Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control
It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was des...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest science 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 737 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Forest science |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | NOWAK, John T HARRINGTON, Timothy B BERISFORD, C. Wayne |
description | It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197722315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>454793921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-ggTBy25J06yNdzL8GIjeKHgX0vREM7ukJulEf72dHYg353Dged8DD0JnlEwpEWxmfICYorbgNMwKMeXTktE9NKGCVRkrWbWPJoRQnpWFeDlERzGuCCEVI_kEfT4ol3r9Dgl31gFOtsNrn95wAxtofbcGl7ByDe5817cqWe9w8-XU2up4iZfOtP32LfYGO5uCfwWHDYRkW_s90tvwBl4hjaf2bsDaE3RgVBvhdLeP0fPN9dPiLrt_vF0uru4zzXiVsrqueS2AUyhJzQtSVExTpeth5AYqpRtGVM5EQQ1heVGV2sxrMELMhWoaytkxOh97u-A_-sGTXPk-uOGlpKIs85z9QvMR0sHHGMDILti1Cl-SErl1LP85loWQXA6Oh-DFrl1FrVoTlNM2_qV5PngWhP0AkTuFAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197722315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creator><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><description>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-749X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FOSCAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: Society of American Foresters</publisher><subject>Animal populations ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butterflies & moths ; Fertilizers ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; Nitrogen ; Pest control ; Plant growth ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Forest science, 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Oct 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15200890$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><title>Forest science</title><description>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</description><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0015-749X</issn><issn>1938-3738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAUhoMoOD_-ggTBy25J06yNdzL8GIjeKHgX0vREM7ukJulEf72dHYg353Dged8DD0JnlEwpEWxmfICYorbgNMwKMeXTktE9NKGCVRkrWbWPJoRQnpWFeDlERzGuCCEVI_kEfT4ol3r9Dgl31gFOtsNrn95wAxtofbcGl7ByDe5817cqWe9w8-XU2up4iZfOtP32LfYGO5uCfwWHDYRkW_s90tvwBl4hjaf2bsDaE3RgVBvhdLeP0fPN9dPiLrt_vF0uru4zzXiVsrqueS2AUyhJzQtSVExTpeth5AYqpRtGVM5EQQ1heVGV2sxrMELMhWoaytkxOh97u-A_-sGTXPk-uOGlpKIs85z9QvMR0sHHGMDILti1Cl-SErl1LP85loWQXA6Oh-DFrl1FrVoTlNM2_qV5PngWhP0AkTuFAw</recordid><startdate>20031001</startdate><enddate>20031001</enddate><creator>NOWAK, John T</creator><creator>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creator><creator>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creator><general>Society of American Foresters</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031001</creationdate><title>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</title><author>NOWAK, John T ; HARRINGTON, Timothy B ; BERISFORD, C. Wayne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-bbb5b9e51e70b540483c1acbc1a2fe8acd30a23941f032487cf6bef9969add153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOWAK, John T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOWAK, John T</au><au>HARRINGTON, Timothy B</au><au>BERISFORD, C. Wayne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control</atitle><jtitle>Forest science</jtitle><date>2003-10-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>737</epage><pages>731-737</pages><issn>0015-749X</issn><eissn>1938-3738</eissn><coden>FOSCAD</coden><abstract>It is commonly believed that Nantucket pine tip moth (Rhyacionia frustrana [Comstock]) feeding damage on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) increases in relation to the intensity of silvicultural practices. Some studies have produced contrary or inconclusive data regarding this issue. This study was designed to examine the relationships between tree growth rates and tip moth development by enhancing growth with nitrogen (N) fertilizer and herbicide applications. The four treatments were N fertilizer, herbicide, herbicide+fertilizer, and untreated control. These treatments were monitored for tip moth damage levels, tip moth pupal numbers per pine shoot, insect population dynamics, and tree growth. Pine growth was significantly greater in the herbicide treatments than in the other treatments. There was a significant increase in diameter related to the fertilizer treatments, but no differences in tree height or volume were detected. Pupal weight was significantly lower in the herbicide treatment in the second year. Tip moth population fluctuations were greater in the herbicide treated plots than in the untreated control, and there were significant linear relationships between these fluctuations in the treatments versus percent parasitism, pupal weight, and diameter growth. This study shows that tip moth populations are not necessarily increased or decreased by intensive management practices, but can be less stable due to these practices.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>Society of American Foresters</pub><doi>10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-749X |
ispartof | Forest science, 2003-10, Vol.49 (5), p.731-737 |
issn | 0015-749X 1938-3738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_197722315 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animal populations Biological and medical sciences Butterflies & moths Fertilizers Forestry Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herbicides Nitrogen Pest control Plant growth Trees |
title | Nantucket pine tip moth development and population dynamics: Influence of nitrogen fertilization and vegetation control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A24%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nantucket%20pine%20tip%20moth%20development%20and%20population%20dynamics:%20Influence%20of%20nitrogen%20fertilization%20and%20vegetation%20control&rft.jtitle=Forest%20science&rft.au=NOWAK,%20John%20T&rft.date=2003-10-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=737&rft.pages=731-737&rft.issn=0015-749X&rft.eissn=1938-3738&rft.coden=FOSCAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/forestscience/49.5.731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E454793921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197722315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |