Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling
Many researchers have identified the negative impact that accounting methods have on reported profits as inventories are being rapidly reduced. This research explores the magnitude and duration of the negative impact on reported profits experienced during a lean manufacturing implementation. The eff...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manufacturing systems 2006-01, Vol.25 (2), p.137-152 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 152 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Journal of manufacturing systems |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Meade, David J. Kumar, Sameer Houshyar, Abdolazim |
description | Many researchers have identified the negative impact that accounting methods have on reported profits as inventories are being rapidly reduced. This research explores the magnitude and duration of the negative impact on reported profits experienced during a lean manufacturing implementation.
The effect on reported profit is evaluated under five accounting methods (full absorption costing, activity-based costing, direct costing, throughput costing, and order activity costing) and three levels of inventory reduction rate. The findings reported here indicate that the period-by-period gains in operational efficiency, resulting from process improvements brought by a lean program, will not counteract the negative impact from the accounting system on the income statement while inventories continue to be reduced. This could lead to the early termination of a lean program that is, in fact, bringing operational improvement in the present time, but the improvement is being erased by poor inventory control practices from past periods.
This research uses a multi-period simulation model of a production operation that incorporates a manufacturing planning and inventory tracking system. A hybrid simulation approach is employed using Microsoft® Excel to model the Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) function, while ProModel simulation software is used for the development and operation of the model production environment. Microsoft® Visual Basic® is used to create a bridge between systems for schedule dissemination and inventory updates. The integrated computer simulation modeling approach developed to conduct this research is novel in the sense that multi-period simulation, incorporating MRP, has not been widely used based on available literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80039-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197605960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278612506800397</els_id><sourcerecordid>1340820681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c3837f61cabe5707aa094cfe1cd52119b8df258e6a00f62edc2157ed72e208ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfQSiCoA_TS9om7ZPIcCoMfFCfQ5ZcXEabzqQV9u1t7dBHXxL43-_uuB8h5xRuKFB--wpMFDNOWX4F_LoASMuZOCATWgwxz9ghmfwix-Qkxg0AZRmwCbEL55XXTlWJ8qraRReTxiYqadfYBGyd7isVKp_UyndW6bYLzn8krt5WWKNvVesan3RxCNe7VXAmia7uqjGvG4NVXzolR1ZVEc_2_5S8Lx7e5k-z5cvj8_x-OdMp523_FqmwnGq1wlyAUArKTFuk2uSM0nJVGMvyArkCsJyh0YzmAo1gyKBAk07JxTh3G5rPDmMrN00X-sOipKXgkJcceigfIR2aGANauQ2uVmEnKcjBqPwxKgddErj8MSpF33e5H65ir8WGQVz8ay5pmtJs4O5GDvtLvxwGGbVDr9G4gLqVpnH_bPoGrwWMvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197605960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Meade, David J. ; Kumar, Sameer ; Houshyar, Abdolazim</creator><creatorcontrib>Meade, David J. ; Kumar, Sameer ; Houshyar, Abdolazim</creatorcontrib><description>Many researchers have identified the negative impact that accounting methods have on reported profits as inventories are being rapidly reduced. This research explores the magnitude and duration of the negative impact on reported profits experienced during a lean manufacturing implementation.
The effect on reported profit is evaluated under five accounting methods (full absorption costing, activity-based costing, direct costing, throughput costing, and order activity costing) and three levels of inventory reduction rate. The findings reported here indicate that the period-by-period gains in operational efficiency, resulting from process improvements brought by a lean program, will not counteract the negative impact from the accounting system on the income statement while inventories continue to be reduced. This could lead to the early termination of a lean program that is, in fact, bringing operational improvement in the present time, but the improvement is being erased by poor inventory control practices from past periods.
This research uses a multi-period simulation model of a production operation that incorporates a manufacturing planning and inventory tracking system. A hybrid simulation approach is employed using Microsoft® Excel to model the Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) function, while ProModel simulation software is used for the development and operation of the model production environment. Microsoft® Visual Basic® is used to create a bridge between systems for schedule dissemination and inventory updates. The integrated computer simulation modeling approach developed to conduct this research is novel in the sense that multi-period simulation, incorporating MRP, has not been widely used based on available literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-6642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80039-7</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMSYEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Activity based costing ; Applied sciences ; Computer simulation ; Cost Accounting Methods ; Costs ; Customer services ; Decision support systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Financial analysis ; Hybrid Simulation ; Integrated Manufacturing Model ; Inventory ; Inventory control ; Inventory control, production control. Distribution ; Knowledge management ; Lean Manufacturing ; Management accounting ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing Process Model ; Manufacturing resource planning ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design ; Methods ; Multi-Period Manufacturing Simulation ; Object oriented programming ; Operational research and scientific management ; Operational research. Management science ; Overhead costs ; Process planning ; Production planning ; Profits ; Sales ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Volatility</subject><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing systems, 2006-01, Vol.25 (2), p.137-152</ispartof><rights>2006</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Manufacturing Engineers 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c3837f61cabe5707aa094cfe1cd52119b8df258e6a00f62edc2157ed72e208ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c3837f61cabe5707aa094cfe1cd52119b8df258e6a00f62edc2157ed72e208ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278612506800397$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19133147$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meade, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houshyar, Abdolazim</creatorcontrib><title>Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling</title><title>Journal of manufacturing systems</title><description>Many researchers have identified the negative impact that accounting methods have on reported profits as inventories are being rapidly reduced. This research explores the magnitude and duration of the negative impact on reported profits experienced during a lean manufacturing implementation.
The effect on reported profit is evaluated under five accounting methods (full absorption costing, activity-based costing, direct costing, throughput costing, and order activity costing) and three levels of inventory reduction rate. The findings reported here indicate that the period-by-period gains in operational efficiency, resulting from process improvements brought by a lean program, will not counteract the negative impact from the accounting system on the income statement while inventories continue to be reduced. This could lead to the early termination of a lean program that is, in fact, bringing operational improvement in the present time, but the improvement is being erased by poor inventory control practices from past periods.
This research uses a multi-period simulation model of a production operation that incorporates a manufacturing planning and inventory tracking system. A hybrid simulation approach is employed using Microsoft® Excel to model the Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) function, while ProModel simulation software is used for the development and operation of the model production environment. Microsoft® Visual Basic® is used to create a bridge between systems for schedule dissemination and inventory updates. The integrated computer simulation modeling approach developed to conduct this research is novel in the sense that multi-period simulation, incorporating MRP, has not been widely used based on available literature.</description><subject>Activity based costing</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cost Accounting Methods</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Decision support systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Financial analysis</subject><subject>Hybrid Simulation</subject><subject>Integrated Manufacturing Model</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Inventory control</subject><subject>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Lean Manufacturing</subject><subject>Management accounting</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing Process Model</subject><subject>Manufacturing resource planning</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multi-Period Manufacturing Simulation</subject><subject>Object oriented programming</subject><subject>Operational research and scientific management</subject><subject>Operational research. Management science</subject><subject>Overhead costs</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Production planning</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Volatility</subject><issn>0278-6125</issn><issn>1878-6642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFLwzAQx4MoOKcfQSiCoA_TS9om7ZPIcCoMfFCfQ5ZcXEabzqQV9u1t7dBHXxL43-_uuB8h5xRuKFB--wpMFDNOWX4F_LoASMuZOCATWgwxz9ghmfwix-Qkxg0AZRmwCbEL55XXTlWJ8qraRReTxiYqadfYBGyd7isVKp_UyndW6bYLzn8krt5WWKNvVesan3RxCNe7VXAmia7uqjGvG4NVXzolR1ZVEc_2_5S8Lx7e5k-z5cvj8_x-OdMp523_FqmwnGq1wlyAUArKTFuk2uSM0nJVGMvyArkCsJyh0YzmAo1gyKBAk07JxTh3G5rPDmMrN00X-sOipKXgkJcceigfIR2aGANauQ2uVmEnKcjBqPwxKgddErj8MSpF33e5H65ir8WGQVz8ay5pmtJs4O5GDvtLvxwGGbVDr9G4gLqVpnH_bPoGrwWMvg</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Meade, David J.</creator><creator>Kumar, Sameer</creator><creator>Houshyar, Abdolazim</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>SME</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88K</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2T</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling</title><author>Meade, David J. ; Kumar, Sameer ; Houshyar, Abdolazim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-c3837f61cabe5707aa094cfe1cd52119b8df258e6a00f62edc2157ed72e208ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Activity based costing</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cost Accounting Methods</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Decision support systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Financial analysis</topic><topic>Hybrid Simulation</topic><topic>Integrated Manufacturing Model</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Inventory control</topic><topic>Inventory control, production control. Distribution</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Lean Manufacturing</topic><topic>Management accounting</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing Process Model</topic><topic>Manufacturing resource planning</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multi-Period Manufacturing Simulation</topic><topic>Object oriented programming</topic><topic>Operational research and scientific management</topic><topic>Operational research. Management science</topic><topic>Overhead costs</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Production planning</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Volatility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meade, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sameer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houshyar, Abdolazim</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Telecommunications (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Telecommunications Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meade, David J.</au><au>Kumar, Sameer</au><au>Houshyar, Abdolazim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing systems</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>137-152</pages><issn>0278-6125</issn><eissn>1878-6642</eissn><coden>JMSYEB</coden><abstract>Many researchers have identified the negative impact that accounting methods have on reported profits as inventories are being rapidly reduced. This research explores the magnitude and duration of the negative impact on reported profits experienced during a lean manufacturing implementation.
The effect on reported profit is evaluated under five accounting methods (full absorption costing, activity-based costing, direct costing, throughput costing, and order activity costing) and three levels of inventory reduction rate. The findings reported here indicate that the period-by-period gains in operational efficiency, resulting from process improvements brought by a lean program, will not counteract the negative impact from the accounting system on the income statement while inventories continue to be reduced. This could lead to the early termination of a lean program that is, in fact, bringing operational improvement in the present time, but the improvement is being erased by poor inventory control practices from past periods.
This research uses a multi-period simulation model of a production operation that incorporates a manufacturing planning and inventory tracking system. A hybrid simulation approach is employed using Microsoft® Excel to model the Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) function, while ProModel simulation software is used for the development and operation of the model production environment. Microsoft® Visual Basic® is used to create a bridge between systems for schedule dissemination and inventory updates. The integrated computer simulation modeling approach developed to conduct this research is novel in the sense that multi-period simulation, incorporating MRP, has not been widely used based on available literature.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80039-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-6125 |
ispartof | Journal of manufacturing systems, 2006-01, Vol.25 (2), p.137-152 |
issn | 0278-6125 1878-6642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_197605960 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Activity based costing Applied sciences Computer simulation Cost Accounting Methods Costs Customer services Decision support systems Exact sciences and technology Financial analysis Hybrid Simulation Integrated Manufacturing Model Inventory Inventory control Inventory control, production control. Distribution Knowledge management Lean Manufacturing Management accounting Manufacturing Manufacturing Process Model Manufacturing resource planning Mechanical engineering. Machine design Methods Multi-Period Manufacturing Simulation Object oriented programming Operational research and scientific management Operational research. Management science Overhead costs Process planning Production planning Profits Sales Standard deviation Studies Volatility |
title | Financial analysis of a theoretical lean manufacturing implementation using hybrid simulation modeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Financial%20analysis%20of%20a%20theoretical%20lean%20manufacturing%20implementation%20using%20hybrid%20simulation%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20systems&rft.au=Meade,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=137-152&rft.issn=0278-6125&rft.eissn=1878-6642&rft.coden=JMSYEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0278-6125(06)80039-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1340820681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197605960&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0278612506800397&rfr_iscdi=true |