The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study

Cross-functional integration offers numerous, well-documented benefits for new-product development (NPD), but it also can carry significant costs. Joint involvement of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing personnel can increase the quality, the manufacturability, and the marketability of the final...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of product innovation management 1998-07, Vol.15 (4), p.289-303
Hauptverfasser: Song, X.Michael, Thieme, R.Jeffrey, Xie, Jinhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 303
container_issue 4
container_start_page 289
container_title The Journal of product innovation management
container_volume 15
creator Song, X.Michael
Thieme, R.Jeffrey
Xie, Jinhong
description Cross-functional integration offers numerous, well-documented benefits for new-product development (NPD), but it also can carry significant costs. Joint involvement of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing personnel can increase the quality, the manufacturability, and the marketability of the final product. However, building consensus among these groups, with their differing perspectives and goals, may require time-consuming meetings as well as tremendous finesse from the managers who guide the NPD effort. Those managers require an approach to cross-functional integration that strikes a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. X. Michael Song, R. Jeffrey Thieme, and Jinhong Xie propose that the right mix of cross-functional involvement may differ depending on the stage in the NPD process. They also suggest that blindly promoting the involvement of all functional areas in all stages of the NPD process may actually decrease NPD performance. They test these propositions in a study that examines the relationships between new product performance and cross-functional joint involvement between R&D, manufacturing, and marketing in five major stages of the NPD process: market opportunity analysis, planning, development, pretesting, and launch. Their objective in this study is to identify patterns of effective cross-functional involvement in different NPD stages. The study uses data collected from 236 managers working in the R&D, manufacturing, and marketing departments of 16 Fortune 500 firms. Their findings suggest that new-product success may be more likely when a firm employs function-specific and stage-specific patterns of cross-functional integration than it is when the firm attempts to integrate all functions during all NPD stages. For example, during the market opportunity analysis stage, the findings suggest that joint involvement between R&D and marketing may be productive, but joint involvement between R&D and manufacturing and among all three functions may be counterproductive. The results also indicate that joint involvement among all three functions either does not have a significant effect on new product success or may be counterproductive in all stages of the NPD process. For the firms in this study, the three functions seem to take turns playing the central role in cross-functional activities. During the product planning, development, and testing phases, the role of the focal function, or communication hub, shifts from manufacturing to R&D and then
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00108-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196937841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0737678297001082</els_id><sourcerecordid>1554122027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7b7221aec97791f899fc03d2f7a8e9c8232f44c36ed2e38fe827ee38760b90f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BKHoRQ_VfLRN4kVk8QsED-o5xHSiWbpNTdri_nuzXfEmnmaYed5h3hehI4LPCSbVxTPmjOcVF_RU8jOMCRY53UIzUhY4L4Uot9HsF9lFezEucKIELWbo4-UDMrfstOkzbzMTfIy5HVrTO9_qJlt41_aZa0ffjLCE1OuJybrg6yGJahih8d20ir1-h3iZ6TaDr67xQfc-rNJ4qFcHaMfqJsLhT91Hr7c3L_P7_PHp7mF-_Zgbxlmf8zdOKdFgJOeSWCGlNZjV1HItQBpBGbVFYVgFNQUmLAjKITW8wm8SW8n20fHmbnrwc4DYq4UfQrISFZGVZFwUJEEnf0JlWRBKMeWJKjfU5DiAVV1wSx1WimC1Tl5Nyat1rEpyNSWvaNJdbXSQfI4OgorGQWugdgFMr2rv_rnwDZ5DjA8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554122027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study</title><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Song, X.Michael ; Thieme, R.Jeffrey ; Xie, Jinhong</creator><creatorcontrib>Song, X.Michael ; Thieme, R.Jeffrey ; Xie, Jinhong</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Cross-functional integration offers numerous, well-documented benefits for new-product development (NPD), but it also can carry significant costs. Joint involvement of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing personnel can increase the quality, the manufacturability, and the marketability of the final product. However, building consensus among these groups, with their differing perspectives and goals, may require time-consuming meetings as well as tremendous finesse from the managers who guide the NPD effort. Those managers require an approach to cross-functional integration that strikes a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. X. Michael Song, R. Jeffrey Thieme, and Jinhong Xie propose that the right mix of cross-functional involvement may differ depending on the stage in the NPD process. They also suggest that blindly promoting the involvement of all functional areas in all stages of the NPD process may actually decrease NPD performance. They test these propositions in a study that examines the relationships between new product performance and cross-functional joint involvement between R&D, manufacturing, and marketing in five major stages of the NPD process: market opportunity analysis, planning, development, pretesting, and launch. Their objective in this study is to identify patterns of effective cross-functional involvement in different NPD stages. The study uses data collected from 236 managers working in the R&D, manufacturing, and marketing departments of 16 Fortune 500 firms. Their findings suggest that new-product success may be more likely when a firm employs function-specific and stage-specific patterns of cross-functional integration than it is when the firm attempts to integrate all functions during all NPD stages. For example, during the market opportunity analysis stage, the findings suggest that joint involvement between R&D and marketing may be productive, but joint involvement between R&D and manufacturing and among all three functions may be counterproductive. The results also indicate that joint involvement among all three functions either does not have a significant effect on new product success or may be counterproductive in all stages of the NPD process. For the firms in this study, the three functions seem to take turns playing the central role in cross-functional activities. During the product planning, development, and testing phases, the role of the focal function, or communication hub, shifts from manufacturing to R&D and then to marketing.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-6782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00108-2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPIMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Departments ; Organizational behavior ; Product development ; Statistical analysis ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of product innovation management, 1998-07, Vol.15 (4), p.289-303</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jul 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7b7221aec97791f899fc03d2f7a8e9c8232f44c36ed2e38fe827ee38760b90f93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27850,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Song, X.Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, R.Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jinhong</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study</title><title>The Journal of product innovation management</title><description><![CDATA[Cross-functional integration offers numerous, well-documented benefits for new-product development (NPD), but it also can carry significant costs. Joint involvement of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing personnel can increase the quality, the manufacturability, and the marketability of the final product. However, building consensus among these groups, with their differing perspectives and goals, may require time-consuming meetings as well as tremendous finesse from the managers who guide the NPD effort. Those managers require an approach to cross-functional integration that strikes a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. X. Michael Song, R. Jeffrey Thieme, and Jinhong Xie propose that the right mix of cross-functional involvement may differ depending on the stage in the NPD process. They also suggest that blindly promoting the involvement of all functional areas in all stages of the NPD process may actually decrease NPD performance. They test these propositions in a study that examines the relationships between new product performance and cross-functional joint involvement between R&D, manufacturing, and marketing in five major stages of the NPD process: market opportunity analysis, planning, development, pretesting, and launch. Their objective in this study is to identify patterns of effective cross-functional involvement in different NPD stages. The study uses data collected from 236 managers working in the R&D, manufacturing, and marketing departments of 16 Fortune 500 firms. Their findings suggest that new-product success may be more likely when a firm employs function-specific and stage-specific patterns of cross-functional integration than it is when the firm attempts to integrate all functions during all NPD stages. For example, during the market opportunity analysis stage, the findings suggest that joint involvement between R&D and marketing may be productive, but joint involvement between R&D and manufacturing and among all three functions may be counterproductive. The results also indicate that joint involvement among all three functions either does not have a significant effect on new product success or may be counterproductive in all stages of the NPD process. For the firms in this study, the three functions seem to take turns playing the central role in cross-functional activities. During the product planning, development, and testing phases, the role of the focal function, or communication hub, shifts from manufacturing to R&D and then to marketing.]]></description><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0737-6782</issn><issn>1540-5885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouH78BKHoRQ_VfLRN4kVk8QsED-o5xHSiWbpNTdri_nuzXfEmnmaYed5h3hehI4LPCSbVxTPmjOcVF_RU8jOMCRY53UIzUhY4L4Uot9HsF9lFezEucKIELWbo4-UDMrfstOkzbzMTfIy5HVrTO9_qJlt41_aZa0ffjLCE1OuJybrg6yGJahih8d20ir1-h3iZ6TaDr67xQfc-rNJ4qFcHaMfqJsLhT91Hr7c3L_P7_PHp7mF-_Zgbxlmf8zdOKdFgJOeSWCGlNZjV1HItQBpBGbVFYVgFNQUmLAjKITW8wm8SW8n20fHmbnrwc4DYq4UfQrISFZGVZFwUJEEnf0JlWRBKMeWJKjfU5DiAVV1wSx1WimC1Tl5Nyat1rEpyNSWvaNJdbXSQfI4OgorGQWugdgFMr2rv_rnwDZ5DjA8</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Song, X.Michael</creator><creator>Thieme, R.Jeffrey</creator><creator>Xie, Jinhong</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>New York, NY :North-Holland,c1984</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SMOQP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study</title><author>Song, X.Michael ; Thieme, R.Jeffrey ; Xie, Jinhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-7b7221aec97791f899fc03d2f7a8e9c8232f44c36ed2e38fe827ee38760b90f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Song, X.Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thieme, R.Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jinhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 46</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Song, X.Michael</au><au>Thieme, R.Jeffrey</au><au>Xie, Jinhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>289</spage><epage>303</epage><pages>289-303</pages><issn>0737-6782</issn><eissn>1540-5885</eissn><coden>JPIMDD</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Cross-functional integration offers numerous, well-documented benefits for new-product development (NPD), but it also can carry significant costs. Joint involvement of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing personnel can increase the quality, the manufacturability, and the marketability of the final product. However, building consensus among these groups, with their differing perspectives and goals, may require time-consuming meetings as well as tremendous finesse from the managers who guide the NPD effort. Those managers require an approach to cross-functional integration that strikes a balance between efficiency and effectiveness. X. Michael Song, R. Jeffrey Thieme, and Jinhong Xie propose that the right mix of cross-functional involvement may differ depending on the stage in the NPD process. They also suggest that blindly promoting the involvement of all functional areas in all stages of the NPD process may actually decrease NPD performance. They test these propositions in a study that examines the relationships between new product performance and cross-functional joint involvement between R&D, manufacturing, and marketing in five major stages of the NPD process: market opportunity analysis, planning, development, pretesting, and launch. Their objective in this study is to identify patterns of effective cross-functional involvement in different NPD stages. The study uses data collected from 236 managers working in the R&D, manufacturing, and marketing departments of 16 Fortune 500 firms. Their findings suggest that new-product success may be more likely when a firm employs function-specific and stage-specific patterns of cross-functional integration than it is when the firm attempts to integrate all functions during all NPD stages. For example, during the market opportunity analysis stage, the findings suggest that joint involvement between R&D and marketing may be productive, but joint involvement between R&D and manufacturing and among all three functions may be counterproductive. The results also indicate that joint involvement among all three functions either does not have a significant effect on new product success or may be counterproductive in all stages of the NPD process. For the firms in this study, the three functions seem to take turns playing the central role in cross-functional activities. During the product planning, development, and testing phases, the role of the focal function, or communication hub, shifts from manufacturing to R&D and then to marketing.]]></abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00108-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-6782
ispartof The Journal of product innovation management, 1998-07, Vol.15 (4), p.289-303
issn 0737-6782
1540-5885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196937841
source Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Departments
Organizational behavior
Product development
Statistical analysis
Studies
title The impact of cross-functional joint involvement across product development stages: an exploratory study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A25%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20cross-functional%20joint%20involvement%20across%20product%20development%20stages:%20an%20exploratory%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20product%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Song,%20X.Michael&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=289&rft.epage=303&rft.pages=289-303&rft.issn=0737-6782&rft.eissn=1540-5885&rft.coden=JPIMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00108-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554122027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554122027&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0737678297001082&rfr_iscdi=true