Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent

Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO3(-)-N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (19...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental quality 2002-11, Vol.31 (6), p.1980
Hauptverfasser: Woodard, Kenneth R, French, Edwin C, Sweat, Lewin A, Graetz, Donald A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1980
container_title Journal of environmental quality
container_volume 31
creator Woodard, Kenneth R
French, Edwin C
Sweat, Lewin A
Graetz, Donald A
description Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO3(-)-N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (1996-2000). Soil in the sprayfield is an excessively drained Kershaw sand (thermic, uncoated Typic Quartzipsamment). Over four cycles, average loading rates of effluent N were 500, 690, and 910 kg ha(-1) per cycle. Nitrogen removed by the bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)-rye (Secale cereale L.) system (BR) during the first three cycles was 465 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low loading rate, 528 kg ha(-1) for the medium rate, and 585 kg ha(-1) for the high. For the corn (Zea mays L.)-forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-rye system (CSR), N removals were 320 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low rate, 327 kg ha(-1) for the medium, and 378 kg ha(-1) for the high. The higher N removals for BR were attributed to higher N concentration in bermudagrass (18.1-24.2 g kg(-1)) than in corn and forage sorghum (10.3-14.7 g kg(-1)). Dry matter yield declined in the fourth cycle for bermudagrass but N removal continued to be higher for BR than CSR. The BR system was much more effective at preventing NO3(-)-N leaching. For CSR, NO3(-)-N levels in soil water (1.5 m below surface) increased steeply during the period between the harvest of one forage and canopy dosure of the next. Overall, the BR system was better than CSR at removing N from the soil and maintaining low NO3(-)-N concentrations below the rooting zone.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/jeq2002.1980
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197388884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>259567281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p95t-7936ac426ce6c9ff5e76f0c459d301d20cc4c6ac86e681ce070a8cf223d73a9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEUhoMoWKs7HyC4n5rbJBN3UrQKRV10X0LmpKZMkzbJFPr2puqBc_0__oPQPSUzRrl43MKBEcJmVHfkAk1oy1XDarlEE0JEnQVrr9FNzltCKCNKTtD4NZhQsAk9hnD0KYYd1N2HAsnY4mPIT_jDlxQ3EHCCXTya4RcP9WgK4AGM_fZhg11M5zQbwPmUC-xy5S3441nsjU8nDM4NY_W_RVfODBnu_vsUrV5fVvO3Zvm5eJ8_L5u9bkujNJfGCiYtSKuda0FJR6xodc8J7RmxVthKdBJkRy0QRUxnHWO8V9xox6fo4c92n-JhhFzW2zimUD-uqVa8qyH4DxZRX6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197388884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Woodard, Kenneth R ; French, Edwin C ; Sweat, Lewin A ; Graetz, Donald A</creator><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Kenneth R ; French, Edwin C ; Sweat, Lewin A ; Graetz, Donald A</creatorcontrib><description>Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO3(-)-N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (1996-2000). Soil in the sprayfield is an excessively drained Kershaw sand (thermic, uncoated Typic Quartzipsamment). Over four cycles, average loading rates of effluent N were 500, 690, and 910 kg ha(-1) per cycle. Nitrogen removed by the bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)-rye (Secale cereale L.) system (BR) during the first three cycles was 465 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low loading rate, 528 kg ha(-1) for the medium rate, and 585 kg ha(-1) for the high. For the corn (Zea mays L.)-forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-rye system (CSR), N removals were 320 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low rate, 327 kg ha(-1) for the medium, and 378 kg ha(-1) for the high. The higher N removals for BR were attributed to higher N concentration in bermudagrass (18.1-24.2 g kg(-1)) than in corn and forage sorghum (10.3-14.7 g kg(-1)). Dry matter yield declined in the fourth cycle for bermudagrass but N removal continued to be higher for BR than CSR. The BR system was much more effective at preventing NO3(-)-N leaching. For CSR, NO3(-)-N levels in soil water (1.5 m below surface) increased steeply during the period between the harvest of one forage and canopy dosure of the next. Overall, the BR system was better than CSR at removing N from the soil and maintaining low NO3(-)-N concentrations below the rooting zone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2002.1980</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Corn ; Dairies ; Dry matter ; Effluents ; Leaching ; Load distribution ; Moisture content ; Nitrogen removal ; Soil water ; Sorghum</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2002-11, Vol.31 (6), p.1980</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Edwin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweat, Lewin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graetz, Donald A</creatorcontrib><title>Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><description>Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO3(-)-N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (1996-2000). Soil in the sprayfield is an excessively drained Kershaw sand (thermic, uncoated Typic Quartzipsamment). Over four cycles, average loading rates of effluent N were 500, 690, and 910 kg ha(-1) per cycle. Nitrogen removed by the bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)-rye (Secale cereale L.) system (BR) during the first three cycles was 465 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low loading rate, 528 kg ha(-1) for the medium rate, and 585 kg ha(-1) for the high. For the corn (Zea mays L.)-forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-rye system (CSR), N removals were 320 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low rate, 327 kg ha(-1) for the medium, and 378 kg ha(-1) for the high. The higher N removals for BR were attributed to higher N concentration in bermudagrass (18.1-24.2 g kg(-1)) than in corn and forage sorghum (10.3-14.7 g kg(-1)). Dry matter yield declined in the fourth cycle for bermudagrass but N removal continued to be higher for BR than CSR. The BR system was much more effective at preventing NO3(-)-N leaching. For CSR, NO3(-)-N levels in soil water (1.5 m below surface) increased steeply during the period between the harvest of one forage and canopy dosure of the next. Overall, the BR system was better than CSR at removing N from the soil and maintaining low NO3(-)-N concentrations below the rooting zone.</description><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Dairies</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Leaching</subject><subject>Load distribution</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotjctKAzEUhoMoWKs7HyC4n5rbJBN3UrQKRV10X0LmpKZMkzbJFPr2puqBc_0__oPQPSUzRrl43MKBEcJmVHfkAk1oy1XDarlEE0JEnQVrr9FNzltCKCNKTtD4NZhQsAk9hnD0KYYd1N2HAsnY4mPIT_jDlxQ3EHCCXTya4RcP9WgK4AGM_fZhg11M5zQbwPmUC-xy5S3441nsjU8nDM4NY_W_RVfODBnu_vsUrV5fVvO3Zvm5eJ8_L5u9bkujNJfGCiYtSKuda0FJR6xodc8J7RmxVthKdBJkRy0QRUxnHWO8V9xox6fo4c92n-JhhFzW2zimUD-uqVa8qyH4DxZRX6c</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Woodard, Kenneth R</creator><creator>French, Edwin C</creator><creator>Sweat, Lewin A</creator><creator>Graetz, Donald A</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent</title><author>Woodard, Kenneth R ; French, Edwin C ; Sweat, Lewin A ; Graetz, Donald A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p95t-7936ac426ce6c9ff5e76f0c459d301d20cc4c6ac86e681ce070a8cf223d73a9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Dairies</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Leaching</topic><topic>Load distribution</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Kenneth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Edwin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweat, Lewin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graetz, Donald A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woodard, Kenneth R</au><au>French, Edwin C</au><au>Sweat, Lewin A</au><au>Graetz, Donald A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1980</spage><pages>1980-</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Florida dairies need year-round forage systems that prevent loss of N to ground water from waste effluent sprayfields. Our purpose was to quantify forage N removal and monitor nitrate N (NO3(-)-N) concentrations in soil water below the rooting zone for two forage systems during four 12-mo cycles (1996-2000). Soil in the sprayfield is an excessively drained Kershaw sand (thermic, uncoated Typic Quartzipsamment). Over four cycles, average loading rates of effluent N were 500, 690, and 910 kg ha(-1) per cycle. Nitrogen removed by the bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.)-rye (Secale cereale L.) system (BR) during the first three cycles was 465 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low loading rate, 528 kg ha(-1) for the medium rate, and 585 kg ha(-1) for the high. For the corn (Zea mays L.)-forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-rye system (CSR), N removals were 320 kg ha(-1) per cycle for the low rate, 327 kg ha(-1) for the medium, and 378 kg ha(-1) for the high. The higher N removals for BR were attributed to higher N concentration in bermudagrass (18.1-24.2 g kg(-1)) than in corn and forage sorghum (10.3-14.7 g kg(-1)). Dry matter yield declined in the fourth cycle for bermudagrass but N removal continued to be higher for BR than CSR. The BR system was much more effective at preventing NO3(-)-N leaching. For CSR, NO3(-)-N levels in soil water (1.5 m below surface) increased steeply during the period between the harvest of one forage and canopy dosure of the next. Overall, the BR system was better than CSR at removing N from the soil and maintaining low NO3(-)-N concentrations below the rooting zone.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/jeq2002.1980</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2425
ispartof Journal of environmental quality, 2002-11, Vol.31 (6), p.1980
issn 0047-2425
1537-2537
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197388884
source Wiley Online Library Journals
subjects Corn
Dairies
Dry matter
Effluents
Leaching
Load distribution
Moisture content
Nitrogen removal
Soil water
Sorghum
title Plant and environment interactions: Nitrogen removal and nitrate leaching for forage systems receiving dairy effluent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T17%3A16%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20and%20environment%20interactions:%20Nitrogen%20removal%20and%20nitrate%20leaching%20for%20forage%20systems%20receiving%20dairy%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Woodard,%20Kenneth%20R&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1980&rft.pages=1980-&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2002.1980&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E259567281%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197388884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true