On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods

Five system-output or performance-measurement methods have been described in the literature for use in operator or occupational workload specifications: laboratory, analytic, synthetic, simulation, and operational-system methods. A review and analysis of these methods indicates that laboratory metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 1979-10, Vol.21 (5), p.515-528
Hauptverfasser: Chiles, W. Dean, Alluisi, Earl A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 528
container_issue 5
container_start_page 515
container_title Human factors
container_volume 21
creator Chiles, W. Dean
Alluisi, Earl A.
description Five system-output or performance-measurement methods have been described in the literature for use in operator or occupational workload specifications: laboratory, analytic, synthetic, simulation, and operational-system methods. A review and analysis of these methods indicates that laboratory methods, where appropriate, are the methods of choice, with the synthetic-work technique especially well suited to examinations of general workload questions. Analytic and synthetic methods appear to yield reasonable results, but both rest on relatively fragile data bases; with correction of this deficiency and further research on time-sharing behavior or function interlacing, these methods should prove to be quite helpful, especially in systems designs and workload allocations. Simulation methods have the potential of providing quite useful information on operator workload, but simulators have not generally been employed for this purpose, and some of the difficulties implicit in their use are discussed. Operational-system methods, except for some possible safety limitations, can be used on virtually any workload-specification problem suitable for investigation in a simulator, but the problems of data recording can be substantial, and often there is little agreement on what should be measured as criteria of good performance. The need for reliable, valid, quantitative criteria to reflect system performance is stressed, and a potentially useful paired-comparisons scaling procedure is described.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/001872087902100501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1974851701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001872087902100501</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1311855064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-fdca10ce0dea6b0e1623b15af326aa5319b4bcc4a2b70ecfe91bc0e123184be63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcFz7Ez2Ww2OUrxC1oqqHgzbDazNrXNxt0E8d-bWg-CKAzMYZ7nZXgZO0U4R1RqAoCZiiFTOcQIIAH32AhloqIMM9xnoy0QbYlDdhTCCgDSXMgRe140vFsSv2_J1LY2uqtdw53li5a87pznwyyM6duvi17zJ-df105X_L3ulvyOvHV-oxtD0Zx06D1tqOn4nLqlq8IxO7B6Hejke4_Z49Xlw_Qmmi2ub6cXs8iIBLvIVkYjGIKKdFoCYRqLEqW2Ik61lgLzMimNSXRcKiBjKcfSDFgsMEtKSsWYne1yW-_eegpdsXK9H94NBeYqySQqwH8pgZhJCWkyUPGOMt6F4MkWra832n8UCMW27eJ324M02UlBv9CP2L-NT8Ypf5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311855064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Chiles, W. Dean ; Alluisi, Earl A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiles, W. Dean ; Alluisi, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><description>Five system-output or performance-measurement methods have been described in the literature for use in operator or occupational workload specifications: laboratory, analytic, synthetic, simulation, and operational-system methods. A review and analysis of these methods indicates that laboratory methods, where appropriate, are the methods of choice, with the synthetic-work technique especially well suited to examinations of general workload questions. Analytic and synthetic methods appear to yield reasonable results, but both rest on relatively fragile data bases; with correction of this deficiency and further research on time-sharing behavior or function interlacing, these methods should prove to be quite helpful, especially in systems designs and workload allocations. Simulation methods have the potential of providing quite useful information on operator workload, but simulators have not generally been employed for this purpose, and some of the difficulties implicit in their use are discussed. Operational-system methods, except for some possible safety limitations, can be used on virtually any workload-specification problem suitable for investigation in a simulator, but the problems of data recording can be substantial, and often there is little agreement on what should be measured as criteria of good performance. The need for reliable, valid, quantitative criteria to reflect system performance is stressed, and a potentially useful paired-comparisons scaling procedure is described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001872087902100501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Allocations ; Criteria ; Data recording ; Laboratories ; Laboratory methods ; Measurement methods ; Scaling ; Simulation ; Simulators ; Specifications ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 1979-10, Vol.21 (5), p.515-528</ispartof><rights>1979 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-fdca10ce0dea6b0e1623b15af326aa5319b4bcc4a2b70ecfe91bc0e123184be63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-fdca10ce0dea6b0e1623b15af326aa5319b4bcc4a2b70ecfe91bc0e123184be63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001872087902100501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872087902100501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27856,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiles, W. Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alluisi, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><title>On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods</title><title>Human factors</title><description>Five system-output or performance-measurement methods have been described in the literature for use in operator or occupational workload specifications: laboratory, analytic, synthetic, simulation, and operational-system methods. A review and analysis of these methods indicates that laboratory methods, where appropriate, are the methods of choice, with the synthetic-work technique especially well suited to examinations of general workload questions. Analytic and synthetic methods appear to yield reasonable results, but both rest on relatively fragile data bases; with correction of this deficiency and further research on time-sharing behavior or function interlacing, these methods should prove to be quite helpful, especially in systems designs and workload allocations. Simulation methods have the potential of providing quite useful information on operator workload, but simulators have not generally been employed for this purpose, and some of the difficulties implicit in their use are discussed. Operational-system methods, except for some possible safety limitations, can be used on virtually any workload-specification problem suitable for investigation in a simulator, but the problems of data recording can be substantial, and often there is little agreement on what should be measured as criteria of good performance. The need for reliable, valid, quantitative criteria to reflect system performance is stressed, and a potentially useful paired-comparisons scaling procedure is described.</description><subject>Allocations</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Data recording</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcFz7Ez2Ww2OUrxC1oqqHgzbDazNrXNxt0E8d-bWg-CKAzMYZ7nZXgZO0U4R1RqAoCZiiFTOcQIIAH32AhloqIMM9xnoy0QbYlDdhTCCgDSXMgRe140vFsSv2_J1LY2uqtdw53li5a87pznwyyM6duvi17zJ-df105X_L3ulvyOvHV-oxtD0Zx06D1tqOn4nLqlq8IxO7B6Hejke4_Z49Xlw_Qmmi2ub6cXs8iIBLvIVkYjGIKKdFoCYRqLEqW2Ik61lgLzMimNSXRcKiBjKcfSDFgsMEtKSsWYne1yW-_eegpdsXK9H94NBeYqySQqwH8pgZhJCWkyUPGOMt6F4MkWra832n8UCMW27eJ324M02UlBv9CP2L-NT8Ypf5k</recordid><startdate>197910</startdate><enddate>197910</enddate><creator>Chiles, W. Dean</creator><creator>Alluisi, Earl A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors Society of America</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197910</creationdate><title>On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods</title><author>Chiles, W. Dean ; Alluisi, Earl A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-fdca10ce0dea6b0e1623b15af326aa5319b4bcc4a2b70ecfe91bc0e123184be63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Allocations</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Data recording</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiles, W. Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alluisi, Earl A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiles, W. Dean</au><au>Alluisi, Earl A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><date>1979-10</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>515-528</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Five system-output or performance-measurement methods have been described in the literature for use in operator or occupational workload specifications: laboratory, analytic, synthetic, simulation, and operational-system methods. A review and analysis of these methods indicates that laboratory methods, where appropriate, are the methods of choice, with the synthetic-work technique especially well suited to examinations of general workload questions. Analytic and synthetic methods appear to yield reasonable results, but both rest on relatively fragile data bases; with correction of this deficiency and further research on time-sharing behavior or function interlacing, these methods should prove to be quite helpful, especially in systems designs and workload allocations. Simulation methods have the potential of providing quite useful information on operator workload, but simulators have not generally been employed for this purpose, and some of the difficulties implicit in their use are discussed. Operational-system methods, except for some possible safety limitations, can be used on virtually any workload-specification problem suitable for investigation in a simulator, but the problems of data recording can be substantial, and often there is little agreement on what should be measured as criteria of good performance. The need for reliable, valid, quantitative criteria to reflect system performance is stressed, and a potentially useful paired-comparisons scaling procedure is described.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001872087902100501</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 1979-10, Vol.21 (5), p.515-528
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1974851701
source Periodicals Index Online; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Allocations
Criteria
Data recording
Laboratories
Laboratory methods
Measurement methods
Scaling
Simulation
Simulators
Specifications
Workload
Workloads
title On the Specification of Operator or Occupational Workload with Performance-Measurement Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A18%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Specification%20of%20Operator%20or%20Occupational%20Workload%20with%20Performance-Measurement%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Chiles,%20W.%20Dean&rft.date=1979-10&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=515-528&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001872087902100501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1311855064%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311855064&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001872087902100501&rfr_iscdi=true