Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence

Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. A study analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual manage...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health care financing review 2000-04, Vol.21 (3), p.127
Hauptverfasser: Greenwald, Leslie M, Levy, Jesse M, Ingber, Melvin J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 127
container_title Health care financing review
container_volume 21
creator Greenwald, Leslie M
Levy, Jesse M
Ingber, Melvin J
description Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. A study analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196947726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>66788942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1969477263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsOgjAUgOHGaCJe3uHE1ZC03OtmiMRFJndSy1FKsNUW8PVl8AGc_uH_ZsRjcRz5PMvSOfEo47GfJSFbkpVzLaUsoCH3yLEQo7Hi1iE47FD2ymhQGvoG4YK1ksLiPm-Mkggvax5WPA9Q4gewHlWNWuKGLO6ic7j9dU12xeman_2Jvwd0fdWaweppVYwnPErTIAn_Ql_VMzn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196947726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Greenwald, Leslie M ; Levy, Jesse M ; Ingber, Melvin J</creator><creatorcontrib>Greenwald, Leslie M ; Levy, Jesse M ; Ingber, Melvin J</creatorcontrib><description>Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. A study analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-8631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-9887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Superintendent of Documents</publisher><subject>Age ; Beneficiaries ; Capitation ; Costs ; Expenditures ; Federal legislation ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health risk assessment ; HMOs ; Managed care ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Payment systems ; Population ; Reimbursement ; Risk factors ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical data ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Health care financing review, 2000-04, Vol.21 (3), p.127</ispartof><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents Spring 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greenwald, Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Jesse M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingber, Melvin J</creatorcontrib><title>Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence</title><title>Health care financing review</title><description>Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. A study analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Capitation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Payment systems</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical data</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0195-8631</issn><issn>1554-9887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyrsOgjAUgOHGaCJe3uHE1ZC03OtmiMRFJndSy1FKsNUW8PVl8AGc_uH_ZsRjcRz5PMvSOfEo47GfJSFbkpVzLaUsoCH3yLEQo7Hi1iE47FD2ymhQGvoG4YK1ksLiPm-Mkggvax5WPA9Q4gewHlWNWuKGLO6ic7j9dU12xeman_2Jvwd0fdWaweppVYwnPErTIAn_Ql_VMzn8</recordid><startdate>20000401</startdate><enddate>20000401</enddate><creator>Greenwald, Leslie M</creator><creator>Levy, Jesse M</creator><creator>Ingber, Melvin J</creator><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000401</creationdate><title>Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence</title><author>Greenwald, Leslie M ; Levy, Jesse M ; Ingber, Melvin J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1969477263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Capitation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Payment systems</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical data</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greenwald, Leslie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Jesse M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingber, Melvin J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Health care financing review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greenwald, Leslie M</au><au>Levy, Jesse M</au><au>Ingber, Melvin J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence</atitle><jtitle>Health care financing review</jtitle><date>2000-04-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><pages>127-</pages><issn>0195-8631</issn><eissn>1554-9887</eissn><abstract>Historically, studying the Medicare managed care favorable-selection issue has been difficult because direct data on managed care enrollees have been unavailable. A study analyzed the first year of Balanced Budget Act (BBA)-mandated inpatient encounter data. Based on this comparison of actual managed care and fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries, it appears that there are significant differences between these populations. The most striking differences are found in the comparison of average risk factors, indicating a clear bias in the managed care populations toward beneficiaries predicted to be less costly.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Superintendent of Documents</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-8631
ispartof Health care financing review, 2000-04, Vol.21 (3), p.127
issn 0195-8631
1554-9887
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196947726
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Business Source Complete; PubMed Central Open Access; U.S. Government Documents; PubMed Central
subjects Age
Beneficiaries
Capitation
Costs
Expenditures
Federal legislation
Health maintenance organizations
Health risk assessment
HMOs
Managed care
Medicaid
Medicare
Payment systems
Population
Reimbursement
Risk factors
Statistical analysis
Statistical data
Studies
title Favorable selection in the Medicare+Choice program: New edvidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A14%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Favorable%20selection%20in%20the%20Medicare+Choice%20program:%20New%20edvidence&rft.jtitle=Health%20care%20financing%20review&rft.au=Greenwald,%20Leslie%20M&rft.date=2000-04-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.pages=127-&rft.issn=0195-8631&rft.eissn=1554-9887&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E66788942%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196947726&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true