Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings

Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-gra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Western journal of applied forestry 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88
Hauptverfasser: Wing, M.G, Eklund, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 2
container_start_page 83
container_title Western journal of applied forestry
container_volume 23
creator Wing, M.G
Eklund, A
description Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198539607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1467288521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0E1PwzAMBuAIgcQY3LgTcaYjidd8HBFiA4kJxDauUZq60KlrStKB9u8pGgfLBz-yrZeQS84mnBm4_dm46lbAREw0HJERN6AzUIodkxHTOs8kM_kpOUtpwxjPpTEj0rxj7GvvGrpAl3YRt9j29M77XXR-T0NFF67r6vYjm0dXIp03oRjwa0h1X4d2GNDlPvW4TfQNPdbfGBOtW7r6jIh0FiKmni6x7weZzslJ5ZqEF_99TNazh9X9Y_b8Mn-6v3vOPIhpn-XGIxjEqXBclgoBPVQllExpURklCyWUBwSFGliuRSELCUNh6WReSAFjcn3Y28XwtRs-sJuwi-1w0nKjczCSqQHdHJCPIaWIle1ivXVxbzmzf3HavzitACushoFfHXjlgnUfsU52vRSMA2OGC6Wn8AsSmHNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198539607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><description>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>accuracy ; altitude ; forests ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; multipathing ; overstory ; satellites ; tree and stand measurements ; vegetation cover ; vertical error</subject><ispartof>Western journal of applied forestry, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Apr 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><title>Western journal of applied forestry</title><description>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>altitude</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>multipathing</subject><subject>overstory</subject><subject>satellites</subject><subject>tree and stand measurements</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>vertical error</subject><issn>0885-6095</issn><issn>1938-3770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNot0E1PwzAMBuAIgcQY3LgTcaYjidd8HBFiA4kJxDauUZq60KlrStKB9u8pGgfLBz-yrZeQS84mnBm4_dm46lbAREw0HJERN6AzUIodkxHTOs8kM_kpOUtpwxjPpTEj0rxj7GvvGrpAl3YRt9j29M77XXR-T0NFF67r6vYjm0dXIp03oRjwa0h1X4d2GNDlPvW4TfQNPdbfGBOtW7r6jIh0FiKmni6x7weZzslJ5ZqEF_99TNazh9X9Y_b8Mn-6v3vOPIhpn-XGIxjEqXBclgoBPVQllExpURklCyWUBwSFGliuRSELCUNh6WReSAFjcn3Y28XwtRs-sJuwi-1w0nKjczCSqQHdHJCPIaWIle1ivXVxbzmzf3HavzitACushoFfHXjlgnUfsU52vRSMA2OGC6Wn8AsSmHNA</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Wing, M.G</creator><creator>Eklund, A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><author>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>altitude</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>multipathing</topic><topic>overstory</topic><topic>satellites</topic><topic>tree and stand measurements</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>vertical error</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Western journal of applied forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wing, M.G</au><au>Eklund, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</atitle><jtitle>Western journal of applied forestry</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>83-88</pages><issn>0885-6095</issn><eissn>1938-3770</eissn><abstract>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6095
ispartof Western journal of applied forestry, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88
issn 0885-6095
1938-3770
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_198539607
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects accuracy
altitude
forests
Global positioning systems
GPS
multipathing
overstory
satellites
tree and stand measurements
vegetation cover
vertical error
title Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20Measurement%20Accuracy%20of%20Mapping-Grade%20Global%20Positioning%20Systems%20Receivers%20in%20Three%20Forest%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Western%20journal%20of%20applied%20forestry&rft.au=Wing,%20M.G&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=83-88&rft.issn=0885-6095&rft.eissn=1938-3770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1467288521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198539607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true