VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain

INTRODUCTION:Despite numerous medical, pharmacological and surgical approaches for chronic low back pain (LBP), many patients continue to complain of severe disabling pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS), alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is a neuromodulation procedure that...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2017, Vol.33 (S1), p.238-238
Hauptverfasser: Rhainds, Marc, Larocque, Brigitte, Bussières, Sylvain, Nourrisat, Alice, Coulombe, Martin, Cantin, Léo, Canuel, Jean-Francois, Prudhomme, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 238
container_issue S1
container_start_page 238
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 33
creator Rhainds, Marc
Larocque, Brigitte
Bussières, Sylvain
Nourrisat, Alice
Coulombe, Martin
Cantin, Léo
Canuel, Jean-Francois
Prudhomme, Michel
description INTRODUCTION:Despite numerous medical, pharmacological and surgical approaches for chronic low back pain (LBP), many patients continue to complain of severe disabling pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS), alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is a neuromodulation procedure that have been recently developed and implemented in our hospital. We conducted a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to determine if PNfS may be considered as a standard of practice in the management of intractable LBP and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).METHODS:An interdisciplinary group of experts was involved in the project. A systematic review (SR) was performed in several databases and grey literature to identify clinical practice guidelines, SR and observational studies published through September 2016. A survey was conducted among other chronic pain centers in Canada to document PNfS use in LBP and FBSS treatment.RESULTS:Data on effectiveness and safety of PNfS in chronic LBP treatment were scarce. Short-term results (3-12 months) from small sample and low quality studies suggest that PNfS, alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is associated with pain intensity and opioid use reductions. Effects on functional status and quality of life remain undetermined. Most frequent adverse events reported with PNfS devices are lead migrations, discomfort or pain and surgical site infections. No other Canadian pain centers were found to use PNfS in chronic LBP or FBSS.CONCLUSIONS:PNfS is potentially a beneficial treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain or FBSS. However, the value of this innovative treatment remains unknown. Among factors to be clarified are target population (any chronic low back pain or FBSS), use of PNfS alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, long-term effects, and comparison with conventional medical management. PNfS use in chronic LBP has to be assessed through a rigorous framework before its introduction as a standard medical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462317004196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1986600306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462317004196</cupid><sourcerecordid>1986600306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1576-da0bad5d292a718e1f4de275b17b6e54605aab960c35548b9917785b70ca9edb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wFvA8-r7br42R1tsFYoWql6XZJPa1O2mZreK_96W9iCIpznMPDMwhFwiXCOguplBLiWXOUMFwFHLI9JDrjCTjBfHpLezs51_Ss7adgmADDT0yOB1ihrp1KewXvhkavro06eno-BrR2ddWG1q04XY0FFMdLhIsQkVncQvOjDVO52a0JyTk7mpW39x0D55Gd09D--zydP4YXg7ySoUSmbOgDVOuFznRmHhcc6dz5WwqKz0gksQxlgtoWJC8MJqjUoVwiqojPbOsj652veuU_zY-LYrl3GTmu1kibqQEoCB3KZwn6pSbNvk5-U6hZVJ3yVCubuq_HPVlmEHxqxsCu7N_6r-l_oBxLtoJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986600306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Rhainds, Marc ; Larocque, Brigitte ; Bussières, Sylvain ; Nourrisat, Alice ; Coulombe, Martin ; Cantin, Léo ; Canuel, Jean-Francois ; Prudhomme, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhainds, Marc ; Larocque, Brigitte ; Bussières, Sylvain ; Nourrisat, Alice ; Coulombe, Martin ; Cantin, Léo ; Canuel, Jean-Francois ; Prudhomme, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION:Despite numerous medical, pharmacological and surgical approaches for chronic low back pain (LBP), many patients continue to complain of severe disabling pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS), alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is a neuromodulation procedure that have been recently developed and implemented in our hospital. We conducted a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to determine if PNfS may be considered as a standard of practice in the management of intractable LBP and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).METHODS:An interdisciplinary group of experts was involved in the project. A systematic review (SR) was performed in several databases and grey literature to identify clinical practice guidelines, SR and observational studies published through September 2016. A survey was conducted among other chronic pain centers in Canada to document PNfS use in LBP and FBSS treatment.RESULTS:Data on effectiveness and safety of PNfS in chronic LBP treatment were scarce. Short-term results (3-12 months) from small sample and low quality studies suggest that PNfS, alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is associated with pain intensity and opioid use reductions. Effects on functional status and quality of life remain undetermined. Most frequent adverse events reported with PNfS devices are lead migrations, discomfort or pain and surgical site infections. No other Canadian pain centers were found to use PNfS in chronic LBP or FBSS.CONCLUSIONS:PNfS is potentially a beneficial treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain or FBSS. However, the value of this innovative treatment remains unknown. Among factors to be clarified are target population (any chronic low back pain or FBSS), use of PNfS alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, long-term effects, and comparison with conventional medical management. PNfS use in chronic LBP has to be assessed through a rigorous framework before its introduction as a standard medical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317004196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Chronic pain ; Long-term effects ; Low back pain ; Neuromodulation ; Opioids ; Pain ; Patients ; Pharmacology ; Quality of life ; Spinal cord ; Stimulation ; Surgery ; Surgical site infections ; Technology assessment ; Vignette Presentations</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2017, Vol.33 (S1), p.238-238</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462317004196/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,777,781,4010,27904,27905,27906,55609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhainds, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larocque, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussières, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourrisat, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulombe, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantin, Léo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canuel, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudhomme, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTION:Despite numerous medical, pharmacological and surgical approaches for chronic low back pain (LBP), many patients continue to complain of severe disabling pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS), alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is a neuromodulation procedure that have been recently developed and implemented in our hospital. We conducted a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to determine if PNfS may be considered as a standard of practice in the management of intractable LBP and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).METHODS:An interdisciplinary group of experts was involved in the project. A systematic review (SR) was performed in several databases and grey literature to identify clinical practice guidelines, SR and observational studies published through September 2016. A survey was conducted among other chronic pain centers in Canada to document PNfS use in LBP and FBSS treatment.RESULTS:Data on effectiveness and safety of PNfS in chronic LBP treatment were scarce. Short-term results (3-12 months) from small sample and low quality studies suggest that PNfS, alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is associated with pain intensity and opioid use reductions. Effects on functional status and quality of life remain undetermined. Most frequent adverse events reported with PNfS devices are lead migrations, discomfort or pain and surgical site infections. No other Canadian pain centers were found to use PNfS in chronic LBP or FBSS.CONCLUSIONS:PNfS is potentially a beneficial treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain or FBSS. However, the value of this innovative treatment remains unknown. Among factors to be clarified are target population (any chronic low back pain or FBSS), use of PNfS alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, long-term effects, and comparison with conventional medical management. PNfS use in chronic LBP has to be assessed through a rigorous framework before its introduction as a standard medical practice.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Long-term effects</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Neuromodulation</subject><subject>Opioids</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacology</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical site infections</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Vignette Presentations</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wFvA8-r7br42R1tsFYoWql6XZJPa1O2mZreK_96W9iCIpznMPDMwhFwiXCOguplBLiWXOUMFwFHLI9JDrjCTjBfHpLezs51_Ss7adgmADDT0yOB1ihrp1KewXvhkavro06eno-BrR2ddWG1q04XY0FFMdLhIsQkVncQvOjDVO52a0JyTk7mpW39x0D55Gd09D--zydP4YXg7ySoUSmbOgDVOuFznRmHhcc6dz5WwqKz0gksQxlgtoWJC8MJqjUoVwiqojPbOsj652veuU_zY-LYrl3GTmu1kibqQEoCB3KZwn6pSbNvk5-U6hZVJ3yVCubuq_HPVlmEHxqxsCu7N_6r-l_oBxLtoJA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Rhainds, Marc</creator><creator>Larocque, Brigitte</creator><creator>Bussières, Sylvain</creator><creator>Nourrisat, Alice</creator><creator>Coulombe, Martin</creator><creator>Cantin, Léo</creator><creator>Canuel, Jean-Francois</creator><creator>Prudhomme, Michel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain</title><author>Rhainds, Marc ; Larocque, Brigitte ; Bussières, Sylvain ; Nourrisat, Alice ; Coulombe, Martin ; Cantin, Léo ; Canuel, Jean-Francois ; Prudhomme, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1576-da0bad5d292a718e1f4de275b17b6e54605aab960c35548b9917785b70ca9edb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Long-term effects</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Neuromodulation</topic><topic>Opioids</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacology</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical site infections</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Vignette Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhainds, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larocque, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bussières, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nourrisat, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulombe, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantin, Léo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canuel, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prudhomme, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhainds, Marc</au><au>Larocque, Brigitte</au><au>Bussières, Sylvain</au><au>Nourrisat, Alice</au><au>Coulombe, Martin</au><au>Cantin, Léo</au><au>Canuel, Jean-Francois</au><au>Prudhomme, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>238</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>238-238</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION:Despite numerous medical, pharmacological and surgical approaches for chronic low back pain (LBP), many patients continue to complain of severe disabling pain. Peripheral nerve field stimulation (PNfS), alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is a neuromodulation procedure that have been recently developed and implemented in our hospital. We conducted a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) to determine if PNfS may be considered as a standard of practice in the management of intractable LBP and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).METHODS:An interdisciplinary group of experts was involved in the project. A systematic review (SR) was performed in several databases and grey literature to identify clinical practice guidelines, SR and observational studies published through September 2016. A survey was conducted among other chronic pain centers in Canada to document PNfS use in LBP and FBSS treatment.RESULTS:Data on effectiveness and safety of PNfS in chronic LBP treatment were scarce. Short-term results (3-12 months) from small sample and low quality studies suggest that PNfS, alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, is associated with pain intensity and opioid use reductions. Effects on functional status and quality of life remain undetermined. Most frequent adverse events reported with PNfS devices are lead migrations, discomfort or pain and surgical site infections. No other Canadian pain centers were found to use PNfS in chronic LBP or FBSS.CONCLUSIONS:PNfS is potentially a beneficial treatment option for patients with chronic low back pain or FBSS. However, the value of this innovative treatment remains unknown. Among factors to be clarified are target population (any chronic low back pain or FBSS), use of PNfS alone or combined with spinal cord stimulation, long-term effects, and comparison with conventional medical management. PNfS use in chronic LBP has to be assessed through a rigorous framework before its introduction as a standard medical practice.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266462317004196</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2017, Vol.33 (S1), p.238-238
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1986600306
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Back pain
Chronic pain
Long-term effects
Low back pain
Neuromodulation
Opioids
Pain
Patients
Pharmacology
Quality of life
Spinal cord
Stimulation
Surgery
Surgical site infections
Technology assessment
Vignette Presentations
title VP191 Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation For Chronic Low Back Pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=VP191%20Peripheral%20Nerve%20Field%20Stimulation%20For%20Chronic%20Low%20Back%20Pain&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Rhainds,%20Marc&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=238&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=238-238&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462317004196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1986600306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986600306&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462317004196&rfr_iscdi=true