Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer

A reply to Bennett Reimer on the teaching of philosophy to K-12 students is presented. The author of this article poses two problems linked to pedagogy and philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation. First, philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation tends to be decontextualized. They have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy of music education review 2005-10, Vol.13 (2), p.135-138
1. Verfasser: Stauffer, Sandra L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 135
container_title Philosophy of music education review
container_volume 13
creator Stauffer, Sandra L.
description A reply to Bennett Reimer on the teaching of philosophy to K-12 students is presented. The author of this article poses two problems linked to pedagogy and philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation. First, philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation tends to be decontextualized. They have both practical and research based evidence to suggest that undergraduates perceive teaching from the student perspective. They already have philosophies of music and education, whether they have articulated them or not, and whether teacher educators like them or not, based on their experiences as students. Most undergraduates do not yet perceive teaching from the point of view of teachers; in fact, they are generally worried about being perceived as teachers themselves. From their perspective as students, undergraduates conceive of philosophy as a paper be written or an assignment to be completed rather than as thinking that shapes practices. Furthermore, teacher educators perpetuate the problem when they teach about philosophy decontextualized from practice and as a thing to be learned rather than a habit of mind. Second, the author proposes that their focus on philosophy with undergraduates is a two-legged stool, and a two-legged stool is a very unstable perch for any teacher, let alone a novice teacher. (Contains 5 notes.)
doi_str_mv 10.2979/PME.2005.13.2.135
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197453488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A145792762</galeid><ericid>EJ739901</ericid><jstor_id>40495506</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A145792762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c17fd78d7bfddad7f916a2b52203848b38b90447300538bf55597fe044e7364b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUV2LFDEQHETB8_QHCAqD7zOXz8lEfNk7Vk-5RdHzOWSSzpFlN1mTDOK_N8PI4sMR6DSVquo01TSvMeqJFPLq227bE4R4j2lPauFPmgvMGe0ow-Rp7dFAOy4oe968yHmPEMGE0Ivmw338rZNtdz5YNx_a3Zy9abd2Nrr4GN63m_Y75FMMGdoS22sIAUqpmD9Cetk8c_qQ4dW_-7L5-XF7f3Pb3X399Plmc9cZimXpDBbOitGKyVmrrXASD5pMnBBERzZOdJwkYkzQ-v_aO865FA4qBIIObKKXzbvV95TirxlyUfs4p1BHKiwF45SNYyV1K-lBH0D54GJJ2jxAgKQPMYDzFd5gxoUkYiCV3z_Cr8fC0ZtHBXgVmBRzTuDUKfmjTn8URmoJQdUQ1BKCwlSRWnjVvFk1kLw587dfBJUS4frMzovtwZTjnOH_3dA4MPVjyXGJEXFSNXxxfbvK9rnEdLZliEnOa9B_ATyLmeY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197453488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Stauffer, Sandra L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><description>A reply to Bennett Reimer on the teaching of philosophy to K-12 students is presented. The author of this article poses two problems linked to pedagogy and philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation. First, philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation tends to be decontextualized. They have both practical and research based evidence to suggest that undergraduates perceive teaching from the student perspective. They already have philosophies of music and education, whether they have articulated them or not, and whether teacher educators like them or not, based on their experiences as students. Most undergraduates do not yet perceive teaching from the point of view of teachers; in fact, they are generally worried about being perceived as teachers themselves. From their perspective as students, undergraduates conceive of philosophy as a paper be written or an assignment to be completed rather than as thinking that shapes practices. Furthermore, teacher educators perpetuate the problem when they teach about philosophy decontextualized from practice and as a thing to be learned rather than a habit of mind. Second, the author proposes that their focus on philosophy with undergraduates is a two-legged stool, and a two-legged stool is a very unstable perch for any teacher, let alone a novice teacher. (Contains 5 notes.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-3412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2979/PME.2005.13.2.135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aural learning ; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes ; Children ; Education ; Educational philosophies ; Elementary school students ; Kindergarten students ; Learning ; Middle school students ; Music ; Music Education ; Music in education ; Music learning ; Music students ; Music Teachers ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of music ; Secondary school students ; Student Interests ; Student Teacher Attitudes ; Study and teaching ; Symposium: Philosophy: Exploring the Potentials in the School Curriculum ; Teacher Education ; Teacher Educators ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Philosophy of music education review, 2005-10, Vol.13 (2), p.135-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Philosophy of Music Education Review.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Indiana University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Fall 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40495506$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40495506$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ739901$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer</title><title>Philosophy of music education review</title><description>A reply to Bennett Reimer on the teaching of philosophy to K-12 students is presented. The author of this article poses two problems linked to pedagogy and philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation. First, philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation tends to be decontextualized. They have both practical and research based evidence to suggest that undergraduates perceive teaching from the student perspective. They already have philosophies of music and education, whether they have articulated them or not, and whether teacher educators like them or not, based on their experiences as students. Most undergraduates do not yet perceive teaching from the point of view of teachers; in fact, they are generally worried about being perceived as teachers themselves. From their perspective as students, undergraduates conceive of philosophy as a paper be written or an assignment to be completed rather than as thinking that shapes practices. Furthermore, teacher educators perpetuate the problem when they teach about philosophy decontextualized from practice and as a thing to be learned rather than a habit of mind. Second, the author proposes that their focus on philosophy with undergraduates is a two-legged stool, and a two-legged stool is a very unstable perch for any teacher, let alone a novice teacher. (Contains 5 notes.)</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aural learning</subject><subject>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational philosophies</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Kindergarten students</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Middle school students</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>Music Education</subject><subject>Music in education</subject><subject>Music learning</subject><subject>Music students</subject><subject>Music Teachers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of music</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Student Interests</subject><subject>Student Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Symposium: Philosophy: Exploring the Potentials in the School Curriculum</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1063-5734</issn><issn>1543-3412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>A3D</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DJMCT</sourceid><recordid>eNptUV2LFDEQHETB8_QHCAqD7zOXz8lEfNk7Vk-5RdHzOWSSzpFlN1mTDOK_N8PI4sMR6DSVquo01TSvMeqJFPLq227bE4R4j2lPauFPmgvMGe0ow-Rp7dFAOy4oe968yHmPEMGE0Ivmw338rZNtdz5YNx_a3Zy9abd2Nrr4GN63m_Y75FMMGdoS22sIAUqpmD9Cetk8c_qQ4dW_-7L5-XF7f3Pb3X399Plmc9cZimXpDBbOitGKyVmrrXASD5pMnBBERzZOdJwkYkzQ-v_aO865FA4qBIIObKKXzbvV95TirxlyUfs4p1BHKiwF45SNYyV1K-lBH0D54GJJ2jxAgKQPMYDzFd5gxoUkYiCV3z_Cr8fC0ZtHBXgVmBRzTuDUKfmjTn8URmoJQdUQ1BKCwlSRWnjVvFk1kLw587dfBJUS4frMzovtwZTjnOH_3dA4MPVjyXGJEXFSNXxxfbvK9rnEdLZliEnOa9B_ATyLmeY</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Stauffer, Sandra L.</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>A3D</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DJMCT</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PGAAH</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer</title><author>Stauffer, Sandra L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c17fd78d7bfddad7f916a2b52203848b38b90447300538bf55597fe044e7364b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aural learning</topic><topic>Beliefs, opinions and attitudes</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational philosophies</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Kindergarten students</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Middle school students</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>Music Education</topic><topic>Music in education</topic><topic>Music learning</topic><topic>Music students</topic><topic>Music Teachers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of music</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Student Interests</topic><topic>Student Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Symposium: Philosophy: Exploring the Potentials in the School Curriculum</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stauffer, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Music Periodicals Database</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Music &amp; Performing Arts Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Religion &amp; Philosophy</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophy of music education review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stauffer, Sandra L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ739901</ericid><atitle>Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy of music education review</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>135-138</pages><issn>1063-5734</issn><eissn>1543-3412</eissn><abstract>A reply to Bennett Reimer on the teaching of philosophy to K-12 students is presented. The author of this article poses two problems linked to pedagogy and philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation. First, philosophy in undergraduate teacher preparation tends to be decontextualized. They have both practical and research based evidence to suggest that undergraduates perceive teaching from the student perspective. They already have philosophies of music and education, whether they have articulated them or not, and whether teacher educators like them or not, based on their experiences as students. Most undergraduates do not yet perceive teaching from the point of view of teachers; in fact, they are generally worried about being perceived as teachers themselves. From their perspective as students, undergraduates conceive of philosophy as a paper be written or an assignment to be completed rather than as thinking that shapes practices. Furthermore, teacher educators perpetuate the problem when they teach about philosophy decontextualized from practice and as a thing to be learned rather than a habit of mind. Second, the author proposes that their focus on philosophy with undergraduates is a two-legged stool, and a two-legged stool is a very unstable perch for any teacher, let alone a novice teacher. (Contains 5 notes.)</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub><doi>10.2979/PME.2005.13.2.135</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-5734
ispartof Philosophy of music education review, 2005-10, Vol.13 (2), p.135-138
issn 1063-5734
1543-3412
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197453488
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source
subjects Analysis
Aural learning
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes
Children
Education
Educational philosophies
Elementary school students
Kindergarten students
Learning
Middle school students
Music
Music Education
Music in education
Music learning
Music students
Music Teachers
Philosophy
Philosophy of music
Secondary school students
Student Interests
Student Teacher Attitudes
Study and teaching
Symposium: Philosophy: Exploring the Potentials in the School Curriculum
Teacher Education
Teacher Educators
Undergraduate Study
title Toward Mindful Music Education: A Response to Bennett Reimer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T11%3A38%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Mindful%20Music%20Education:%20A%20Response%20to%20Bennett%20Reimer&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20of%20music%20education%20review&rft.au=Stauffer,%20Sandra%20L.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=135-138&rft.issn=1063-5734&rft.eissn=1543-3412&rft_id=info:doi/10.2979/PME.2005.13.2.135&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA145792762%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197453488&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A145792762&rft_ericid=EJ739901&rft_jstor_id=40495506&rfr_iscdi=true