A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens

This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy (Oxford) 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Yeongmin, Jeong, Hae Jun, Kim, Wonsik, Chun, Wongee, Han, Hyun Joo, Lim, Sang Hoon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue
container_start_page 449
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 137
creator Kim, Yeongmin
Jeong, Hae Jun
Kim, Wonsik
Chun, Wongee
Han, Hyun Joo
Lim, Sang Hoon
description This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures. •Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968401527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544217303511</els_id><sourcerecordid>1968401527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAchYMoOKf_gYeA59akTdvUgzCmU2HgRc8hS3_ZMrqkJtlG_3sz5tnTu7z34PsQuqckp4TWj9scLPj1mBeENjkpclrzCzShvCmzuuHVJZqQsiZZxVhxjW5C2BJCKt62E3ScYeV2g_QymgPgAbx2fietAiyt7MdgAnYWd3LszXoTjV3jVMDx6HBntAYPNuI4DpBqGgfXS58O09zGdOl8eMIvJmzwIeR44SFY6HEPNtyiKy37AHd_OUXfi9ev-Xu2_Hz7mM-WmSpLFrO6bSXIblVUHeVcy5YxwjRJNDUvq6JjVaUkZy3UHVBeUtko2hagZEPISisop-jh_Dt497OHEMXW7X0iC4K2NWeEVkWTWuzcUt6F4EGLwZud9KOgRJwUi604KxYnxYIUIilOs-fzDBLBwYAXQRlI8J3xoKLonPn_4Bd2nYi_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968401527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures. •Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Apertures ; Comparative analysis ; Concentrators ; Daylighting ; Fiber optics ; Fresnel lens ; Illuminance ; Lighting systems ; Luminance ; Parabolic dish ; Performance evaluation ; Photometry ; Planes ; Solar concentrator ; Solar energy ; Solar tracking ; Systems analysis ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217303511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Wongee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures. •Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</description><subject>Apertures</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Concentrators</subject><subject>Daylighting</subject><subject>Fiber optics</subject><subject>Fresnel lens</subject><subject>Illuminance</subject><subject>Lighting systems</subject><subject>Luminance</subject><subject>Parabolic dish</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Photometry</subject><subject>Planes</subject><subject>Solar concentrator</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar tracking</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAchYMoOKf_gYeA59akTdvUgzCmU2HgRc8hS3_ZMrqkJtlG_3sz5tnTu7z34PsQuqckp4TWj9scLPj1mBeENjkpclrzCzShvCmzuuHVJZqQsiZZxVhxjW5C2BJCKt62E3ScYeV2g_QymgPgAbx2fietAiyt7MdgAnYWd3LszXoTjV3jVMDx6HBntAYPNuI4DpBqGgfXS58O09zGdOl8eMIvJmzwIeR44SFY6HEPNtyiKy37AHd_OUXfi9ev-Xu2_Hz7mM-WmSpLFrO6bSXIblVUHeVcy5YxwjRJNDUvq6JjVaUkZy3UHVBeUtko2hagZEPISisop-jh_Dt497OHEMXW7X0iC4K2NWeEVkWTWuzcUt6F4EGLwZud9KOgRJwUi604KxYnxYIUIilOs-fzDBLBwYAXQRlI8J3xoKLonPn_4Bd2nYi_</recordid><startdate>20171015</startdate><enddate>20171015</enddate><creator>Kim, Yeongmin</creator><creator>Jeong, Hae Jun</creator><creator>Kim, Wonsik</creator><creator>Chun, Wongee</creator><creator>Han, Hyun Joo</creator><creator>Lim, Sang Hoon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171015</creationdate><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><author>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Apertures</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Concentrators</topic><topic>Daylighting</topic><topic>Fiber optics</topic><topic>Fresnel lens</topic><topic>Illuminance</topic><topic>Lighting systems</topic><topic>Luminance</topic><topic>Parabolic dish</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Photometry</topic><topic>Planes</topic><topic>Solar concentrator</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar tracking</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Wongee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yeongmin</au><au>Jeong, Hae Jun</au><au>Kim, Wonsik</au><au>Chun, Wongee</au><au>Han, Hyun Joo</au><au>Lim, Sang Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2017-10-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>137</volume><spage>449</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>449-456</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures. •Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456
issn 0360-5442
1873-6785
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1968401527
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Apertures
Comparative analysis
Concentrators
Daylighting
Fiber optics
Fresnel lens
Illuminance
Lighting systems
Luminance
Parabolic dish
Performance evaluation
Photometry
Planes
Solar concentrator
Solar energy
Solar tracking
Systems analysis
Tracking
title A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20performance%20analysis%20on%20daylighting%20for%20two%20different%20types%20of%20solar%20concentrators:%20Dish%20vs.%20Fresnel%20lens&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kim,%20Yeongmin&rft.date=2017-10-15&rft.volume=137&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=449-456&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968401527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968401527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544217303511&rfr_iscdi=true