Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain

The limits of most sensory systems can now be routinely determined by objective detection-theory methods. The threshold of pain, however, is often thought to require more traditional methods that rely on a subject providing some estimate or description of what is perceived. The subject makes a measu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 1991-07, Vol.2 (4), p.230-235
Hauptverfasser: Irwin, R. John, Whitehead, Paul R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 235
container_issue 4
container_start_page 230
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 2
creator Irwin, R. John
Whitehead, Paul R.
description The limits of most sensory systems can now be routinely determined by objective detection-theory methods. The threshold of pain, however, is often thought to require more traditional methods that rely on a subject providing some estimate or description of what is perceived. The subject makes a measurement that cannot be contested and, in this sense, the methods are subjective. An experimental study of electrocutaneous stimuli showed how it is possible to interpret a traditional identification method and a category method in detection-theory terms. On this interpretation, these traditional methods yield results similar to a rating method of detection theory, a method that measures sensory resolution. However, the traditional methods give rise to additional judgmental variance not involved in standard detection-theory methods. They therefore do not provide a special insight into the experience of pain, and the extra variance they produce serves only to degrade, rather than to enhance, their usefulness.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1970411700</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40062679</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40062679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1ff5dfeb92a8b190db3591dad40b9ae7284e017c8730e2475aa0b7e1d221e7543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSh6J7Sek6ZJ452M-QGD7WJeh6RNXYsuM-l0-_e2dAwvPTcHznk_4CHkBiHBbu6bBBkXsaR5d5ASk9YAIINkd0JGx9cpGYHMeCyk4OfkIoQGuhEpH5G7pfvRvgyRXkdz09iirb9ttAj7YuU2q32oixC5Klroen1Jzir9EezVYY_J29N0OXmJZ_Pn18njLC5Sjm2MVZWVlTWS6tyghNKkmcRSlwyM1FbQnFlAUeQiBUuZyLQGIyyWlKIVGUvH5HbI3Xj3tbWhVY3b-nVXqVAKYIgCoFM9DKrCuxC8rdTG15_a7xWC6tmoRvUAVA9A9WzUgY3adWYxmIN-t3_i_-O8HpxNaJ0_djIATrmQ6S-_xHIF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970411700</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Irwin, R. John ; Whitehead, Paul R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Irwin, R. John ; Whitehead, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><description>The limits of most sensory systems can now be routinely determined by objective detection-theory methods. The threshold of pain, however, is often thought to require more traditional methods that rely on a subject providing some estimate or description of what is perceived. The subject makes a measurement that cannot be contested and, in this sense, the methods are subjective. An experimental study of electrocutaneous stimuli showed how it is possible to interpret a traditional identification method and a category method in detection-theory terms. On this interpretation, these traditional methods yield results similar to a rating method of detection theory, a method that measures sensory resolution. However, the traditional methods give rise to additional judgmental variance not involved in standard detection-theory methods. They therefore do not provide a special insight into the experience of pain, and the extra variance they produce serves only to degrade, rather than to enhance, their usefulness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Electric current ; Experimentation ; Measurement ; Mental stimulation ; Methods ; Pain ; Pain perception ; Psychophysics ; Sensory discrimination ; Sensory systems ; Signal detection ; Signal detection theory ; Statistical variance ; Usefulness</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 1991-07, Vol.2 (4), p.230-235</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 American Psychological Society</rights><rights>1991 Association for Psychological Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1ff5dfeb92a8b190db3591dad40b9ae7284e017c8730e2475aa0b7e1d221e7543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1ff5dfeb92a8b190db3591dad40b9ae7284e017c8730e2475aa0b7e1d221e7543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40062679$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40062679$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Irwin, R. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><title>Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>The limits of most sensory systems can now be routinely determined by objective detection-theory methods. The threshold of pain, however, is often thought to require more traditional methods that rely on a subject providing some estimate or description of what is perceived. The subject makes a measurement that cannot be contested and, in this sense, the methods are subjective. An experimental study of electrocutaneous stimuli showed how it is possible to interpret a traditional identification method and a category method in detection-theory terms. On this interpretation, these traditional methods yield results similar to a rating method of detection theory, a method that measures sensory resolution. However, the traditional methods give rise to additional judgmental variance not involved in standard detection-theory methods. They therefore do not provide a special insight into the experience of pain, and the extra variance they produce serves only to degrade, rather than to enhance, their usefulness.</description><subject>Electric current</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mental stimulation</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Sensory discrimination</subject><subject>Sensory systems</subject><subject>Signal detection</subject><subject>Signal detection theory</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Usefulness</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QSh6J7Sek6ZJ452M-QGD7WJeh6RNXYsuM-l0-_e2dAwvPTcHznk_4CHkBiHBbu6bBBkXsaR5d5ASk9YAIINkd0JGx9cpGYHMeCyk4OfkIoQGuhEpH5G7pfvRvgyRXkdz09iirb9ttAj7YuU2q32oixC5Klroen1Jzir9EezVYY_J29N0OXmJZ_Pn18njLC5Sjm2MVZWVlTWS6tyghNKkmcRSlwyM1FbQnFlAUeQiBUuZyLQGIyyWlKIVGUvH5HbI3Xj3tbWhVY3b-nVXqVAKYIgCoFM9DKrCuxC8rdTG15_a7xWC6tmoRvUAVA9A9WzUgY3adWYxmIN-t3_i_-O8HpxNaJ0_djIATrmQ6S-_xHIF</recordid><startdate>19910701</startdate><enddate>19910701</enddate><creator>Irwin, R. John</creator><creator>Whitehead, Paul R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910701</creationdate><title>Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain</title><author>Irwin, R. John ; Whitehead, Paul R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1ff5dfeb92a8b190db3591dad40b9ae7284e017c8730e2475aa0b7e1d221e7543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Electric current</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mental stimulation</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Sensory discrimination</topic><topic>Sensory systems</topic><topic>Signal detection</topic><topic>Signal detection theory</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Usefulness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Irwin, R. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Irwin, R. John</au><au>Whitehead, Paul R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>1991-07-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>230-235</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><abstract>The limits of most sensory systems can now be routinely determined by objective detection-theory methods. The threshold of pain, however, is often thought to require more traditional methods that rely on a subject providing some estimate or description of what is perceived. The subject makes a measurement that cannot be contested and, in this sense, the methods are subjective. An experimental study of electrocutaneous stimuli showed how it is possible to interpret a traditional identification method and a category method in detection-theory terms. On this interpretation, these traditional methods yield results similar to a rating method of detection theory, a method that measures sensory resolution. However, the traditional methods give rise to additional judgmental variance not involved in standard detection-theory methods. They therefore do not provide a special insight into the experience of pain, and the extra variance they produce serves only to degrade, rather than to enhance, their usefulness.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 1991-07, Vol.2 (4), p.230-235
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1970411700
source Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Electric current
Experimentation
Measurement
Mental stimulation
Methods
Pain
Pain perception
Psychophysics
Sensory discrimination
Sensory systems
Signal detection
Signal detection theory
Statistical variance
Usefulness
title Towards an Objective Psychophysics of Pain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T18%3A24%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20an%20Objective%20Psychophysics%20of%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Irwin,%20R.%20John&rft.date=1991-07-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=230-235&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40062679%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970411700&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40062679&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1467-9280.1991.tb00140.x&rfr_iscdi=true