Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)

This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reti medievali rivista 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85
1. Verfasser: Saggioro, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ita
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Reti medievali rivista
container_volume 16
creator Saggioro, Alessandro
description This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.
doi_str_mv 10.6092/1593-2214/458
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1970714669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1970714669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19707146693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjbtOAzEQRS0kJMKjpB-JBopN7M0-2BLCq0IIto-s7Czr4HgWjw3Kz_CtmIeoqUYz95w7QhwrOa1kk89U2cyzPFfFrCjPd8Tkb98T-8xrKYuyruuJ-Lj1FEd4QttnV9gbZ4Ihx6BdB49ozbOhyLAga3EVzFtKkcE4CAOCqsIAl0QvQP33oR2QOmKjXTI6nMI9hYTTD96i38CKMKTC03eTXA0PPv3YGKf9Fi6ctls2_NU20hht5LNDsdtry3j0Ow_Eyc11u7jLRk-vETks1xR9EnmpmlrWqqiqZv4_6hNPVl4r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970714669</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Saggioro, Alessandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><description>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1593-2214</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6092/1593-2214/458</identifier><language>ita</language><publisher>Florence: Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</publisher><subject>Law ; Religion ; Roman civilization</subject><ispartof>Reti medievali rivista, 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85</ispartof><rights>Copyright Firenze University Press 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><title>Reti medievali rivista</title><description>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</description><subject>Law</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Roman civilization</subject><issn>1593-2214</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjbtOAzEQRS0kJMKjpB-JBopN7M0-2BLCq0IIto-s7Czr4HgWjw3Kz_CtmIeoqUYz95w7QhwrOa1kk89U2cyzPFfFrCjPd8Tkb98T-8xrKYuyruuJ-Lj1FEd4QttnV9gbZ4Ihx6BdB49ozbOhyLAga3EVzFtKkcE4CAOCqsIAl0QvQP33oR2QOmKjXTI6nMI9hYTTD96i38CKMKTC03eTXA0PPv3YGKf9Fi6ctls2_NU20hht5LNDsdtry3j0Ow_Eyc11u7jLRk-vETks1xR9EnmpmlrWqqiqZv4_6hNPVl4r</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Saggioro, Alessandro</creator><general>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</title><author>Saggioro, Alessandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19707146693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ita</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Law</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Roman civilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saggioro, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reti medievali rivista</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saggioro, Alessandro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)</atitle><jtitle>Reti medievali rivista</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><pages>85-</pages><eissn>1593-2214</eissn><abstract>This essay starts from the well-known definition of populus as well as it appears in some Cicero’s works and aims at analyze the religious significance of coetus, a term strictly connected with the first, at least focusing on the 16th book of the Theodosian Code. This article intends to cast light some transformations and representations of religious groups between Constantinian and Post-Constantinian ages.</abstract><cop>Florence</cop><pub>Firenze University Press Università degli Studi di Firenze</pub><doi>10.6092/1593-2214/458</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1593-2214
ispartof Reti medievali rivista, 2015-01, Vol.16 (1), p.85
issn 1593-2214
language ita
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1970714669
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Law
Religion
Roman civilization
title Group Self-Definitions and Religious Collectivities in the 16th Book of the Theodosian Code. Notes on the Term coetus (with a Preliminary Analysis of populus)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A14%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%20Self-Definitions%20and%20Religious%20Collectivities%20in%20the%2016th%20Book%20of%20the%20Theodosian%20Code.%20Notes%20on%20the%20Term%20coetus%20(with%20a%20Preliminary%20Analysis%20of%20populus)&rft.jtitle=Reti%20medievali%20rivista&rft.au=Saggioro,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.pages=85-&rft.eissn=1593-2214&rft_id=info:doi/10.6092/1593-2214/458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1970714669%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970714669&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true