Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of audiology 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 392 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3S |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | American journal of audiology |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Krueger, Melanie Schulte, Michael Zokoll, Melanie A Wagener, Kirsten C Meis, Markus Brand, Thomas Holube, Inga |
description | Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated.
Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, & Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, & Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, & Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort.
Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs.
The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968397377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A515470108</galeid><sourcerecordid>A515470108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rHDEMhk1oyVd77ykMFHqb1LLHX8dN2DYpSwtJezYer7zrMGtvxl5K_n1nSdImUHSQEM8rIb2EfAB6DrTrPjMKys6-zVqQLQUuD8gxCKFbA1y9mWoqTEu1NkfkpJQ7SoEZzQ7JETO0M5KxYzK_wcHVmFNzgfU3YmoWsVRMMa2aeQh5rI1Ly-Z2i-jXzXWqOAxxFfs4xPrQxNR8z7HgO_I2uKHg-6d8Sn59mf-8vGoXP75eX84Wre-YqG2QDBxVfS9BOKcV9-iFYdIoA86gBIbOUK8DKMNVL9mSS0GDQxF0FwTjp-Tj49ztmO93WKq9y7sxTSstGKm5UVypf9TKDWhjCrmOzm9i8XYmQHSKAtUTdf4faoolbqLPCUOc-q8En14I1uiGui552O2_V16D9BH0Yy5lxGC3Y9y48cECtXvf7LNvFqTd-zZJzp4O2_UbXP4VPBvF_wDdb48z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968397377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</creator><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><description>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated.
Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, & Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, & Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, & Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort.
Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs.
The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29049622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Assistive Technology ; Audiology ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognition ; Communication ; Female ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss - psychology ; Hearing Loss - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Intelligibility ; Listening ; Male ; Medical screening ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Physiological aspects ; Rating Scales ; Reception ; Sentences ; Signal to noise ratio ; Speech ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Speech Reception Threshold Test ; Speech reception thresholds ; Speech tests ; Speech, Intelligibility of ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zokoll, Melanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, Kirsten C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><description>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated.
Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, & Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, & Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, & Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort.
Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs.
The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Audiology</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Intelligibility</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reception</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><subject>Speech reception thresholds</subject><subject>Speech tests</subject><subject>Speech, Intelligibility of</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rHDEMhk1oyVd77ykMFHqb1LLHX8dN2DYpSwtJezYer7zrMGtvxl5K_n1nSdImUHSQEM8rIb2EfAB6DrTrPjMKys6-zVqQLQUuD8gxCKFbA1y9mWoqTEu1NkfkpJQ7SoEZzQ7JETO0M5KxYzK_wcHVmFNzgfU3YmoWsVRMMa2aeQh5rI1Ly-Z2i-jXzXWqOAxxFfs4xPrQxNR8z7HgO_I2uKHg-6d8Sn59mf-8vGoXP75eX84Wre-YqG2QDBxVfS9BOKcV9-iFYdIoA86gBIbOUK8DKMNVL9mSS0GDQxF0FwTjp-Tj49ztmO93WKq9y7sxTSstGKm5UVypf9TKDWhjCrmOzm9i8XYmQHSKAtUTdf4faoolbqLPCUOc-q8En14I1uiGui552O2_V16D9BH0Yy5lxGC3Y9y48cECtXvf7LNvFqTd-zZJzp4O2_UbXP4VPBvF_wDdb48z</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Krueger, Melanie</creator><creator>Schulte, Michael</creator><creator>Zokoll, Melanie A</creator><creator>Wagener, Kirsten C</creator><creator>Meis, Markus</creator><creator>Brand, Thomas</creator><creator>Holube, Inga</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><author>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Audiology</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Intelligibility</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reception</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Speech Reception Threshold Test</topic><topic>Speech reception thresholds</topic><topic>Speech tests</topic><topic>Speech, Intelligibility of</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zokoll, Melanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, Kirsten C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krueger, Melanie</au><au>Schulte, Michael</au><au>Zokoll, Melanie A</au><au>Wagener, Kirsten C</au><au>Meis, Markus</au><au>Brand, Thomas</au><au>Holube, Inga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3S</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>378-392</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><abstract>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated.
Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, & Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, & Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, & Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort.
Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs.
The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>29049622</pmid><doi>10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-0889 |
ispartof | American journal of audiology, 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392 |
issn | 1059-0889 1558-9137 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1968397377 |
source | MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Algorithms Assistive Technology Audiology Audiometry, Pure-Tone Case-Control Studies Cognition Communication Female Hearing Aids Hearing Impairments Hearing loss Hearing Loss - physiopathology Hearing Loss - psychology Hearing Loss - rehabilitation Humans Individual differences Intelligibility Listening Male Medical screening Methods Middle Aged Noise Physiological aspects Rating Scales Reception Sentences Signal to noise ratio Speech Speech Intelligibility Speech Perception - physiology Speech Reception Threshold Test Speech reception thresholds Speech tests Speech, Intelligibility of Young Adult |
title | Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A06%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20Between%20Listening%20Effort%20and%20Speech%20Intelligibility%20in%20Noise&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Krueger,%20Melanie&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3S&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=378-392&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA515470108%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968397377&rft_id=info:pmid/29049622&rft_galeid=A515470108&rfr_iscdi=true |