The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search
Computational cognitive models developed so far do not incorporate individual differences in domain knowledge in predicting user clicks on search result pages. We address this problem using a cognitive model of information search which enables us to use two semantic spaces having a low (non-expert s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information retrieval (Boston) 2017-10, Vol.20 (5), p.456-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 479 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 456 |
container_title | Information retrieval (Boston) |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Karanam, Saraschandra Jorge-Botana, Guillermo Olmos, Ricardo van Oostendorp, Herre |
description | Computational cognitive models developed so far do not incorporate individual differences in domain knowledge in predicting user clicks on search result pages. We address this problem using a cognitive model of information search which enables us to use two semantic spaces having a low (non-expert semantic space) and a high (expert semantic space) amount of medical and health related information to represent respectively low and high knowledge of users in this domain. We also investigated two different processes along which one can gain a larger amount of knowledge in a domain: an evolutionary and a common core process. Simulations of model click behavior on difficult information search tasks and subsequent matching with actual behavioral data from users (divided into low and high domain knowledge groups based on a domain knowledge test) were conducted. Results showed that the efficacy of modeling for high domain knowledge participants (in terms of the number of matches between the model predictions and the actual user clicks on search result pages) was higher with the expert semantic space compared to the non-expert semantic space while for low domain knowledge participants it was the other way around. When the process of knowledge acquisition was taken into account, the effect of using a semantic space based on high domain knowledge was significant only for high domain knowledge participants, irrespective of the knowledge acquisition process. The implications of these outcomes for support tools that can be built based on these models are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10791-017-9308-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1971251153</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1971251153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e6e213acac23ba24a850e9ef2a2d54158778bd2741ad0319d871dc13762f02343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giMRt8_oidEVVAkZBYymy58SVNaexipyD-PanCwMJ0d9Lzvic9hFwDuwXG9F0GpiugDDStBDPUnJAZKC2oLlV1Ou7ClFSqUp6Ti5y3jLFSympGlqsNFinusIhN4WPvulC8h_i1Q99iMR51bEM3dJ9Y9NHjrgvtkexCE1Pvhi6GIqNL9eaSnDVul_Hqd87J2-PDarGkL69Pz4v7F1pLxgeKJXIQrnY1F2vHpTOKYYUNd9wrCcpobdaeawnOMwGVNxp8DUKXvGFcSDEnN1PvPsWPA-bBbuMhhfGlhUoDVwBKjBRMVJ1izgkbu09d79K3BWaPwuwkzI7C7FGYNWOGT5k8sqHF9Kf539APjSZs_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1971251153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Karanam, Saraschandra ; Jorge-Botana, Guillermo ; Olmos, Ricardo ; van Oostendorp, Herre</creator><creatorcontrib>Karanam, Saraschandra ; Jorge-Botana, Guillermo ; Olmos, Ricardo ; van Oostendorp, Herre</creatorcontrib><description>Computational cognitive models developed so far do not incorporate individual differences in domain knowledge in predicting user clicks on search result pages. We address this problem using a cognitive model of information search which enables us to use two semantic spaces having a low (non-expert semantic space) and a high (expert semantic space) amount of medical and health related information to represent respectively low and high knowledge of users in this domain. We also investigated two different processes along which one can gain a larger amount of knowledge in a domain: an evolutionary and a common core process. Simulations of model click behavior on difficult information search tasks and subsequent matching with actual behavioral data from users (divided into low and high domain knowledge groups based on a domain knowledge test) were conducted. Results showed that the efficacy of modeling for high domain knowledge participants (in terms of the number of matches between the model predictions and the actual user clicks on search result pages) was higher with the expert semantic space compared to the non-expert semantic space while for low domain knowledge participants it was the other way around. When the process of knowledge acquisition was taken into account, the effect of using a semantic space based on high domain knowledge was significant only for high domain knowledge participants, irrespective of the knowledge acquisition process. The implications of these outcomes for support tools that can be built based on these models are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-4564</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7659</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10791-017-9308-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Cognitive models ; Computer Science ; Computer simulation ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; End users ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Knowledge acquisition ; Mathematical models ; Microprocessors ; Natural Language Processing (NLP) ; Pattern Recognition ; Predictions ; Search as Learning ; Searching ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Information retrieval (Boston), 2017-10, Vol.20 (5), p.456-479</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>Information Retrieval Journal is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e6e213acac23ba24a850e9ef2a2d54158778bd2741ad0319d871dc13762f02343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e6e213acac23ba24a850e9ef2a2d54158778bd2741ad0319d871dc13762f02343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karanam, Saraschandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorge-Botana, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmos, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostendorp, Herre</creatorcontrib><title>The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search</title><title>Information retrieval (Boston)</title><addtitle>Inf Retrieval J</addtitle><description>Computational cognitive models developed so far do not incorporate individual differences in domain knowledge in predicting user clicks on search result pages. We address this problem using a cognitive model of information search which enables us to use two semantic spaces having a low (non-expert semantic space) and a high (expert semantic space) amount of medical and health related information to represent respectively low and high knowledge of users in this domain. We also investigated two different processes along which one can gain a larger amount of knowledge in a domain: an evolutionary and a common core process. Simulations of model click behavior on difficult information search tasks and subsequent matching with actual behavioral data from users (divided into low and high domain knowledge groups based on a domain knowledge test) were conducted. Results showed that the efficacy of modeling for high domain knowledge participants (in terms of the number of matches between the model predictions and the actual user clicks on search result pages) was higher with the expert semantic space compared to the non-expert semantic space while for low domain knowledge participants it was the other way around. When the process of knowledge acquisition was taken into account, the effect of using a semantic space based on high domain knowledge was significant only for high domain knowledge participants, irrespective of the knowledge acquisition process. The implications of these outcomes for support tools that can be built based on these models are discussed.</description><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microprocessors</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Search as Learning</subject><subject>Searching</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>1386-4564</issn><issn>1573-7659</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwA9giMRt8_oidEVVAkZBYymy58SVNaexipyD-PanCwMJ0d9Lzvic9hFwDuwXG9F0GpiugDDStBDPUnJAZKC2oLlV1Ou7ClFSqUp6Ti5y3jLFSympGlqsNFinusIhN4WPvulC8h_i1Q99iMR51bEM3dJ9Y9NHjrgvtkexCE1Pvhi6GIqNL9eaSnDVul_Hqd87J2-PDarGkL69Pz4v7F1pLxgeKJXIQrnY1F2vHpTOKYYUNd9wrCcpobdaeawnOMwGVNxp8DUKXvGFcSDEnN1PvPsWPA-bBbuMhhfGlhUoDVwBKjBRMVJ1izgkbu09d79K3BWaPwuwkzI7C7FGYNWOGT5k8sqHF9Kf539APjSZs_A</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Karanam, Saraschandra</creator><creator>Jorge-Botana, Guillermo</creator><creator>Olmos, Ricardo</creator><creator>van Oostendorp, Herre</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search</title><author>Karanam, Saraschandra ; Jorge-Botana, Guillermo ; Olmos, Ricardo ; van Oostendorp, Herre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-e6e213acac23ba24a850e9ef2a2d54158778bd2741ad0319d871dc13762f02343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microprocessors</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Search as Learning</topic><topic>Searching</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karanam, Saraschandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jorge-Botana, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmos, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostendorp, Herre</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Information retrieval (Boston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karanam, Saraschandra</au><au>Jorge-Botana, Guillermo</au><au>Olmos, Ricardo</au><au>van Oostendorp, Herre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search</atitle><jtitle>Information retrieval (Boston)</jtitle><stitle>Inf Retrieval J</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>456</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>456-479</pages><issn>1386-4564</issn><eissn>1573-7659</eissn><abstract>Computational cognitive models developed so far do not incorporate individual differences in domain knowledge in predicting user clicks on search result pages. We address this problem using a cognitive model of information search which enables us to use two semantic spaces having a low (non-expert semantic space) and a high (expert semantic space) amount of medical and health related information to represent respectively low and high knowledge of users in this domain. We also investigated two different processes along which one can gain a larger amount of knowledge in a domain: an evolutionary and a common core process. Simulations of model click behavior on difficult information search tasks and subsequent matching with actual behavioral data from users (divided into low and high domain knowledge groups based on a domain knowledge test) were conducted. Results showed that the efficacy of modeling for high domain knowledge participants (in terms of the number of matches between the model predictions and the actual user clicks on search result pages) was higher with the expert semantic space compared to the non-expert semantic space while for low domain knowledge participants it was the other way around. When the process of knowledge acquisition was taken into account, the effect of using a semantic space based on high domain knowledge was significant only for high domain knowledge participants, irrespective of the knowledge acquisition process. The implications of these outcomes for support tools that can be built based on these models are discussed.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10791-017-9308-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-4564 |
ispartof | Information retrieval (Boston), 2017-10, Vol.20 (5), p.456-479 |
issn | 1386-4564 1573-7659 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1971251153 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cognitive models Computer Science Computer simulation Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Data Structures and Information Theory End users Information Storage and Retrieval Knowledge acquisition Mathematical models Microprocessors Natural Language Processing (NLP) Pattern Recognition Predictions Search as Learning Searching Semantics |
title | The role of domain knowledge in cognitive modeling of information search |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A38%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20domain%20knowledge%20in%20cognitive%20modeling%20of%20information%20search&rft.jtitle=Information%20retrieval%20(Boston)&rft.au=Karanam,%20Saraschandra&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=456&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=456-479&rft.issn=1386-4564&rft.eissn=1573-7659&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10791-017-9308-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1971251153%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1971251153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |