Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis

The highly centralized management of rangelands in northwest Iran has caused their degradation. Rangeland Management Cooperatives (RMCs) have been taken into account by the Iranian researchers and practitioners as the best mode of managing and tackling these resources. In this regard, stakeholders&#...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rangeland ecology & management 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.126-137
Hauptverfasser: Jalali, Mohammad, Abadi, Bijan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 1
container_start_page 126
container_title Rangeland ecology & management
container_volume 71
creator Jalali, Mohammad
Abadi, Bijan
description The highly centralized management of rangelands in northwest Iran has caused their degradation. Rangeland Management Cooperatives (RMCs) have been taken into account by the Iranian researchers and practitioners as the best mode of managing and tackling these resources. In this regard, stakeholders' participation (i.e., the rangers) in such institutions is a substantial issue because without their close collaboration, any management scheme is likely to fail or succeed partially. Therefore, this study investigates the rangers' participation in RMCs using the theory-triangulation method. We developed the main research question: how the explanatory variables, extracted from the social-psychological models, influence rangers' participation in RMCs. A sample of 200 rangers participated in the survey method, of which we received 179 completed self-reported questionnaires. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Kuder-Richardson 21, the metrics that measure the consistency of items in indicator variables with the interval and binary scales, respectively. The results of path analysis unveil that job satisfaction and progressivism have a direct effect on participation, and the improved economic conditions of industries developed by the RMCs, good intrarelation, fatalism, progressivism, optimism, and cost-benefit indirectly influence participation via job satisfaction. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that to increase rangers' participation in RMCs, which is a key factor in preventing the degradation of rangelands, RMCs' officials need to improve the local industries benefiting from the rangelands and upgrade intracommunication skills via training. It is also suggested that all rangers, even those with fatalistic beliefs, need to be included in RMCs' participatory activities. Finally, it is needed to assess progressivist rangers' needs, promote optimism, and visualize the economic, social, and conservation benefits of the participation in RMCs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1983450312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550742417300684</els_id><sourcerecordid>1983450312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b369t-8ffa371425a9e0d1c45a58a0c348707f55bcd1f37fa898517483525f3cf801363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFqGzEQhpfSQtO0L9CToIecdjuzWu3KUAjGJGkgoSFp6VGMtZItI0tbaRPqF-hzZ20319LTDDP_98_wF8VHhAoB28-bKtGWqhqwq6CtAOtXxQkKgaWAWr4-9FB2Td28Ld7lvAHgLWJ3Uvz5uXZ6zR6iduTLu7zT6-jjymny7Db2xmd28Xvw5AK7p7AyKZ-xO0qj026g0cXAXjaeQs9uKdDKbE0Y2SLGwaRJ82TyOZsHNh8GP_keoGgnl3E9jcnvssvvizeWfDYf_tbT4sflxffF1_Lm29X1Yn5TLnk7G0tpLfEOm1rQzECPuhEkJIHmjeygs0IsdY-Wd5bkTArsGslFLSzXVgLylp8Wn46-Q4q_Hk0e1SY-pumJrHAmeSOAYz2p6qNKp5hzMlYNyW0p7RSC2uetNmqft9rnraBVcIC-HKEpM_PkTFJZOxO06V0yelR9dP_G4YgvXYzB_M_FZ0JEmV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983450312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jalali, Mohammad ; Abadi, Bijan</creator><creatorcontrib>Jalali, Mohammad ; Abadi, Bijan</creatorcontrib><description>The highly centralized management of rangelands in northwest Iran has caused their degradation. Rangeland Management Cooperatives (RMCs) have been taken into account by the Iranian researchers and practitioners as the best mode of managing and tackling these resources. In this regard, stakeholders' participation (i.e., the rangers) in such institutions is a substantial issue because without their close collaboration, any management scheme is likely to fail or succeed partially. Therefore, this study investigates the rangers' participation in RMCs using the theory-triangulation method. We developed the main research question: how the explanatory variables, extracted from the social-psychological models, influence rangers' participation in RMCs. A sample of 200 rangers participated in the survey method, of which we received 179 completed self-reported questionnaires. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Kuder-Richardson 21, the metrics that measure the consistency of items in indicator variables with the interval and binary scales, respectively. The results of path analysis unveil that job satisfaction and progressivism have a direct effect on participation, and the improved economic conditions of industries developed by the RMCs, good intrarelation, fatalism, progressivism, optimism, and cost-benefit indirectly influence participation via job satisfaction. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that to increase rangers' participation in RMCs, which is a key factor in preventing the degradation of rangelands, RMCs' officials need to improve the local industries benefiting from the rangelands and upgrade intracommunication skills via training. It is also suggested that all rangers, even those with fatalistic beliefs, need to be included in RMCs' participatory activities. Finally, it is needed to assess progressivist rangers' needs, promote optimism, and visualize the economic, social, and conservation benefits of the participation in RMCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-5028</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.012</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: the Society for Range Management</publisher><subject>Analysis ; cooperatives ; Degradation ; Economic conditions ; Environmental protection ; Factor analysis ; Job satisfaction ; Management ; participation ; path analysis ; Psychology ; Questionnaires ; Range management ; Rangelands ; Reliability analysis ; Reliability aspects ; Social factors ; Studies ; Triangulation ; Wilderness areas</subject><ispartof>Rangeland ecology &amp; management, 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.126-137</ispartof><rights>2017 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2017 The Society for Range Management</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b369t-8ffa371425a9e0d1c45a58a0c348707f55bcd1f37fa898517483525f3cf801363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b369t-8ffa371425a9e0d1c45a58a0c348707f55bcd1f37fa898517483525f3cf801363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jalali, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abadi, Bijan</creatorcontrib><title>Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis</title><title>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</title><description>The highly centralized management of rangelands in northwest Iran has caused their degradation. Rangeland Management Cooperatives (RMCs) have been taken into account by the Iranian researchers and practitioners as the best mode of managing and tackling these resources. In this regard, stakeholders' participation (i.e., the rangers) in such institutions is a substantial issue because without their close collaboration, any management scheme is likely to fail or succeed partially. Therefore, this study investigates the rangers' participation in RMCs using the theory-triangulation method. We developed the main research question: how the explanatory variables, extracted from the social-psychological models, influence rangers' participation in RMCs. A sample of 200 rangers participated in the survey method, of which we received 179 completed self-reported questionnaires. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Kuder-Richardson 21, the metrics that measure the consistency of items in indicator variables with the interval and binary scales, respectively. The results of path analysis unveil that job satisfaction and progressivism have a direct effect on participation, and the improved economic conditions of industries developed by the RMCs, good intrarelation, fatalism, progressivism, optimism, and cost-benefit indirectly influence participation via job satisfaction. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that to increase rangers' participation in RMCs, which is a key factor in preventing the degradation of rangelands, RMCs' officials need to improve the local industries benefiting from the rangelands and upgrade intracommunication skills via training. It is also suggested that all rangers, even those with fatalistic beliefs, need to be included in RMCs' participatory activities. Finally, it is needed to assess progressivist rangers' needs, promote optimism, and visualize the economic, social, and conservation benefits of the participation in RMCs.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>cooperatives</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>participation</subject><subject>path analysis</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Range management</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reliability aspects</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Triangulation</subject><subject>Wilderness areas</subject><issn>1550-7424</issn><issn>1551-5028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFqGzEQhpfSQtO0L9CToIecdjuzWu3KUAjGJGkgoSFp6VGMtZItI0tbaRPqF-hzZ20319LTDDP_98_wF8VHhAoB28-bKtGWqhqwq6CtAOtXxQkKgaWAWr4-9FB2Td28Ld7lvAHgLWJ3Uvz5uXZ6zR6iduTLu7zT6-jjymny7Db2xmd28Xvw5AK7p7AyKZ-xO0qj026g0cXAXjaeQs9uKdDKbE0Y2SLGwaRJ82TyOZsHNh8GP_keoGgnl3E9jcnvssvvizeWfDYf_tbT4sflxffF1_Lm29X1Yn5TLnk7G0tpLfEOm1rQzECPuhEkJIHmjeygs0IsdY-Wd5bkTArsGslFLSzXVgLylp8Wn46-Q4q_Hk0e1SY-pumJrHAmeSOAYz2p6qNKp5hzMlYNyW0p7RSC2uetNmqft9rnraBVcIC-HKEpM_PkTFJZOxO06V0yelR9dP_G4YgvXYzB_M_FZ0JEmV8</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Jalali, Mohammad</creator><creator>Abadi, Bijan</creator><general>the Society for Range Management</general><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis</title><author>Jalali, Mohammad ; Abadi, Bijan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b369t-8ffa371425a9e0d1c45a58a0c348707f55bcd1f37fa898517483525f3cf801363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>cooperatives</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>participation</topic><topic>path analysis</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Range management</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reliability aspects</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Triangulation</topic><topic>Wilderness areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jalali, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abadi, Bijan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jalali, Mohammad</au><au>Abadi, Bijan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Rangeland ecology &amp; management</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>126-137</pages><issn>1550-7424</issn><eissn>1551-5028</eissn><abstract>The highly centralized management of rangelands in northwest Iran has caused their degradation. Rangeland Management Cooperatives (RMCs) have been taken into account by the Iranian researchers and practitioners as the best mode of managing and tackling these resources. In this regard, stakeholders' participation (i.e., the rangers) in such institutions is a substantial issue because without their close collaboration, any management scheme is likely to fail or succeed partially. Therefore, this study investigates the rangers' participation in RMCs using the theory-triangulation method. We developed the main research question: how the explanatory variables, extracted from the social-psychological models, influence rangers' participation in RMCs. A sample of 200 rangers participated in the survey method, of which we received 179 completed self-reported questionnaires. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using the Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Kuder-Richardson 21, the metrics that measure the consistency of items in indicator variables with the interval and binary scales, respectively. The results of path analysis unveil that job satisfaction and progressivism have a direct effect on participation, and the improved economic conditions of industries developed by the RMCs, good intrarelation, fatalism, progressivism, optimism, and cost-benefit indirectly influence participation via job satisfaction. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that to increase rangers' participation in RMCs, which is a key factor in preventing the degradation of rangelands, RMCs' officials need to improve the local industries benefiting from the rangelands and upgrade intracommunication skills via training. It is also suggested that all rangers, even those with fatalistic beliefs, need to be included in RMCs' participatory activities. Finally, it is needed to assess progressivist rangers' needs, promote optimism, and visualize the economic, social, and conservation benefits of the participation in RMCs.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>the Society for Range Management</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.012</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1550-7424
ispartof Rangeland ecology & management, 2018-01, Vol.71 (1), p.126-137
issn 1550-7424
1551-5028
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1983450312
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
cooperatives
Degradation
Economic conditions
Environmental protection
Factor analysis
Job satisfaction
Management
participation
path analysis
Psychology
Questionnaires
Range management
Rangelands
Reliability analysis
Reliability aspects
Social factors
Studies
Triangulation
Wilderness areas
title Which Social-Psychological Models Explain Rangers' Participation in Rangeland Management Cooperatives? An Application of Path Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A05%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Social-Psychological%20Models%20Explain%20Rangers'%20Participation%20in%20Rangeland%20Management%20Cooperatives?%20An%20Application%20of%20Path%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Rangeland%20ecology%20&%20management&rft.au=Jalali,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=126-137&rft.issn=1550-7424&rft.eissn=1551-5028&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rama.2017.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983450312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983450312&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1550742417300684&rfr_iscdi=true