Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1
Objectives were to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5137 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Prezotto, L D Gilbery, T C Bauer, M L Islas, A Swanson, K C |
description | Objectives were to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601-1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800-0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LFS). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P < 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limitfeeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas2017.1925 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1974540550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1974540550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19745405503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLFOwzAURS0EEgG68QFPYk6xnbppZgSCvXv1mjw3jhy72E6q_gTfDK5gZ7rSPUeHsUfBl1LJ-nnAKLmol6KR6ooVQklVVmJdXbOCcynKzUbIW3YX48C5kKpRBfv6cNpO5FoCr8Ga0aRSE3XGHQBdB8mMF9LhOU9GgDMai3tjTTpD8nAI_pT9Fu1MEby7PKmHIwXtw4i5nmN_4T31OBsfwDhove3gRJh6CiAe2I1GG2nxu_fs6e11-_JeHoP_nCim3eCn4H7QTjT1Sq24Urz6n_UNNXBbPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1974540550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Prezotto, L D ; Gilbery, T C ; Bauer, M L ; Islas, A ; Swanson, K C</creator><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L D ; Gilbery, T C ; Bauer, M L ; Islas, A ; Swanson, K C</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives were to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601-1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800-0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LFS). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P < 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limitfeeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Body temperature ; Calves ; Cattle ; Cold ; Cold weather ; Corn ; Daytime ; Diet ; Dry matter ; Energy requirements ; Feeding ; Feeding behavior ; Meals ; Night ; Nighttime ; Temperature requirements ; Time of use ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbery, T C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islas, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, K C</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Objectives were to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601-1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800-0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LFS). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P < 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limitfeeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Body temperature</subject><subject>Calves</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Cold weather</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Energy requirements</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Nighttime</subject><subject>Temperature requirements</subject><subject>Time of use</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLFOwzAURS0EEgG68QFPYk6xnbppZgSCvXv1mjw3jhy72E6q_gTfDK5gZ7rSPUeHsUfBl1LJ-nnAKLmol6KR6ooVQklVVmJdXbOCcynKzUbIW3YX48C5kKpRBfv6cNpO5FoCr8Ga0aRSE3XGHQBdB8mMF9LhOU9GgDMai3tjTTpD8nAI_pT9Fu1MEby7PKmHIwXtw4i5nmN_4T31OBsfwDhove3gRJh6CiAe2I1GG2nxu_fs6e11-_JeHoP_nCim3eCn4H7QTjT1Sq24Urz6n_UNNXBbPg</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Prezotto, L D</creator><creator>Gilbery, T C</creator><creator>Bauer, M L</creator><creator>Islas, A</creator><creator>Swanson, K C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1</title><author>Prezotto, L D ; Gilbery, T C ; Bauer, M L ; Islas, A ; Swanson, K C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19745405503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Body temperature</topic><topic>Calves</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Cold weather</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Energy requirements</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Nighttime</topic><topic>Temperature requirements</topic><topic>Time of use</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prezotto, L D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbery, T C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Islas, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, K C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career and Technical Education</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prezotto, L D</au><au>Gilbery, T C</au><au>Bauer, M L</au><au>Islas, A</au><au>Swanson, K C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5137</spage><epage>5144</epage><pages>5137-5144</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Objectives were to determine the effects of limit-feeding and time of feed access in cold weather on growth performance and feeding behavior of growing calves fed a corn silage-based diet. Sixty-six steers (BW = 317 ± 5.3 kg) and 30 heifers (BW = 239 ± 7.6 kg) were assigned randomly to dietary treatment: 1) ad libitum feed intake (AL), 2) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the daytime (0601-1759 h; LF-D), 3) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis in the nighttime (1800-0559 h; LF-N), and 4) limit-fed to 80% of the average DMI of the AL group on a BW basis, split 1/2 in the daytime and 1/2 in the nighttime (LFS). Feed intake and feeding behavior were monitored over 84 d using the Insentec feeding system. Average daily gain, DMI, and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.002) in the AL group compared with others. Dry matter intake was not different (P = 0.17) when comparing the LF-D with the LF-N groups. Average daily gain and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.05) when comparing the LF-N group to the LF-D group, and were not different (P ≥ 0.51) when comparing the LF-S group with the mean of the LF-D and LF-N groups. Number of visits and meals per d was greater (P ≤ 0.001) in the LF-N than the LF-D group. Feed intake per visit was not different (P = 0.55) when comparing the AL group and others, and tended to be greater (P = 0.06) in the LF-D than the LF-N group. Feed intake per meal was greater (P < 0.001) when comparing the AL group with others, and the LF-D with the LF-N group. Feed intake per minute (eating rate) was not influenced by treatment. In conclusion, limitfeeding at 80% of ad libitum intake decreased ADG and G:F. Limit-feeding in the nighttime as compared to limit-feeding in the daytime improves growth performance and increases feeding activity (number of visits and meals per d) which could be because of increased heat production to help maintain body temperature and thus reduce maintenance energy requirements.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1925</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-11, Vol.95 (11), p.5137-5144 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1974540550 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Animal behavior Body temperature Calves Cattle Cold Cold weather Corn Daytime Diet Dry matter Energy requirements Feeding Feeding behavior Meals Night Nighttime Temperature requirements Time of use Weather |
title | Influence of limit-feeding and time of day of feed availability to growing calves on growth performance and feeding behavior in cold weather 1 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T20%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20limit-feeding%20and%20time%20of%20day%20of%20feed%20availability%20to%20growing%20calves%20on%20growth%20performance%20and%20feeding%20behavior%20in%20cold%20weather%201&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Prezotto,%20L%20D&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5137&rft.epage=5144&rft.pages=5137-5144&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1925&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1974540550%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1974540550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |