; Evaluation ; Evidence Based Practice ; Feasibility ; Fidelity ; Focus Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Home practice ; Low Income ; Low income groups ; Mixed Methods Research ; Nonviolence ; Parent Attitudes ; Parent Child Relationship ; Parent Education ; Parent-child relations ; Parenthood education ; Parenting Skills ; Parents & parenting ; Prevention ; Program Evaluation ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; Receptivity ; Resistance ; Risk ; Risk reduction ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Skills ; Supervision ; Toddlers ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Research on social work practice, 2018-02, Vol.28 (2), p.188-202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-27008c4b70ad6d54d5f9d22c28275d706b9b121051a9ba5a20b3a2073c9cc2e03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-27008c4b70ad6d54d5f9d22c28275d706b9b121051a9ba5a20b3a2073c9cc2e03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049731516645665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049731516645665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1166313$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lachman, Jamie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cluver, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Catherine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Frances</creatorcontrib><title>Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa</title><title>Research on social work practice</title><description>Objective:
This mixed-methods process evaluation examined the feasibility of a parenting program delivered by community facilitators to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in low-income families with children aged 3–8 years in Cape Town, South Africa (N = 68).
Method:
Quantitative measures included attendance registers, fidelity checklists, satisfaction surveys, and engagement in home practice activities. Qualitative data included parent interviews, facilitator focus groups, and transcripts from parent groups and facilitator supervision sessions.
Results:
Quantitative results show high levels of participant involvement, implementation, and acceptability. Thematic analyses identified seven themes related to program feasibility: (a) supporting participant involvement, (b) engagement in collaborative learning, (c) strengthening facilitator competency, (d) delivering nonviolent discipline skills, (e) contextualizing content, (f) receptivity to existing practices, and (g) resistance to new skills.
Discussion:
Findings suggest that parenting programs derived from evidence-based principles may be feasible in South Africa when situated within a culturally relevant context.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child abuse & neglect</subject><subject>Child poverty</subject><subject>Childrearing practices</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Competency based learning</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Cultural Awareness</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Home practice</subject><subject>Low Income</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Nonviolence</subject><subject>Parent Attitudes</subject><subject>Parent Child Relationship</subject><subject>Parent Education</subject><subject>Parent-child relations</subject><subject>Parenthood education</subject><subject>Parenting Skills</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>Receptivity</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Toddlers</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1049-7315</issn><issn>1552-7581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kNFLwzAQxoMoOKfvvggBn6O5pEnaxzG2ORk4UZ9LmqazY21m0ir-92ZURARf7g6-3_cddwhdAr0BUOoWaJIpDgKkTISU4giNQAhGlEjhOM5RJgf9FJ2FsKUUOJPZCD2uvTM2BDx717ted7VrsauwxmvtbdvV7QZHYuN1gyvn8cp9kGVrXGPxXDf1rrYB1y1-cn33iieVr40-RyeV3gV78d3H6GU-e57ekdXDYjmdrIjhHDrCFKWpSQpFdSlLkZSiykrGDEuZEqWissgKYEAF6KzQQjNa8FgUN5kxzFI-RtdD7t67t96GLt-63rdxZQ5ZqhgVkstI0YEy3oXgbZXvfd1o_5kDzQ-Py_8-LlquBouN5_zgs3uIBAcedTLoQW_sr6X_5X0B3qZ0rg</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Lachman, Jamie M.</creator><creator>Kelly, Jane</creator><creator>Cluver, Lucie</creator><creator>Ward, Catherine L.</creator><creator>Hutchings, Judy</creator><creator>Gardner, Frances</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa</title><author>Lachman, Jamie M. ; Kelly, Jane ; Cluver, Lucie ; Ward, Catherine L. ; Hutchings, Judy ; Gardner, Frances</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-27008c4b70ad6d54d5f9d22c28275d706b9b121051a9ba5a20b3a2073c9cc2e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child abuse & neglect</topic><topic>Child poverty</topic><topic>Childrearing practices</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Competency based learning</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Cultural Awareness</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Home practice</topic><topic>Low Income</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Nonviolence</topic><topic>Parent Attitudes</topic><topic>Parent Child Relationship</topic><topic>Parent Education</topic><topic>Parent-child relations</topic><topic>Parenthood education</topic><topic>Parenting Skills</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>Receptivity</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Toddlers</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lachman, Jamie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cluver, Lucie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Catherine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchings, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Frances</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lachman, Jamie M.</au><au>Kelly, Jane</au><au>Cluver, Lucie</au><au>Ward, Catherine L.</au><au>Hutchings, Judy</au><au>Gardner, Frances</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1166313</ericid><atitle>Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Research on social work practice</jtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>202</epage><pages>188-202</pages><issn>1049-7315</issn><eissn>1552-7581</eissn><abstract>Objective:
This mixed-methods process evaluation examined the feasibility of a parenting program delivered by community facilitators to reduce the risk of child maltreatment in low-income families with children aged 3–8 years in Cape Town, South Africa (N = 68).
Method:
Quantitative measures included attendance registers, fidelity checklists, satisfaction surveys, and engagement in home practice activities. Qualitative data included parent interviews, facilitator focus groups, and transcripts from parent groups and facilitator supervision sessions.
Results:
Quantitative results show high levels of participant involvement, implementation, and acceptability. Thematic analyses identified seven themes related to program feasibility: (a) supporting participant involvement, (b) engagement in collaborative learning, (c) strengthening facilitator competency, (d) delivering nonviolent discipline skills, (e) contextualizing content, (f) receptivity to existing practices, and (g) resistance to new skills.
Discussion:
Findings suggest that parenting programs derived from evidence-based principles may be feasible in South Africa when situated within a culturally relevant context.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1049731516645665</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1049-7315 |
| ispartof | Research on social work practice, 2018-02, Vol.28 (2), p.188-202 |
| issn | 1049-7315 1552-7581 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1987205636 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Academic disciplines Attendance Check Lists Child Abuse Child abuse & neglect Child poverty Childrearing practices Children Collaborative learning Competence Competency based learning Cooperative Learning Cultural Awareness Discipline Evaluation Evidence Based Practice Feasibility Fidelity Focus Groups Foreign Countries Home practice Low Income Low income groups Mixed Methods Research Nonviolence Parent Attitudes Parent Child Relationship Parent Education Parent-child relations Parenthood education Parenting Skills Parents & parenting Prevention Program Evaluation Randomized Controlled Trials Receptivity Resistance Risk Risk reduction Semi Structured Interviews Skills Supervision Toddlers Young Children |
| title | Process Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Low-Income Families in South Africa |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T00%3A16%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Process%20Evaluation%20of%20a%20Parenting%20Program%20for%20Low-Income%20Families%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Research%20on%20social%20work%20practice&rft.au=Lachman,%20Jamie%20M.&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=202&rft.pages=188-202&rft.issn=1049-7315&rft.eissn=1552-7581&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049731516645665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1987205636%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1987205636&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1166313&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049731516645665&rfr_iscdi=true |