Faculty Forum
Freud's scientific legacy is controversial within contemporary psychology. There are pedagogical benefits to this controversy, however, because instructors can use it to encourage students to critically evaluate Freud's contributions. We describe a course in which students discuss Freud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teaching of psychology 2005-04, Vol.32 (2), p.114-128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 114 |
container_title | Teaching of psychology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Dunn, Dana S Dougherty, Sarah B Uskul, Ayse K Eaton, Judy Schwebel, David C Tzanetos, Douglas B Neumann, Sandra L McElroy, Heather K Prentice-Dunn, Steven Duer, Joan D Hays-Thomas, Rosemary |
description | Freud's scientific legacy is controversial within contemporary psychology. There are pedagogical benefits to this controversy, however, because instructors can use it to encourage students to critically evaluate Freud's contributions. We describe a course in which students discuss Freud's works from different points in his career, along with available empirical evidence and recent critical commentaries. We present the course readings, writing assignments, examinations, and student evaluations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1207/s15328023top3202_8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198095749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1207_s15328023top3202_8</sage_id><sourcerecordid>883744541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f5d9215d9e06f2afc6cae9391b74592df244691f77df9831617ba9066ec732e53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMNZ-AU-i59jZ2b9zlGKrUPCi52Wb7IqlNXE3OfTbmxAPgvQyDx6_9wYeYzccHjiCWWSuBFpA0TWtQEBnz1gxeuVonrMCgGyp0YpLdpXzDgCkVLJg85Wv-n13vF01qT9cs4vo9znMf3XG3ldPb8vncvO6flk-bsoKlenKqGpCPpwAOqKPla58IEF8a6QirCNKqYlHY-pIVnDNzdYTaB0qIzAoMWN3U2-bmu8-5M7tmj59DS8dJwukjKQBuj8JWSsFCcXlQOFEVanJOYXo2vR58OnoOLhxG_d_myG0mELZf4Q_tacTPx31YuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1884393514</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Faculty Forum</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Dunn, Dana S ; Dougherty, Sarah B ; Uskul, Ayse K ; Eaton, Judy ; Schwebel, David C ; Tzanetos, Douglas B ; Neumann, Sandra L ; McElroy, Heather K ; Prentice-Dunn, Steven ; Duer, Joan D ; Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Dana S ; Dougherty, Sarah B ; Uskul, Ayse K ; Eaton, Judy ; Schwebel, David C ; Tzanetos, Douglas B ; Neumann, Sandra L ; McElroy, Heather K ; Prentice-Dunn, Steven ; Duer, Joan D ; Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><description>Freud's scientific legacy is controversial within contemporary psychology. There are pedagogical benefits to this controversy, however, because instructors can use it to encourage students to critically evaluate Freud's contributions. We describe a course in which students discuss Freud's works from different points in his career, along with available empirical evidence and recent critical commentaries. We present the course readings, writing assignments, examinations, and student evaluations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-6283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top3202_8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Teaching of psychology, 2005-04, Vol.32 (2), p.114-128</ispartof><rights>2005 Society for the Teaching of Psychology</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f5d9215d9e06f2afc6cae9391b74592df244691f77df9831617ba9066ec732e53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f5d9215d9e06f2afc6cae9391b74592df244691f77df9831617ba9066ec732e53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15328023top3202_8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15328023top3202_8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27902,27903,43599,43600</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Dana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uskul, Ayse K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebel, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzanetos, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Heather K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentice-Dunn, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duer, Joan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><title>Faculty Forum</title><title>Teaching of psychology</title><description>Freud's scientific legacy is controversial within contemporary psychology. There are pedagogical benefits to this controversy, however, because instructors can use it to encourage students to critically evaluate Freud's contributions. We describe a course in which students discuss Freud's works from different points in his career, along with available empirical evidence and recent critical commentaries. We present the course readings, writing assignments, examinations, and student evaluations.</description><issn>0098-6283</issn><issn>1532-8023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMNZ-AU-i59jZ2b9zlGKrUPCi52Wb7IqlNXE3OfTbmxAPgvQyDx6_9wYeYzccHjiCWWSuBFpA0TWtQEBnz1gxeuVonrMCgGyp0YpLdpXzDgCkVLJg85Wv-n13vF01qT9cs4vo9znMf3XG3ldPb8vncvO6flk-bsoKlenKqGpCPpwAOqKPla58IEF8a6QirCNKqYlHY-pIVnDNzdYTaB0qIzAoMWN3U2-bmu8-5M7tmj59DS8dJwukjKQBuj8JWSsFCcXlQOFEVanJOYXo2vR58OnoOLhxG_d_myG0mELZf4Q_tacTPx31YuQ</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>Dunn, Dana S</creator><creator>Dougherty, Sarah B</creator><creator>Uskul, Ayse K</creator><creator>Eaton, Judy</creator><creator>Schwebel, David C</creator><creator>Tzanetos, Douglas B</creator><creator>Neumann, Sandra L</creator><creator>McElroy, Heather K</creator><creator>Prentice-Dunn, Steven</creator><creator>Duer, Joan D</creator><creator>Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>Faculty Forum</title><author>Dunn, Dana S ; Dougherty, Sarah B ; Uskul, Ayse K ; Eaton, Judy ; Schwebel, David C ; Tzanetos, Douglas B ; Neumann, Sandra L ; McElroy, Heather K ; Prentice-Dunn, Steven ; Duer, Joan D ; Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-f5d9215d9e06f2afc6cae9391b74592df244691f77df9831617ba9066ec732e53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Dana S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, Sarah B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uskul, Ayse K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebel, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzanetos, Douglas B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElroy, Heather K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prentice-Dunn, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duer, Joan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Teaching of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, Dana S</au><au>Dougherty, Sarah B</au><au>Uskul, Ayse K</au><au>Eaton, Judy</au><au>Schwebel, David C</au><au>Tzanetos, Douglas B</au><au>Neumann, Sandra L</au><au>McElroy, Heather K</au><au>Prentice-Dunn, Steven</au><au>Duer, Joan D</au><au>Hays-Thomas, Rosemary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Faculty Forum</atitle><jtitle>Teaching of psychology</jtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>114-128</pages><issn>0098-6283</issn><eissn>1532-8023</eissn><abstract>Freud's scientific legacy is controversial within contemporary psychology. There are pedagogical benefits to this controversy, however, because instructors can use it to encourage students to critically evaluate Freud's contributions. We describe a course in which students discuss Freud's works from different points in his career, along with available empirical evidence and recent critical commentaries. We present the course readings, writing assignments, examinations, and student evaluations.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1207/s15328023top3202_8</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-6283 |
ispartof | Teaching of psychology, 2005-04, Vol.32 (2), p.114-128 |
issn | 0098-6283 1532-8023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198095749 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Education Source |
title | Faculty Forum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Faculty%20Forum&rft.jtitle=Teaching%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Dunn,%20Dana%20S&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=114-128&rft.issn=0098-6283&rft.eissn=1532-8023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/s15328023top3202_8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E883744541%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1884393514&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1207_s15328023top3202_8&rfr_iscdi=true |