Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations

A critical analysis was made of the Oliver and Pharr method for determination of the hardness and elastic moduli of materials by instrumented indentations with the continuous recording of the P– h diagrams ( P is the force acting on the indenter, h is the approach of the indenter and a sample). Mist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of superhard materials 2017-11, Vol.39 (6), p.373-389
Hauptverfasser: Galanov, B. A., Dub, S. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 389
container_issue 6
container_start_page 373
container_title Journal of superhard materials
container_volume 39
creator Galanov, B. A.
Dub, S. N.
description A critical analysis was made of the Oliver and Pharr method for determination of the hardness and elastic moduli of materials by instrumented indentations with the continuous recording of the P– h diagrams ( P is the force acting on the indenter, h is the approach of the indenter and a sample). Mistakes and insufficient justification were revealed in the basic theoretical relations of this method. In particular, this refers to an incorrect definition of the depth of the elastic contact h c , which is the base of these relalations. New refined basic relations and formulas for the determination of hardness and elastic modulus are given, in which the above defects are eliminated and which are based only on the assumption of elastic unloading of the indenter according to the classic theories of the elastic contact. In addition to the foregoing, using the data of the P – h diagram measured in the arbitrary laboratory coordinate system, an improved method of the stable determination of the contact stiffness S = d P /dh at the P –h diagram position have been proposed in the commonly accepted theoretical coordinate system in which its basic classic model relations are recorded. These refinements have been derived without additional assumptions to hypotheses to the Oliver and Pharr method and additional experimental measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.3103/S1063457617060016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1984386030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1984386030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-70bdca1fe0f43bc42a94e357ce3afe2262bc31b01e0791441d907b2154a1055f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA5-qkSdvtURb_wcIK6rmk7dTN0qZrkgp78x18AZ_NJ3HWehDEUyZ83_ebSYaxUwHnUoC8eBCQSpVkqcggBRDpHpuIXKooVzDbp5rkaKcfsiPv1wBJkstswj7mzgRT6ZZXfdehDZ6HnocV8mVrXtF9vr3fr7RzvEPtB4c7Cw9Yrax5GZD3DSe1tug917bm2GpPON719dAOnpdbbqwPbtjlsKZLTYUOprdjwGFj7EgllqH2pfYEcET6dh2zg0a3Hk9-zil7ur56nN9Gi-XN3fxyEVVSpCHKoKwrLRqERsmyUrHOFcokq1DqBuM4jUsyliAQslwoJeocsjIWidKC_qKRU3Y2cjeup5f5UKz7wVlqWYh8puQsBQnkEqOrcr33NHyxcabTblsIKHaLKP4sgjLxmPHktc_ofpH_DX0BWvuO6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984386030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Galanov, B. A. ; Dub, S. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Galanov, B. A. ; Dub, S. N.</creatorcontrib><description>A critical analysis was made of the Oliver and Pharr method for determination of the hardness and elastic moduli of materials by instrumented indentations with the continuous recording of the P– h diagrams ( P is the force acting on the indenter, h is the approach of the indenter and a sample). Mistakes and insufficient justification were revealed in the basic theoretical relations of this method. In particular, this refers to an incorrect definition of the depth of the elastic contact h c , which is the base of these relalations. New refined basic relations and formulas for the determination of hardness and elastic modulus are given, in which the above defects are eliminated and which are based only on the assumption of elastic unloading of the indenter according to the classic theories of the elastic contact. In addition to the foregoing, using the data of the P – h diagram measured in the arbitrary laboratory coordinate system, an improved method of the stable determination of the contact stiffness S = d P /dh at the P –h diagram position have been proposed in the commonly accepted theoretical coordinate system in which its basic classic model relations are recorded. These refinements have been derived without additional assumptions to hypotheses to the Oliver and Pharr method and additional experimental measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-4576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-9408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1063457617060016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Errors ; Hardness ; Measurement techniques ; Modulus of elasticity ; Physical Chemistry ; Production ; Properties ; Stiffness ; Structure</subject><ispartof>Journal of superhard materials, 2017-11, Vol.39 (6), p.373-389</ispartof><rights>Allerton Press, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-70bdca1fe0f43bc42a94e357ce3afe2262bc31b01e0791441d907b2154a1055f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-70bdca1fe0f43bc42a94e357ce3afe2262bc31b01e0791441d907b2154a1055f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1063457617060016$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1063457617060016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galanov, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dub, S. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations</title><title>Journal of superhard materials</title><addtitle>J. Superhard Mater</addtitle><description>A critical analysis was made of the Oliver and Pharr method for determination of the hardness and elastic moduli of materials by instrumented indentations with the continuous recording of the P– h diagrams ( P is the force acting on the indenter, h is the approach of the indenter and a sample). Mistakes and insufficient justification were revealed in the basic theoretical relations of this method. In particular, this refers to an incorrect definition of the depth of the elastic contact h c , which is the base of these relalations. New refined basic relations and formulas for the determination of hardness and elastic modulus are given, in which the above defects are eliminated and which are based only on the assumption of elastic unloading of the indenter according to the classic theories of the elastic contact. In addition to the foregoing, using the data of the P – h diagram measured in the arbitrary laboratory coordinate system, an improved method of the stable determination of the contact stiffness S = d P /dh at the P –h diagram position have been proposed in the commonly accepted theoretical coordinate system in which its basic classic model relations are recorded. These refinements have been derived without additional assumptions to hypotheses to the Oliver and Pharr method and additional experimental measurements.</description><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Structure</subject><issn>1063-4576</issn><issn>1934-9408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9KxDAQxoMouK4-gLeA5-qkSdvtURb_wcIK6rmk7dTN0qZrkgp78x18AZ_NJ3HWehDEUyZ83_ebSYaxUwHnUoC8eBCQSpVkqcggBRDpHpuIXKooVzDbp5rkaKcfsiPv1wBJkstswj7mzgRT6ZZXfdehDZ6HnocV8mVrXtF9vr3fr7RzvEPtB4c7Cw9Yrax5GZD3DSe1tug917bm2GpPON719dAOnpdbbqwPbtjlsKZLTYUOprdjwGFj7EgllqH2pfYEcET6dh2zg0a3Hk9-zil7ur56nN9Gi-XN3fxyEVVSpCHKoKwrLRqERsmyUrHOFcokq1DqBuM4jUsyliAQslwoJeocsjIWidKC_qKRU3Y2cjeup5f5UKz7wVlqWYh8puQsBQnkEqOrcr33NHyxcabTblsIKHaLKP4sgjLxmPHktc_ofpH_DX0BWvuO6Q</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Galanov, B. A.</creator><creator>Dub, S. N.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations</title><author>Galanov, B. A. ; Dub, S. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-70bdca1fe0f43bc42a94e357ce3afe2262bc31b01e0791441d907b2154a1055f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galanov, B. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dub, S. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of superhard materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galanov, B. A.</au><au>Dub, S. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of superhard materials</jtitle><stitle>J. Superhard Mater</stitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>389</epage><pages>373-389</pages><issn>1063-4576</issn><eissn>1934-9408</eissn><abstract>A critical analysis was made of the Oliver and Pharr method for determination of the hardness and elastic moduli of materials by instrumented indentations with the continuous recording of the P– h diagrams ( P is the force acting on the indenter, h is the approach of the indenter and a sample). Mistakes and insufficient justification were revealed in the basic theoretical relations of this method. In particular, this refers to an incorrect definition of the depth of the elastic contact h c , which is the base of these relalations. New refined basic relations and formulas for the determination of hardness and elastic modulus are given, in which the above defects are eliminated and which are based only on the assumption of elastic unloading of the indenter according to the classic theories of the elastic contact. In addition to the foregoing, using the data of the P – h diagram measured in the arbitrary laboratory coordinate system, an improved method of the stable determination of the contact stiffness S = d P /dh at the P –h diagram position have been proposed in the commonly accepted theoretical coordinate system in which its basic classic model relations are recorded. These refinements have been derived without additional assumptions to hypotheses to the Oliver and Pharr method and additional experimental measurements.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S1063457617060016</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-4576
ispartof Journal of superhard materials, 2017-11, Vol.39 (6), p.373-389
issn 1063-4576
1934-9408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1984386030
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Errors
Hardness
Measurement techniques
Modulus of elasticity
Physical Chemistry
Production
Properties
Stiffness
Structure
title Critical comments to the Oliver–Pharr measurement technique of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentations and refinement of its basic relations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T20%3A52%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20comments%20to%20the%20Oliver%E2%80%93Pharr%20measurement%20technique%20of%20hardness%20and%20elastic%20modulus%20by%20instrumented%20indentations%20and%20refinement%20of%20its%20basic%20relations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20superhard%20materials&rft.au=Galanov,%20B.%20A.&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=389&rft.pages=373-389&rft.issn=1063-4576&rft.eissn=1934-9408&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1063457617060016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1984386030%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984386030&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true