Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1
ABSTRACT We hypothesized that maternal nutrition and day of gestation would impact utero-placental mRNA expression of the nutrient transporters GLUT1, GLUT5, CAT-1, CAT-2, and CAT-3 in beef heifers. Crossbred Angus heifers (n = 49) were estrous synchronized, bred via AI, assigned to nutritional trea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-12, Vol.95 (12), p.5563-5572 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5572 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 5563 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Crouse, M. S. McLean, K. J. Greseth, N. P. Crosswhite, M. R. Pereira, N. Negrin Ward, A. K. Reynolds, L. P. Dahlen, C. R. Neville, B. W. Borowicz, P. P. Caton, J. S. |
description | ABSTRACT
We hypothesized that maternal nutrition and day of gestation would impact utero-placental mRNA expression of the nutrient transporters GLUT1, GLUT5, CAT-1, CAT-2, and CAT-3 in beef heifers. Crossbred Angus heifers (n = 49) were estrous synchronized, bred via AI, assigned to nutritional treatment (CON = 100% of NRC requirements for 0.45 kg/d gain and RES = 60% of CON) and ovariohysterectomized on d 16, 34, or 50 of gestation (n = 6 to 9/d); Non-bred, non-pregnant (NB-NP) controls were fed the CON diet, not bred, and were ovariohysterectomized on d 16 of the synchronized estrous cycle (n = 6). The resulting arrangement of treatments was a 2 × 3 factorial + 1 (CON vs. RES × d 16, 34, or 50 + NB-NP controls). Caruncle (CAR), intercaruncular endometrium (ICAR), and fetal membranes (FM [chorioallantois]), were obtained from the pregnant uterine horn (the uterine horn containing the conceptus) immediately after ovariohysterectomy. On d 50 cotyledons (COT), intercotyledonary placenta (ICOT) and amnion (AMN) were also collected. Relative expression of nutrient transporters was determined for each tissue utilizing NB-NP-CAR and NB-NP-ICAR tissues as the baseline. For FM, NB-NP endometrium served as the baseline. There was no interaction of day × treatment (P ≥ 0.20) for any genes in CAR. However, CAR expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34 and 50, and GLUT5, CAT-1, and CAT-2 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) on d 34 compared with d 16 and 50. In ICAR, CAT-2 was the only gene to be influenced by the day × treatment interaction (P = 0.01), being greater in d 50 CON compared with d 34 CON and d 16 and 50 RES. In ICAR, expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. In FM, expression of GLUT5 was greater (P = 0.04) on d 16 compared with d 50 of gestation, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. On d 50, expression of GLUT1, CAT-1, and CAT-3 expression were all greater (P < 0.05) in AMN compared with COT and ICOT, and expression of GLUT5 was greater (P < 0.01) in ICOT compared with COT and AMN. These data indicate that day was a more influential factor for mRNA expression of utero-placental glucose and cationic AA transporters than maternal nutritional status in heifers during early pregnancy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas2017.1983 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1984369317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.2527/jas2017.1983</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1984369317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-cd0edc3d031bf92f4435fbd544842e90553b63d5aa75f535d258aa047bc6490c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9P4zAQxS3ESpTu3vgAljhwIcV_4ibhhhALSEVcds_RxLGLq9QOHkeiX2o_I86WM6eZw--9N3pDyAVnK6FEdbMDFIxXK97U8oQsuBKqkHwtT8mCMcGLuubijJwj7hjjQjVqQf69QDLRw0D9lKJLLngKvqeYYGtosNRAHA50jGbrwesDdZ52xlj6Zpw1EW_p834EnZBmofnIHOLskZXbYdIBzTW1cdLp_zY7a5hDnKawdz5Q0K6nKYLHMcR8Cs4JU15CMQ6gjU_5tuQQJ4OU_yQ_LAxofn3NJfn7--HP_VOxeX18vr_bFJpXtSx0z0yvZc8k72wjbFlKZbtelWVdCtMwpWS3lr0CqJRVUvVC1QCsrDq9Lhum5ZJcHn3HGN5zcmp3YZprwjaXW8p1I3mVqesjpWNAjMa2Y3R7iIeWs3b-SPv1kVkkM351xMM0fk9-An3HjjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1984369317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Crouse, M. S. ; McLean, K. J. ; Greseth, N. P. ; Crosswhite, M. R. ; Pereira, N. Negrin ; Ward, A. K. ; Reynolds, L. P. ; Dahlen, C. R. ; Neville, B. W. ; Borowicz, P. P. ; Caton, J. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crouse, M. S. ; McLean, K. J. ; Greseth, N. P. ; Crosswhite, M. R. ; Pereira, N. Negrin ; Ward, A. K. ; Reynolds, L. P. ; Dahlen, C. R. ; Neville, B. W. ; Borowicz, P. P. ; Caton, J. S.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[ABSTRACT
We hypothesized that maternal nutrition and day of gestation would impact utero-placental mRNA expression of the nutrient transporters GLUT1, GLUT5, CAT-1, CAT-2, and CAT-3 in beef heifers. Crossbred Angus heifers (n = 49) were estrous synchronized, bred via AI, assigned to nutritional treatment (CON = 100% of NRC requirements for 0.45 kg/d gain and RES = 60% of CON) and ovariohysterectomized on d 16, 34, or 50 of gestation (n = 6 to 9/d); Non-bred, non-pregnant (NB-NP) controls were fed the CON diet, not bred, and were ovariohysterectomized on d 16 of the synchronized estrous cycle (n = 6). The resulting arrangement of treatments was a 2 × 3 factorial + 1 (CON vs. RES × d 16, 34, or 50 + NB-NP controls). Caruncle (CAR), intercaruncular endometrium (ICAR), and fetal membranes (FM [chorioallantois]), were obtained from the pregnant uterine horn (the uterine horn containing the conceptus) immediately after ovariohysterectomy. On d 50 cotyledons (COT), intercotyledonary placenta (ICOT) and amnion (AMN) were also collected. Relative expression of nutrient transporters was determined for each tissue utilizing NB-NP-CAR and NB-NP-ICAR tissues as the baseline. For FM, NB-NP endometrium served as the baseline. There was no interaction of day × treatment (P ≥ 0.20) for any genes in CAR. However, CAR expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34 and 50, and GLUT5, CAT-1, and CAT-2 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) on d 34 compared with d 16 and 50. In ICAR, CAT-2 was the only gene to be influenced by the day × treatment interaction (P = 0.01), being greater in d 50 CON compared with d 34 CON and d 16 and 50 RES. In ICAR, expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. In FM, expression of GLUT5 was greater (P = 0.04) on d 16 compared with d 50 of gestation, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. On d 50, expression of GLUT1, CAT-1, and CAT-3 expression were all greater (P < 0.05) in AMN compared with COT and ICOT, and expression of GLUT5 was greater (P < 0.01) in ICOT compared with COT and AMN. These data indicate that day was a more influential factor for mRNA expression of utero-placental glucose and cationic AA transporters than maternal nutritional status in heifers during early pregnancy.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1983</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Amino acids ; Amnion ; Animal reproduction ; Beef ; Cations ; Cattle ; Cotyledons ; Endometrium ; Estrus cycle ; Fetuses ; Fructose ; Gene expression ; Gestation ; Glucose ; Glucose transporter type 5 ; Human nutrition ; Membranes ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutritional status ; Placenta ; Pregnancy ; Tissues ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-12, Vol.95 (12), p.5563-5572</ispartof><rights>American Society of Animal Science 2017</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-cd0edc3d031bf92f4435fbd544842e90553b63d5aa75f535d258aa047bc6490c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-cd0edc3d031bf92f4435fbd544842e90553b63d5aa75f535d258aa047bc6490c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27913,27914</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crouse, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greseth, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosswhite, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, N. Negrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, B. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowicz, P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caton, J. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[ABSTRACT
We hypothesized that maternal nutrition and day of gestation would impact utero-placental mRNA expression of the nutrient transporters GLUT1, GLUT5, CAT-1, CAT-2, and CAT-3 in beef heifers. Crossbred Angus heifers (n = 49) were estrous synchronized, bred via AI, assigned to nutritional treatment (CON = 100% of NRC requirements for 0.45 kg/d gain and RES = 60% of CON) and ovariohysterectomized on d 16, 34, or 50 of gestation (n = 6 to 9/d); Non-bred, non-pregnant (NB-NP) controls were fed the CON diet, not bred, and were ovariohysterectomized on d 16 of the synchronized estrous cycle (n = 6). The resulting arrangement of treatments was a 2 × 3 factorial + 1 (CON vs. RES × d 16, 34, or 50 + NB-NP controls). Caruncle (CAR), intercaruncular endometrium (ICAR), and fetal membranes (FM [chorioallantois]), were obtained from the pregnant uterine horn (the uterine horn containing the conceptus) immediately after ovariohysterectomy. On d 50 cotyledons (COT), intercotyledonary placenta (ICOT) and amnion (AMN) were also collected. Relative expression of nutrient transporters was determined for each tissue utilizing NB-NP-CAR and NB-NP-ICAR tissues as the baseline. For FM, NB-NP endometrium served as the baseline. There was no interaction of day × treatment (P ≥ 0.20) for any genes in CAR. However, CAR expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34 and 50, and GLUT5, CAT-1, and CAT-2 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) on d 34 compared with d 16 and 50. In ICAR, CAT-2 was the only gene to be influenced by the day × treatment interaction (P = 0.01), being greater in d 50 CON compared with d 34 CON and d 16 and 50 RES. In ICAR, expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. In FM, expression of GLUT5 was greater (P = 0.04) on d 16 compared with d 50 of gestation, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. On d 50, expression of GLUT1, CAT-1, and CAT-3 expression were all greater (P < 0.05) in AMN compared with COT and ICOT, and expression of GLUT5 was greater (P < 0.01) in ICOT compared with COT and AMN. These data indicate that day was a more influential factor for mRNA expression of utero-placental glucose and cationic AA transporters than maternal nutritional status in heifers during early pregnancy.]]></description><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Amnion</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cotyledons</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Estrus cycle</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Fructose</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gestation</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose transporter type 5</subject><subject>Human nutrition</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional status</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9P4zAQxS3ESpTu3vgAljhwIcV_4ibhhhALSEVcds_RxLGLq9QOHkeiX2o_I86WM6eZw--9N3pDyAVnK6FEdbMDFIxXK97U8oQsuBKqkHwtT8mCMcGLuubijJwj7hjjQjVqQf69QDLRw0D9lKJLLngKvqeYYGtosNRAHA50jGbrwesDdZ52xlj6Zpw1EW_p834EnZBmofnIHOLskZXbYdIBzTW1cdLp_zY7a5hDnKawdz5Q0K6nKYLHMcR8Cs4JU15CMQ6gjU_5tuQQJ4OU_yQ_LAxofn3NJfn7--HP_VOxeX18vr_bFJpXtSx0z0yvZc8k72wjbFlKZbtelWVdCtMwpWS3lr0CqJRVUvVC1QCsrDq9Lhum5ZJcHn3HGN5zcmp3YZprwjaXW8p1I3mVqesjpWNAjMa2Y3R7iIeWs3b-SPv1kVkkM351xMM0fk9-An3HjjQ</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Crouse, M. S.</creator><creator>McLean, K. J.</creator><creator>Greseth, N. P.</creator><creator>Crosswhite, M. R.</creator><creator>Pereira, N. Negrin</creator><creator>Ward, A. K.</creator><creator>Reynolds, L. P.</creator><creator>Dahlen, C. R.</creator><creator>Neville, B. W.</creator><creator>Borowicz, P. P.</creator><creator>Caton, J. S.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1</title><author>Crouse, M. S. ; McLean, K. J. ; Greseth, N. P. ; Crosswhite, M. R. ; Pereira, N. Negrin ; Ward, A. K. ; Reynolds, L. P. ; Dahlen, C. R. ; Neville, B. W. ; Borowicz, P. P. ; Caton, J. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1783-cd0edc3d031bf92f4435fbd544842e90553b63d5aa75f535d258aa047bc6490c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Amnion</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cotyledons</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Estrus cycle</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Fructose</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gestation</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose transporter type 5</topic><topic>Human nutrition</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional status</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crouse, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLean, K. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greseth, N. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosswhite, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, N. Negrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, A. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neville, B. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowicz, P. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caton, J. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crouse, M. S.</au><au>McLean, K. J.</au><au>Greseth, N. P.</au><au>Crosswhite, M. R.</au><au>Pereira, N. Negrin</au><au>Ward, A. K.</au><au>Reynolds, L. P.</au><au>Dahlen, C. R.</au><au>Neville, B. W.</au><au>Borowicz, P. P.</au><au>Caton, J. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5563</spage><epage>5572</epage><pages>5563-5572</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[ABSTRACT
We hypothesized that maternal nutrition and day of gestation would impact utero-placental mRNA expression of the nutrient transporters GLUT1, GLUT5, CAT-1, CAT-2, and CAT-3 in beef heifers. Crossbred Angus heifers (n = 49) were estrous synchronized, bred via AI, assigned to nutritional treatment (CON = 100% of NRC requirements for 0.45 kg/d gain and RES = 60% of CON) and ovariohysterectomized on d 16, 34, or 50 of gestation (n = 6 to 9/d); Non-bred, non-pregnant (NB-NP) controls were fed the CON diet, not bred, and were ovariohysterectomized on d 16 of the synchronized estrous cycle (n = 6). The resulting arrangement of treatments was a 2 × 3 factorial + 1 (CON vs. RES × d 16, 34, or 50 + NB-NP controls). Caruncle (CAR), intercaruncular endometrium (ICAR), and fetal membranes (FM [chorioallantois]), were obtained from the pregnant uterine horn (the uterine horn containing the conceptus) immediately after ovariohysterectomy. On d 50 cotyledons (COT), intercotyledonary placenta (ICOT) and amnion (AMN) were also collected. Relative expression of nutrient transporters was determined for each tissue utilizing NB-NP-CAR and NB-NP-ICAR tissues as the baseline. For FM, NB-NP endometrium served as the baseline. There was no interaction of day × treatment (P ≥ 0.20) for any genes in CAR. However, CAR expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34 and 50, and GLUT5, CAT-1, and CAT-2 were greater (P ≤ 0.05) on d 34 compared with d 16 and 50. In ICAR, CAT-2 was the only gene to be influenced by the day × treatment interaction (P = 0.01), being greater in d 50 CON compared with d 34 CON and d 16 and 50 RES. In ICAR, expression of GLUT1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 16 compared with d 34, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. In FM, expression of GLUT5 was greater (P = 0.04) on d 16 compared with d 50 of gestation, and expression of CAT-1 was greater (P < 0.01) on d 34 and 50 compared with d 16. On d 50, expression of GLUT1, CAT-1, and CAT-3 expression were all greater (P < 0.05) in AMN compared with COT and ICOT, and expression of GLUT5 was greater (P < 0.01) in ICOT compared with COT and AMN. These data indicate that day was a more influential factor for mRNA expression of utero-placental glucose and cationic AA transporters than maternal nutritional status in heifers during early pregnancy.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1983</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-12, Vol.95 (12), p.5563-5572 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1984369317 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); PubMed Central |
subjects | Amino acids Amnion Animal reproduction Beef Cations Cattle Cotyledons Endometrium Estrus cycle Fetuses Fructose Gene expression Gestation Glucose Glucose transporter type 5 Human nutrition Membranes Nutrients Nutrition Nutritional status Placenta Pregnancy Tissues Uterus |
title | Maternal nutrition and stage of early pregnancy in beef heifers: Impacts on expression of glucose, fructose, and cationic amino acid transporters in utero-placental tissues 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T08%3A09%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal%20nutrition%20and%20stage%20of%20early%20pregnancy%20in%20beef%20heifers:%20Impacts%20on%20expression%20of%20glucose,%20fructose,%20and%20cationic%20amino%20acid%20transporters%20in%20utero-placental%20tissues%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Crouse,%20M.%20S.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5563&rft.epage=5572&rft.pages=5563-5572&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1983&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1984369317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1984369317&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.2527/jas2017.1983&rfr_iscdi=true |