The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc

In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Tax lawyer 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347
1. Verfasser: Levine, Jeffrey C. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 2
container_start_page 339
container_title The Tax lawyer
container_volume 39
creator Levine, Jeffrey C. B.
description In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197636205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20769089</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20769089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j765-e92b21bb455d3c4a66825a835b8df86c22e6d2e9445d4b072a124ceb407ab8453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAchoMoWKcfQQhevFj5Nf_aeBvDaWG4YSt4K0mbshbbziR19NtbmHdP7-XhfeA5QwGhRIYCEnmOAgAGIQD_vERXzrUAFCKQAdrme4PT9-wev5kjzveNrcKdsn7C2dh1Q-_wbjga-4Q_-sabCmdeeePwzyPOm7pW_YTXTW_w0nr3gNO-vEYXtfpy5uZvFyhfP-er13CzfUlXy03YxoKHRhJNIq0Z5xUtmRIiIVwllOukqhNREmJERYxkjFdMQ0xURFhpNINY6YRxukB3p9uDHb5H43zRDqPtZ2MRyVhQQeBfCOYCYoZuT1Dr_GCLg206ZaeCQCzknI7-AvhIXXU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197600106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-6089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Arts ; Congressional investigations ; Corporations ; Enforcement ; Government agencies ; Marketing ; Political parties ; Power ; Summons ; Summonses ; Supreme Court decisions ; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM ; Tax attorneys ; Tax liabilities ; Taxes ; Taxpaying ; Third party</subject><ispartof>The Tax lawyer, 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347</ispartof><rights>1986 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Taxation Winter 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20769089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20769089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><title>The Tax lawyer</title><description>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</description><subject>Arts</subject><subject>Congressional investigations</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Summons</subject><subject>Summonses</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM</subject><subject>Tax attorneys</subject><subject>Tax liabilities</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Taxpaying</subject><subject>Third party</subject><issn>0040-005X</issn><issn>2329-6089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAchoMoWKcfQQhevFj5Nf_aeBvDaWG4YSt4K0mbshbbziR19NtbmHdP7-XhfeA5QwGhRIYCEnmOAgAGIQD_vERXzrUAFCKQAdrme4PT9-wev5kjzveNrcKdsn7C2dh1Q-_wbjga-4Q_-sabCmdeeePwzyPOm7pW_YTXTW_w0nr3gNO-vEYXtfpy5uZvFyhfP-er13CzfUlXy03YxoKHRhJNIq0Z5xUtmRIiIVwllOukqhNREmJERYxkjFdMQ0xURFhpNINY6YRxukB3p9uDHb5H43zRDqPtZ2MRyVhQQeBfCOYCYoZuT1Dr_GCLg206ZaeCQCzknI7-AvhIXXU</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creator><general>Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><author>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j765-e92b21bb455d3c4a66825a835b8df86c22e6d2e9445d4b072a124ceb407ab8453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Arts</topic><topic>Congressional investigations</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Summons</topic><topic>Summonses</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM</topic><topic>Tax attorneys</topic><topic>Tax liabilities</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Taxpaying</topic><topic>Third party</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</atitle><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>339-347</pages><issn>0040-005X</issn><eissn>2329-6089</eissn><abstract>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-005X
ispartof The Tax lawyer, 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347
issn 0040-005X
2329-6089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197636205
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Arts
Congressional investigations
Corporations
Enforcement
Government agencies
Marketing
Political parties
Power
Summons
Summonses
Supreme Court decisions
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM
Tax attorneys
Tax liabilities
Taxes
Taxpaying
Third party
title The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20IRS'%20New%20Third-Party%20Summons%20Power:%20United%20States%20v.%20Tiffany%20Fine%20Arts,%20Inc&rft.jtitle=The%20Tax%20lawyer&rft.au=Levine,%20Jeffrey%20C.%20B.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=339-347&rft.issn=0040-005X&rft.eissn=2329-6089&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20769089%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197600106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20769089&rfr_iscdi=true