Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition
This paper considers porphyry copper-deposition models examined from the petrological and geochemical points of view. The principal differences between the models include the time and mechanism of the sulfide-ore deposition and composition of the ore-bearing fluid. The copper-rich fluid inclusions c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Moscow University geology bulletin 2017-09, Vol.72 (5), p.332-338 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 338 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 332 |
| container_title | Moscow University geology bulletin |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Plechov, P. Yu Nekrylov, N. A. Blundy, J. |
| description | This paper considers porphyry copper-deposition models examined from the petrological and geochemical points of view. The principal differences between the models include the time and mechanism of the sulfide-ore deposition and composition of the ore-bearing fluid. The copper-rich fluid inclusions contain an insufficient amount of sulfur to form sulfide ores; an independent sulfur source is necessary to form porphyry copper deposits. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S014587521705009X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1979758861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1979758861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f271fc56ffab6844d9c26c24fa756ecfa56f1ea61507c4cb8d3203b4a10f65f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wF3AdTRv8jVZSqlWKLhQwd2QySR1SmcSkynSf-8MdSGIq7c499wHF6FroLcMKLt7ocBFqUQBigpK9fsJmoFmnJScyVM0mzCZ-Dm6yHlLqRCa0xlaLkIXTWpz6HHwOPSOYNM3ePgKJA9m43AXGrfLE4whxY9DOmAbYnQJNy6G3A5t6C_RmTe77K5-7hy9PSxfFyuyfn58WtyviWUgB-ILBd4K6b2pZcl5o20hbcG9UUI6682IwBkJgirLbV02rKCs5gaol8JrNkc3x96Ywufe5aHahn3qx5cVaKWVKEsJYwqOKZtCzsn5Kqa2M-lQAa2mtao_a41OcXTymO03Lv1q_lf6BrI0bBU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1979758861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Plechov, P. Yu ; Nekrylov, N. A. ; Blundy, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Plechov, P. Yu ; Nekrylov, N. A. ; Blundy, J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper considers porphyry copper-deposition models examined from the petrological and geochemical points of view. The principal differences between the models include the time and mechanism of the sulfide-ore deposition and composition of the ore-bearing fluid. The copper-rich fluid inclusions contain an insufficient amount of sulfur to form sulfide ores; an independent sulfur source is necessary to form porphyry copper deposits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-8752</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8436</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S014587521705009X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Composition ; Copper ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geochemistry ; Geology ; Ores ; Sulfides ; Sulfur ; Sulphides ; Sulphur</subject><ispartof>Moscow University geology bulletin, 2017-09, Vol.72 (5), p.332-338</ispartof><rights>Allerton Press, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f271fc56ffab6844d9c26c24fa756ecfa56f1ea61507c4cb8d3203b4a10f65f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f271fc56ffab6844d9c26c24fa756ecfa56f1ea61507c4cb8d3203b4a10f65f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S014587521705009X$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S014587521705009X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plechov, P. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekrylov, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blundy, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition</title><title>Moscow University geology bulletin</title><addtitle>Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull</addtitle><description>This paper considers porphyry copper-deposition models examined from the petrological and geochemical points of view. The principal differences between the models include the time and mechanism of the sulfide-ore deposition and composition of the ore-bearing fluid. The copper-rich fluid inclusions contain an insufficient amount of sulfur to form sulfide ores; an independent sulfur source is necessary to form porphyry copper deposits.</description><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Ores</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><issn>0145-8752</issn><issn>1934-8436</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEURYMoWKs_wF3AdTRv8jVZSqlWKLhQwd2QySR1SmcSkynSf-8MdSGIq7c499wHF6FroLcMKLt7ocBFqUQBigpK9fsJmoFmnJScyVM0mzCZ-Dm6yHlLqRCa0xlaLkIXTWpz6HHwOPSOYNM3ePgKJA9m43AXGrfLE4whxY9DOmAbYnQJNy6G3A5t6C_RmTe77K5-7hy9PSxfFyuyfn58WtyviWUgB-ILBd4K6b2pZcl5o20hbcG9UUI6682IwBkJgirLbV02rKCs5gaol8JrNkc3x96Ywufe5aHahn3qx5cVaKWVKEsJYwqOKZtCzsn5Kqa2M-lQAa2mtao_a41OcXTymO03Lv1q_lf6BrI0bBU</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Plechov, P. Yu</creator><creator>Nekrylov, N. A.</creator><creator>Blundy, J.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition</title><author>Plechov, P. Yu ; Nekrylov, N. A. ; Blundy, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-f271fc56ffab6844d9c26c24fa756ecfa56f1ea61507c4cb8d3203b4a10f65f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Ores</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plechov, P. Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekrylov, N. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blundy, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Moscow University geology bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plechov, P. Yu</au><au>Nekrylov, N. A.</au><au>Blundy, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition</atitle><jtitle>Moscow University geology bulletin</jtitle><stitle>Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull</stitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>332-338</pages><issn>0145-8752</issn><eissn>1934-8436</eissn><abstract>This paper considers porphyry copper-deposition models examined from the petrological and geochemical points of view. The principal differences between the models include the time and mechanism of the sulfide-ore deposition and composition of the ore-bearing fluid. The copper-rich fluid inclusions contain an insufficient amount of sulfur to form sulfide ores; an independent sulfur source is necessary to form porphyry copper deposits.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S014587521705009X</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0145-8752 |
| ispartof | Moscow University geology bulletin, 2017-09, Vol.72 (5), p.332-338 |
| issn | 0145-8752 1934-8436 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1979758861 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Composition Copper Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geochemistry Geology Ores Sulfides Sulfur Sulphides Sulphur |
| title | Comparison of one- and two-stage models of porphyry copper deposition |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A48%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20one-%20and%20two-stage%20models%20of%20porphyry%20copper%20deposition&rft.jtitle=Moscow%20University%20geology%20bulletin&rft.au=Plechov,%20P.%20Yu&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=332-338&rft.issn=0145-8752&rft.eissn=1934-8436&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S014587521705009X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1979758861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1979758861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |