A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity
In this paper I will hold that it is desirable to ensure people be included within the borders and the political community both, but I will point out the potential incompatibility of the two. In an open-borders society, members of a polity would not be exclusively individuals who expect to stay in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Res publica (Liverpool, England) England), 2019-02, Vol.25 (1), p.101-117 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 117 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 101 |
container_title | Res publica (Liverpool, England) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Biale, Enrico |
description | In this paper I will hold that it is desirable to ensure people be included within the borders and the political community both, but I will point out the potential incompatibility of the two. In an open-borders society, members of a polity would not be exclusively individuals who expect to stay in a country for a long time but also people who temporarily work and live there. Among this latter group would be individuals who would continuously migrate—call them hypermigrants. While I agree that hypermigrants cannot be fully included in the decision making, excluding them is problematic because it justifies a hierarchical society. The case of hypermigrants points to the tension between treating people as equals by including them in a democratic system whose members do not simply support their own interests but strive for the common good and by including them in an open-borders society that acknowledges their life plans as of equal worth. To overcome these problems I will claim that it is possible to justify an account of a fluid demos that provides different levels of political inclusion and addresses the challenges of a hypermigration polity. In this account, citizenship and full political inclusion are granted to permanent members only but hypermigrants are partially included. This perspective recognises every member of the polity as equal and ensures that she has control over the relevant political decisions without undermining the idea that citizenship requires a sense of belonging to the political community and concern for its long-term interests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1973670878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1973670878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-1528287db38e058ee15d407157c20436cbc6ed7a684310c49bc5883fc566ee4f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAGyRmBgMd3ZsX8aq0BapEgwwW6njVKnautjp0LfHVRhYmO6G__vv9DF2j_CEAOY5IaIiDmh4JQm5uGAjVEZw0pW4zLtUmpdGq2t2k9IGABRUYsQeJ8Vse-ya4sXvQiraEIu6WJwOPu66daz7LuyLj7Dt-tMtu2rrbfJ3v3PMvmavn9MFX77P36aTJXdCU89RCRJkmpUkD4q8R9WUYPIvTkAptVs57RtTayolgiurlVNEsnVKa-_LVo7Zw9B7iOH76FNvN-EY9_mkxcpIbYAM5RQOKRdDStG39hC7XR1PFsGejdjBiM1G7NmIFZkRA5Nydr_28U_zv9APcYhgvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1973670878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Biale, Enrico</creator><creatorcontrib>Biale, Enrico</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper I will hold that it is desirable to ensure people be included within the borders and the political community both, but I will point out the potential incompatibility of the two. In an open-borders society, members of a polity would not be exclusively individuals who expect to stay in a country for a long time but also people who temporarily work and live there. Among this latter group would be individuals who would continuously migrate—call them hypermigrants. While I agree that hypermigrants cannot be fully included in the decision making, excluding them is problematic because it justifies a hierarchical society. The case of hypermigrants points to the tension between treating people as equals by including them in a democratic system whose members do not simply support their own interests but strive for the common good and by including them in an open-borders society that acknowledges their life plans as of equal worth. To overcome these problems I will claim that it is possible to justify an account of a fluid demos that provides different levels of political inclusion and addresses the challenges of a hypermigration polity. In this account, citizenship and full political inclusion are granted to permanent members only but hypermigrants are partially included. This perspective recognises every member of the polity as equal and ensures that she has control over the relevant political decisions without undermining the idea that citizenship requires a sense of belonging to the political community and concern for its long-term interests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-4765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Borders ; Boundaries ; Citizenship ; Decision making ; Education ; Ethics ; Immigration policy ; Legal History ; Life plans ; Migration ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Political behavior ; Political Philosophy ; Political systems ; Political Theory ; Social integration ; Society ; Theories of Law</subject><ispartof>Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2019-02, Vol.25 (1), p.101-117</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Res Publica is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-1528287db38e058ee15d407157c20436cbc6ed7a684310c49bc5883fc566ee4f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Biale, Enrico</creatorcontrib><title>A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity</title><title>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</title><addtitle>Res Publica</addtitle><description>In this paper I will hold that it is desirable to ensure people be included within the borders and the political community both, but I will point out the potential incompatibility of the two. In an open-borders society, members of a polity would not be exclusively individuals who expect to stay in a country for a long time but also people who temporarily work and live there. Among this latter group would be individuals who would continuously migrate—call them hypermigrants. While I agree that hypermigrants cannot be fully included in the decision making, excluding them is problematic because it justifies a hierarchical society. The case of hypermigrants points to the tension between treating people as equals by including them in a democratic system whose members do not simply support their own interests but strive for the common good and by including them in an open-borders society that acknowledges their life plans as of equal worth. To overcome these problems I will claim that it is possible to justify an account of a fluid demos that provides different levels of political inclusion and addresses the challenges of a hypermigration polity. In this account, citizenship and full political inclusion are granted to permanent members only but hypermigrants are partially included. This perspective recognises every member of the polity as equal and ensures that she has control over the relevant political decisions without undermining the idea that citizenship requires a sense of belonging to the political community and concern for its long-term interests.</description><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Immigration policy</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Life plans</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Political behavior</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Social integration</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><issn>1356-4765</issn><issn>1572-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EEqXwAGyRmBgMd3ZsX8aq0BapEgwwW6njVKnautjp0LfHVRhYmO6G__vv9DF2j_CEAOY5IaIiDmh4JQm5uGAjVEZw0pW4zLtUmpdGq2t2k9IGABRUYsQeJ8Vse-ya4sXvQiraEIu6WJwOPu66daz7LuyLj7Dt-tMtu2rrbfJ3v3PMvmavn9MFX77P36aTJXdCU89RCRJkmpUkD4q8R9WUYPIvTkAptVs57RtTayolgiurlVNEsnVKa-_LVo7Zw9B7iOH76FNvN-EY9_mkxcpIbYAM5RQOKRdDStG39hC7XR1PFsGejdjBiM1G7NmIFZkRA5Nydr_28U_zv9APcYhgvA</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Biale, Enrico</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity</title><author>Biale, Enrico</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-1528287db38e058ee15d407157c20436cbc6ed7a684310c49bc5883fc566ee4f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Immigration policy</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Life plans</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Political behavior</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Social integration</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Biale, Enrico</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Biale, Enrico</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity</atitle><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle><stitle>Res Publica</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101</spage><epage>117</epage><pages>101-117</pages><issn>1356-4765</issn><eissn>1572-8692</eissn><abstract>In this paper I will hold that it is desirable to ensure people be included within the borders and the political community both, but I will point out the potential incompatibility of the two. In an open-borders society, members of a polity would not be exclusively individuals who expect to stay in a country for a long time but also people who temporarily work and live there. Among this latter group would be individuals who would continuously migrate—call them hypermigrants. While I agree that hypermigrants cannot be fully included in the decision making, excluding them is problematic because it justifies a hierarchical society. The case of hypermigrants points to the tension between treating people as equals by including them in a democratic system whose members do not simply support their own interests but strive for the common good and by including them in an open-borders society that acknowledges their life plans as of equal worth. To overcome these problems I will claim that it is possible to justify an account of a fluid demos that provides different levels of political inclusion and addresses the challenges of a hypermigration polity. In this account, citizenship and full political inclusion are granted to permanent members only but hypermigrants are partially included. This perspective recognises every member of the polity as equal and ensures that she has control over the relevant political decisions without undermining the idea that citizenship requires a sense of belonging to the political community and concern for its long-term interests.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-4765 |
ispartof | Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2019-02, Vol.25 (1), p.101-117 |
issn | 1356-4765 1572-8692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1973670878 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Borders Boundaries Citizenship Decision making Education Ethics Immigration policy Legal History Life plans Migration Philosophy Philosophy of Law Political behavior Political Philosophy Political systems Political Theory Social integration Society Theories of Law |
title | A Fluid Demos for a Hypermigration Polity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A48%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Fluid%20Demos%20for%20a%20Hypermigration%20Polity&rft.jtitle=Res%20publica%20(Liverpool,%20England)&rft.au=Biale,%20Enrico&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101&rft.epage=117&rft.pages=101-117&rft.issn=1356-4765&rft.eissn=1572-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11158-017-9381-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1973670878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1973670878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |