Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis

An innovative conceptual design is introduced for lignocellulosic‐based biochemical platform biorefineries using three mixed‐culture bioprocesses that sequentially disintegrate each polysaccharide fraction into different target biofuels: hydrogen, methane, and fuel butanol. This mixed‐culture bioref...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-01, Vol.12 (1), p.56-67
Hauptverfasser: Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania, Sanchez, Arturo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining
container_volume 12
creator Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania
Sanchez, Arturo
description An innovative conceptual design is introduced for lignocellulosic‐based biochemical platform biorefineries using three mixed‐culture bioprocesses that sequentially disintegrate each polysaccharide fraction into different target biofuels: hydrogen, methane, and fuel butanol. This mixed‐culture biorefinery circumvents the use of corrosive chemicals, energy‐demanding pre‐treatments, costly enzymes, separate units for saccharification and fermentation, steam for sterilization, and expensive steel bioreactors. The concept mimics bioprocesses occurring in nature to degrade complex substrates. A techno‐economic analysis of these biorefineries is carried out focusing on the impact of residence times (8–120 h) and butanol titers (10–20 g/L) of the production of acetone‐butanol‐ethanol (ABE) on the total production costs (TPC) of butanol. The design includes electricity‐steam cogeneration from gaseous biofuels and lignin, as well as solvent purification. Simulation results show that the highest butanol titer impacts TPC to a greater extent than the lowest residence time. TPC range from US$1.04 to US$1.27 per liter of butanol in facilities with 20 g/L of butanol irrespective of residence time. The end‐use energy ratio for all facilities was close to 2 or higher. These biorefineries display lower energy consumption and environmental impacts than conventional second‐generation lignocellulosic biofuels biorefineries, and its cost structure is determined by the substrate similar to bioprocesses with mature technology. Finally, this study provides an insight to the advancements made in realizing viable mixed‐culture fermentations for different fields of biotechnology and therefore might be encouraging for further studies of lignocellulosic biorefineries based on mixed cultures. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bbb.1828
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1985826612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1985826612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-eb0f0efdb00f22f15638576ace20782f79ba5fb4b2c39b0a19b46bb723898fc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKvgIwTcuJmay1wy7qx4g4IuFNyFJE00JZ3UZELtzkfwGX0SM1bcuTo_h-8cfj4AjjGaYITImZRyghlhO2CEW0oKjCje_cvl8z44iHGBUFVXZTUC64fgVz4KB40PUFoftLGdDlZHKEXUc-g7uLTvOajk-hTyfiCdfem80s4l56NVw6VJ2sFV8POkeuu7cyhgr9Vr578-PrXynV9mTnTCbaKNh2DPCBf10e8cg6frq8fL22J2f3N3eTErFKWIFVoig7SZS4QMIQZXNWVVUwulCWoYMU0rRWVkKYmirUQCt7KspWwIZS0zCtMxONn-zcXeko49X_gUconIccsqRuoak0ydbikVfIxZAV8FuxRhwzHig1aetfJBa0aLLbq2Tm_-5fh0Ov3hvwHHXXxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985826612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania ; Sanchez, Arturo</creator><creatorcontrib>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania ; Sanchez, Arturo</creatorcontrib><description>An innovative conceptual design is introduced for lignocellulosic‐based biochemical platform biorefineries using three mixed‐culture bioprocesses that sequentially disintegrate each polysaccharide fraction into different target biofuels: hydrogen, methane, and fuel butanol. This mixed‐culture biorefinery circumvents the use of corrosive chemicals, energy‐demanding pre‐treatments, costly enzymes, separate units for saccharification and fermentation, steam for sterilization, and expensive steel bioreactors. The concept mimics bioprocesses occurring in nature to degrade complex substrates. A techno‐economic analysis of these biorefineries is carried out focusing on the impact of residence times (8–120 h) and butanol titers (10–20 g/L) of the production of acetone‐butanol‐ethanol (ABE) on the total production costs (TPC) of butanol. The design includes electricity‐steam cogeneration from gaseous biofuels and lignin, as well as solvent purification. Simulation results show that the highest butanol titer impacts TPC to a greater extent than the lowest residence time. TPC range from US$1.04 to US$1.27 per liter of butanol in facilities with 20 g/L of butanol irrespective of residence time. The end‐use energy ratio for all facilities was close to 2 or higher. These biorefineries display lower energy consumption and environmental impacts than conventional second‐generation lignocellulosic biofuels biorefineries, and its cost structure is determined by the substrate similar to bioprocesses with mature technology. Finally, this study provides an insight to the advancements made in realizing viable mixed‐culture fermentations for different fields of biotechnology and therefore might be encouraging for further studies of lignocellulosic biorefineries based on mixed cultures. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>ABE fermentation ; Acetone ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; biohydrogen ; Bioreactors ; Biorefineries ; biorefinery ; Biotechnology ; Butanol ; Cogeneration ; Costs ; Culture ; Cultures ; Economic analysis ; Electricity pricing ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; Environmental impact ; Ethanol ; Fermentation ; Industrial engineering ; Lignin ; Lignocellulose ; Manufacturing engineering ; mixed cultures ; Nuclear fuels ; Polysaccharides ; Production costs ; Purification ; Refining ; Residence time ; Saccharification ; simulation ; Steam electric power generation ; Steel ; Sterilization ; Substrates ; Water purification</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-01, Vol.12 (1), p.56-67</ispartof><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><rights>2018 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-eb0f0efdb00f22f15638576ace20782f79ba5fb4b2c39b0a19b46bb723898fc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-eb0f0efdb00f22f15638576ace20782f79ba5fb4b2c39b0a19b46bb723898fc13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3654-7230 ; 0000-0001-5453-0478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbbb.1828$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbbb.1828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Arturo</creatorcontrib><title>Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><description>An innovative conceptual design is introduced for lignocellulosic‐based biochemical platform biorefineries using three mixed‐culture bioprocesses that sequentially disintegrate each polysaccharide fraction into different target biofuels: hydrogen, methane, and fuel butanol. This mixed‐culture biorefinery circumvents the use of corrosive chemicals, energy‐demanding pre‐treatments, costly enzymes, separate units for saccharification and fermentation, steam for sterilization, and expensive steel bioreactors. The concept mimics bioprocesses occurring in nature to degrade complex substrates. A techno‐economic analysis of these biorefineries is carried out focusing on the impact of residence times (8–120 h) and butanol titers (10–20 g/L) of the production of acetone‐butanol‐ethanol (ABE) on the total production costs (TPC) of butanol. The design includes electricity‐steam cogeneration from gaseous biofuels and lignin, as well as solvent purification. Simulation results show that the highest butanol titer impacts TPC to a greater extent than the lowest residence time. TPC range from US$1.04 to US$1.27 per liter of butanol in facilities with 20 g/L of butanol irrespective of residence time. The end‐use energy ratio for all facilities was close to 2 or higher. These biorefineries display lower energy consumption and environmental impacts than conventional second‐generation lignocellulosic biofuels biorefineries, and its cost structure is determined by the substrate similar to bioprocesses with mature technology. Finally, this study provides an insight to the advancements made in realizing viable mixed‐culture fermentations for different fields of biotechnology and therefore might be encouraging for further studies of lignocellulosic biorefineries based on mixed cultures. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><subject>ABE fermentation</subject><subject>Acetone</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>biohydrogen</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biorefineries</subject><subject>biorefinery</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Butanol</subject><subject>Cogeneration</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Cultures</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Electricity pricing</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Industrial engineering</subject><subject>Lignin</subject><subject>Lignocellulose</subject><subject>Manufacturing engineering</subject><subject>mixed cultures</subject><subject>Nuclear fuels</subject><subject>Polysaccharides</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Purification</subject><subject>Refining</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Saccharification</subject><subject>simulation</subject><subject>Steam electric power generation</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKvgIwTcuJmay1wy7qx4g4IuFNyFJE00JZ3UZELtzkfwGX0SM1bcuTo_h-8cfj4AjjGaYITImZRyghlhO2CEW0oKjCje_cvl8z44iHGBUFVXZTUC64fgVz4KB40PUFoftLGdDlZHKEXUc-g7uLTvOajk-hTyfiCdfem80s4l56NVw6VJ2sFV8POkeuu7cyhgr9Vr578-PrXynV9mTnTCbaKNh2DPCBf10e8cg6frq8fL22J2f3N3eTErFKWIFVoig7SZS4QMIQZXNWVVUwulCWoYMU0rRWVkKYmirUQCt7KspWwIZS0zCtMxONn-zcXeko49X_gUconIccsqRuoak0ydbikVfIxZAV8FuxRhwzHig1aetfJBa0aLLbq2Tm_-5fh0Ov3hvwHHXXxE</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania</creator><creator>Sanchez, Arturo</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-7230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-0478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis</title><author>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania ; Sanchez, Arturo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-eb0f0efdb00f22f15638576ace20782f79ba5fb4b2c39b0a19b46bb723898fc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>ABE fermentation</topic><topic>Acetone</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>biohydrogen</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biorefineries</topic><topic>biorefinery</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Butanol</topic><topic>Cogeneration</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Cultures</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Electricity pricing</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Industrial engineering</topic><topic>Lignin</topic><topic>Lignocellulose</topic><topic>Manufacturing engineering</topic><topic>mixed cultures</topic><topic>Nuclear fuels</topic><topic>Polysaccharides</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Purification</topic><topic>Refining</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Saccharification</topic><topic>simulation</topic><topic>Steam electric power generation</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Arturo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Valdez‐Vazquez, Idania</au><au>Sanchez, Arturo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>56-67</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>An innovative conceptual design is introduced for lignocellulosic‐based biochemical platform biorefineries using three mixed‐culture bioprocesses that sequentially disintegrate each polysaccharide fraction into different target biofuels: hydrogen, methane, and fuel butanol. This mixed‐culture biorefinery circumvents the use of corrosive chemicals, energy‐demanding pre‐treatments, costly enzymes, separate units for saccharification and fermentation, steam for sterilization, and expensive steel bioreactors. The concept mimics bioprocesses occurring in nature to degrade complex substrates. A techno‐economic analysis of these biorefineries is carried out focusing on the impact of residence times (8–120 h) and butanol titers (10–20 g/L) of the production of acetone‐butanol‐ethanol (ABE) on the total production costs (TPC) of butanol. The design includes electricity‐steam cogeneration from gaseous biofuels and lignin, as well as solvent purification. Simulation results show that the highest butanol titer impacts TPC to a greater extent than the lowest residence time. TPC range from US$1.04 to US$1.27 per liter of butanol in facilities with 20 g/L of butanol irrespective of residence time. The end‐use energy ratio for all facilities was close to 2 or higher. These biorefineries display lower energy consumption and environmental impacts than conventional second‐generation lignocellulosic biofuels biorefineries, and its cost structure is determined by the substrate similar to bioprocesses with mature technology. Finally, this study provides an insight to the advancements made in realizing viable mixed‐culture fermentations for different fields of biotechnology and therefore might be encouraging for further studies of lignocellulosic biorefineries based on mixed cultures. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.1828</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3654-7230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5453-0478</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-104X
ispartof Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2018-01, Vol.12 (1), p.56-67
issn 1932-104X
1932-1031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1985826612
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects ABE fermentation
Acetone
Biodiesel fuels
Biofuels
biohydrogen
Bioreactors
Biorefineries
biorefinery
Biotechnology
Butanol
Cogeneration
Costs
Culture
Cultures
Economic analysis
Electricity pricing
Energy
Energy consumption
Environmental impact
Ethanol
Fermentation
Industrial engineering
Lignin
Lignocellulose
Manufacturing engineering
mixed cultures
Nuclear fuels
Polysaccharides
Production costs
Purification
Refining
Residence time
Saccharification
simulation
Steam electric power generation
Steel
Sterilization
Substrates
Water purification
title Proposal for biorefineries based on mixed cultures for lignocellulosic biofuel production: a techno‐economic analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A12%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proposal%20for%20biorefineries%20based%20on%20mixed%20cultures%20for%20lignocellulosic%20biofuel%20production:%20a%20techno%E2%80%90economic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Valdez%E2%80%90Vazquez,%20Idania&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=56-67&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.1828&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1985826612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985826612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true