Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages
ABSTRACT Legislators at the state and national levels are addressing renewed concerns over the adequacy of hospital nurse staffing to provide quality care and ensure patient safety. At the same time, the well‐known nursing shortage remains an ongoing problem. To address these issues, we reexamine th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Decision sciences 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.39-70 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 70 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Decision sciences |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Wright, P. Daniel Bretthauer, Kurt M. Côté, Murray J. |
description | ABSTRACT
Legislators at the state and national levels are addressing renewed concerns over the adequacy of hospital nurse staffing to provide quality care and ensure patient safety. At the same time, the well‐known nursing shortage remains an ongoing problem. To address these issues, we reexamine the nurse scheduling problem and consider how recent health care legislation impacts nursing workforce management decisions. Specifically, we develop a scheduling model and perform computational experiments to evaluate how mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios and other policies impact schedule cost and schedule desirability (from the nurses' perspective). Our primary findings include the following: (i) nurse wage costs can be highly nonlinear with respect to changes in mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios of the type being considered by legislators; (ii) the number of undesirable shifts can be substantially reduced without incurring additional wage cost; (iii) more desirable scheduling policies, such as assigning fewer weekends to each nurse, have only a small impact on wage cost; and (iv) complex policy statements involving both single‐period and multiperiod service levels can sometimes be relaxed while still obtaining good schedules that satisfy the nurse‐to‐patient ratio requirements. The findings in this article suggest that new directions for future nurse scheduling models, as it is likely that nurse‐to‐patient ratios and nursing shortages will remain a challenge for health care organizations for some time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00109.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198117907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1029377601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-ff2fa91e7a86d2e000150b20295c3240b6e4966f527338ef90870e810c2a1c313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_G-9ZymaRrBC5m6CWN-TBG8CVl34jq3VZMO5783teK1uUl48z4n4WEsQkgwrNNFgiKDWGSYJSlAngAgqGS7w3rdhUKxy3ohxVhyFPvswPsFhKbIeI_dPhBtzapaV-vXqJlTNN44T9GknNNss2zDO1dPl7Q6iyaNsbZNHkxT1T4y69lPu40m89o15pX8EduzZunp-Hc_ZE_XV4_9YTy6Hdz0L0ZxyWWhYmtTaxSSNEU-Syl8BwVMU0iVKHmawTSnTOW5FankvCCroJBABUKZGiw58kN20s19d_XHhnyjF_XGrcOTGlWBKBXIUCq6Uulq7x1Z_e6qlXFfGkG39vRCt5J0a0-39vSPPb0N6HmHflZL-vo3py-v-jfhFPi44yvf0PaPN-5N55JLoZ_HAz2BlwEf3t_pAf8GXWiDPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198117907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wright, P. Daniel ; Bretthauer, Kurt M. ; Côté, Murray J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wright, P. Daniel ; Bretthauer, Kurt M. ; Côté, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Legislators at the state and national levels are addressing renewed concerns over the adequacy of hospital nurse staffing to provide quality care and ensure patient safety. At the same time, the well‐known nursing shortage remains an ongoing problem. To address these issues, we reexamine the nurse scheduling problem and consider how recent health care legislation impacts nursing workforce management decisions. Specifically, we develop a scheduling model and perform computational experiments to evaluate how mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios and other policies impact schedule cost and schedule desirability (from the nurses' perspective). Our primary findings include the following: (i) nurse wage costs can be highly nonlinear with respect to changes in mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios of the type being considered by legislators; (ii) the number of undesirable shifts can be substantially reduced without incurring additional wage cost; (iii) more desirable scheduling policies, such as assigning fewer weekends to each nurse, have only a small impact on wage cost; and (iv) complex policy statements involving both single‐period and multiperiod service levels can sometimes be relaxed while still obtaining good schedules that satisfy the nurse‐to‐patient ratio requirements. The findings in this article suggest that new directions for future nurse scheduling models, as it is likely that nurse‐to‐patient ratios and nursing shortages will remain a challenge for health care organizations for some time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00109.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DESCDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA: Decision Sciences</publisher><subject>and Planning and Scheduling ; Decision making ; Direct labor costs ; Employees ; Health Care Policy ; Health services ; Impact analysis ; Integer programming ; Labor and Staff Planning ; Legislation ; Legislators ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical programming ; Mathematical Programming/Optimization ; Nurse Scheduling ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Optimization techniques ; Ratios ; Schedules ; Scheduling ; Shortages ; Studies ; Wages & salaries ; Workforce ; Workforce planning ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.39-70</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute for Decision Sciences Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-ff2fa91e7a86d2e000150b20295c3240b6e4966f527338ef90870e810c2a1c313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-ff2fa91e7a86d2e000150b20295c3240b6e4966f527338ef90870e810c2a1c313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5414.2006.00109.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5414.2006.00109.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wright, P. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretthauer, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages</title><title>Decision sciences</title><description>ABSTRACT
Legislators at the state and national levels are addressing renewed concerns over the adequacy of hospital nurse staffing to provide quality care and ensure patient safety. At the same time, the well‐known nursing shortage remains an ongoing problem. To address these issues, we reexamine the nurse scheduling problem and consider how recent health care legislation impacts nursing workforce management decisions. Specifically, we develop a scheduling model and perform computational experiments to evaluate how mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios and other policies impact schedule cost and schedule desirability (from the nurses' perspective). Our primary findings include the following: (i) nurse wage costs can be highly nonlinear with respect to changes in mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios of the type being considered by legislators; (ii) the number of undesirable shifts can be substantially reduced without incurring additional wage cost; (iii) more desirable scheduling policies, such as assigning fewer weekends to each nurse, have only a small impact on wage cost; and (iv) complex policy statements involving both single‐period and multiperiod service levels can sometimes be relaxed while still obtaining good schedules that satisfy the nurse‐to‐patient ratio requirements. The findings in this article suggest that new directions for future nurse scheduling models, as it is likely that nurse‐to‐patient ratios and nursing shortages will remain a challenge for health care organizations for some time.</description><subject>and Planning and Scheduling</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Direct labor costs</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Health Care Policy</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Integer programming</subject><subject>Labor and Staff Planning</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Mathematical Programming/Optimization</subject><subject>Nurse Scheduling</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0011-7315</issn><issn>1540-5915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-Q_G-9ZymaRrBC5m6CWN-TBG8CVl34jq3VZMO5783teK1uUl48z4n4WEsQkgwrNNFgiKDWGSYJSlAngAgqGS7w3rdhUKxy3ohxVhyFPvswPsFhKbIeI_dPhBtzapaV-vXqJlTNN44T9GknNNss2zDO1dPl7Q6iyaNsbZNHkxT1T4y69lPu40m89o15pX8EduzZunp-Hc_ZE_XV4_9YTy6Hdz0L0ZxyWWhYmtTaxSSNEU-Syl8BwVMU0iVKHmawTSnTOW5FankvCCroJBABUKZGiw58kN20s19d_XHhnyjF_XGrcOTGlWBKBXIUCq6Uulq7x1Z_e6qlXFfGkG39vRCt5J0a0-39vSPPb0N6HmHflZL-vo3py-v-jfhFPi44yvf0PaPN-5N55JLoZ_HAz2BlwEf3t_pAf8GXWiDPg</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Wright, P. Daniel</creator><creator>Bretthauer, Kurt M.</creator><creator>Côté, Murray J.</creator><general>Decision Sciences</general><general>American Institute for Decision Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages</title><author>Wright, P. Daniel ; Bretthauer, Kurt M. ; Côté, Murray J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3789-ff2fa91e7a86d2e000150b20295c3240b6e4966f527338ef90870e810c2a1c313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>and Planning and Scheduling</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Direct labor costs</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Health Care Policy</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Integer programming</topic><topic>Labor and Staff Planning</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Mathematical Programming/Optimization</topic><topic>Nurse Scheduling</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wright, P. Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bretthauer, Kurt M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Côté, Murray J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wright, P. Daniel</au><au>Bretthauer, Kurt M.</au><au>Côté, Murray J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>70</epage><pages>39-70</pages><issn>0011-7315</issn><eissn>1540-5915</eissn><coden>DESCDQ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
Legislators at the state and national levels are addressing renewed concerns over the adequacy of hospital nurse staffing to provide quality care and ensure patient safety. At the same time, the well‐known nursing shortage remains an ongoing problem. To address these issues, we reexamine the nurse scheduling problem and consider how recent health care legislation impacts nursing workforce management decisions. Specifically, we develop a scheduling model and perform computational experiments to evaluate how mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios and other policies impact schedule cost and schedule desirability (from the nurses' perspective). Our primary findings include the following: (i) nurse wage costs can be highly nonlinear with respect to changes in mandatory nurse‐to‐patient ratios of the type being considered by legislators; (ii) the number of undesirable shifts can be substantially reduced without incurring additional wage cost; (iii) more desirable scheduling policies, such as assigning fewer weekends to each nurse, have only a small impact on wage cost; and (iv) complex policy statements involving both single‐period and multiperiod service levels can sometimes be relaxed while still obtaining good schedules that satisfy the nurse‐to‐patient ratio requirements. The findings in this article suggest that new directions for future nurse scheduling models, as it is likely that nurse‐to‐patient ratios and nursing shortages will remain a challenge for health care organizations for some time.</abstract><cop>350 Main Street , Malden , MA 02148 , USA</cop><pub>Decision Sciences</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00109.x</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-7315 |
ispartof | Decision sciences, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.39-70 |
issn | 0011-7315 1540-5915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198117907 |
source | Wiley Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | and Planning and Scheduling Decision making Direct labor costs Employees Health Care Policy Health services Impact analysis Integer programming Labor and Staff Planning Legislation Legislators Mathematical models Mathematical programming Mathematical Programming/Optimization Nurse Scheduling Nurses Nursing Optimization techniques Ratios Schedules Scheduling Shortages Studies Wages & salaries Workforce Workforce planning Workloads |
title | Reexamining the Nurse Scheduling Problem: Staffing Ratios and Nursing Shortages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A55%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reexamining%20the%20Nurse%20Scheduling%20Problem:%20Staffing%20Ratios%20and%20Nursing%20Shortages&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences&rft.au=Wright,%20P.%20Daniel&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=70&rft.pages=39-70&rft.issn=0011-7315&rft.eissn=1540-5915&rft.coden=DESCDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00109.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1029377601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198117907&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |