Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control

It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was des...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest science 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737
Hauptverfasser: NOWAK, John T, HARRINGTON, Timothy B, BERISFORD, C. Wayne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 737
container_issue 5
container_start_page 731
container_title Forest science
container_volume 49
creator NOWAK, John T
HARRINGTON, Timothy B
BERISFORD, C. Wayne
description It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197722315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>454793921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-ggTBy25J06yNdzL8GIjeKHgX0vREM7ukJulEf72dHYg353Dged8DD0JnlEwpEWxmfICYorbgNMwKMeXTktE9NKGCVRkrWbWPJoRQnpWFeDlERzGuCCEVI_kEfT4ol3r9Dgl31gFOtsNrn95wAxtofbcGl7ByDe5817cqWe9w8-XU2up4iZfOtP32LfYGO5uCfwWHDYRkW_s90tvwBl4hjaf2bsDaE3RgVBvhdLeP0fPN9dPiLrt_vF0uru4zzXiVsrqueS2AUyhJzQtSVExTpeth5AYqpRtGVM5EQQ1heVGV2sxrMELMhWoaytkxOh97u-A_-sGTXPk-uOGlpKIs85z9QvMR0sHHGMDILti1Cl-SErl1LP85loWQXA6Oh-DFrl1FrVoTlNM2_qV5PngWhP0AkTuFAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197722315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creator><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><description>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FOSCAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Fertilizers ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; Nitrogen ; Pest control ; Plant growth ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Forest science, 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Oct 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15200890$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><title>Forest science</title><description>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0015-749X</issn><issn>1938-3738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-ggTBy25J06yNdzL8GIjeKHgX0vREM7ukJulEf72dHYg353Dged8DD0JnlEwpEWxmfICYorbgNMwKMeXTktE9NKGCVRkrWbWPJoRQnpWFeDlERzGuCCEVI_kEfT4ol3r9Dgl31gFOtsNrn95wAxtofbcGl7ByDe5817cqWe9w8-XU2up4iZfOtP32LfYGO5uCfwWHDYRkW_s90tvwBl4hjaf2bsDaE3RgVBvhdLeP0fPN9dPiLrt_vF0uru4zzXiVsrqueS2AUyhJzQtSVExTpeth5AYqpRtGVM5EQQ1heVGV2sxrMELMhWoaytkxOh97u-A_-sGTXPk-uOGlpKIs85z9QvMR0sHHGMDILti1Cl-SErl1LP85loWQXA6Oh-DFrl1FrVoTlNM2_qV5PngWhP0AkTuFAw</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>NOWAK, John T</creator><creator>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creator><creator>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creator><general>Society of American Foresters</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><author>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOWAK, John T</au><au>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</au><au>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</atitle><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>731-737</pages><issn>0015-749X</issn><eissn>1938-3738</eissn><coden>FOSCAD</coden><abstract>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Society of American Foresters</pub><doi>10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0015-749X
ispartof Forest science, 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737
issn 0015-749X
1938-3738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197722315
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animal populations
Biological and medical sciences
Butterflies & moths
Fertilizers
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicides
Nitrogen
Pest control
Plant growth
Trees
title Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A24%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nantucket%20pine%20tip%20moth%20development%20and%20population%20dynamics:%20Influence%20of%20nitrogen%20fertilization%20and%20vegetation%20control&rft.jtitle=Forest%20science&rft.au=NOWAK,%20John%20T&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=731-737&rft.issn=0015-749X&rft.eissn=1938-3738&rft.coden=FOSCAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E454793921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197722315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true