Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions
An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 1991-04, Vol.10 (4), p.303-310 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 310 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 303 |
| container_title | Journal of business ethics |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Shepard, Jon M. Hartenian, Linda S. |
| description | An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making situations. The dependent variable - ethical orientation toward work-related decisions - is measured through student responses to questions following four work-related vignettes. Possible responses to each vignette are structured to permit categorization of respondents into two broad orientations: egoistic and ethical. Independent variables are academic major, "ethics in business orientation," gender, and religiosity. Generally, students tended to choose an ethical orientation over an egoistic orientation in each vignette. Business majors were generally no less likely to choose an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than nonbusiness majors. Respondents characterized by "moral unity" (belief in the consistency between general ethical principles and work-related ethical standards) were more likely to have an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than those subscribing to the "amoral theory of business." Females showed a consistent tendency to be more ethically oriented toward work-related decisions than males. Finally, respondents high on religiosity tended to be more ethically oriented. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00382970 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_198073970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25058234</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25058234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-1ee687b8bee0fe7804a4e5014da2bf3933b3f17a14c3509cf0367e254a521153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3dh0ZsQnc1-JUetrQqFglY9hk0y0a012-5ulf57Uyp6ci5zmGdm4CXkmMEFA9CX1yMAnqW5hh3SY1LzBFSud0kPmNKJkELsk4MQZtCVZKJHnoevzoZoK2ramg7jm63MnE68xTaaaF0bqGvoU2s_0Qcb1_QxrupuFmh0X8bX9MX59-QB5yZiTW-wsmGzdEj2GjMPePTT-2Q6Gk4Hd8l4cns_uBonFQcVE4aoMl1mJSI0qDMQRqAEJmqTlg3POS95w7RhouIS8qoBrjSmUhiZMiZ5n5xuzy68W64wxGLmVr7tPhYsz0DzLogOnf2LOKRKSqV0p863qvIuBI9NsfD2w_h1waDYZFv8Zdvhky2ehej8r0wlyCzlgn8Dm9pz9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1302655667</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shepard, Jon M. ; Hartenian, Linda S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Jon M. ; Hartenian, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><description>An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making situations. The dependent variable - ethical orientation toward work-related decisions - is measured through student responses to questions following four work-related vignettes. Possible responses to each vignette are structured to permit categorization of respondents into two broad orientations: egoistic and ethical. Independent variables are academic major, "ethics in business orientation," gender, and religiosity. Generally, students tended to choose an ethical orientation over an egoistic orientation in each vignette. Business majors were generally no less likely to choose an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than nonbusiness majors. Respondents characterized by "moral unity" (belief in the consistency between general ethical principles and work-related ethical standards) were more likely to have an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than those subscribing to the "amoral theory of business." Females showed a consistent tendency to be more ethically oriented toward work-related decisions than males. Finally, respondents high on religiosity tended to be more ethically oriented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00382970</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBUEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Amorality ; Business ethics ; Consciousness ; Decision making ; Deontological ethics ; Ethical behavior ; Ethical instruction ; Ethics ; Morality ; Political ethics ; Religiosity ; Religious ethics ; Social ethics ; Statistical analysis ; Students ; Studies ; University students ; Virtue ethics</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 1991-04, Vol.10 (4), p.303-310</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Apr 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-1ee687b8bee0fe7804a4e5014da2bf3933b3f17a14c3509cf0367e254a521153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-1ee687b8bee0fe7804a4e5014da2bf3933b3f17a14c3509cf0367e254a521153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25058234$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25058234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27866,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Jon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartenian, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><title>Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><description>An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making situations. The dependent variable - ethical orientation toward work-related decisions - is measured through student responses to questions following four work-related vignettes. Possible responses to each vignette are structured to permit categorization of respondents into two broad orientations: egoistic and ethical. Independent variables are academic major, "ethics in business orientation," gender, and religiosity. Generally, students tended to choose an ethical orientation over an egoistic orientation in each vignette. Business majors were generally no less likely to choose an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than nonbusiness majors. Respondents characterized by "moral unity" (belief in the consistency between general ethical principles and work-related ethical standards) were more likely to have an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than those subscribing to the "amoral theory of business." Females showed a consistent tendency to be more ethically oriented toward work-related decisions than males. Finally, respondents high on religiosity tended to be more ethically oriented.</description><subject>Amorality</subject><subject>Business ethics</subject><subject>Consciousness</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deontological ethics</subject><subject>Ethical behavior</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Religiosity</subject><subject>Religious ethics</subject><subject>Social ethics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>University students</subject><subject>Virtue ethics</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~PQ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3dh0ZsQnc1-JUetrQqFglY9hk0y0a012-5ulf57Uyp6ci5zmGdm4CXkmMEFA9CX1yMAnqW5hh3SY1LzBFSud0kPmNKJkELsk4MQZtCVZKJHnoevzoZoK2ramg7jm63MnE68xTaaaF0bqGvoU2s_0Qcb1_QxrupuFmh0X8bX9MX59-QB5yZiTW-wsmGzdEj2GjMPePTT-2Q6Gk4Hd8l4cns_uBonFQcVE4aoMl1mJSI0qDMQRqAEJmqTlg3POS95w7RhouIS8qoBrjSmUhiZMiZ5n5xuzy68W64wxGLmVr7tPhYsz0DzLogOnf2LOKRKSqV0p863qvIuBI9NsfD2w_h1waDYZFv8Zdvhky2ehej8r0wlyCzlgn8Dm9pz9Q</recordid><startdate>19910401</startdate><enddate>19910401</enddate><creator>Shepard, Jon M.</creator><creator>Hartenian, Linda S.</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>D. Reidel Pub. Co</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>EGZRM</scope><scope>HGTKA</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>IBDFT</scope><scope>JVXPA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OX</scope><scope>~OY</scope><scope>~OZ</scope><scope>~P.</scope><scope>~P0</scope><scope>~P1</scope><scope>~PQ</scope><scope>~P~</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910401</creationdate><title>Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions</title><author>Shepard, Jon M. ; Hartenian, Linda S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-1ee687b8bee0fe7804a4e5014da2bf3933b3f17a14c3509cf0367e254a521153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Amorality</topic><topic>Business ethics</topic><topic>Consciousness</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deontological ethics</topic><topic>Ethical behavior</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Religiosity</topic><topic>Religious ethics</topic><topic>Social ethics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>University students</topic><topic>Virtue ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Jon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartenian, Linda S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.1</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 18</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 27</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 38</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.4</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (subscription only)</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase post Aug/2005)</collection><collection>PAO Collection 3 (purchase pre Aug/2005+extra titles)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.3</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 4</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 3.2</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Access via Art, Design & Architecture Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shepard, Jon M.</au><au>Hartenian, Linda S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><date>1991-04-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>303-310</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><coden>JBUEDJ</coden><abstract>An onslaught of ethically questionable actions by top government, business, and religious leaders during the 1980s has brought the issue of ethics in decision making to the forefront of public consciousness. This study examines the ethical orientation of university students in four decision-making situations. The dependent variable - ethical orientation toward work-related decisions - is measured through student responses to questions following four work-related vignettes. Possible responses to each vignette are structured to permit categorization of respondents into two broad orientations: egoistic and ethical. Independent variables are academic major, "ethics in business orientation," gender, and religiosity. Generally, students tended to choose an ethical orientation over an egoistic orientation in each vignette. Business majors were generally no less likely to choose an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than nonbusiness majors. Respondents characterized by "moral unity" (belief in the consistency between general ethical principles and work-related ethical standards) were more likely to have an ethical orientation toward work-related decisions than those subscribing to the "amoral theory of business." Females showed a consistent tendency to be more ethically oriented toward work-related decisions than males. Finally, respondents high on religiosity tended to be more ethically oriented.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00382970</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
| ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 1991-04, Vol.10 (4), p.303-310 |
| issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_198073970 |
| source | PAIS Index; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Amorality Business ethics Consciousness Decision making Deontological ethics Ethical behavior Ethical instruction Ethics Morality Political ethics Religiosity Religious ethics Social ethics Statistical analysis Students Studies University students Virtue ethics |
| title | Egoistic and Ethical Orientations of University Students toward Work-Related Decisions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A55%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Egoistic%20and%20Ethical%20Orientations%20of%20University%20Students%20toward%20Work-Related%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Shepard,%20Jon%20M.&rft.date=1991-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=303-310&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft.coden=JBUEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00382970&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25058234%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1302655667&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25058234&rfr_iscdi=true |