“E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous
Usually, the main argumentation against the same-sex marriage drags the nature in: gay marriage is ‘contra Naturam’. But, what is Nature in and of the marriage bond? The sex of the two partners? The natural fact of the procreation? Thanks by the theory of the sexual division of labour, the author de...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze) 2017-01, Vol.8 (16), p.199 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | ita |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 16 |
| container_start_page | 199 |
| container_title | SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze) |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Guizzardi, Luca |
| description | Usually, the main argumentation against the same-sex marriage drags the nature in: gay marriage is ‘contra Naturam’. But, what is Nature in and of the marriage bond? The sex of the two partners? The natural fact of the procreation? Thanks by the theory of the sexual division of labour, the author develops a durkheimian defence of the gay marriage goodness. Durkheim’s theory allows us to outline the natural elements of and in the marriage tie which go beyond the strictly contingency of the (hetero)sexuality as well as of the sexual reproduction. So, following Durkheim, the gay marriage is not only a juridical and normative transformation but, first of all, it is linked to the person’s relational ability and (relational) construction of a conscious self-identity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.13128/SMP-21288 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1970721020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1970721020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19707210203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj8EOATEYhBuJhODiCf7EhUPp342osxAXiQTnTcOPsqu0u-LoQXg5T6Jk3Z1mMt9kkmGsiaKLEUrVW8zmXAajSqwqRaR4hH1RYQ3vD0IIjJRClFV2e90fY7ga2Jj13mhnIdXOZBYIUrtLDEH7F3HiBbMF-yRf03ndn11YnXSY2ZIPkrvjnkxq9Cej5DuhdwRnmzvIbO7rrLzViadGoTXWmoyXoyk_O3vJyWfxIVRPAcU4HIiBRBFu_Nd6A47GUfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970721020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Guizzardi, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Guizzardi, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Usually, the main argumentation against the same-sex marriage drags the nature in: gay marriage is ‘contra Naturam’. But, what is Nature in and of the marriage bond? The sex of the two partners? The natural fact of the procreation? Thanks by the theory of the sexual division of labour, the author develops a durkheimian defence of the gay marriage goodness. Durkheim’s theory allows us to outline the natural elements of and in the marriage tie which go beyond the strictly contingency of the (hetero)sexuality as well as of the sexual reproduction. So, following Durkheim, the gay marriage is not only a juridical and normative transformation but, first of all, it is linked to the person’s relational ability and (relational) construction of a conscious self-identity.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.13128/SMP-21288</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>Florence: Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</publisher><subject>Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917) ; Gays & lesbians ; Homosexuality ; Morality ; Reproduction ; Same sex marriage ; Sexual division of labor ; Sexuality</subject><ispartof>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze), 2017-01, Vol.8 (16), p.199</ispartof><rights>Copyright Firenze University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,27346,27926,27927,33776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guizzardi, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>“E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous</title><title>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</title><description>Usually, the main argumentation against the same-sex marriage drags the nature in: gay marriage is ‘contra Naturam’. But, what is Nature in and of the marriage bond? The sex of the two partners? The natural fact of the procreation? Thanks by the theory of the sexual division of labour, the author develops a durkheimian defence of the gay marriage goodness. Durkheim’s theory allows us to outline the natural elements of and in the marriage tie which go beyond the strictly contingency of the (hetero)sexuality as well as of the sexual reproduction. So, following Durkheim, the gay marriage is not only a juridical and normative transformation but, first of all, it is linked to the person’s relational ability and (relational) construction of a conscious self-identity.</description><subject>Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917)</subject><subject>Gays & lesbians</subject><subject>Homosexuality</subject><subject>Morality</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Same sex marriage</subject><subject>Sexual division of labor</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><issn>2038-3150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj8EOATEYhBuJhODiCf7EhUPp342osxAXiQTnTcOPsqu0u-LoQXg5T6Jk3Z1mMt9kkmGsiaKLEUrVW8zmXAajSqwqRaR4hH1RYQ3vD0IIjJRClFV2e90fY7ga2Jj13mhnIdXOZBYIUrtLDEH7F3HiBbMF-yRf03ndn11YnXSY2ZIPkrvjnkxq9Cej5DuhdwRnmzvIbO7rrLzViadGoTXWmoyXoyk_O3vJyWfxIVRPAcU4HIiBRBFu_Nd6A47GUfw</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Guizzardi, Luca</creator><general>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>“E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous</title><author>Guizzardi, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19707210203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917)</topic><topic>Gays & lesbians</topic><topic>Homosexuality</topic><topic>Morality</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Same sex marriage</topic><topic>Sexual division of labor</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guizzardi, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guizzardi, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous</atitle><jtitle>SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze)</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>199</spage><pages>199-</pages><eissn>2038-3150</eissn><abstract>Usually, the main argumentation against the same-sex marriage drags the nature in: gay marriage is ‘contra Naturam’. But, what is Nature in and of the marriage bond? The sex of the two partners? The natural fact of the procreation? Thanks by the theory of the sexual division of labour, the author develops a durkheimian defence of the gay marriage goodness. Durkheim’s theory allows us to outline the natural elements of and in the marriage tie which go beyond the strictly contingency of the (hetero)sexuality as well as of the sexual reproduction. So, following Durkheim, the gay marriage is not only a juridical and normative transformation but, first of all, it is linked to the person’s relational ability and (relational) construction of a conscious self-identity.</abstract><cop>Florence</cop><pub>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</pub><doi>10.13128/SMP-21288</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2038-3150 |
| ispartof | SocietàMutamentoPolitica (Firenze), 2017-01, Vol.8 (16), p.199 |
| issn | 2038-3150 |
| language | ita |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1970721020 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917) Gays & lesbians Homosexuality Morality Reproduction Same sex marriage Sexual division of labor Sexuality |
| title | “E vi dichiaro marito e moglie (o marito-e-marito o moglie-e-moglie)”. Una difesa durkheimiana del mariage pour tous |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A15%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CE%20vi%20dichiaro%20marito%20e%20moglie%20(o%20marito-e-marito%20o%20moglie-e-moglie)%E2%80%9D.%20Una%20difesa%20durkheimiana%20del%20mariage%20pour%20tous&rft.jtitle=Societ%C3%A0MutamentoPolitica%20(Firenze)&rft.au=Guizzardi,%20Luca&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=199&rft.pages=199-&rft.eissn=2038-3150&rft_id=info:doi/10.13128/SMP-21288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1970721020%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970721020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |