Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)
This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Reti medievali rivista 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | ita |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 85 |
container_title | Reti medievali rivista |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Saggioro, Alessandro |
description | This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.6092/1593-2214/458 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1970714669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1970714669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19707146693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbtOAzEQRS0kJMKjpB-JBopN7M0-2BLCq0IIto-s7Czr4HgWjw3Kz_CtmIeoqUYz95w7QhwrOa1kk89U2cyzPFfFrCjPd8Tkb98T-8xrKYuyruuJ-Lj1FEd4QttnV9gbZ4Ihx6BdB49ozbOhyLAga3EVzFtKkcE4CAOCqsIAl0QvQP33oR2QOmKjXTI6nMI9hYTTD96i38CKMKTC03eTXA0PPv3YGKf9Fi6ctls2_NU20hht5LNDsdtry3j0Ow_Eyc11u7jLRk-vETks1xR9EnmpmlrWqqiqZv4_6hNPVl4r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970714669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Saggioro, Alessandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><description>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1593-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6092/1593-2214/458</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>Florence: Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</publisher><subject>Law ; Religion ; Roman civilization</subject><ispartof>Reti medievali rivista, 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85</ispartof><rights>Copyright Firenze University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><title>Reti medievali rivista</title><description>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</description><subject>Law</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Roman civilization</subject><issn>1593-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbtOAzEQRS0kJMKjpB-JBopN7M0-2BLCq0IIto-s7Czr4HgWjw3Kz_CtmIeoqUYz95w7QhwrOa1kk89U2cyzPFfFrCjPd8Tkb98T-8xrKYuyruuJ-Lj1FEd4QttnV9gbZ4Ihx6BdB49ozbOhyLAga3EVzFtKkcE4CAOCqsIAl0QvQP33oR2QOmKjXTI6nMI9hYTTD96i38CKMKTC03eTXA0PPv3YGKf9Fi6ctls2_NU20hht5LNDsdtry3j0Ow_Eyc11u7jLRk-vETks1xR9EnmpmlrWqqiqZv4_6hNPVl4r</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Saggioro, Alessandro</creator><general>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><author>Saggioro, Alessandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19707146693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Law</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Roman civilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reti medievali rivista</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saggioro, Alessandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</atitle><jtitle>Reti medievali rivista</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><pages>85-</pages><eissn>1593-2214</eissn><abstract>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</abstract><cop>Florence</cop><pub>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</pub><doi>10.6092/1593-2214/458</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1593-2214 |
ispartof | Reti medievali rivista, 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85 |
issn | 1593-2214 |
language | ita |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1970714669 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Law Religion Roman civilization |
title | Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%20Self-Definitions%20and%20Religious%20Collectivities%20in%20the%2016th%20Book%20of%20the%20Theodosian%20Code.%20Notes%20on%20the%20Term%20coetus%20(with%20a%20Preliminary%20Analysis%20of%20populus)&rft.jtitle=Reti%20medievali%20rivista&rft.au=Saggioro,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.pages=85-&rft.eissn=1593-2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.6092/1593-2214/458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1970714669%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970714669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |