COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS

COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS

In 1999, we compared foraging success rates (captures/min) and foraging behaviors of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) at tidal (Georgia) and non-tidal freshwater (South Carolina) foraging sites. Foraging success rates were 30 times greater at the tidal site, but storks foraging in tidal areas only f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Wilson journal of ornithology 2005-12, Vol.117 (4), p.386
Hauptverfasser: Depkin, F Chris, Estep, Laura K, Bryan, A Lawrence, Eldridge, Carol S, Brisbin, I Lehr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Animal behavior
Birds
Habitats
Ornithology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 386
container_title The Wilson journal of ornithology
container_volume 117
creator Depkin, F Chris
Estep, Laura K
Bryan, A Lawrence
Eldridge, Carol S
Brisbin, I Lehr
description In 1999, we compared foraging success rates (captures/min) and foraging behaviors of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) at tidal (Georgia) and non-tidal freshwater (South Carolina) foraging sites. Foraging success rates were 30 times greater at the tidal site, but storks foraging in tidal areas only fed at low tide, which limited their foraging time at that site. On-site behaviors indicated the window of prey availability. Storks at the tidal site engaged almost exclusively in foraging behaviors, whereas storks at the non-tidal site devoted more time to other, non-foraging behaviors (e.g., preening, resting). The greater foraging success rate associated with the tidal site suggests that salt marsh/tidal creek habitats are high-quality foraging areas. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198641362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>957215671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1986413623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JCAFYVlKkUbsNbTqkrjABTGiIP8vUT_A1cycMyNiuZEX2j6lm_HQfT-yKY3cKZl1Xe04A_Z8i5Qc9wdWSI0KMIUzYgLaYLGDFAu2lWoL-si50BqYSiAWGTtJLEAq0CIX3IgEjExY_tEKlf1dGYulYUYvyOR6uXXV8pdzskqF4Zn9aJtnX3Wvsm769j6o0o3CgLpesPb-Or0BBSE7pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198641362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Depkin, F Chris ; Estep, Laura K ; Bryan, A Lawrence ; Eldridge, Carol S ; Brisbin, I Lehr</creator><creatorcontrib>Depkin, F Chris ; Estep, Laura K ; Bryan, A Lawrence ; Eldridge, Carol S ; Brisbin, I Lehr</creatorcontrib><description>In 1999, we compared foraging success rates (captures/min) and foraging behaviors of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) at tidal (Georgia) and non-tidal freshwater (South Carolina) foraging sites. Foraging success rates were 30 times greater at the tidal site, but storks foraging in tidal areas only fed at low tide, which limited their foraging time at that site. On-site behaviors indicated the window of prey availability. Storks at the tidal site engaged almost exclusively in foraging behaviors, whereas storks at the non-tidal site devoted more time to other, non-foraging behaviors (e.g., preening, resting). The greater foraging success rate associated with the tidal site suggests that salt marsh/tidal creek habitats are high-quality foraging areas. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-4491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Wilson Ornithological Society</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Birds ; Habitats ; Ornithology</subject><ispartof>The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2005-12, Vol.117 (4), p.386</ispartof><rights>Copyright Wilson Ornithological Society Dec 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Depkin, F Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estep, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, A Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, Carol S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisbin, I Lehr</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS</title><title>The Wilson journal of ornithology</title><description>In 1999, we compared foraging success rates (captures/min) and foraging behaviors of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) at tidal (Georgia) and non-tidal freshwater (South Carolina) foraging sites. Foraging success rates were 30 times greater at the tidal site, but storks foraging in tidal areas only fed at low tide, which limited their foraging time at that site. On-site behaviors indicated the window of prey availability. Storks at the tidal site engaged almost exclusively in foraging behaviors, whereas storks at the non-tidal site devoted more time to other, non-foraging behaviors (e.g., preening, resting). The greater foraging success rate associated with the tidal site suggests that salt marsh/tidal creek habitats are high-quality foraging areas. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Ornithology</subject><issn>1559-4491</issn><issn>1938-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNissOgjAURBujifj4hxv3JCAFYVlKkUbsNbTqkrjABTGiIP8vUT_A1cycMyNiuZEX2j6lm_HQfT-yKY3cKZl1Xe04A_Z8i5Qc9wdWSI0KMIUzYgLaYLGDFAu2lWoL-si50BqYSiAWGTtJLEAq0CIX3IgEjExY_tEKlf1dGYulYUYvyOR6uXXV8pdzskqF4Zn9aJtnX3Wvsm769j6o0o3CgLpesPb-Or0BBSE7pA</recordid><startdate>20051201</startdate><enddate>20051201</enddate><creator>Depkin, F Chris</creator><creator>Estep, Laura K</creator><creator>Bryan, A Lawrence</creator><creator>Eldridge, Carol S</creator><creator>Brisbin, I Lehr</creator><general>Wilson Ornithological Society</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051201</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS</title><author>Depkin, F Chris ; Estep, Laura K ; Bryan, A Lawrence ; Eldridge, Carol S ; Brisbin, I Lehr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1986413623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Ornithology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Depkin, F Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estep, Laura K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryan, A Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldridge, Carol S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brisbin, I Lehr</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Depkin, F Chris</au><au>Estep, Laura K</au><au>Bryan, A Lawrence</au><au>Eldridge, Carol S</au><au>Brisbin, I Lehr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS</atitle><jtitle>The Wilson journal of ornithology</jtitle><date>2005-12-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>386</spage><pages>386-</pages><issn>1559-4491</issn><eissn>1938-5447</eissn><abstract>In 1999, we compared foraging success rates (captures/min) and foraging behaviors of Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) at tidal (Georgia) and non-tidal freshwater (South Carolina) foraging sites. Foraging success rates were 30 times greater at the tidal site, but storks foraging in tidal areas only fed at low tide, which limited their foraging time at that site. On-site behaviors indicated the window of prey availability. Storks at the tidal site engaged almost exclusively in foraging behaviors, whereas storks at the non-tidal site devoted more time to other, non-foraging behaviors (e.g., preening, resting). The greater foraging success rate associated with the tidal site suggests that salt marsh/tidal creek habitats are high-quality foraging areas. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Wilson Ornithological Society</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1559-4491
ispartof The Wilson journal of ornithology, 2005-12, Vol.117 (4), p.386
issn 1559-4491
1938-5447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198641362
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal behavior
Birds
Habitats
Ornithology
title COMPARISON OF WOOD STORK FORAGING SUCCESS AND BEHAVIOR IN SELECTED TIDAL AND NON-TIDAL HABITATS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T17%3A50%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20WOOD%20STORK%20FORAGING%20SUCCESS%20AND%20BEHAVIOR%20IN%20SELECTED%20TIDAL%20AND%20NON-TIDAL%20HABITATS&rft.jtitle=The%20Wilson%20journal%20of%20ornithology&rft.au=Depkin,%20F%20Chris&rft.date=2005-12-01&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=386&rft.pages=386-&rft.issn=1559-4491&rft.eissn=1938-5447&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E957215671%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198641362&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true