A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents
Background: Decalcification is a process of complete removal of calcium salts from mineralized tissues. Microwave decalcification is a novel technique that can accelerate the duration of decalcification compared to the manual method, by increasing the temperature to evaluate the fastest decalcifying...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry 2017-07, Vol.7 (2), p.94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 94 |
container_title | Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Kadashetti, Vidya Shivakumar, K Baad, Rajendra Vibhute, Nupura Belgaumi, Uzma Bommanavar, Sushma Kamate, Wasim Sankapal, Sonali |
description | Background: Decalcification is a process of complete removal of calcium salts from mineralized tissues. Microwave decalcification is a novel technique that can accelerate the duration of decalcification compared to the manual method, by increasing the temperature to evaluate the fastest decalcifying agents and methods (routine with Microwave decalcification) in both bone and tooth. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 80 hard tissues, 40 teeth and 40 pieces of 1 cm × 1 cm cut bone specimens were decalcified by both routine and microwave method using four decalcifying solutions (five bone pieces and five teeth in each agents for both routine and microwave method). The four decalcifying solutions were 8% nitric acid, 8% formic acid, 8%formal nitric acid, and 14% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Results: Duration of decalcifi cation of bone and tooth by both methods with 8% nitric acid took 10 days for CD and 2 days for MD respectively. Similarly for rest of the acids took more time to decalcify in CD method than MD method. Fourteen percent EDTA gave excellent results followed by 8% formal nitric acid, and 8% formic acid has good results than 8% nitric acid. Conclusion: Microwave processing proved to be an efficient and reliable procedure for the decalcification of bones and tooth. Microwave decalcification yielded quicker and better results compared to the routine methods. Therefore, microwave can serve as a quicker and reliable diagnostic method for a pathologist. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijmd.ijmd_37_17 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1983183411</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A521006680</galeid><sourcerecordid>A521006680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-cf233b34361404df1be6101c2ee4acd0f7b6155d7695c9bc2359a269fd83db2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFr3DAQhU1poCHJuVdBITdvNJItr49LSJtCIJfkLGRptKtgSxtJTti_0F9duSlJQ4NAGp6-mYH3quor0FUDlF-4h8mslkvyTkL3qTpmrOvqDoB_XmrW14IL-qU6S8kNtBGCdUzAcfVrQx5n5bPLKrsnJCnP5kCCJTpMexWd35K8QxLDnJ1HYlCrUTvrdMGDJ8obMjkdw7N6-v93wrwLJpHhQOa0jDLOWozo8yt6WGS1LVI6rY6sGhOe_X1PqvvvV3eX1_XN7Y-fl5ubWjNgUGvLOB94wwU0tDEWBhRAQTPERmlDbTcIaFvTib7V_aAZb3vFRG_NmpuBaX5SfXuZu4_hccaU5UOYoy8rJfRrDmveFNteqa0aUTpvQ45KTy5puWkZUCrEmhZq9QFVjsFiS_BoXdHfNZz_07BDNeZdCuO8-JXegxcvYDE3pYhW7qObVDxIoHLJXP6J-y1z_hsl5qKP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983183411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Kadashetti, Vidya ; Shivakumar, K ; Baad, Rajendra ; Vibhute, Nupura ; Belgaumi, Uzma ; Bommanavar, Sushma ; Kamate, Wasim ; Sankapal, Sonali</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadashetti, Vidya ; Shivakumar, K ; Baad, Rajendra ; Vibhute, Nupura ; Belgaumi, Uzma ; Bommanavar, Sushma ; Kamate, Wasim ; Sankapal, Sonali</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Decalcification is a process of complete removal of calcium salts from mineralized tissues. Microwave decalcification is a novel technique that can accelerate the duration of decalcification compared to the manual method, by increasing the temperature to evaluate the fastest decalcifying agents and methods (routine with Microwave decalcification) in both bone and tooth. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 80 hard tissues, 40 teeth and 40 pieces of 1 cm × 1 cm cut bone specimens were decalcified by both routine and microwave method using four decalcifying solutions (five bone pieces and five teeth in each agents for both routine and microwave method). The four decalcifying solutions were 8% nitric acid, 8% formic acid, 8%formal nitric acid, and 14% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Results: Duration of decalcifi cation of bone and tooth by both methods with 8% nitric acid took 10 days for CD and 2 days for MD respectively. Similarly for rest of the acids took more time to decalcify in CD method than MD method. Fourteen percent EDTA gave excellent results followed by 8% formal nitric acid, and 8% formic acid has good results than 8% nitric acid. Conclusion: Microwave processing proved to be an efficient and reliable procedure for the decalcification of bones and tooth. Microwave decalcification yielded quicker and better results compared to the routine methods. Therefore, microwave can serve as a quicker and reliable diagnostic method for a pathologist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2229-6360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2277-7113</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijmd.ijmd_37_17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chennai: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Acids ; Analysis ; Bones ; Calcium ; Calcium compounds ; Decalcification ; Dental enamel ; Dental research ; Diagnostic systems ; Dosage and administration ; Edetic acid ; EDTA ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids ; Formic acid ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Histopathology ; Laboratories ; Methods ; Nitric acid ; Orthodontics ; Pathology ; Pathology laboratories ; Salts ; Teeth ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry, 2017-07, Vol.7 (2), p.94</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jul/Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-cf233b34361404df1be6101c2ee4acd0f7b6155d7695c9bc2359a269fd83db2c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadashetti, Vidya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivakumar, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad, Rajendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vibhute, Nupura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belgaumi, Uzma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bommanavar, Sushma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamate, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankapal, Sonali</creatorcontrib><title>A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents</title><title>Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry</title><description>Background: Decalcification is a process of complete removal of calcium salts from mineralized tissues. Microwave decalcification is a novel technique that can accelerate the duration of decalcification compared to the manual method, by increasing the temperature to evaluate the fastest decalcifying agents and methods (routine with Microwave decalcification) in both bone and tooth. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 80 hard tissues, 40 teeth and 40 pieces of 1 cm × 1 cm cut bone specimens were decalcified by both routine and microwave method using four decalcifying solutions (five bone pieces and five teeth in each agents for both routine and microwave method). The four decalcifying solutions were 8% nitric acid, 8% formic acid, 8%formal nitric acid, and 14% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Results: Duration of decalcifi cation of bone and tooth by both methods with 8% nitric acid took 10 days for CD and 2 days for MD respectively. Similarly for rest of the acids took more time to decalcify in CD method than MD method. Fourteen percent EDTA gave excellent results followed by 8% formal nitric acid, and 8% formic acid has good results than 8% nitric acid. Conclusion: Microwave processing proved to be an efficient and reliable procedure for the decalcification of bones and tooth. Microwave decalcification yielded quicker and better results compared to the routine methods. Therefore, microwave can serve as a quicker and reliable diagnostic method for a pathologist.</description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium compounds</subject><subject>Decalcification</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental research</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Edetic acid</subject><subject>EDTA</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids</subject><subject>Formic acid</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nitric acid</subject><subject>Orthodontics</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Pathology laboratories</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>2229-6360</issn><issn>2277-7113</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFr3DAQhU1poCHJuVdBITdvNJItr49LSJtCIJfkLGRptKtgSxtJTti_0F9duSlJQ4NAGp6-mYH3quor0FUDlF-4h8mslkvyTkL3qTpmrOvqDoB_XmrW14IL-qU6S8kNtBGCdUzAcfVrQx5n5bPLKrsnJCnP5kCCJTpMexWd35K8QxLDnJ1HYlCrUTvrdMGDJ8obMjkdw7N6-v93wrwLJpHhQOa0jDLOWozo8yt6WGS1LVI6rY6sGhOe_X1PqvvvV3eX1_XN7Y-fl5ubWjNgUGvLOB94wwU0tDEWBhRAQTPERmlDbTcIaFvTib7V_aAZb3vFRG_NmpuBaX5SfXuZu4_hccaU5UOYoy8rJfRrDmveFNteqa0aUTpvQ45KTy5puWkZUCrEmhZq9QFVjsFiS_BoXdHfNZz_07BDNeZdCuO8-JXegxcvYDE3pYhW7qObVDxIoHLJXP6J-y1z_hsl5qKP</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Kadashetti, Vidya</creator><creator>Shivakumar, K</creator><creator>Baad, Rajendra</creator><creator>Vibhute, Nupura</creator><creator>Belgaumi, Uzma</creator><creator>Bommanavar, Sushma</creator><creator>Kamate, Wasim</creator><creator>Sankapal, Sonali</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents</title><author>Kadashetti, Vidya ; Shivakumar, K ; Baad, Rajendra ; Vibhute, Nupura ; Belgaumi, Uzma ; Bommanavar, Sushma ; Kamate, Wasim ; Sankapal, Sonali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2121-cf233b34361404df1be6101c2ee4acd0f7b6155d7695c9bc2359a269fd83db2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium compounds</topic><topic>Decalcification</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental research</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Edetic acid</topic><topic>EDTA</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids</topic><topic>Formic acid</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nitric acid</topic><topic>Orthodontics</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Pathology laboratories</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadashetti, Vidya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shivakumar, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baad, Rajendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vibhute, Nupura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belgaumi, Uzma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bommanavar, Sushma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamate, Wasim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankapal, Sonali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Health & Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadashetti, Vidya</au><au>Shivakumar, K</au><au>Baad, Rajendra</au><au>Vibhute, Nupura</au><au>Belgaumi, Uzma</au><au>Bommanavar, Sushma</au><au>Kamate, Wasim</au><au>Sankapal, Sonali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents</atitle><jtitle>Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>94</spage><pages>94-</pages><issn>2229-6360</issn><eissn>2277-7113</eissn><abstract>Background: Decalcification is a process of complete removal of calcium salts from mineralized tissues. Microwave decalcification is a novel technique that can accelerate the duration of decalcification compared to the manual method, by increasing the temperature to evaluate the fastest decalcifying agents and methods (routine with Microwave decalcification) in both bone and tooth. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 80 hard tissues, 40 teeth and 40 pieces of 1 cm × 1 cm cut bone specimens were decalcified by both routine and microwave method using four decalcifying solutions (five bone pieces and five teeth in each agents for both routine and microwave method). The four decalcifying solutions were 8% nitric acid, 8% formic acid, 8%formal nitric acid, and 14% of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Results: Duration of decalcifi cation of bone and tooth by both methods with 8% nitric acid took 10 days for CD and 2 days for MD respectively. Similarly for rest of the acids took more time to decalcify in CD method than MD method. Fourteen percent EDTA gave excellent results followed by 8% formal nitric acid, and 8% formic acid has good results than 8% nitric acid. Conclusion: Microwave processing proved to be an efficient and reliable procedure for the decalcification of bones and tooth. Microwave decalcification yielded quicker and better results compared to the routine methods. Therefore, microwave can serve as a quicker and reliable diagnostic method for a pathologist.</abstract><cop>Chennai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ijmd.ijmd_37_17</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2229-6360 |
ispartof | Indian Journal of Multidisciplinary Dentistry, 2017-07, Vol.7 (2), p.94 |
issn | 2229-6360 2277-7113 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1983183411 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Acetic acid Acids Analysis Bones Calcium Calcium compounds Decalcification Dental enamel Dental research Diagnostic systems Dosage and administration Edetic acid EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acids Formic acid Health aspects Health care Histopathology Laboratories Methods Nitric acid Orthodontics Pathology Pathology laboratories Salts Teeth Tissues |
title | A quantitative study of comparing the routine decalcification and microwave decalcification methods by using different decalcifying agents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A31%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20quantitative%20study%20of%20comparing%20the%20routine%20decalcification%20and%20microwave%20decalcification%20methods%20by%20using%20different%20decalcifying%20agents&rft.jtitle=Indian%20Journal%20of%20Multidisciplinary%20Dentistry&rft.au=Kadashetti,%20Vidya&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=94&rft.pages=94-&rft.issn=2229-6360&rft.eissn=2277-7113&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijmd.ijmd_37_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA521006680%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983183411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A521006680&rfr_iscdi=true |