Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications
A number of studies in strategic management rely on panel (longitudinal) data to test theory. The advantages of panel data notwithstanding, such data introduce analytic problems (e.g., autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, contemporaneous correlation) that make traditional estimators (e.g., ordinary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of management 2006-06, Vol.32 (3), p.449-471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 471 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Journal of management |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Certo, S. Trevis Semadeni, Matthew |
description | A number of studies in strategic management rely on panel (longitudinal) data to test theory. The advantages of panel data notwithstanding, such data introduce analytic problems (e.g., autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, contemporaneous correlation) that make traditional estimators (e.g., ordinary least squares) inappropriate. This study highlights the influence of contemporaneous correlation, a statistical problem that affects the analysis of panel data. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors find that contemporaneous correlation is particularly problematic when analyzing data sets typically used in strategic management research. They suggest straightforward techniques to mitigate the harmful effects of contemporaneous correlation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0149206305283320 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_197138267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0149206305283320</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1030540001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-d3fe4ad64548b407fdfd4e16143019604aa94815c98821e204c7d1a820fc48243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Lw0AQhRdRsFbvHoP36MzuJLvRk9SqhYLij3MYdzc1JU3qbir0v7e1HkTwNIfve2_gCXGKcI6o9QUgFRJyBZk0SknYEwPMMp2iRNwXgy1Ot_xQHMU4BwA0QANx9dwH7v1snTz56DnY94Rblzxy65vkhnu-TMaftfOt9d9gslg2teW-7tp4LA4qbqI_-blD8Xo7fhndp9OHu8noepqyKnSfOlV5YpdTRuaNQFeucuQxR1KARQ7EXJDBzBbGSPQSyGqHbCRUlowkNRRnu95l6D5WPvblvFuFdvOyxEKjMjLXGwl2kg1djMFX5TLUCw7rEqHcLlT-XWgTSXeRyDP_q_M__wtDHmKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197138267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><creator>Certo, S. Trevis ; Semadeni, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Certo, S. Trevis ; Semadeni, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>A number of studies in strategic management rely on panel (longitudinal) data to test theory. The advantages of panel data notwithstanding, such data introduce analytic problems (e.g., autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, contemporaneous correlation) that make traditional estimators (e.g., ordinary least squares) inappropriate. This study highlights the influence of contemporaneous correlation, a statistical problem that affects the analysis of panel data. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors find that contemporaneous correlation is particularly problematic when analyzing data sets typically used in strategic management research. They suggest straightforward techniques to mitigate the harmful effects of contemporaneous correlation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2063</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-1211</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0149206305283320</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOMADO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Correlation analysis ; Data analysis ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Research methodology ; Strategic management ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of management, 2006-06, Vol.32 (3), p.449-471</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 1, 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-d3fe4ad64548b407fdfd4e16143019604aa94815c98821e204c7d1a820fc48243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-d3fe4ad64548b407fdfd4e16143019604aa94815c98821e204c7d1a820fc48243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0149206305283320$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0149206305283320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Certo, S. Trevis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semadeni, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications</title><title>Journal of management</title><description>A number of studies in strategic management rely on panel (longitudinal) data to test theory. The advantages of panel data notwithstanding, such data introduce analytic problems (e.g., autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, contemporaneous correlation) that make traditional estimators (e.g., ordinary least squares) inappropriate. This study highlights the influence of contemporaneous correlation, a statistical problem that affects the analysis of panel data. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors find that contemporaneous correlation is particularly problematic when analyzing data sets typically used in strategic management research. They suggest straightforward techniques to mitigate the harmful effects of contemporaneous correlation.</description><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0149-2063</issn><issn>1557-1211</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM9Lw0AQhRdRsFbvHoP36MzuJLvRk9SqhYLij3MYdzc1JU3qbir0v7e1HkTwNIfve2_gCXGKcI6o9QUgFRJyBZk0SknYEwPMMp2iRNwXgy1Ot_xQHMU4BwA0QANx9dwH7v1snTz56DnY94Rblzxy65vkhnu-TMaftfOt9d9gslg2teW-7tp4LA4qbqI_-blD8Xo7fhndp9OHu8noepqyKnSfOlV5YpdTRuaNQFeucuQxR1KARQ7EXJDBzBbGSPQSyGqHbCRUlowkNRRnu95l6D5WPvblvFuFdvOyxEKjMjLXGwl2kg1djMFX5TLUCw7rEqHcLlT-XWgTSXeRyDP_q_M__wtDHmKg</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Certo, S. Trevis</creator><creator>Semadeni, Matthew</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications</title><author>Certo, S. Trevis ; Semadeni, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a397t-d3fe4ad64548b407fdfd4e16143019604aa94815c98821e204c7d1a820fc48243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Certo, S. Trevis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semadeni, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Certo, S. Trevis</au><au>Semadeni, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of management</jtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>449</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>449-471</pages><issn>0149-2063</issn><eissn>1557-1211</eissn><coden>JOMADO</coden><abstract>A number of studies in strategic management rely on panel (longitudinal) data to test theory. The advantages of panel data notwithstanding, such data introduce analytic problems (e.g., autocorrelation, heteroskedasticity, contemporaneous correlation) that make traditional estimators (e.g., ordinary least squares) inappropriate. This study highlights the influence of contemporaneous correlation, a statistical problem that affects the analysis of panel data. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors find that contemporaneous correlation is particularly problematic when analyzing data sets typically used in strategic management research. They suggest straightforward techniques to mitigate the harmful effects of contemporaneous correlation.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0149206305283320</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2063 |
ispartof | Journal of management, 2006-06, Vol.32 (3), p.449-471 |
issn | 0149-2063 1557-1211 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_197138267 |
source | SAGE Publications |
subjects | Correlation analysis Data analysis Monte Carlo simulation Research methodology Strategic management Studies |
title | Strategy Research and Panel Data: Evidence and Implications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A47%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategy%20Research%20and%20Panel%20Data:%20Evidence%20and%20Implications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20management&rft.au=Certo,%20S.%20Trevis&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=449-471&rft.issn=0149-2063&rft.eissn=1557-1211&rft.coden=JOMADO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0149206305283320&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1030540001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197138267&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0149206305283320&rfr_iscdi=true |