“Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s

To argue that the future was (re-)invented in the 1970s and the 1980s might seem especially puzzling in light of arguments that the optimism associated with utilitarian, modernization, and socialist theories withered at the time amidst widespread debate over a variety of “crises.” Nonetheless, it wa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Social science history 2015, Vol.39 (1), p.39-61
1. Verfasser: Geyer, Martin H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 39
container_title Social science history
container_volume 39
creator Geyer, Martin H.
description To argue that the future was (re-)invented in the 1970s and the 1980s might seem especially puzzling in light of arguments that the optimism associated with utilitarian, modernization, and socialist theories withered at the time amidst widespread debate over a variety of “crises.” Nonetheless, it was in this peculiar constellation that ideas of the future became fundamentally renegotiated. “New risks” were juxtaposed with prevailing older ideas of social security that were predicated on individual and collective risk management. Focusing on West Germany, this article examines the various technical and political debates over “gaps” in terms of the finances, demographics, and trust in the system of social policy, which helped to put technical and political diagnoses of “new risks” squarely on the political agenda. This demographic argument is of particular interest, as it dramatized the unintended side effects of older social policy and created new, dystopian future scenarios of total systemic breakdown. At times, however, these discussions about managing the risks associated with Germany's demographic future verged on the utopian. New concepts of governmentality and biopolitics prevailed in this context. Moreover, pragmatic and sometimes technocratic concepts of new “governance” (and thus risk management) were proposed by social scientists and politicians as a means to address anxieties about the demographic future, and new models of risk-taking and risk-managing individuals also flourished at the time. With their descriptive but also prescriptive features, these theories contributed to ongoing academic efforts to explain the present and the future in terms of risk.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/ssh.2015.41
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1986375107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_ssh_2015_41</cupid><jstor_id>90017113</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90017113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-100120b741ea209577340bd54c78f36208a49bc38cf8920bb8869aea4e2aa6513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc2KFDEQDqLguHryLAS8KNJjVX4myVHW3XFhQXH1HNKZ9EwP050x6Rbm5oOsL-eTmJ5ZVg_iqaDq--MrQp4jzBFQvc15M2eAci7wAZmhZKrSwMVDMgMUspKSs8fkSc5bADBCw4zkXz9ul25fxk_q-hUdNoG--hyq11f999APbexpbI7by3EYU6A30bdud8S-D11cJ7fftJ5-irvWH2jb02VInesPdDWmtl8fqWgU5CMFjYb8lDxq3C6HZ3fzjHy9vPhy_qG6_ri8On93XXluxFAhADKolcDgGBipFBdQr6TwSjd8wUA7YWrPtW-0KcBa64VxwYnAnFtI5Gfk5Ul3n-K3MeTBbuOY-mJpS44FVxJB_RellDYS0JiCenNC-RRzTqGx-9R2Lh0sgp26t6V7O3VvxeQs7jW3wQ_dmMMfWak1MLA303-m92DJAcB4ob040bZ5iOnewZQiFOJ0r-5CuK5O7Wr9l-i_YvwGhTadjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1986375107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Geyer, Martin H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geyer, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><description>To argue that the future was (re-)invented in the 1970s and the 1980s might seem especially puzzling in light of arguments that the optimism associated with utilitarian, modernization, and socialist theories withered at the time amidst widespread debate over a variety of “crises.” Nonetheless, it was in this peculiar constellation that ideas of the future became fundamentally renegotiated. “New risks” were juxtaposed with prevailing older ideas of social security that were predicated on individual and collective risk management. Focusing on West Germany, this article examines the various technical and political debates over “gaps” in terms of the finances, demographics, and trust in the system of social policy, which helped to put technical and political diagnoses of “new risks” squarely on the political agenda. This demographic argument is of particular interest, as it dramatized the unintended side effects of older social policy and created new, dystopian future scenarios of total systemic breakdown. At times, however, these discussions about managing the risks associated with Germany's demographic future verged on the utopian. New concepts of governmentality and biopolitics prevailed in this context. Moreover, pragmatic and sometimes technocratic concepts of new “governance” (and thus risk management) were proposed by social scientists and politicians as a means to address anxieties about the demographic future, and new models of risk-taking and risk-managing individuals also flourished at the time. With their descriptive but also prescriptive features, these theories contributed to ongoing academic efforts to explain the present and the future in terms of risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5532</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-8034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/ssh.2015.41</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, US: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biopolitics ; Crises ; Debates ; Demography ; Economic conditions ; Future ; Governance ; Governmentality ; Management ; Modernization ; Politics ; Population ; Population policy ; Pragmatism ; Risk management ; Social policy ; Social scientists ; Social security ; Socialism ; Special Section: Moving Targets: Risk, Security, and the Social in Twentieth-Century Europe ; Technocracy</subject><ispartof>Social science history, 2015, Vol.39 (1), p.39-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Social Science History Association, 2015</rights><rights>Social Science History Association, 2015</rights><rights>Copyright © The Social Science History Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press Spring 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-100120b741ea209577340bd54c78f36208a49bc38cf8920bb8869aea4e2aa6513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-100120b741ea209577340bd54c78f36208a49bc38cf8920bb8869aea4e2aa6513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90017113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0145553215000413/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,799,4010,12824,27321,27900,27901,27902,33751,55603,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geyer, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><title>“Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s</title><title>Social science history</title><addtitle>Social Science History</addtitle><description>To argue that the future was (re-)invented in the 1970s and the 1980s might seem especially puzzling in light of arguments that the optimism associated with utilitarian, modernization, and socialist theories withered at the time amidst widespread debate over a variety of “crises.” Nonetheless, it was in this peculiar constellation that ideas of the future became fundamentally renegotiated. “New risks” were juxtaposed with prevailing older ideas of social security that were predicated on individual and collective risk management. Focusing on West Germany, this article examines the various technical and political debates over “gaps” in terms of the finances, demographics, and trust in the system of social policy, which helped to put technical and political diagnoses of “new risks” squarely on the political agenda. This demographic argument is of particular interest, as it dramatized the unintended side effects of older social policy and created new, dystopian future scenarios of total systemic breakdown. At times, however, these discussions about managing the risks associated with Germany's demographic future verged on the utopian. New concepts of governmentality and biopolitics prevailed in this context. Moreover, pragmatic and sometimes technocratic concepts of new “governance” (and thus risk management) were proposed by social scientists and politicians as a means to address anxieties about the demographic future, and new models of risk-taking and risk-managing individuals also flourished at the time. With their descriptive but also prescriptive features, these theories contributed to ongoing academic efforts to explain the present and the future in terms of risk.</description><subject>Biopolitics</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Future</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governmentality</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social scientists</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Socialism</subject><subject>Special Section: Moving Targets: Risk, Security, and the Social in Twentieth-Century Europe</subject><subject>Technocracy</subject><issn>0145-5532</issn><issn>1527-8034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc2KFDEQDqLguHryLAS8KNJjVX4myVHW3XFhQXH1HNKZ9EwP050x6Rbm5oOsL-eTmJ5ZVg_iqaDq--MrQp4jzBFQvc15M2eAci7wAZmhZKrSwMVDMgMUspKSs8fkSc5bADBCw4zkXz9ul25fxk_q-hUdNoG--hyq11f999APbexpbI7by3EYU6A30bdud8S-D11cJ7fftJ5-irvWH2jb02VInesPdDWmtl8fqWgU5CMFjYb8lDxq3C6HZ3fzjHy9vPhy_qG6_ri8On93XXluxFAhADKolcDgGBipFBdQr6TwSjd8wUA7YWrPtW-0KcBa64VxwYnAnFtI5Gfk5Ul3n-K3MeTBbuOY-mJpS44FVxJB_RellDYS0JiCenNC-RRzTqGx-9R2Lh0sgp26t6V7O3VvxeQs7jW3wQ_dmMMfWak1MLA303-m92DJAcB4ob040bZ5iOnewZQiFOJ0r-5CuK5O7Wr9l-i_YvwGhTadjw</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Geyer, Martin H.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>“Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s</title><author>Geyer, Martin H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-100120b741ea209577340bd54c78f36208a49bc38cf8920bb8869aea4e2aa6513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biopolitics</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Future</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governmentality</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social scientists</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Socialism</topic><topic>Special Section: Moving Targets: Risk, Security, and the Social in Twentieth-Century Europe</topic><topic>Technocracy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geyer, Martin H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Social science history</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geyer, Martin H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s</atitle><jtitle>Social science history</jtitle><addtitle>Social Science History</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>39-61</pages><issn>0145-5532</issn><eissn>1527-8034</eissn><abstract>To argue that the future was (re-)invented in the 1970s and the 1980s might seem especially puzzling in light of arguments that the optimism associated with utilitarian, modernization, and socialist theories withered at the time amidst widespread debate over a variety of “crises.” Nonetheless, it was in this peculiar constellation that ideas of the future became fundamentally renegotiated. “New risks” were juxtaposed with prevailing older ideas of social security that were predicated on individual and collective risk management. Focusing on West Germany, this article examines the various technical and political debates over “gaps” in terms of the finances, demographics, and trust in the system of social policy, which helped to put technical and political diagnoses of “new risks” squarely on the political agenda. This demographic argument is of particular interest, as it dramatized the unintended side effects of older social policy and created new, dystopian future scenarios of total systemic breakdown. At times, however, these discussions about managing the risks associated with Germany's demographic future verged on the utopian. New concepts of governmentality and biopolitics prevailed in this context. Moreover, pragmatic and sometimes technocratic concepts of new “governance” (and thus risk management) were proposed by social scientists and politicians as a means to address anxieties about the demographic future, and new models of risk-taking and risk-managing individuals also flourished at the time. With their descriptive but also prescriptive features, these theories contributed to ongoing academic efforts to explain the present and the future in terms of risk.</abstract><cop>New York, US</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/ssh.2015.41</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-5532
ispartof Social science history, 2015, Vol.39 (1), p.39-61
issn 0145-5532
1527-8034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1986375107
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Biopolitics
Crises
Debates
Demography
Economic conditions
Future
Governance
Governmentality
Management
Modernization
Politics
Population
Population policy
Pragmatism
Risk management
Social policy
Social scientists
Social security
Socialism
Special Section: Moving Targets: Risk, Security, and the Social in Twentieth-Century Europe
Technocracy
title “Gaps” and the (Re-)Invention of the Future Social and Demographic Policy in Germany during the 1970s and 1980s
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CGaps%E2%80%9D%20and%20the%20(Re-)Invention%20of%20the%20Future%20Social%20and%20Demographic%20Policy%20in%20Germany%20during%20the%201970s%20and%201980s&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20history&rft.au=Geyer,%20Martin%20H.&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=39-61&rft.issn=0145-5532&rft.eissn=1527-8034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/ssh.2015.41&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90017113%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1986375107&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_ssh_2015_41&rft_jstor_id=90017113&rfr_iscdi=true