A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens
This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy (Oxford) 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 456 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 449 |
container_title | Energy (Oxford) |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Kim, Yeongmin Jeong, Hae Jun Kim, Wonsik Chun, Wongee Han, Hyun Joo Lim, Sang Hoon |
description | This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures.
•Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968401527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360544217303511</els_id><sourcerecordid>1968401527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFLwzAchYMoOKf_gYeA59akTdvUgzCmU2HgRc8hS3_ZMrqkJtlG_3sz5tnTu7z34PsQuqckp4TWj9scLPj1mBeENjkpclrzCzShvCmzuuHVJZqQsiZZxVhxjW5C2BJCKt62E3ScYeV2g_QymgPgAbx2fietAiyt7MdgAnYWd3LszXoTjV3jVMDx6HBntAYPNuI4DpBqGgfXS58O09zGdOl8eMIvJmzwIeR44SFY6HEPNtyiKy37AHd_OUXfi9ev-Xu2_Hz7mM-WmSpLFrO6bSXIblVUHeVcy5YxwjRJNDUvq6JjVaUkZy3UHVBeUtko2hagZEPISisop-jh_Dt497OHEMXW7X0iC4K2NWeEVkWTWuzcUt6F4EGLwZud9KOgRJwUi604KxYnxYIUIilOs-fzDBLBwYAXQRlI8J3xoKLonPn_4Bd2nYi_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968401527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><description>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures.
•Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6785</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Apertures ; Comparative analysis ; Concentrators ; Daylighting ; Fiber optics ; Fresnel lens ; Illuminance ; Lighting systems ; Luminance ; Parabolic dish ; Performance evaluation ; Photometry ; Planes ; Solar concentrator ; Solar energy ; Solar tracking ; Systems analysis ; Tracking</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217303511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Wongee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures.
•Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</description><subject>Apertures</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Concentrators</subject><subject>Daylighting</subject><subject>Fiber optics</subject><subject>Fresnel lens</subject><subject>Illuminance</subject><subject>Lighting systems</subject><subject>Luminance</subject><subject>Parabolic dish</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Photometry</subject><subject>Planes</subject><subject>Solar concentrator</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar tracking</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><issn>1873-6785</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFLwzAchYMoOKf_gYeA59akTdvUgzCmU2HgRc8hS3_ZMrqkJtlG_3sz5tnTu7z34PsQuqckp4TWj9scLPj1mBeENjkpclrzCzShvCmzuuHVJZqQsiZZxVhxjW5C2BJCKt62E3ScYeV2g_QymgPgAbx2fietAiyt7MdgAnYWd3LszXoTjV3jVMDx6HBntAYPNuI4DpBqGgfXS58O09zGdOl8eMIvJmzwIeR44SFY6HEPNtyiKy37AHd_OUXfi9ev-Xu2_Hz7mM-WmSpLFrO6bSXIblVUHeVcy5YxwjRJNDUvq6JjVaUkZy3UHVBeUtko2hagZEPISisop-jh_Dt497OHEMXW7X0iC4K2NWeEVkWTWuzcUt6F4EGLwZud9KOgRJwUi604KxYnxYIUIilOs-fzDBLBwYAXQRlI8J3xoKLonPn_4Bd2nYi_</recordid><startdate>20171015</startdate><enddate>20171015</enddate><creator>Kim, Yeongmin</creator><creator>Jeong, Hae Jun</creator><creator>Kim, Wonsik</creator><creator>Chun, Wongee</creator><creator>Han, Hyun Joo</creator><creator>Lim, Sang Hoon</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171015</creationdate><title>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</title><author>Kim, Yeongmin ; Jeong, Hae Jun ; Kim, Wonsik ; Chun, Wongee ; Han, Hyun Joo ; Lim, Sang Hoon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-699aeadb25d188fa94404f003668352d455ca849e6de1831a7c192eca700bfce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Apertures</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Concentrators</topic><topic>Daylighting</topic><topic>Fiber optics</topic><topic>Fresnel lens</topic><topic>Illuminance</topic><topic>Lighting systems</topic><topic>Luminance</topic><topic>Parabolic dish</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Photometry</topic><topic>Planes</topic><topic>Solar concentrator</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar tracking</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yeongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Hae Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Wonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chun, Wongee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Hyun Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Hoon</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yeongmin</au><au>Jeong, Hae Jun</au><au>Kim, Wonsik</au><au>Chun, Wongee</au><au>Han, Hyun Joo</au><au>Lim, Sang Hoon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2017-10-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>137</volume><spage>449</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>449-456</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><eissn>1873-6785</eissn><abstract>This study introduces the experimental work done to analyze the performance of active daylighting systems, which consist of small individually operated solar concentrators. Each system is capable of precise solar tracking thanks to the double axis solar tracker designed and constructed for lightness and easy operation. A solar tracking algorithm was implemented with AVR based on both closed and open loop control algorithms. Two different types of solar concentrators (developed for the system) were tested to assess their photometric characteristics in collecting and delivering solar rays to a deep plan office space for better lighting. To measure illuminance at different times of the day, a number of photo sensors were installed on the task planes at a height of 85 cm above the floor. The luminance values on different walls (including task planes) were also measured at a regular interval of 30 min to assess their variation with time and solar altitude. These photometric data enabled a systematic performance evaluation of the systems employed in the present study. The experimental results demonstrated the applicability of the daylighting systems employed in this work in bringing natural daylight to the interior, especially, to those spaces too deep for conventional daylighting apertures.
•Two different types of solar concentrators are compared for daylighting performance.•A series of measurements were performed side by side for an actual office space.•Some practical suggestions are made when using a daylighting system in view of energy efficiency.•Results are introduced leading to an innovative fiber optic system to harvest daylight in buildings.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-5442 |
ispartof | Energy (Oxford), 2017-10, Vol.137, p.449-456 |
issn | 0360-5442 1873-6785 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1968401527 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Apertures Comparative analysis Concentrators Daylighting Fiber optics Fresnel lens Illuminance Lighting systems Luminance Parabolic dish Performance evaluation Photometry Planes Solar concentrator Solar energy Solar tracking Systems analysis Tracking |
title | A comparative performance analysis on daylighting for two different types of solar concentrators: Dish vs. Fresnel lens |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A16%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20performance%20analysis%20on%20daylighting%20for%20two%20different%20types%20of%20solar%20concentrators:%20Dish%20vs.%20Fresnel%20lens&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Kim,%20Yeongmin&rft.date=2017-10-15&rft.volume=137&rft.spage=449&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=449-456&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft.eissn=1873-6785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.168&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968401527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968401527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0360544217303511&rfr_iscdi=true |