HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS
ABSTRACT We develop and test ways for modifying the Silver‐Meal and part‐period‐balancing lot‐sizing procedures to include the costs of schedule changes in response to changes in demand estimates. These modifications tend to reduce MRP system nervousness. We compare the performance of these approach...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Decision sciences 1983-04, Vol.14 (2), p.156-169 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 169 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 156 |
| container_title | Decision sciences |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Kropp, Dean H. Carlson, Robert C. Jucker, James V. |
| description | ABSTRACT
We develop and test ways for modifying the Silver‐Meal and part‐period‐balancing lot‐sizing procedures to include the costs of schedule changes in response to changes in demand estimates. These modifications tend to reduce MRP system nervousness. We compare the performance of these approaches with the modified Wagner‐Whitin algorithm, which we have shown is optimal for static conditions. We find that the modified SilverMeal approach is only slightly more costly than the modified Wagner‐Whitin technique and that the modified part‐period‐balancing approach performs both poorly and erratically. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198083205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1059193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2996-1e8d0e238338a23a70170aceb88d5735e29ae1b0577a2bbecfaf70f7d0ee3eec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkFFvgjAQx5tlS-bcvgPxHdZSS2EvC8EKLCgGcGa8NAVLInPTgWb67VeC8X33csnd_f539wdghKCBVDzXBiJjqBMHEQM5NjYOBYSIUuN0AwbX1i0YqCrSKUbkHjy0bQ0htMgYD4AfsGUSplnoaVGc6WmYh3NfcxeLJHa9gKXaNE60CXOjrrwKs0CbJQst_UgzNtPmLHmPl-mcpekjuKvEtpVPlzwEyynLvECPYj_03EgvTcexdCTtNZQmtjG2hYkFVcdCUcrCtteEYiJNR0hUQEKpMItClpWoKKyogiSWssRDMOp1983u5yjbA693x-ZbreTqf2hjExI19NIPlc2ubRtZ8X2z-RLNmSPIO994zTtzeGdOx2F-8Y2fFPzaw7-brTz_g-QT5oWIWEpB7xU27UGergqi-eQWxZTw1dznef6Gp3mCOcV_491-Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198083205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kropp, Dean H. ; Carlson, Robert C. ; Jucker, James V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kropp, Dean H. ; Carlson, Robert C. ; Jucker, James V.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
We develop and test ways for modifying the Silver‐Meal and part‐period‐balancing lot‐sizing procedures to include the costs of schedule changes in response to changes in demand estimates. These modifications tend to reduce MRP system nervousness. We compare the performance of these approaches with the modified Wagner‐Whitin algorithm, which we have shown is optimal for static conditions. We find that the modified SilverMeal approach is only slightly more costly than the modified Wagner‐Whitin technique and that the modified part‐period‐balancing approach performs both poorly and erratically.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-7315</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DESCDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Heuristic ; Management science ; Material Requirements Planning ; Order quantity ; Production scheduling ; Scheduling ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Decision sciences, 1983-04, Vol.14 (2), p.156-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute for Decision Sciences Apr 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2996-1e8d0e238338a23a70170aceb88d5735e29ae1b0577a2bbecfaf70f7d0ee3eec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2996-1e8d0e238338a23a70170aceb88d5735e29ae1b0577a2bbecfaf70f7d0ee3eec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kropp, Dean H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jucker, James V.</creatorcontrib><title>HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS</title><title>Decision sciences</title><description>ABSTRACT
We develop and test ways for modifying the Silver‐Meal and part‐period‐balancing lot‐sizing procedures to include the costs of schedule changes in response to changes in demand estimates. These modifications tend to reduce MRP system nervousness. We compare the performance of these approaches with the modified Wagner‐Whitin algorithm, which we have shown is optimal for static conditions. We find that the modified SilverMeal approach is only slightly more costly than the modified Wagner‐Whitin technique and that the modified part‐period‐balancing approach performs both poorly and erratically.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Heuristic</subject><subject>Management science</subject><subject>Material Requirements Planning</subject><subject>Order quantity</subject><subject>Production scheduling</subject><subject>Scheduling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0011-7315</issn><issn>1540-5915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkFFvgjAQx5tlS-bcvgPxHdZSS2EvC8EKLCgGcGa8NAVLInPTgWb67VeC8X33csnd_f539wdghKCBVDzXBiJjqBMHEQM5NjYOBYSIUuN0AwbX1i0YqCrSKUbkHjy0bQ0htMgYD4AfsGUSplnoaVGc6WmYh3NfcxeLJHa9gKXaNE60CXOjrrwKs0CbJQst_UgzNtPmLHmPl-mcpekjuKvEtpVPlzwEyynLvECPYj_03EgvTcexdCTtNZQmtjG2hYkFVcdCUcrCtteEYiJNR0hUQEKpMItClpWoKKyogiSWssRDMOp1983u5yjbA693x-ZbreTqf2hjExI19NIPlc2ubRtZ8X2z-RLNmSPIO994zTtzeGdOx2F-8Y2fFPzaw7-brTz_g-QT5oWIWEpB7xU27UGergqi-eQWxZTw1dznef6Gp3mCOcV_491-Yg</recordid><startdate>198304</startdate><enddate>198304</enddate><creator>Kropp, Dean H.</creator><creator>Carlson, Robert C.</creator><creator>Jucker, James V.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Institute for Decision Sciences</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198304</creationdate><title>HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS</title><author>Kropp, Dean H. ; Carlson, Robert C. ; Jucker, James V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2996-1e8d0e238338a23a70170aceb88d5735e29ae1b0577a2bbecfaf70f7d0ee3eec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Heuristic</topic><topic>Management science</topic><topic>Material Requirements Planning</topic><topic>Order quantity</topic><topic>Production scheduling</topic><topic>Scheduling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kropp, Dean H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlson, Robert C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jucker, James V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kropp, Dean H.</au><au>Carlson, Robert C.</au><au>Jucker, James V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS</atitle><jtitle>Decision sciences</jtitle><date>1983-04</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>156-169</pages><issn>0011-7315</issn><eissn>1540-5915</eissn><coden>DESCDQ</coden><abstract>ABSTRACT
We develop and test ways for modifying the Silver‐Meal and part‐period‐balancing lot‐sizing procedures to include the costs of schedule changes in response to changes in demand estimates. These modifications tend to reduce MRP system nervousness. We compare the performance of these approaches with the modified Wagner‐Whitin algorithm, which we have shown is optimal for static conditions. We find that the modified SilverMeal approach is only slightly more costly than the modified Wagner‐Whitin technique and that the modified part‐period‐balancing approach performs both poorly and erratically.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-7315 |
| ispartof | Decision sciences, 1983-04, Vol.14 (2), p.156-169 |
| issn | 0011-7315 1540-5915 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198083205 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Algorithms Heuristic Management science Material Requirements Planning Order quantity Production scheduling Scheduling Studies |
| title | HEURISTIC LOT-SIZING APPROACHES FOR DEALING WITH MRP SYSTEM NERVOUSNESS |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HEURISTIC%20LOT-SIZING%20APPROACHES%20FOR%20DEALING%20WITH%20MRP%20SYSTEM%20NERVOUSNESS&rft.jtitle=Decision%20sciences&rft.au=Kropp,%20Dean%20H.&rft.date=1983-04&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=156-169&rft.issn=0011-7315&rft.eissn=1540-5915&rft.coden=DESCDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00177.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1059193%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198083205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |