Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions
This paper presents the results of a survey of lead agency representatives from the 74 grantee regions for the HUD Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) from 2010-2011. Previous work suggests that different understandings of sustainability and equity existed across the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cityscape (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2017-01, Vol.19 (3), p.39-62 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 62 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Cityscape (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth |
description | This paper presents the results of a survey of lead agency representatives from the 74 grantee regions for the HUD Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) from 2010-2011. Previous work suggests that different understandings of sustainability and equity existed across the country prior to the grant period, and that the impacts of SCI-RPG in these two areas occurred through indirect as well as direct means (Chapple and Mattiuzzi 2013; Frick et al. 2015). Conducted in July-August 2016 by Virginia Commonwealth University and UC Berkeley, the survey reached 76 percent of grantee regions (56 responses). The results provide insights into how a federal incentive grant for regional sustainability planning helped spur new relationships between regional actors and new approaches to engagement with the public. Respondents clarified how they incorporated social equity into planning processes through new approaches to planning, new data sources, and other means. The survey asked about the SCI-RPG planning process itself and its ongoing impact on regional plans after the completion of the grant period. Consortium leaders reported on how the grant impacted specific policy areas, such as fair housing, as well as its broad impact on capacity and continued investment in the region. Grantees reflected on how SCI-RPG impacted regional collaboration and governance, what the barriers and areas of opportunity are for implementing the regional plans developed under SCI-RPG, and how future grant programs can be improved. The paper uses these results to give a high-level analysis of what worked about SCI-RPG across the nation and what barriers remain to implementation. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1977751227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26328352</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26328352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-7b0b2c2c4e1ac3d1333976cad76b9120c4570feb76091593f91dfc1339fc7d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjl1LwzAYhYsoOKc_QQh4u0I-lqa5lDK1MFD8AO_K2zSdKW2yJamwf2903pxz4Dwczlm2IJLJPAk__8tFjrH4vMyuQhgwpiUti0UG9bQHFQNyPYpfGr3NIYKx0I4aVW6aZmui0QHVvw7RfGvkLHrVO-MsjAkZR2idT42zK7Q5zCYeVwhsh15GsNbY3XV20cMY9M2_L7OPh8179ZRvnx_r6n6bD4TxmIsWt1RRtdYEFOsIY0yKQkEnilYSitWaC9zrVhRYEi5ZL0nXq4TJXomOUbbM7k67e-8Osw6xGdzs08nQECmE4IRSkajbEzWE6Hyz92YCf2xowWjJOGU_coJbyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1977751227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents the results of a survey of lead agency representatives from the 74 grantee regions for the HUD Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) from 2010-2011. Previous work suggests that different understandings of sustainability and equity existed across the country prior to the grant period, and that the impacts of SCI-RPG in these two areas occurred through indirect as well as direct means (Chapple and Mattiuzzi 2013; Frick et al. 2015). Conducted in July-August 2016 by Virginia Commonwealth University and UC Berkeley, the survey reached 76 percent of grantee regions (56 responses). The results provide insights into how a federal incentive grant for regional sustainability planning helped spur new relationships between regional actors and new approaches to engagement with the public. Respondents clarified how they incorporated social equity into planning processes through new approaches to planning, new data sources, and other means. The survey asked about the SCI-RPG planning process itself and its ongoing impact on regional plans after the completion of the grant period. Consortium leaders reported on how the grant impacted specific policy areas, such as fair housing, as well as its broad impact on capacity and continued investment in the region. Grantees reflected on how SCI-RPG impacted regional collaboration and governance, what the barriers and areas of opportunity are for implementing the regional plans developed under SCI-RPG, and how future grant programs can be improved. The paper uses these results to give a high-level analysis of what worked about SCI-RPG across the nation and what barriers remain to implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-007X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)</publisher><subject>Affordable housing ; Area planning & development ; Cities ; Collaboration ; Consortia ; Cooperation ; Economic development ; Education ; Environmental protection ; Equity ; Funding ; Government agencies ; Grants ; Housing ; Leadership ; Nonprofit organizations ; Planning ; Regional planning ; Regions ; Sustainable communities ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable economies ; Symposium: Planning Livable Communities ; Transportation</subject><ispartof>Cityscape (Washington, D.C.), 2017-01, Vol.19 (3), p.39-62</ispartof><rights>Copyright U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26328352$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26328352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions</title><title>Cityscape (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>This paper presents the results of a survey of lead agency representatives from the 74 grantee regions for the HUD Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) from 2010-2011. Previous work suggests that different understandings of sustainability and equity existed across the country prior to the grant period, and that the impacts of SCI-RPG in these two areas occurred through indirect as well as direct means (Chapple and Mattiuzzi 2013; Frick et al. 2015). Conducted in July-August 2016 by Virginia Commonwealth University and UC Berkeley, the survey reached 76 percent of grantee regions (56 responses). The results provide insights into how a federal incentive grant for regional sustainability planning helped spur new relationships between regional actors and new approaches to engagement with the public. Respondents clarified how they incorporated social equity into planning processes through new approaches to planning, new data sources, and other means. The survey asked about the SCI-RPG planning process itself and its ongoing impact on regional plans after the completion of the grant period. Consortium leaders reported on how the grant impacted specific policy areas, such as fair housing, as well as its broad impact on capacity and continued investment in the region. Grantees reflected on how SCI-RPG impacted regional collaboration and governance, what the barriers and areas of opportunity are for implementing the regional plans developed under SCI-RPG, and how future grant programs can be improved. The paper uses these results to give a high-level analysis of what worked about SCI-RPG across the nation and what barriers remain to implementation.</description><subject>Affordable housing</subject><subject>Area planning & development</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Grants</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Regional planning</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Sustainable communities</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable economies</subject><subject>Symposium: Planning Livable Communities</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><issn>1936-007X</issn><issn>1939-1935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNotjl1LwzAYhYsoOKc_QQh4u0I-lqa5lDK1MFD8AO_K2zSdKW2yJamwf2903pxz4Dwczlm2IJLJPAk__8tFjrH4vMyuQhgwpiUti0UG9bQHFQNyPYpfGr3NIYKx0I4aVW6aZmui0QHVvw7RfGvkLHrVO-MsjAkZR2idT42zK7Q5zCYeVwhsh15GsNbY3XV20cMY9M2_L7OPh8179ZRvnx_r6n6bD4TxmIsWt1RRtdYEFOsIY0yKQkEnilYSitWaC9zrVhRYEi5ZL0nXq4TJXomOUbbM7k67e-8Osw6xGdzs08nQECmE4IRSkajbEzWE6Hyz92YCf2xowWjJOGU_coJbyA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</creator><general>Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)</general><general>U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning</title><author>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-7b0b2c2c4e1ac3d1333976cad76b9120c4570feb76091593f91dfc1339fc7d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Affordable housing</topic><topic>Area planning & development</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Grants</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Regional planning</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Sustainable communities</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable economies</topic><topic>Symposium: Planning Livable Communities</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cityscape (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattiuzzi, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions</atitle><jtitle>Cityscape (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>39</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>39-62</pages><issn>1936-007X</issn><eissn>1939-1935</eissn><abstract>This paper presents the results of a survey of lead agency representatives from the 74 grantee regions for the HUD Sustainable Communities Initiative Regional Planning Grant (SCI-RPG) from 2010-2011. Previous work suggests that different understandings of sustainability and equity existed across the country prior to the grant period, and that the impacts of SCI-RPG in these two areas occurred through indirect as well as direct means (Chapple and Mattiuzzi 2013; Frick et al. 2015). Conducted in July-August 2016 by Virginia Commonwealth University and UC Berkeley, the survey reached 76 percent of grantee regions (56 responses). The results provide insights into how a federal incentive grant for regional sustainability planning helped spur new relationships between regional actors and new approaches to engagement with the public. Respondents clarified how they incorporated social equity into planning processes through new approaches to planning, new data sources, and other means. The survey asked about the SCI-RPG planning process itself and its ongoing impact on regional plans after the completion of the grant period. Consortium leaders reported on how the grant impacted specific policy areas, such as fair housing, as well as its broad impact on capacity and continued investment in the region. Grantees reflected on how SCI-RPG impacted regional collaboration and governance, what the barriers and areas of opportunity are for implementing the regional plans developed under SCI-RPG, and how future grant programs can be improved. The paper uses these results to give a high-level analysis of what worked about SCI-RPG across the nation and what barriers remain to implementation.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R) of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)</pub><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1936-007X |
ispartof | Cityscape (Washington, D.C.), 2017-01, Vol.19 (3), p.39-62 |
issn | 1936-007X 1939-1935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1977751227 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Affordable housing Area planning & development Cities Collaboration Consortia Cooperation Economic development Education Environmental protection Equity Funding Government agencies Grants Housing Leadership Nonprofit organizations Planning Regional planning Regions Sustainable communities Sustainable development Sustainable economies Symposium: Planning Livable Communities Transportation |
title | Impacts of the Sustainable Communities Initiative on Regional Collaboration, Equity, and Planning: Results of a Survey of Grantee Regions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A13%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20the%20Sustainable%20Communities%20Initiative%20on%20Regional%20Collaboration,%20Equity,%20and%20Planning:%20Results%20of%20a%20Survey%20of%20Grantee%20Regions&rft.jtitle=Cityscape%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Mattiuzzi,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=39-62&rft.issn=1936-007X&rft.eissn=1939-1935&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26328352%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1977751227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26328352&rfr_iscdi=true |