Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise

Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of audiology 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392
Hauptverfasser: Krueger, Melanie, Schulte, Michael, Zokoll, Melanie A, Wagener, Kirsten C, Meis, Markus, Brand, Thomas, Holube, Inga
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 3S
container_start_page 378
container_title American journal of audiology
container_volume 26
creator Krueger, Melanie
Schulte, Michael
Zokoll, Melanie A
Wagener, Kirsten C
Meis, Markus
Brand, Thomas
Holube, Inga
description Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated. Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, & Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, & Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, & Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort. Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs. The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.
doi_str_mv 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968397377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A515470108</galeid><sourcerecordid>A515470108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rHDEMhk1oyVd77ykMFHqb1LLHX8dN2DYpSwtJezYer7zrMGtvxl5K_n1nSdImUHSQEM8rIb2EfAB6DrTrPjMKys6-zVqQLQUuD8gxCKFbA1y9mWoqTEu1NkfkpJQ7SoEZzQ7JETO0M5KxYzK_wcHVmFNzgfU3YmoWsVRMMa2aeQh5rI1Ly-Z2i-jXzXWqOAxxFfs4xPrQxNR8z7HgO_I2uKHg-6d8Sn59mf-8vGoXP75eX84Wre-YqG2QDBxVfS9BOKcV9-iFYdIoA86gBIbOUK8DKMNVL9mSS0GDQxF0FwTjp-Tj49ztmO93WKq9y7sxTSstGKm5UVypf9TKDWhjCrmOzm9i8XYmQHSKAtUTdf4faoolbqLPCUOc-q8En14I1uiGui552O2_V16D9BH0Yy5lxGC3Y9y48cECtXvf7LNvFqTd-zZJzp4O2_UbXP4VPBvF_wDdb48z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968397377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</creator><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><description>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated. Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, &amp; Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort. Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs. The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9137</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29049622</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Algorithms ; Assistive Technology ; Audiology ; Audiometry, Pure-Tone ; Case-Control Studies ; Cognition ; Communication ; Female ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss - psychology ; Hearing Loss - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Individual differences ; Intelligibility ; Listening ; Male ; Medical screening ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Physiological aspects ; Rating Scales ; Reception ; Sentences ; Signal to noise ratio ; Speech ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception - physiology ; Speech Reception Threshold Test ; Speech reception thresholds ; Speech tests ; Speech, Intelligibility of ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of audiology, 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049622$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zokoll, Melanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, Kirsten C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><title>American journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><description>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated. Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, &amp; Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort. Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs. The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Audiology</subject><subject>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - psychology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Individual differences</subject><subject>Intelligibility</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Rating Scales</subject><subject>Reception</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Speech Reception Threshold Test</subject><subject>Speech reception thresholds</subject><subject>Speech tests</subject><subject>Speech, Intelligibility of</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1059-0889</issn><issn>1558-9137</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rHDEMhk1oyVd77ykMFHqb1LLHX8dN2DYpSwtJezYer7zrMGtvxl5K_n1nSdImUHSQEM8rIb2EfAB6DrTrPjMKys6-zVqQLQUuD8gxCKFbA1y9mWoqTEu1NkfkpJQ7SoEZzQ7JETO0M5KxYzK_wcHVmFNzgfU3YmoWsVRMMa2aeQh5rI1Ly-Z2i-jXzXWqOAxxFfs4xPrQxNR8z7HgO_I2uKHg-6d8Sn59mf-8vGoXP75eX84Wre-YqG2QDBxVfS9BOKcV9-iFYdIoA86gBIbOUK8DKMNVL9mSS0GDQxF0FwTjp-Tj49ztmO93WKq9y7sxTSstGKm5UVypf9TKDWhjCrmOzm9i8XYmQHSKAtUTdf4faoolbqLPCUOc-q8En14I1uiGui552O2_V16D9BH0Yy5lxGC3Y9y48cECtXvf7LNvFqTd-zZJzp4O2_UbXP4VPBvF_wDdb48z</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Krueger, Melanie</creator><creator>Schulte, Michael</creator><creator>Zokoll, Melanie A</creator><creator>Wagener, Kirsten C</creator><creator>Meis, Markus</creator><creator>Brand, Thomas</creator><creator>Holube, Inga</creator><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</title><author>Krueger, Melanie ; Schulte, Michael ; Zokoll, Melanie A ; Wagener, Kirsten C ; Meis, Markus ; Brand, Thomas ; Holube, Inga</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-f621a07bb615aa873cec59269791a9e612ea90c8f17937b62d3650fae5f84f523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Audiology</topic><topic>Audiometry, Pure-Tone</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - psychology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Individual differences</topic><topic>Intelligibility</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Rating Scales</topic><topic>Reception</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Speech Reception Threshold Test</topic><topic>Speech reception thresholds</topic><topic>Speech tests</topic><topic>Speech, Intelligibility of</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krueger, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulte, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zokoll, Melanie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagener, Kirsten C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meis, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holube, Inga</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krueger, Melanie</au><au>Schulte, Michael</au><au>Zokoll, Melanie A</au><au>Wagener, Kirsten C</au><au>Meis, Markus</au><au>Brand, Thomas</au><au>Holube, Inga</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise</atitle><jtitle>American journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Audiol</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3S</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>378-392</pages><issn>1059-0889</issn><eissn>1558-9137</eissn><abstract>Subjective ratings of listening effort might be applicable to estimate hearing difficulties at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at which speech intelligibility scores are near 100%. Hence, ratings of listening effort were compared with speech intelligibility scores at different SNRs, and the benefit of hearing aids was evaluated. Two groups of listeners, 1 with normal hearing and 1 with hearing impairment, performed adaptive speech intelligibility and adaptive listening effort tests (Adaptive Categorical Listening Effort Scaling; Krueger, Schulte, Brand, &amp; Holube, 2017) with sentences of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Wagener, Brand, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999a, 1999b; Wagener, Kühnel, &amp; Kollmeier, 1999) in 4 different maskers. Model functions were fitted to the data to estimate the speech reception threshold and listening effort ratings for extreme effort and no effort. Listeners with hearing impairment showed higher rated listening effort compared with listeners with normal hearing. For listeners with hearing impairment, the rating extreme effort, which corresponds to negative SNRs, was more correlated to the speech reception threshold than the rating no effort, which corresponds to positive SNRs. A benefit of hearing aids on speech intelligibility was only verifiable at negative SNRs, whereas the effect on listening effort showed high individual differences mainly at positive SNRs. The adaptive procedure for rating subjective listening effort yields information beyond using speech intelligibility to estimate hearing difficulties and to evaluate hearing aids.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</pub><pmid>29049622</pmid><doi>10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0889
ispartof American journal of audiology, 2017-10, Vol.26 (3S), p.378-392
issn 1059-0889
1558-9137
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1968397377
source MEDLINE; Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Assistive Technology
Audiology
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
Case-Control Studies
Cognition
Communication
Female
Hearing Aids
Hearing Impairments
Hearing loss
Hearing Loss - physiopathology
Hearing Loss - psychology
Hearing Loss - rehabilitation
Humans
Individual differences
Intelligibility
Listening
Male
Medical screening
Methods
Middle Aged
Noise
Physiological aspects
Rating Scales
Reception
Sentences
Signal to noise ratio
Speech
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception - physiology
Speech Reception Threshold Test
Speech reception thresholds
Speech tests
Speech, Intelligibility of
Young Adult
title Relation Between Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Noise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T10%3A06%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relation%20Between%20Listening%20Effort%20and%20Speech%20Intelligibility%20in%20Noise&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Krueger,%20Melanie&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3S&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=378-392&rft.issn=1059-0889&rft.eissn=1558-9137&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0136&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA515470108%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968397377&rft_id=info:pmid/29049622&rft_galeid=A515470108&rfr_iscdi=true