Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings
Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-gra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Western journal of applied forestry 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 88 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Western journal of applied forestry |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Wing, M.G Eklund, A |
description | Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198539607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1467288521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0E1PwzAMBuAIgcQY3LgTcaYjidd8HBFiA4kJxDauUZq60KlrStKB9u8pGgfLBz-yrZeQS84mnBm4_dm46lbAREw0HJERN6AzUIodkxHTOs8kM_kpOUtpwxjPpTEj0rxj7GvvGrpAl3YRt9j29M77XXR-T0NFF67r6vYjm0dXIp03oRjwa0h1X4d2GNDlPvW4TfQNPdbfGBOtW7r6jIh0FiKmni6x7weZzslJ5ZqEF_99TNazh9X9Y_b8Mn-6v3vOPIhpn-XGIxjEqXBclgoBPVQllExpURklCyWUBwSFGliuRSELCUNh6WReSAFjcn3Y28XwtRs-sJuwi-1w0nKjczCSqQHdHJCPIaWIle1ivXVxbzmzf3HavzitACushoFfHXjlgnUfsU52vRSMA2OGC6Wn8AsSmHNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198539607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><description>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3770</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>accuracy ; altitude ; forests ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; multipathing ; overstory ; satellites ; tree and stand measurements ; vegetation cover ; vertical error</subject><ispartof>Western journal of applied forestry, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Apr 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><title>Western journal of applied forestry</title><description>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>altitude</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>multipathing</subject><subject>overstory</subject><subject>satellites</subject><subject>tree and stand measurements</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>vertical error</subject><issn>0885-6095</issn><issn>1938-3770</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNot0E1PwzAMBuAIgcQY3LgTcaYjidd8HBFiA4kJxDauUZq60KlrStKB9u8pGgfLBz-yrZeQS84mnBm4_dm46lbAREw0HJERN6AzUIodkxHTOs8kM_kpOUtpwxjPpTEj0rxj7GvvGrpAl3YRt9j29M77XXR-T0NFF67r6vYjm0dXIp03oRjwa0h1X4d2GNDlPvW4TfQNPdbfGBOtW7r6jIh0FiKmni6x7weZzslJ5ZqEF_99TNazh9X9Y_b8Mn-6v3vOPIhpn-XGIxjEqXBclgoBPVQllExpURklCyWUBwSFGliuRSELCUNh6WReSAFjcn3Y28XwtRs-sJuwi-1w0nKjczCSqQHdHJCPIaWIle1ivXVxbzmzf3HavzitACushoFfHXjlgnUfsU52vRSMA2OGC6Wn8AsSmHNA</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Wing, M.G</creator><creator>Eklund, A</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</title><author>Wing, M.G ; Eklund, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-59ce39ee42a16d7e3ec3fd3d0782f976b727c3e37e830582b6b636b6eda65b623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>altitude</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>multipathing</topic><topic>overstory</topic><topic>satellites</topic><topic>tree and stand measurements</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>vertical error</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wing, M.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Western journal of applied forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wing, M.G</au><au>Eklund, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings</atitle><jtitle>Western journal of applied forestry</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>83-88</pages><issn>0885-6095</issn><eissn>1938-3770</eissn><abstract>Elevation or height differences are necessary measurements for many forest operation activities. We rigorously examined the vertical measurement performance of five mapping-grade GPS receivers in three forest settings representing open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy conditions. The mapping-grade GPS receivers collected data simultaneously at each of the three forest settings and had different hardware and data-collection configurations, including internal and external antennas, and real-time differential corrections. We evaluated the influence of forest setting and postprocessed differential corrections on all GPS receiver measurements, including those that were collected with real-time differential corrections. We also compared the effect of 1-, 30-, and 60-point averaging intervals on vertical measurement accuracy. We found average vertical accuracies for unprocessed GPS receiver measurements of 0.9, 1.7, and 2.8 m in the open-sky, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. The influence of data postprocessing was inconsistent under closed canopy and resulted in average vertical GPS accuracies of 0.2, 0.4, 3.3 m in open-canopy, young-forest, and closed-canopy settings, respectively. Different point averaging intervals did not result in statistically significant differences in vertical accuracies for either unprocessed or postprocessed GPS data.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-6095 |
ispartof | Western journal of applied forestry, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.83-88 |
issn | 0885-6095 1938-3770 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198539607 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | accuracy altitude forests Global positioning systems GPS multipathing overstory satellites tree and stand measurements vegetation cover vertical error |
title | Vertical Measurement Accuracy of Mapping-Grade Global Positioning Systems Receivers in Three Forest Settings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vertical%20Measurement%20Accuracy%20of%20Mapping-Grade%20Global%20Positioning%20Systems%20Receivers%20in%20Three%20Forest%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Western%20journal%20of%20applied%20forestry&rft.au=Wing,%20M.G&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=83-88&rft.issn=0885-6095&rft.eissn=1938-3770&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/wjaf/23.2.83&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1467288521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198539607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |