Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding
To study inheritance of Malus sieboldii -derived apple proliferation resistance, 14 cross combinations were performed with the tetraploid apomictic M. sieboldii and first and second generation parental lines as donor of resistance and Malus x domestica scion cultivars and apple rootstocks as donor o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of plant pathology 2018-07, Vol.151 (3), p.767-779 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 779 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 767 |
container_title | European journal of plant pathology |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Seemüller, Erich Gallinger, Jannicke Jelkmann, Wilhelm Jarausch, Wolfgang |
description | To study inheritance of
Malus sieboldii
-derived apple proliferation resistance, 14 cross combinations were performed with the tetraploid apomictic
M. sieboldii
and first and second generation parental lines as donor of resistance and
Malus
x
domestica
scion cultivars and apple rootstocks as donor of pomological traits. In the progeny examined mainly three classes were present consisting of mother-like plants with the allele composition of the maternal apomict (ML), hybrids based on fertilization of an unreduced egg cell (hybrid I), and fully recombinant plants (hybrid II). Two-year screening of inoculated plants in the nursery revealed that progeny classes ML and H I responded similarly to infection and that about half of the progeny showed satisfactory resistance. No appropriate resistance was identified in progeny class H II. This might be due to the fact that in fully recombinant offspring
M. sieboldii
haplotypes have been reduced from 4n to 1-2n or were entirely lost. Following nursery-growing, promising trees were evaluated for six more years in the orchard. Nearly all of them showed satisfactory resistance but were mostly less productive and more vigorous than trees on clonal standard rootstock M9. However, mainly among the offspring of progeny 4608 × M9, resistant genotypes were identified showing pomological properties similar to M9. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1985630579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1985630579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-58e4d26a98607b1b9b42ba035392d4bf9d4d7b7ef129e843a888033537fe8ab63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOxDAQRS0EEsvjA-gsURvsOI7tEq14rASigdqykwl4ydrBzhb7Cfw1XoViG6op5pw7movQFaM3jFJ5mxlthCKUScJqVhFxhBZMSE5U3ehjtKC60oQpyU_RWc5rWhytqwX6WYVPSH6yoQUce2zHcQA8pjj4HpKdfAw4QfZ5JtwOjzZBmOyABx8gz07c-HbyLX6xwzbj7MHFofMe24y7GGLaUwcpvmTGOOUptl_YJYDOh48LdNLbIcPl3zxH7w_3b8sn8vz6uFrePZOWs2YiQkHdVY3VqqHSMaddXTlLueC66mrX667upJPQs0qDqrlVSlFe1rIHZV3Dz9H1nFue_N5Cnsw6blMoJw3TSjScCqkLxWaqTTHnBL0Zk9_YtDOMmn3jZm7clMbNvnEjilPNTi5s-IB0kPyv9Asi8oYt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985630579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Seemüller, Erich ; Gallinger, Jannicke ; Jelkmann, Wilhelm ; Jarausch, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Seemüller, Erich ; Gallinger, Jannicke ; Jelkmann, Wilhelm ; Jarausch, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>To study inheritance of
Malus sieboldii
-derived apple proliferation resistance, 14 cross combinations were performed with the tetraploid apomictic
M. sieboldii
and first and second generation parental lines as donor of resistance and
Malus
x
domestica
scion cultivars and apple rootstocks as donor of pomological traits. In the progeny examined mainly three classes were present consisting of mother-like plants with the allele composition of the maternal apomict (ML), hybrids based on fertilization of an unreduced egg cell (hybrid I), and fully recombinant plants (hybrid II). Two-year screening of inoculated plants in the nursery revealed that progeny classes ML and H I responded similarly to infection and that about half of the progeny showed satisfactory resistance. No appropriate resistance was identified in progeny class H II. This might be due to the fact that in fully recombinant offspring
M. sieboldii
haplotypes have been reduced from 4n to 1-2n or were entirely lost. Following nursery-growing, promising trees were evaluated for six more years in the orchard. Nearly all of them showed satisfactory resistance but were mostly less productive and more vigorous than trees on clonal standard rootstock M9. However, mainly among the offspring of progeny 4608 × M9, resistant genotypes were identified showing pomological properties similar to M9.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0929-1873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8469</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Apples ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cultivars ; Ecology ; Fertilization ; Fruits ; Genetic crosses ; Genotypes ; Haplotypes ; Hybrids ; Life Sciences ; Malus sieboldii ; Offspring ; Plant breeding ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences ; Progeny ; Rootstocks ; Trees</subject><ispartof>European journal of plant pathology, 2018-07, Vol.151 (3), p.767-779</ispartof><rights>Koninklijke Nederlandse Planteziektenkundige Vereniging 2018</rights><rights>European Journal of Plant Pathology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-58e4d26a98607b1b9b42ba035392d4bf9d4d7b7ef129e843a888033537fe8ab63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-58e4d26a98607b1b9b42ba035392d4bf9d4d7b7ef129e843a888033537fe8ab63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seemüller, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallinger, Jannicke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelkmann, Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarausch, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding</title><title>European journal of plant pathology</title><addtitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>To study inheritance of
Malus sieboldii
-derived apple proliferation resistance, 14 cross combinations were performed with the tetraploid apomictic
M. sieboldii
and first and second generation parental lines as donor of resistance and
Malus
x
domestica
scion cultivars and apple rootstocks as donor of pomological traits. In the progeny examined mainly three classes were present consisting of mother-like plants with the allele composition of the maternal apomict (ML), hybrids based on fertilization of an unreduced egg cell (hybrid I), and fully recombinant plants (hybrid II). Two-year screening of inoculated plants in the nursery revealed that progeny classes ML and H I responded similarly to infection and that about half of the progeny showed satisfactory resistance. No appropriate resistance was identified in progeny class H II. This might be due to the fact that in fully recombinant offspring
M. sieboldii
haplotypes have been reduced from 4n to 1-2n or were entirely lost. Following nursery-growing, promising trees were evaluated for six more years in the orchard. Nearly all of them showed satisfactory resistance but were mostly less productive and more vigorous than trees on clonal standard rootstock M9. However, mainly among the offspring of progeny 4608 × M9, resistant genotypes were identified showing pomological properties similar to M9.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Apples</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Genetic crosses</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Malus sieboldii</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Progeny</subject><subject>Rootstocks</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0929-1873</issn><issn>1573-8469</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOxDAQRS0EEsvjA-gsURvsOI7tEq14rASigdqykwl4ydrBzhb7Cfw1XoViG6op5pw7movQFaM3jFJ5mxlthCKUScJqVhFxhBZMSE5U3ehjtKC60oQpyU_RWc5rWhytqwX6WYVPSH6yoQUce2zHcQA8pjj4HpKdfAw4QfZ5JtwOjzZBmOyABx8gz07c-HbyLX6xwzbj7MHFofMe24y7GGLaUwcpvmTGOOUptl_YJYDOh48LdNLbIcPl3zxH7w_3b8sn8vz6uFrePZOWs2YiQkHdVY3VqqHSMaddXTlLueC66mrX667upJPQs0qDqrlVSlFe1rIHZV3Dz9H1nFue_N5Cnsw6blMoJw3TSjScCqkLxWaqTTHnBL0Zk9_YtDOMmn3jZm7clMbNvnEjilPNTi5s-IB0kPyv9Asi8oYt</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>Seemüller, Erich</creator><creator>Gallinger, Jannicke</creator><creator>Jelkmann, Wilhelm</creator><creator>Jarausch, Wolfgang</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding</title><author>Seemüller, Erich ; Gallinger, Jannicke ; Jelkmann, Wilhelm ; Jarausch, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-58e4d26a98607b1b9b42ba035392d4bf9d4d7b7ef129e843a888033537fe8ab63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Apples</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Genetic crosses</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Malus sieboldii</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Progeny</topic><topic>Rootstocks</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seemüller, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallinger, Jannicke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jelkmann, Wilhelm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarausch, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seemüller, Erich</au><au>Gallinger, Jannicke</au><au>Jelkmann, Wilhelm</au><au>Jarausch, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding</atitle><jtitle>European journal of plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>767-779</pages><issn>0929-1873</issn><eissn>1573-8469</eissn><abstract>To study inheritance of
Malus sieboldii
-derived apple proliferation resistance, 14 cross combinations were performed with the tetraploid apomictic
M. sieboldii
and first and second generation parental lines as donor of resistance and
Malus
x
domestica
scion cultivars and apple rootstocks as donor of pomological traits. In the progeny examined mainly three classes were present consisting of mother-like plants with the allele composition of the maternal apomict (ML), hybrids based on fertilization of an unreduced egg cell (hybrid I), and fully recombinant plants (hybrid II). Two-year screening of inoculated plants in the nursery revealed that progeny classes ML and H I responded similarly to infection and that about half of the progeny showed satisfactory resistance. No appropriate resistance was identified in progeny class H II. This might be due to the fact that in fully recombinant offspring
M. sieboldii
haplotypes have been reduced from 4n to 1-2n or were entirely lost. Following nursery-growing, promising trees were evaluated for six more years in the orchard. Nearly all of them showed satisfactory resistance but were mostly less productive and more vigorous than trees on clonal standard rootstock M9. However, mainly among the offspring of progeny 4608 × M9, resistant genotypes were identified showing pomological properties similar to M9.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0929-1873 |
ispartof | European journal of plant pathology, 2018-07, Vol.151 (3), p.767-779 |
issn | 0929-1873 1573-8469 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1985630579 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Apples Biomedical and Life Sciences Cultivars Ecology Fertilization Fruits Genetic crosses Genotypes Haplotypes Hybrids Life Sciences Malus sieboldii Offspring Plant breeding Plant Pathology Plant Sciences Progeny Rootstocks Trees |
title | Inheritance of apple proliferation resistance by parental lines of apomictic Malus sieboldii as donor of resistance in rootstock breeding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A57%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inheritance%20of%20apple%20proliferation%20resistance%20by%20parental%20lines%20of%20apomictic%20Malus%20sieboldii%20as%20donor%20of%20resistance%20in%20rootstock%20breeding&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Seem%C3%BCller,%20Erich&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=767-779&rft.issn=0929-1873&rft.eissn=1573-8469&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10658-017-1412-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1985630579%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985630579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |