Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates

This article presents the results of a study on the evaluation criteria that companies use at several gates in the NPD process. The findings from 166 managers suggest that companies use different criteria at different NPD evaluation gates. While such criteria as technical feasibility, intuition and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of product innovation management 2003-01, Vol.20 (1), p.22-36
Hauptverfasser: Hart, Susan, Jan Hultink, Erik, Tzokas, Nikolaos, Commandeur, Harry R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title The Journal of product innovation management
container_volume 20
creator Hart, Susan
Jan Hultink, Erik
Tzokas, Nikolaos
Commandeur, Harry R.
description This article presents the results of a study on the evaluation criteria that companies use at several gates in the NPD process. The findings from 166 managers suggest that companies use different criteria at different NPD evaluation gates. While such criteria as technical feasibility, intuition and market potential are stressed in the early‐screening gates of the NPD process, a focus on product performance, quality, and staying within the development budget are considered of paramount importance after the product has been developed. During and after commercialization, customer acceptance and satisfaction and unit sales are primary considerations. In addition, based on the performance dimensions developed by Griffin and Page (1993), we derive patterns of use of various evaluative dimensions at the NPD gates. Our results show that while the market acceptance dimension permeates evaluation at all the gates in the NPD process, the financial dimension is especially important during the business analysis gate and after‐market launch. The product performance dimension figures strongly in the product and market testing gates. The importance of our additional set of criteria (i.e., product uniqueness, market potential, market chance, technical feasibility, and intuition) decreases as the NPD process unfolds. Overall the above pattern of dimensions' usage holds true for both countries in which we collected our data, and across firms of different sizes, holding different market share positions, with different NPD drivers, following different innovation strategies, and developing different types of new products. The results also are stable for respondents that differ in terms of expertise and functional background. The results of this study provide useful guidelines for project selection and evaluation purposes and therefore can be helpful for effective investment decision‐making at gate‐meetings and for project portfolio management. We elaborate on these guidelines for product developers and marketers wishing to employ evaluation criteria in their NPD gates, and we discuss directions for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1540-5885.201003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196926698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>286022401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4113-cc2f13bb0b67004f99a9dd57a67d9c4d7f3f62d03e481775869516b601e419313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwM0YsTCl27NgxG4SStmpLkUCwWU7iSC5pEmynpf-eVEFdueWku-_dSQ-AawRHqKs7FBLoh1EUjgKIIMQnYHAcnYIBZJj5lEXBObiwdg0hRFFABmA2rfLWOqNl6cX1ppGVVvbWG29l2Uqn68qLjXaq23u68pZq561MnbeZ857UVpV1s1GV8xLplL0EZ4Usrbr660Pw_jx-iyf-_CWZxg9zPyMIYT_LggLhNIUpZRCSgnPJ8zxkkrKcZyRnBS5okEOsSIQYCyPKQ0RTCpEiiGOEh-Cmv9uY-rtV1ol13ZqqeykQpzyglEddCPahzNTWGlWIxuiNNHuBoDgIEwc74mBH9MI65L5HdrpU-3_zYraaLoJuKXrY72Ftnfo5wtJ8CdqpD8XHMhE8WfDPySMRr_gXjuV74Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196926698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Hart, Susan ; Jan Hultink, Erik ; Tzokas, Nikolaos ; Commandeur, Harry R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hart, Susan ; Jan Hultink, Erik ; Tzokas, Nikolaos ; Commandeur, Harry R.</creatorcontrib><description>This article presents the results of a study on the evaluation criteria that companies use at several gates in the NPD process. The findings from 166 managers suggest that companies use different criteria at different NPD evaluation gates. While such criteria as technical feasibility, intuition and market potential are stressed in the early‐screening gates of the NPD process, a focus on product performance, quality, and staying within the development budget are considered of paramount importance after the product has been developed. During and after commercialization, customer acceptance and satisfaction and unit sales are primary considerations. In addition, based on the performance dimensions developed by Griffin and Page (1993), we derive patterns of use of various evaluative dimensions at the NPD gates. Our results show that while the market acceptance dimension permeates evaluation at all the gates in the NPD process, the financial dimension is especially important during the business analysis gate and after‐market launch. The product performance dimension figures strongly in the product and market testing gates. The importance of our additional set of criteria (i.e., product uniqueness, market potential, market chance, technical feasibility, and intuition) decreases as the NPD process unfolds. Overall the above pattern of dimensions' usage holds true for both countries in which we collected our data, and across firms of different sizes, holding different market share positions, with different NPD drivers, following different innovation strategies, and developing different types of new products. The results also are stable for respondents that differ in terms of expertise and functional background. The results of this study provide useful guidelines for project selection and evaluation purposes and therefore can be helpful for effective investment decision‐making at gate‐meetings and for project portfolio management. We elaborate on these guidelines for product developers and marketers wishing to employ evaluation criteria in their NPD gates, and we discuss directions for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-6782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-5885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.201003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPIMDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Aftermarkets ; Criteria ; Product development ; Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of product innovation management, 2003-01, Vol.20 (1), p.22-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4113-cc2f13bb0b67004f99a9dd57a67d9c4d7f3f62d03e481775869516b601e419313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4113-cc2f13bb0b67004f99a9dd57a67d9c4d7f3f62d03e481775869516b601e419313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1540-5885.201003$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1540-5885.201003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hart, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan Hultink, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzokas, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Commandeur, Harry R.</creatorcontrib><title>Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates</title><title>The Journal of product innovation management</title><description>This article presents the results of a study on the evaluation criteria that companies use at several gates in the NPD process. The findings from 166 managers suggest that companies use different criteria at different NPD evaluation gates. While such criteria as technical feasibility, intuition and market potential are stressed in the early‐screening gates of the NPD process, a focus on product performance, quality, and staying within the development budget are considered of paramount importance after the product has been developed. During and after commercialization, customer acceptance and satisfaction and unit sales are primary considerations. In addition, based on the performance dimensions developed by Griffin and Page (1993), we derive patterns of use of various evaluative dimensions at the NPD gates. Our results show that while the market acceptance dimension permeates evaluation at all the gates in the NPD process, the financial dimension is especially important during the business analysis gate and after‐market launch. The product performance dimension figures strongly in the product and market testing gates. The importance of our additional set of criteria (i.e., product uniqueness, market potential, market chance, technical feasibility, and intuition) decreases as the NPD process unfolds. Overall the above pattern of dimensions' usage holds true for both countries in which we collected our data, and across firms of different sizes, holding different market share positions, with different NPD drivers, following different innovation strategies, and developing different types of new products. The results also are stable for respondents that differ in terms of expertise and functional background. The results of this study provide useful guidelines for project selection and evaluation purposes and therefore can be helpful for effective investment decision‐making at gate‐meetings and for project portfolio management. We elaborate on these guidelines for product developers and marketers wishing to employ evaluation criteria in their NPD gates, and we discuss directions for further research.</description><subject>Aftermarkets</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0737-6782</issn><issn>1540-5885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQRi0EEqWwM0YsTCl27NgxG4SStmpLkUCwWU7iSC5pEmynpf-eVEFdueWku-_dSQ-AawRHqKs7FBLoh1EUjgKIIMQnYHAcnYIBZJj5lEXBObiwdg0hRFFABmA2rfLWOqNl6cX1ppGVVvbWG29l2Uqn68qLjXaq23u68pZq561MnbeZ857UVpV1s1GV8xLplL0EZ4Usrbr660Pw_jx-iyf-_CWZxg9zPyMIYT_LggLhNIUpZRCSgnPJ8zxkkrKcZyRnBS5okEOsSIQYCyPKQ0RTCpEiiGOEh-Cmv9uY-rtV1ol13ZqqeykQpzyglEddCPahzNTWGlWIxuiNNHuBoDgIEwc74mBH9MI65L5HdrpU-3_zYraaLoJuKXrY72Ftnfo5wtJ8CdqpD8XHMhE8WfDPySMRr_gXjuV74Q</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Hart, Susan</creator><creator>Jan Hultink, Erik</creator><creator>Tzokas, Nikolaos</creator><creator>Commandeur, Harry R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates</title><author>Hart, Susan ; Jan Hultink, Erik ; Tzokas, Nikolaos ; Commandeur, Harry R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4113-cc2f13bb0b67004f99a9dd57a67d9c4d7f3f62d03e481775869516b601e419313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aftermarkets</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hart, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jan Hultink, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzokas, Nikolaos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Commandeur, Harry R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hart, Susan</au><au>Jan Hultink, Erik</au><au>Tzokas, Nikolaos</au><au>Commandeur, Harry R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of product innovation management</jtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>22-36</pages><issn>0737-6782</issn><eissn>1540-5885</eissn><coden>JPIMDD</coden><abstract>This article presents the results of a study on the evaluation criteria that companies use at several gates in the NPD process. The findings from 166 managers suggest that companies use different criteria at different NPD evaluation gates. While such criteria as technical feasibility, intuition and market potential are stressed in the early‐screening gates of the NPD process, a focus on product performance, quality, and staying within the development budget are considered of paramount importance after the product has been developed. During and after commercialization, customer acceptance and satisfaction and unit sales are primary considerations. In addition, based on the performance dimensions developed by Griffin and Page (1993), we derive patterns of use of various evaluative dimensions at the NPD gates. Our results show that while the market acceptance dimension permeates evaluation at all the gates in the NPD process, the financial dimension is especially important during the business analysis gate and after‐market launch. The product performance dimension figures strongly in the product and market testing gates. The importance of our additional set of criteria (i.e., product uniqueness, market potential, market chance, technical feasibility, and intuition) decreases as the NPD process unfolds. Overall the above pattern of dimensions' usage holds true for both countries in which we collected our data, and across firms of different sizes, holding different market share positions, with different NPD drivers, following different innovation strategies, and developing different types of new products. The results also are stable for respondents that differ in terms of expertise and functional background. The results of this study provide useful guidelines for project selection and evaluation purposes and therefore can be helpful for effective investment decision‐making at gate‐meetings and for project portfolio management. We elaborate on these guidelines for product developers and marketers wishing to employ evaluation criteria in their NPD gates, and we discuss directions for further research.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><doi>10.1111/1540-5885.201003</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-6782
ispartof The Journal of product innovation management, 2003-01, Vol.20 (1), p.22-36
issn 0737-6782
1540-5885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196926698
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Aftermarkets
Criteria
Product development
Studies
title Industrial Companies' Evaluation Criteria in New Product Development Gates
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A46%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Industrial%20Companies'%20Evaluation%20Criteria%20in%20New%20Product%20Development%20Gates&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20product%20innovation%20management&rft.au=Hart,%20Susan&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=22-36&rft.issn=0737-6782&rft.eissn=1540-5885&rft.coden=JPIMDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1540-5885.201003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E286022401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196926698&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true