Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises

Analysis based on a new measure of financial distress for 24 advanced economies in the postwar period shows substantial variation in the aftermath of financial crises. This paper examines the role that macroeconomic policy plays in explaining this variation. We find that the degree of monetary and f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economica (London) 2018-01, Vol.85 (337), p.1-40
Hauptverfasser: Romer, Christina D., Romer, David H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue 337
container_start_page 1
container_title Economica (London)
container_volume 85
creator Romer, Christina D.
Romer, David H.
description Analysis based on a new measure of financial distress for 24 advanced economies in the postwar period shows substantial variation in the aftermath of financial crises. This paper examines the role that macroeconomic policy plays in explaining this variation. We find that the degree of monetary and fiscal policy space prior to financial distress—that is, whether the policy interest rate is above the zero lower bound and whether the debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively low—greatly affects the aftermath of crises. The decline in output following a crisis is less than 1 % when a country possesses both types of policy space, but almost 10% when it has neither. The difference is highly statistically significant and robust to the measures of policy space and the sample. We also consider the mechanisms by which policy space matters. We find that monetary and fiscal policy are used more aggressively when policy space is ample. Financial distress itself is also less persistent when there is policy space. The findings may have implications for policy during both normal times and periods of acute financial distress.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ecca.12258
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1972272964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26746399</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26746399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-88a9cd0fb1127a20356cce01bc8df765aee8259b706fe42e5fc13822113f72503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVJoI7TS-8FQW-BdaXR7mq3N7O104JDDHHJcZHlEZbZXTnSmuJb3yFvmCeJnG1KTpnDDAzf_w_zE_KZswmP9Q21VhMOkBUfyIineZEwIbIzMmKMi4SlID-SixB2LFYGckTa5dY2jd0HukDdHzzSp7-P9H57pHeuRbqyLQY6jesf1hj02PXf6Y3S3qF2nWutpkvXWH2kqtvQfot0anr0req31Bk6t53qtFUNrbwNGC7JuVFNwE__5pj8ns9W1c9kcXv9q5ouEp1yUSRFoUq9YWbNOUgFTGS51sj4WhcbI_NMIRaQlWvJcoMpYGZ0lAFwLoyEjIkx-Tr47r17OGDo6507-C6erHkpASSUeRqpq4GK74Tg0dR7b1vljzVn9SnO-hRn_RJnhOkAnx634Q2a5sBih4jwAfljGzy-Y1bPqmr6avtl0OxC7_x_DeQyzUVZimeA0Ysi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972272964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete (EBSCO)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Romer, Christina D. ; Romer, David H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Romer, Christina D. ; Romer, David H.</creatorcontrib><description>Analysis based on a new measure of financial distress for 24 advanced economies in the postwar period shows substantial variation in the aftermath of financial crises. This paper examines the role that macroeconomic policy plays in explaining this variation. We find that the degree of monetary and fiscal policy space prior to financial distress—that is, whether the policy interest rate is above the zero lower bound and whether the debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively low—greatly affects the aftermath of crises. The decline in output following a crisis is less than 1 % when a country possesses both types of policy space, but almost 10% when it has neither. The difference is highly statistically significant and robust to the measures of policy space and the sample. We also consider the mechanisms by which policy space matters. We find that monetary and fiscal policy are used more aggressively when policy space is ample. Financial distress itself is also less persistent when there is policy space. The findings may have implications for policy during both normal times and periods of acute financial distress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>1967-2012 ; Aftermath ; Debt ; Economic crisis ; Economic models ; Finanzkrise ; Finanzpolitik ; Fiscal policy ; Game theory ; GDP ; Geldpolitik ; Gross Domestic Product ; Industrieländer ; Interest rates ; Macroeconomics ; Monetary policy ; Psychological distress ; Welt ; Wirkungsanalyse</subject><ispartof>Economica (London), 2018-01, Vol.85 (337), p.1-40</ispartof><rights>2017 The London School of Economics and Political Science</rights><rights>Economica © 2018 The London School of Economics and Political Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-88a9cd0fb1127a20356cce01bc8df765aee8259b706fe42e5fc13822113f72503</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26746399$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26746399$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romer, Christina D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romer, David H.</creatorcontrib><title>Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises</title><title>Economica (London)</title><description>Analysis based on a new measure of financial distress for 24 advanced economies in the postwar period shows substantial variation in the aftermath of financial crises. This paper examines the role that macroeconomic policy plays in explaining this variation. We find that the degree of monetary and fiscal policy space prior to financial distress—that is, whether the policy interest rate is above the zero lower bound and whether the debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively low—greatly affects the aftermath of crises. The decline in output following a crisis is less than 1 % when a country possesses both types of policy space, but almost 10% when it has neither. The difference is highly statistically significant and robust to the measures of policy space and the sample. We also consider the mechanisms by which policy space matters. We find that monetary and fiscal policy are used more aggressively when policy space is ample. Financial distress itself is also less persistent when there is policy space. The findings may have implications for policy during both normal times and periods of acute financial distress.</description><subject>1967-2012</subject><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Finanzkrise</subject><subject>Finanzpolitik</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Geldpolitik</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Industrieländer</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Macroeconomics</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Psychological distress</subject><subject>Welt</subject><subject>Wirkungsanalyse</subject><issn>0013-0427</issn><issn>1468-0335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFqGzEQhkVJoI7TS-8FQW-BdaXR7mq3N7O104JDDHHJcZHlEZbZXTnSmuJb3yFvmCeJnG1KTpnDDAzf_w_zE_KZswmP9Q21VhMOkBUfyIineZEwIbIzMmKMi4SlID-SixB2LFYGckTa5dY2jd0HukDdHzzSp7-P9H57pHeuRbqyLQY6jesf1hj02PXf6Y3S3qF2nWutpkvXWH2kqtvQfot0anr0req31Bk6t53qtFUNrbwNGC7JuVFNwE__5pj8ns9W1c9kcXv9q5ouEp1yUSRFoUq9YWbNOUgFTGS51sj4WhcbI_NMIRaQlWvJcoMpYGZ0lAFwLoyEjIkx-Tr47r17OGDo6507-C6erHkpASSUeRqpq4GK74Tg0dR7b1vljzVn9SnO-hRn_RJnhOkAnx634Q2a5sBih4jwAfljGzy-Y1bPqmr6avtl0OxC7_x_DeQyzUVZimeA0Ysi</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Romer, Christina D.</creator><creator>Romer, David H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises</title><author>Romer, Christina D. ; Romer, David H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4138-88a9cd0fb1127a20356cce01bc8df765aee8259b706fe42e5fc13822113f72503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>1967-2012</topic><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Finanzkrise</topic><topic>Finanzpolitik</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Geldpolitik</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Industrieländer</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Macroeconomics</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Psychological distress</topic><topic>Welt</topic><topic>Wirkungsanalyse</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romer, Christina D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romer, David H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romer, Christina D.</au><au>Romer, David H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises</atitle><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>337</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>1-40</pages><issn>0013-0427</issn><eissn>1468-0335</eissn><abstract>Analysis based on a new measure of financial distress for 24 advanced economies in the postwar period shows substantial variation in the aftermath of financial crises. This paper examines the role that macroeconomic policy plays in explaining this variation. We find that the degree of monetary and fiscal policy space prior to financial distress—that is, whether the policy interest rate is above the zero lower bound and whether the debt-to-GDP ratio is relatively low—greatly affects the aftermath of crises. The decline in output following a crisis is less than 1 % when a country possesses both types of policy space, but almost 10% when it has neither. The difference is highly statistically significant and robust to the measures of policy space and the sample. We also consider the mechanisms by which policy space matters. We find that monetary and fiscal policy are used more aggressively when policy space is ample. Financial distress itself is also less persistent when there is policy space. The findings may have implications for policy during both normal times and periods of acute financial distress.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/ecca.12258</doi><tpages>40</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0427
ispartof Economica (London), 2018-01, Vol.85 (337), p.1-40
issn 0013-0427
1468-0335
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1972272964
source Wiley Online Library Journals; Business Source Complete (EBSCO); PAIS Index; JSTOR
subjects 1967-2012
Aftermath
Debt
Economic crisis
Economic models
Finanzkrise
Finanzpolitik
Fiscal policy
Game theory
GDP
Geldpolitik
Gross Domestic Product
Industrieländer
Interest rates
Macroeconomics
Monetary policy
Psychological distress
Welt
Wirkungsanalyse
title Phillips Lecture – Why Some Times Are Different: Macroeconomic Policy and the Aftermath of Financial Crises
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T19%3A27%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phillips%20Lecture%20%E2%80%93%20Why%20Some%20Times%20Are%20Different:%20Macroeconomic%20Policy%20and%20the%20Aftermath%20of%20Financial%20Crises&rft.jtitle=Economica%20(London)&rft.au=Romer,%20Christina%20D.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=337&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=1-40&rft.issn=0013-0427&rft.eissn=1468-0335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecca.12258&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26746399%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972272964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26746399&rfr_iscdi=true