Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning

A study was conducted to determine the relative effectiveness of various safety training techniques on industrial accident occurrence. A punch press simulator was designed and equipped with special electronic instrumentation to record the occurrence of simulated accidents as well as to indicate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 1973-06, Vol.15 (3), p.223-236
Hauptverfasser: Leslie, John Howell, Adams, S. K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 236
container_issue 3
container_start_page 223
container_title Human factors
container_volume 15
creator Leslie, John Howell
Adams, S. K.
description A study was conducted to determine the relative effectiveness of various safety training techniques on industrial accident occurrence. A punch press simulator was designed and equipped with special electronic instrumentation to record the occurrence of simulated accidents as well as to indicate the production of substandard simulated parts. Four training techniques were used to impart instructions to four groups of 25 experimental subjects each. The training methods included: an audio-visual presentation (slides and audio tapes); direct, face-to-face oral instruction; no instruction (a control group); and a video tape presentation. The study proved that industrial simulation is a feasible means of determining the effectiveness of industrial training instructions. In terms of accident performance, the classical, face-to-face training method proved to be the most effective. There was a significant difference in accident occurrences relative to the four training procedures. There were no significant differences in the elapsed times to first accident, the total time required to perform the task, or the quality of parts associated with the various training methods. By constructing learning curves it was determined that the accident occurrence data conformed to a curve generally associated with learning while the production of good quality parts remained relatively constant.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001872087301500305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1975957207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001872087301500305</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1311835126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d53e061200766de54d58839ca9793e52d37112ee4045ad8f08458b0a808bd79a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotVa_gCAUPK-dSTKbyVGK_6CgoJ6XtMluW2y3JrsHv71bWqQgeprD-733mCfEJcINojEjAGQjgY0CJAAFdCT6SNpkjIzHor8Fsi1xKs5SWgJAbhX1RE-jlAZkX2Qvsa6iW62CH766MjRfw2Ye67aaDw-USXBxvVhX5-KkdB8pXOzvQLzf372NH7PJ88PT-HaSzbTiJvOkAuQoAUye-0DaE7OyM2eNVYGkVwZRhqBBk_NcAmviKTgGnnpjnRqI613uJtafbUhNsazbuO4qC7SGLHU_mX8phciKUOYdJXfULNYpxVAWm7hYufhVIBTbGYvfM3amq310O-0G-LHsd-v00U5PrgoHtX8nfgNGNXZV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311835126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Leslie, John Howell ; Adams, S. K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leslie, John Howell ; Adams, S. K.</creatorcontrib><description>A study was conducted to determine the relative effectiveness of various safety training techniques on industrial accident occurrence. A punch press simulator was designed and equipped with special electronic instrumentation to record the occurrence of simulated accidents as well as to indicate the production of substandard simulated parts. Four training techniques were used to impart instructions to four groups of 25 experimental subjects each. The training methods included: an audio-visual presentation (slides and audio tapes); direct, face-to-face oral instruction; no instruction (a control group); and a video tape presentation. The study proved that industrial simulation is a feasible means of determining the effectiveness of industrial training instructions. In terms of accident performance, the classical, face-to-face training method proved to be the most effective. There was a significant difference in accident occurrences relative to the four training procedures. There were no significant differences in the elapsed times to first accident, the total time required to perform the task, or the quality of parts associated with the various training methods. By constructing learning curves it was determined that the accident occurrence data conformed to a curve generally associated with learning while the production of good quality parts remained relatively constant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001872087301500305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4122702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accident Prevention ; Accidents ; Accidents, Occupational ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Audio tapes ; Audiovisual Aids ; Feasibility studies ; Female ; Humans ; Instrumentation ; Learning ; Learning curves ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational safety ; Programmed Instruction as Topic ; Punch presses ; Quality Control ; Safety ; Simulation ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Training</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 1973-06, Vol.15 (3), p.223-236</ispartof><rights>1973 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d53e061200766de54d58839ca9793e52d37112ee4045ad8f08458b0a808bd79a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001872087301500305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872087301500305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21821,27871,27926,27927,43623,43624</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4122702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leslie, John Howell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, S. K.</creatorcontrib><title>Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning</title><title>Human factors</title><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><description>A study was conducted to determine the relative effectiveness of various safety training techniques on industrial accident occurrence. A punch press simulator was designed and equipped with special electronic instrumentation to record the occurrence of simulated accidents as well as to indicate the production of substandard simulated parts. Four training techniques were used to impart instructions to four groups of 25 experimental subjects each. The training methods included: an audio-visual presentation (slides and audio tapes); direct, face-to-face oral instruction; no instruction (a control group); and a video tape presentation. The study proved that industrial simulation is a feasible means of determining the effectiveness of industrial training instructions. In terms of accident performance, the classical, face-to-face training method proved to be the most effective. There was a significant difference in accident occurrences relative to the four training procedures. There were no significant differences in the elapsed times to first accident, the total time required to perform the task, or the quality of parts associated with the various training methods. By constructing learning curves it was determined that the accident occurrence data conformed to a curve generally associated with learning while the production of good quality parts remained relatively constant.</description><subject>Accident Prevention</subject><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Accidents, Occupational</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audio tapes</subject><subject>Audiovisual Aids</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instrumentation</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning curves</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Programmed Instruction as Topic</subject><subject>Punch presses</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1973</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotVa_gCAUPK-dSTKbyVGK_6CgoJ6XtMluW2y3JrsHv71bWqQgeprD-733mCfEJcINojEjAGQjgY0CJAAFdCT6SNpkjIzHor8Fsi1xKs5SWgJAbhX1RE-jlAZkX2Qvsa6iW62CH766MjRfw2Ye67aaDw-USXBxvVhX5-KkdB8pXOzvQLzf372NH7PJ88PT-HaSzbTiJvOkAuQoAUye-0DaE7OyM2eNVYGkVwZRhqBBk_NcAmviKTgGnnpjnRqI613uJtafbUhNsazbuO4qC7SGLHU_mX8phciKUOYdJXfULNYpxVAWm7hYufhVIBTbGYvfM3amq310O-0G-LHsd-v00U5PrgoHtX8nfgNGNXZV</recordid><startdate>197306</startdate><enddate>197306</enddate><creator>Leslie, John Howell</creator><creator>Adams, S. K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors Society of America</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197306</creationdate><title>Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning</title><author>Leslie, John Howell ; Adams, S. K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d53e061200766de54d58839ca9793e52d37112ee4045ad8f08458b0a808bd79a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1973</creationdate><topic>Accident Prevention</topic><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Accidents, Occupational</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audio tapes</topic><topic>Audiovisual Aids</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instrumentation</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning curves</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Programmed Instruction as Topic</topic><topic>Punch presses</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leslie, John Howell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, S. K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leslie, John Howell</au><au>Adams, S. K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Factors</addtitle><date>1973-06</date><risdate>1973</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>236</epage><pages>223-236</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>A study was conducted to determine the relative effectiveness of various safety training techniques on industrial accident occurrence. A punch press simulator was designed and equipped with special electronic instrumentation to record the occurrence of simulated accidents as well as to indicate the production of substandard simulated parts. Four training techniques were used to impart instructions to four groups of 25 experimental subjects each. The training methods included: an audio-visual presentation (slides and audio tapes); direct, face-to-face oral instruction; no instruction (a control group); and a video tape presentation. The study proved that industrial simulation is a feasible means of determining the effectiveness of industrial training instructions. In terms of accident performance, the classical, face-to-face training method proved to be the most effective. There was a significant difference in accident occurrences relative to the four training procedures. There were no significant differences in the elapsed times to first accident, the total time required to perform the task, or the quality of parts associated with the various training methods. By constructing learning curves it was determined that the accident occurrence data conformed to a curve generally associated with learning while the production of good quality parts remained relatively constant.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>4122702</pmid><doi>10.1177/001872087301500305</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 1973-06, Vol.15 (3), p.223-236
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1975957207
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Accident Prevention
Accidents
Accidents, Occupational
Adolescent
Adult
Audio tapes
Audiovisual Aids
Feasibility studies
Female
Humans
Instrumentation
Learning
Learning curves
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational safety
Programmed Instruction as Topic
Punch presses
Quality Control
Safety
Simulation
Task Performance and Analysis
Training
title Programmed Safety through Programmed Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T23%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Programmed%20Safety%20through%20Programmed%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Leslie,%20John%20Howell&rft.date=1973-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=236&rft.pages=223-236&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001872087301500305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311835126%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311835126&rft_id=info:pmid/4122702&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001872087301500305&rfr_iscdi=true