The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc
In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Tax lawyer 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 347 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 339 |
container_title | The Tax lawyer |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Levine, Jeffrey C. B. |
description | In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197636205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20769089</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20769089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j765-e92b21bb455d3c4a66825a835b8df86c22e6d2e9445d4b072a124ceb407ab8453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LwzAchoMoWKcfQQhevFj5Nf_aeBvDaWG4YSt4K0mbshbbziR19NtbmHdP7-XhfeA5QwGhRIYCEnmOAgAGIQD_vERXzrUAFCKQAdrme4PT9-wev5kjzveNrcKdsn7C2dh1Q-_wbjga-4Q_-sabCmdeeePwzyPOm7pW_YTXTW_w0nr3gNO-vEYXtfpy5uZvFyhfP-er13CzfUlXy03YxoKHRhJNIq0Z5xUtmRIiIVwllOukqhNREmJERYxkjFdMQ0xURFhpNINY6YRxukB3p9uDHb5H43zRDqPtZ2MRyVhQQeBfCOYCYoZuT1Dr_GCLg206ZaeCQCzknI7-AvhIXXU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197600106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-6089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Arts ; Congressional investigations ; Corporations ; Enforcement ; Government agencies ; Marketing ; Political parties ; Power ; Summons ; Summonses ; Supreme Court decisions ; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM ; Tax attorneys ; Tax liabilities ; Taxes ; Taxpaying ; Third party</subject><ispartof>The Tax lawyer, 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347</ispartof><rights>1986 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association, Section of Taxation Winter 1986</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20769089$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20769089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><title>The Tax lawyer</title><description>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</description><subject>Arts</subject><subject>Congressional investigations</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Summons</subject><subject>Summonses</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><subject>SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM</subject><subject>Tax attorneys</subject><subject>Tax liabilities</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Taxpaying</subject><subject>Third party</subject><issn>0040-005X</issn><issn>2329-6089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFkE9LwzAchoMoWKcfQQhevFj5Nf_aeBvDaWG4YSt4K0mbshbbziR19NtbmHdP7-XhfeA5QwGhRIYCEnmOAgAGIQD_vERXzrUAFCKQAdrme4PT9-wev5kjzveNrcKdsn7C2dh1Q-_wbjga-4Q_-sabCmdeeePwzyPOm7pW_YTXTW_w0nr3gNO-vEYXtfpy5uZvFyhfP-er13CzfUlXy03YxoKHRhJNIq0Z5xUtmRIiIVwllOukqhNREmJERYxkjFdMQ0xURFhpNINY6YRxukB3p9uDHb5H43zRDqPtZ2MRyVhQQeBfCOYCYoZuT1Dr_GCLg206ZaeCQCzknI7-AvhIXXU</recordid><startdate>19860101</startdate><enddate>19860101</enddate><creator>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creator><general>Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</general><general>American Bar Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19860101</creationdate><title>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</title><author>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j765-e92b21bb455d3c4a66825a835b8df86c22e6d2e9445d4b072a124ceb407ab8453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Arts</topic><topic>Congressional investigations</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Summons</topic><topic>Summonses</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><topic>SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM</topic><topic>Tax attorneys</topic><topic>Tax liabilities</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Taxpaying</topic><topic>Third party</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levine, Jeffrey C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc</atitle><jtitle>The Tax lawyer</jtitle><date>1986-01-01</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>339-347</pages><issn>0040-005X</issn><eissn>2329-6089</eissn><abstract>In US versus Tiffany Fine Arts Inc (1985), the Supreme Court held that, when the information requested is relevant to a legitimate investigation of the known, summoned taxpayer, prior judicial approval is not required for a summons served with a dual purpose of investigating the taxpayer's tax liability and that of an unnamed party or parties. Reasoning that the known taxpayer's interest in resisting the summons sufficiently safeguards against overly broad and intrusive summonses, the Court upheld an interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 7609 that broadens and strengthens the Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) summons power. This follows substantial precedent construing congressional intent to uphold the IRS' enforcement authority when necessary for effective enforcement of tax laws and not contrary to legislative purposes. However, it remains to be seen whether some of the concerns raised about the unprotected rights of unknown taxpayers will reappear in later cases and whether the decision grants the IRS the potential to abuse its summons power.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Section of Taxation, American Bar Association</pub><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-005X |
ispartof | The Tax lawyer, 1986-01, Vol.39 (2), p.339-347 |
issn | 0040-005X 2329-6089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_197636205 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Arts Congressional investigations Corporations Enforcement Government agencies Marketing Political parties Power Summons Summonses Supreme Court decisions SUPREME COURT DECISIONS IN TAXATION: 1984 TERM Tax attorneys Tax liabilities Taxes Taxpaying Third party |
title | The IRS' New Third-Party Summons Power: United States v. Tiffany Fine Arts, Inc |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T20%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20IRS'%20New%20Third-Party%20Summons%20Power:%20United%20States%20v.%20Tiffany%20Fine%20Arts,%20Inc&rft.jtitle=The%20Tax%20lawyer&rft.au=Levine,%20Jeffrey%20C.%20B.&rft.date=1986-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=339-347&rft.issn=0040-005X&rft.eissn=2329-6089&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20769089%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197600106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20769089&rfr_iscdi=true |