Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls
Fundamental economic and societal transformations are necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. One broad policy approach that addresses the close relationship between conservation and climate change mitigation is based on correcting a market failure, that is, to establish a price signal for carb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change 2018-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e486-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e486 |
container_title | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Essl, Franz Erb, Karl‐Heinz Glatzel, Stephan Pauchard, Aníbal |
description | Fundamental economic and societal transformations are necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. One broad policy approach that addresses the close relationship between conservation and climate change mitigation is based on correcting a market failure, that is, to establish a price signal for carbon, or more generally, greenhouse gas emissions. While many synergies between climate policy instruments and biodiversity conservation do exist, current policies often fall short of harvesting this potential. Here, we present six key challenges: (1) establishing a strong price signal for greenhouse gas emissions from all emission sources (including land‐use and the terrestrial biosphere) that takes into account long‐term societal and ecological costs; (2) expand carbon market instruments to cover the full range of greenhouse gases; (3) develop an ambitious, yet accountable architecture for rising emission prices; (4) develop guidelines and ensure enforcement to avoid greenhouse gas leakage; (5) improve greenhouse gas emission measurements from land‐use and the biosphere; and (6) integrate emission reduction as a priority into relevant policies. Substantial synergies, but also trade‐offs between climate policy and conservation exist, and we identify key risks and challenges. We call for (1) evidence‐based evaluations of policy options; (2) avoiding too narrow framings of contested issues such as forest plantations, biofuels, or land‐use decisions that exclude (or downplay) indirect effects (e.g., indirect land‐use changes or creating carbon debts); and (3) strengthening integrated analyzes beyond sector policy goals. We conclude that avoiding bio‐perverse impacts of climate policies on biodiversity will be crucial for the success of global climate change mitigation. WIREs Clim Change 2018, 9:e486. doi: 10.1002/wcc.486
This article is categorized under:
Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies
Degraded mires are an important source of global CO2 emissions, which have received insufficient recognition by climate policy. Recently, several carbon market initiatives (such as peatland credits) have been developed to tackle this issue by developing and testing instruments which account for and monetarize the carbon kept stored in organic soils by re‐wetting of mires. Dammed drainage ditch in the restored bog ‘Leckermoor’ in Austria, ©F. Essl. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wcc.486 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1979455838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1979455838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2896-5aa4120ae7b13cfaa8cfbe96c140d78ae1d1de419ea90c1b1087a534af55462f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGrxLwQ8eLBbk93sJvEmi19Q8KJ4DNnsbJu6zdZk27L_3tSKN-fyDswzM_AgdEnJjBKS3u6NmTFRnKAR5TlPOJfy9K8X5BxNQliRWFkqhGAjtCxbu9Y9YLPUbgFTbLSvOofX2n9Cj60Lvd-uwfVhirWrcWW72u7AB9sPd7jpzDZYt8BxIwwO_MJC-OH0rrP1YbKxfaPbNlygs5gBJr85Ru-PD2_lczJ_fXop7-eJSYUsklxrRlOigVc0M43WwjQVyMJQRmouNNCa1sCoBC2JoRUlgus8Y7rJc1akTTZGV8e7G999bSH0atVtvYsvFZVcsjwXmYjU9ZEyvgvBQ6M2Pnrwg6JEHUyqaFJFk5G8OZJ728LwH6Y-yvJAfwN7mnWT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1979455838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Essl, Franz ; Erb, Karl‐Heinz ; Glatzel, Stephan ; Pauchard, Aníbal</creator><creatorcontrib>Essl, Franz ; Erb, Karl‐Heinz ; Glatzel, Stephan ; Pauchard, Aníbal</creatorcontrib><description>Fundamental economic and societal transformations are necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. One broad policy approach that addresses the close relationship between conservation and climate change mitigation is based on correcting a market failure, that is, to establish a price signal for carbon, or more generally, greenhouse gas emissions. While many synergies between climate policy instruments and biodiversity conservation do exist, current policies often fall short of harvesting this potential. Here, we present six key challenges: (1) establishing a strong price signal for greenhouse gas emissions from all emission sources (including land‐use and the terrestrial biosphere) that takes into account long‐term societal and ecological costs; (2) expand carbon market instruments to cover the full range of greenhouse gases; (3) develop an ambitious, yet accountable architecture for rising emission prices; (4) develop guidelines and ensure enforcement to avoid greenhouse gas leakage; (5) improve greenhouse gas emission measurements from land‐use and the biosphere; and (6) integrate emission reduction as a priority into relevant policies. Substantial synergies, but also trade‐offs between climate policy and conservation exist, and we identify key risks and challenges. We call for (1) evidence‐based evaluations of policy options; (2) avoiding too narrow framings of contested issues such as forest plantations, biofuels, or land‐use decisions that exclude (or downplay) indirect effects (e.g., indirect land‐use changes or creating carbon debts); and (3) strengthening integrated analyzes beyond sector policy goals. We conclude that avoiding bio‐perverse impacts of climate policies on biodiversity will be crucial for the success of global climate change mitigation. WIREs Clim Change 2018, 9:e486. doi: 10.1002/wcc.486
This article is categorized under:
Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies
Degraded mires are an important source of global CO2 emissions, which have received insufficient recognition by climate policy. Recently, several carbon market initiatives (such as peatland credits) have been developed to tackle this issue by developing and testing instruments which account for and monetarize the carbon kept stored in organic soils by re‐wetting of mires. Dammed drainage ditch in the restored bog ‘Leckermoor’ in Austria, ©F. Essl.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-7780</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-7799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wcc.486</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Biodiversity ; Biofuels ; Biosphere ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Climate policy ; Conservation ; Ecology ; Emission measurements ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Environmental policy ; Global climate ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Harvesting ; Land ; Land use ; Markets ; Plantations ; Policies ; Prices ; Terrestrial environments ; Trade policy ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2018-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e486-n/a</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2896-5aa4120ae7b13cfaa8cfbe96c140d78ae1d1de419ea90c1b1087a534af55462f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2896-5aa4120ae7b13cfaa8cfbe96c140d78ae1d1de419ea90c1b1087a534af55462f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fwcc.486$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fwcc.486$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Essl, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erb, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatzel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauchard, Aníbal</creatorcontrib><title>Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls</title><title>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</title><description>Fundamental economic and societal transformations are necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. One broad policy approach that addresses the close relationship between conservation and climate change mitigation is based on correcting a market failure, that is, to establish a price signal for carbon, or more generally, greenhouse gas emissions. While many synergies between climate policy instruments and biodiversity conservation do exist, current policies often fall short of harvesting this potential. Here, we present six key challenges: (1) establishing a strong price signal for greenhouse gas emissions from all emission sources (including land‐use and the terrestrial biosphere) that takes into account long‐term societal and ecological costs; (2) expand carbon market instruments to cover the full range of greenhouse gases; (3) develop an ambitious, yet accountable architecture for rising emission prices; (4) develop guidelines and ensure enforcement to avoid greenhouse gas leakage; (5) improve greenhouse gas emission measurements from land‐use and the biosphere; and (6) integrate emission reduction as a priority into relevant policies. Substantial synergies, but also trade‐offs between climate policy and conservation exist, and we identify key risks and challenges. We call for (1) evidence‐based evaluations of policy options; (2) avoiding too narrow framings of contested issues such as forest plantations, biofuels, or land‐use decisions that exclude (or downplay) indirect effects (e.g., indirect land‐use changes or creating carbon debts); and (3) strengthening integrated analyzes beyond sector policy goals. We conclude that avoiding bio‐perverse impacts of climate policies on biodiversity will be crucial for the success of global climate change mitigation. WIREs Clim Change 2018, 9:e486. doi: 10.1002/wcc.486
This article is categorized under:
Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies
Degraded mires are an important source of global CO2 emissions, which have received insufficient recognition by climate policy. Recently, several carbon market initiatives (such as peatland credits) have been developed to tackle this issue by developing and testing instruments which account for and monetarize the carbon kept stored in organic soils by re‐wetting of mires. Dammed drainage ditch in the restored bog ‘Leckermoor’ in Austria, ©F. Essl.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Land</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1757-7780</issn><issn>1757-7799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWGrxLwQ8eLBbk93sJvEmi19Q8KJ4DNnsbJu6zdZk27L_3tSKN-fyDswzM_AgdEnJjBKS3u6NmTFRnKAR5TlPOJfy9K8X5BxNQliRWFkqhGAjtCxbu9Y9YLPUbgFTbLSvOofX2n9Cj60Lvd-uwfVhirWrcWW72u7AB9sPd7jpzDZYt8BxIwwO_MJC-OH0rrP1YbKxfaPbNlygs5gBJr85Ru-PD2_lczJ_fXop7-eJSYUsklxrRlOigVc0M43WwjQVyMJQRmouNNCa1sCoBC2JoRUlgus8Y7rJc1akTTZGV8e7G999bSH0atVtvYsvFZVcsjwXmYjU9ZEyvgvBQ6M2Pnrwg6JEHUyqaFJFk5G8OZJ728LwH6Y-yvJAfwN7mnWT</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Essl, Franz</creator><creator>Erb, Karl‐Heinz</creator><creator>Glatzel, Stephan</creator><creator>Pauchard, Aníbal</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls</title><author>Essl, Franz ; Erb, Karl‐Heinz ; Glatzel, Stephan ; Pauchard, Aníbal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2896-5aa4120ae7b13cfaa8cfbe96c140d78ae1d1de419ea90c1b1087a534af55462f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Land</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Essl, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erb, Karl‐Heinz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glatzel, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauchard, Aníbal</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Essl, Franz</au><au>Erb, Karl‐Heinz</au><au>Glatzel, Stephan</au><au>Pauchard, Aníbal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls</atitle><jtitle>Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e486</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e486-n/a</pages><issn>1757-7780</issn><eissn>1757-7799</eissn><abstract>Fundamental economic and societal transformations are necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. One broad policy approach that addresses the close relationship between conservation and climate change mitigation is based on correcting a market failure, that is, to establish a price signal for carbon, or more generally, greenhouse gas emissions. While many synergies between climate policy instruments and biodiversity conservation do exist, current policies often fall short of harvesting this potential. Here, we present six key challenges: (1) establishing a strong price signal for greenhouse gas emissions from all emission sources (including land‐use and the terrestrial biosphere) that takes into account long‐term societal and ecological costs; (2) expand carbon market instruments to cover the full range of greenhouse gases; (3) develop an ambitious, yet accountable architecture for rising emission prices; (4) develop guidelines and ensure enforcement to avoid greenhouse gas leakage; (5) improve greenhouse gas emission measurements from land‐use and the biosphere; and (6) integrate emission reduction as a priority into relevant policies. Substantial synergies, but also trade‐offs between climate policy and conservation exist, and we identify key risks and challenges. We call for (1) evidence‐based evaluations of policy options; (2) avoiding too narrow framings of contested issues such as forest plantations, biofuels, or land‐use decisions that exclude (or downplay) indirect effects (e.g., indirect land‐use changes or creating carbon debts); and (3) strengthening integrated analyzes beyond sector policy goals. We conclude that avoiding bio‐perverse impacts of climate policies on biodiversity will be crucial for the success of global climate change mitigation. WIREs Clim Change 2018, 9:e486. doi: 10.1002/wcc.486
This article is categorized under:
Climate, Ecology, and Conservation > Conservation Strategies
Degraded mires are an important source of global CO2 emissions, which have received insufficient recognition by climate policy. Recently, several carbon market initiatives (such as peatland credits) have been developed to tackle this issue by developing and testing instruments which account for and monetarize the carbon kept stored in organic soils by re‐wetting of mires. Dammed drainage ditch in the restored bog ‘Leckermoor’ in Austria, ©F. Essl.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/wcc.486</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-7780 |
ispartof | Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Climate change, 2018-01, Vol.9 (1), p.e486-n/a |
issn | 1757-7780 1757-7799 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1979455838 |
source | PAIS Index; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Architecture Biodiversity Biofuels Biosphere Carbon Climate change Climate change mitigation Climate policy Conservation Ecology Emission measurements Emissions Emissions control Environmental policy Global climate Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Harvesting Land Land use Markets Plantations Policies Prices Terrestrial environments Trade policy Wildlife conservation |
title | Climate change, carbon market instruments, and biodiversity: focusing on synergies and avoiding pitfalls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T04%3A56%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Climate%20change,%20carbon%20market%20instruments,%20and%20biodiversity:%20focusing%20on%20synergies%20and%20avoiding%20pitfalls&rft.jtitle=Wiley%20interdisciplinary%20reviews.%20Climate%20change&rft.au=Essl,%20Franz&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e486&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e486-n/a&rft.issn=1757-7780&rft.eissn=1757-7799&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wcc.486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1979455838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1979455838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |