In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy

In this study, the deformation behavior of a near-β Ti-17 titanium alloy under uniaxial tension was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. It is found slip mode is the main deformation mechanism in pri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-12, Vol.708, p.574
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Saifei, Zeng, Weidong, Zhao, Qinyang, Ge, Liling, Zhang, Min
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 574
container_title Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing
container_volume 708
creator Zhang, Saifei
Zeng, Weidong
Zhao, Qinyang
Ge, Liling
Zhang, Min
description In this study, the deformation behavior of a near-β Ti-17 titanium alloy under uniaxial tension was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. It is found slip mode is the main deformation mechanism in primary α grains of Ti-17 during the tensile test. Slip systems activated were identified by performing calculations on EBSD orientation data. The results show that all the three slip systems with a-type Burgers vector, i.e. basal, prism and 1st-order pyramidal slip, could be activated in the primary α grains of Ti-17, but no a+c-type slip (2nd-order pyramidal slip) activated is observed. Analysis reveals that basal and prism slips are the dominating slip mode, while 1st-order pyramidal slip acts as a subsidiary or deviated slipping mode. For the equivalent slip systems, Schmid factor dominates the slip behavior, while for the non-equivalent slip systems, critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) must be taken into account. It is proved that CRSS for a+c-type slip is much larger than that for a-type slips (basal and prism slips) in Ti-17 alloy (at least 2.5 times that for basal slip). a-type slip remains the easiest slip to be activated even in the condition favoring a+c-type slip and suppressing a-type slip (an angle of ~10° between the tensile axis and c-axis).
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1985138268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1985138268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19851382683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93eOA6kDRtTdZa0YUruy-BppCSJprPoqfxMF5MBQ_gamBmZiijfM9wIVg1RxkROcUlEWyJViEMhBBakDJDx4uFoGOCW32FEFM3geshKhu0UdCp3vlRRu3sV0uwSnr8ekLUUVqdRpDGuGmDFr00QW1_XKPdqW4OZ3z37pFUiO3gkref1FLBS8p4XnH23_UGC3g7wQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1985138268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zhang, Saifei ; Zeng, Weidong ; Zhao, Qinyang ; Ge, Liling ; Zhang, Min</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Saifei ; Zeng, Weidong ; Zhao, Qinyang ; Ge, Liling ; Zhang, Min</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the deformation behavior of a near-β Ti-17 titanium alloy under uniaxial tension was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. It is found slip mode is the main deformation mechanism in primary α grains of Ti-17 during the tensile test. Slip systems activated were identified by performing calculations on EBSD orientation data. The results show that all the three slip systems with a-type Burgers vector, i.e. basal, prism and 1st-order pyramidal slip, could be activated in the primary α grains of Ti-17, but no a+c-type slip (2nd-order pyramidal slip) activated is observed. Analysis reveals that basal and prism slips are the dominating slip mode, while 1st-order pyramidal slip acts as a subsidiary or deviated slipping mode. For the equivalent slip systems, Schmid factor dominates the slip behavior, while for the non-equivalent slip systems, critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) must be taken into account. It is proved that CRSS for a+c-type slip is much larger than that for a-type slips (basal and prism slips) in Ti-17 alloy (at least 2.5 times that for basal slip). a-type slip remains the easiest slip to be activated even in the condition favoring a+c-type slip and suppressing a-type slip (an angle of ~10° between the tensile axis and c-axis).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-5093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4936</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier BV</publisher><subject>Burgers vector ; Deformation ; Deformation mechanisms ; Electron backscatter diffraction ; Equivalence ; Grains ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Shear stress ; Slip ; Tensile deformation ; Tensile tests ; Titanium alloys ; Titanium base alloys</subject><ispartof>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-12, Vol.708, p.574</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Dec 21, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Saifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qinyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Liling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Min</creatorcontrib><title>In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy</title><title>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</title><description>In this study, the deformation behavior of a near-β Ti-17 titanium alloy under uniaxial tension was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. It is found slip mode is the main deformation mechanism in primary α grains of Ti-17 during the tensile test. Slip systems activated were identified by performing calculations on EBSD orientation data. The results show that all the three slip systems with a-type Burgers vector, i.e. basal, prism and 1st-order pyramidal slip, could be activated in the primary α grains of Ti-17, but no a+c-type slip (2nd-order pyramidal slip) activated is observed. Analysis reveals that basal and prism slips are the dominating slip mode, while 1st-order pyramidal slip acts as a subsidiary or deviated slipping mode. For the equivalent slip systems, Schmid factor dominates the slip behavior, while for the non-equivalent slip systems, critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) must be taken into account. It is proved that CRSS for a+c-type slip is much larger than that for a-type slips (basal and prism slips) in Ti-17 alloy (at least 2.5 times that for basal slip). a-type slip remains the easiest slip to be activated even in the condition favoring a+c-type slip and suppressing a-type slip (an angle of ~10° between the tensile axis and c-axis).</description><subject>Burgers vector</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deformation mechanisms</subject><subject>Electron backscatter diffraction</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Grains</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Tensile deformation</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Titanium base alloys</subject><issn>0921-5093</issn><issn>1873-4936</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMoWD93eOA6kDRtTdZa0YUruy-BppCSJprPoqfxMF5MBQ_gamBmZiijfM9wIVg1RxkROcUlEWyJViEMhBBakDJDx4uFoGOCW32FEFM3geshKhu0UdCp3vlRRu3sV0uwSnr8ekLUUVqdRpDGuGmDFr00QW1_XKPdqW4OZ3z37pFUiO3gkref1FLBS8p4XnH23_UGC3g7wQ</recordid><startdate>20171221</startdate><enddate>20171221</enddate><creator>Zhang, Saifei</creator><creator>Zeng, Weidong</creator><creator>Zhao, Qinyang</creator><creator>Ge, Liling</creator><creator>Zhang, Min</creator><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171221</creationdate><title>In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy</title><author>Zhang, Saifei ; Zeng, Weidong ; Zhao, Qinyang ; Ge, Liling ; Zhang, Min</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19851382683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Burgers vector</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deformation mechanisms</topic><topic>Electron backscatter diffraction</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Grains</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Tensile deformation</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Titanium base alloys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Saifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Weidong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Qinyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ge, Liling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Min</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Saifei</au><au>Zeng, Weidong</au><au>Zhao, Qinyang</au><au>Ge, Liling</au><au>Zhang, Min</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy</atitle><jtitle>Materials science &amp; engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing</jtitle><date>2017-12-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>708</volume><spage>574</spage><pages>574-</pages><issn>0921-5093</issn><eissn>1873-4936</eissn><abstract>In this study, the deformation behavior of a near-β Ti-17 titanium alloy under uniaxial tension was investigated using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and tensile tests with in situ scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. It is found slip mode is the main deformation mechanism in primary α grains of Ti-17 during the tensile test. Slip systems activated were identified by performing calculations on EBSD orientation data. The results show that all the three slip systems with a-type Burgers vector, i.e. basal, prism and 1st-order pyramidal slip, could be activated in the primary α grains of Ti-17, but no a+c-type slip (2nd-order pyramidal slip) activated is observed. Analysis reveals that basal and prism slips are the dominating slip mode, while 1st-order pyramidal slip acts as a subsidiary or deviated slipping mode. For the equivalent slip systems, Schmid factor dominates the slip behavior, while for the non-equivalent slip systems, critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) must be taken into account. It is proved that CRSS for a+c-type slip is much larger than that for a-type slips (basal and prism slips) in Ti-17 alloy (at least 2.5 times that for basal slip). a-type slip remains the easiest slip to be activated even in the condition favoring a+c-type slip and suppressing a-type slip (an angle of ~10° between the tensile axis and c-axis).</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier BV</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-5093
ispartof Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-12, Vol.708, p.574
issn 0921-5093
1873-4936
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1985138268
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Burgers vector
Deformation
Deformation mechanisms
Electron backscatter diffraction
Equivalence
Grains
Scanning electron microscopy
Shear stress
Slip
Tensile deformation
Tensile tests
Titanium alloys
Titanium base alloys
title In situ SEM study of tensile deformation of a near-ß titanium alloy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A38%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20situ%20SEM%20study%20of%20tensile%20deformation%20of%20a%20near-%C3%9F%20titanium%20alloy&rft.jtitle=Materials%20science%20&%20engineering.%20A,%20Structural%20materials%20:%20properties,%20microstructure%20and%20processing&rft.au=Zhang,%20Saifei&rft.date=2017-12-21&rft.volume=708&rft.spage=574&rft.pages=574-&rft.issn=0921-5093&rft.eissn=1873-4936&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1985138268%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1985138268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true