MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW

Throughout the history of US antitrust litigation, the outcome of more cases has surely turned on market definition than on any other substantive issue. Market definition is often the most critical step in evaluating market power and determining whether business conduct has or likely will have antic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antitrust law journal 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.129-173
1. Verfasser: Baker, Jonathan B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 173
container_issue 1
container_start_page 129
container_title Antitrust law journal
container_volume 74
creator Baker, Jonathan B.
description Throughout the history of US antitrust litigation, the outcome of more cases has surely turned on market definition than on any other substantive issue. Market definition is often the most critical step in evaluating market power and determining whether business conduct has or likely will have anticompetitive effects. This survey addresses the reasons for undertaking market definition in antitrust analysis and methods of doing so. It discusses how the process of market definition should be conducted, with attention to the practical difficulties of doing so. Among other things, it explains why markets should be defined based solely with reference to demand substitution, leaving supply substitution considerations for other steps of competitive effects analysis, and identifies five types of evidence as to buyer substitution. The article also discusses the appropriate scope of markets (including supermarkets) and explains why four approaches sometimes employed for market definition (price correlations, shipment flows, critical loss analysis, and cluster markets) should be avoided. In addition, it analyzes how market definition differs depending on whether the alleged harm is prospective or retrospective and depending upon whether the anticompetitive theory involves collusion or exclusion.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197276624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27897544</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27897544</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g235t-b67d32176b9012cf90da924410944d62610002d75ce5468c439f66ff697913b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoWEd_glDcuQgkL8nLxF0ZMxqsLQx1xFXpV8Sidkw7C_-9HUa4cDeHe-4JiUAAUqO1PCURY0xQZArPycU49oxxxoFH5PY52TzZIr63a5e5wuXZXZxkc5L0rXCrJI3zrd1snX29JGe--hy7q_9ekJe1LVaPNM0fDiB9B6EmWqNuBXCNtZkNjTesrQxIyZmRskVAPl-BVqumUxKXjRTGI3qPRhsuaikW5Oa4uwvDz74bp7If9uF7VpbcaNCIcICuj1A_TkMod-Hjqwq_Jeil0UpK8Qfr8UE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197276624</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Baker, Jonathan B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><description>Throughout the history of US antitrust litigation, the outcome of more cases has surely turned on market definition than on any other substantive issue. Market definition is often the most critical step in evaluating market power and determining whether business conduct has or likely will have anticompetitive effects. This survey addresses the reasons for undertaking market definition in antitrust analysis and methods of doing so. It discusses how the process of market definition should be conducted, with attention to the practical difficulties of doing so. Among other things, it explains why markets should be defined based solely with reference to demand substitution, leaving supply substitution considerations for other steps of competitive effects analysis, and identifies five types of evidence as to buyer substitution. The article also discusses the appropriate scope of markets (including supermarkets) and explains why four approaches sometimes employed for market definition (price correlations, shipment flows, critical loss analysis, and cluster markets) should be avoided. In addition, it analyzes how market definition differs depending on whether the alleged harm is prospective or retrospective and depending upon whether the anticompetitive theory involves collusion or exclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-9774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Bar Association</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Antitrust ; Antitrust laws ; Business conditions ; Collusion ; Competition ; Elasticity of demand ; Litigation ; Market demand ; Market power ; Market prices ; Market share ; Price increases ; Product markets ; Studies ; Supply</subject><ispartof>Antitrust law journal, 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.129-173</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 American Bar Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Bar Association 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27897544$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27897544$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><title>MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW</title><title>Antitrust law journal</title><description>Throughout the history of US antitrust litigation, the outcome of more cases has surely turned on market definition than on any other substantive issue. Market definition is often the most critical step in evaluating market power and determining whether business conduct has or likely will have anticompetitive effects. This survey addresses the reasons for undertaking market definition in antitrust analysis and methods of doing so. It discusses how the process of market definition should be conducted, with attention to the practical difficulties of doing so. Among other things, it explains why markets should be defined based solely with reference to demand substitution, leaving supply substitution considerations for other steps of competitive effects analysis, and identifies five types of evidence as to buyer substitution. The article also discusses the appropriate scope of markets (including supermarkets) and explains why four approaches sometimes employed for market definition (price correlations, shipment flows, critical loss analysis, and cluster markets) should be avoided. In addition, it analyzes how market definition differs depending on whether the alleged harm is prospective or retrospective and depending upon whether the anticompetitive theory involves collusion or exclusion.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Antitrust laws</subject><subject>Business conditions</subject><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Elasticity of demand</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Market demand</subject><subject>Market power</subject><subject>Market prices</subject><subject>Market share</subject><subject>Price increases</subject><subject>Product markets</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supply</subject><issn>0003-6056</issn><issn>2326-9774</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNotjk1LxDAURYMoWEd_glDcuQgkL8nLxF0ZMxqsLQx1xFXpV8Sidkw7C_-9HUa4cDeHe-4JiUAAUqO1PCURY0xQZArPycU49oxxxoFH5PY52TzZIr63a5e5wuXZXZxkc5L0rXCrJI3zrd1snX29JGe--hy7q_9ekJe1LVaPNM0fDiB9B6EmWqNuBXCNtZkNjTesrQxIyZmRskVAPl-BVqumUxKXjRTGI3qPRhsuaikW5Oa4uwvDz74bp7If9uF7VpbcaNCIcICuj1A_TkMod-Hjqwq_Jeil0UpK8Qfr8UE4</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Baker, Jonathan B.</creator><general>American Bar Association</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW</title><author>Baker, Jonathan B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g235t-b67d32176b9012cf90da924410944d62610002d75ce5468c439f66ff697913b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Antitrust laws</topic><topic>Business conditions</topic><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Elasticity of demand</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Market demand</topic><topic>Market power</topic><topic>Market prices</topic><topic>Market share</topic><topic>Price increases</topic><topic>Product markets</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jonathan B.</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Antitrust law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Jonathan B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW</atitle><jtitle>Antitrust law journal</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>173</epage><pages>129-173</pages><issn>0003-6056</issn><eissn>2326-9774</eissn><abstract>Throughout the history of US antitrust litigation, the outcome of more cases has surely turned on market definition than on any other substantive issue. Market definition is often the most critical step in evaluating market power and determining whether business conduct has or likely will have anticompetitive effects. This survey addresses the reasons for undertaking market definition in antitrust analysis and methods of doing so. It discusses how the process of market definition should be conducted, with attention to the practical difficulties of doing so. Among other things, it explains why markets should be defined based solely with reference to demand substitution, leaving supply substitution considerations for other steps of competitive effects analysis, and identifies five types of evidence as to buyer substitution. The article also discusses the appropriate scope of markets (including supermarkets) and explains why four approaches sometimes employed for market definition (price correlations, shipment flows, critical loss analysis, and cluster markets) should be avoided. In addition, it analyzes how market definition differs depending on whether the alleged harm is prospective or retrospective and depending upon whether the anticompetitive theory involves collusion or exclusion.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Bar Association</pub><tpages>45</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6056
ispartof Antitrust law journal, 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.129-173
issn 0003-6056
2326-9774
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_197276624
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Aluminum
Antitrust
Antitrust laws
Business conditions
Collusion
Competition
Elasticity of demand
Litigation
Market demand
Market power
Market prices
Market share
Price increases
Product markets
Studies
Supply
title MARKET DEFINITION: AN ANALYTICAL OVERVIEW
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MARKET%20DEFINITION:%20AN%20ANALYTICAL%20OVERVIEW&rft.jtitle=Antitrust%20law%20journal&rft.au=Baker,%20Jonathan%20B.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=173&rft.pages=129-173&rft.issn=0003-6056&rft.eissn=2326-9774&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27897544%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197276624&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27897544&rfr_iscdi=true