Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling
Quasi‐static electromagnetic (EM) approximation was frequently used in numerical modeling of the seismoelectric wavefields, but the computational error it brings is unclear. In this study, we investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation based on a horizontally layered model. Wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2017-10, Vol.122 (10), p.8066-8106 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 8106 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 8066 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 122 |
creator | Gao, Yongxin Huang, Feng Hu, Hengshan |
description | Quasi‐static electromagnetic (EM) approximation was frequently used in numerical modeling of the seismoelectric wavefields, but the computational error it brings is unclear. In this study, we investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation based on a horizontally layered model. With such an approximation we obtain a simplified set of Pride's equations and present an analytically based algorithm to solve the seismoelectric responses to an explosive source. First, we solve the seismic wavefields by ignoring the influence of the converted EM fields on the propagation of the seismic waves. Second, we simplify Maxwell equations to a Poisson equation of the electric potential, from which the EM signals are solved. The solved EM signals are compared with the solutions solved from the full Pride's equations to investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation. The result shows that the quasi‐static EM approximation causes the loss of the electric field accompanying the S waves and yields errors in modeling the coseismic magnetic fields accompanying the S waves. The errors tend to become smaller when increasing the frequency and decreasing the salinity, implying that the quasi‐static EM approximation seems to be more suitable for simulating the coseismic EM signals under high‐frequency and low‐salinity conditions. The quasi‐static EM approximation also affects the simulation of the interfacial EM waves. Only under the condition that the wavelength of the EM wave is much larger than the source‐receiver distance, the quasi‐static method is valid in simulating the EM wave.
Key Points
An algorithm with quasi‐static EM approximation is presented to solve the seismoelectric wavefields in a horizontally layered media
Seismoelectric wavefields solved with and without introducing quasi‐static EM approximation are compared to analyze the errors
Errors caused by quasi‐static EM approximation increase with the decrease of the frequency and the increase of the pore fluid salinity |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2017JB014251 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968358189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1968358189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3302-ccf4fa9967bfca03dcb5db7fcc2a6a8d36bbb019cdadf30e5e3c9ae14b5b0b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsNTufICAW6Pzk79Z2qLVUlBE1-HOn0yZZNqZBMnOR-gz-iRGKuLKu7n3Hj4Oh4PQOcFXBGN6TTEpV3NMMpqTIzShpOApZ3lx_HsTdopmMW7wONUokWyCnha-2UKw0beJN4npnUugVcmuh2g_P_axg87KJGobG6-dll0YX2jBDaMOzg2JgKhV0nilnW3fztCJARf17GdP0evd7cviPl0_Lh8WN-sUGMM0ldJkBjgvSmEkYKakyJUojZQUCqgUK4QQmHCpQBmGda6Z5KBJJnKBBS3ZFF0cfLfB73odu3rj-zDmijXhRcXyilR8pC4PlAw-xqBNvQ22gTDUBNfftdV_axtxdsDfrdPDv2y9Wj7Pc0o5ZV9prnDz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968358189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gao, Yongxin ; Huang, Feng ; Hu, Hengshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yongxin ; Huang, Feng ; Hu, Hengshan</creatorcontrib><description>Quasi‐static electromagnetic (EM) approximation was frequently used in numerical modeling of the seismoelectric wavefields, but the computational error it brings is unclear. In this study, we investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation based on a horizontally layered model. With such an approximation we obtain a simplified set of Pride's equations and present an analytically based algorithm to solve the seismoelectric responses to an explosive source. First, we solve the seismic wavefields by ignoring the influence of the converted EM fields on the propagation of the seismic waves. Second, we simplify Maxwell equations to a Poisson equation of the electric potential, from which the EM signals are solved. The solved EM signals are compared with the solutions solved from the full Pride's equations to investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation. The result shows that the quasi‐static EM approximation causes the loss of the electric field accompanying the S waves and yields errors in modeling the coseismic magnetic fields accompanying the S waves. The errors tend to become smaller when increasing the frequency and decreasing the salinity, implying that the quasi‐static EM approximation seems to be more suitable for simulating the coseismic EM signals under high‐frequency and low‐salinity conditions. The quasi‐static EM approximation also affects the simulation of the interfacial EM waves. Only under the condition that the wavelength of the EM wave is much larger than the source‐receiver distance, the quasi‐static method is valid in simulating the EM wave.
Key Points
An algorithm with quasi‐static EM approximation is presented to solve the seismoelectric wavefields in a horizontally layered media
Seismoelectric wavefields solved with and without introducing quasi‐static EM approximation are compared to analyze the errors
Errors caused by quasi‐static EM approximation increase with the decrease of the frequency and the increase of the pore fluid salinity</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Computer applications ; Computer simulation ; Electric fields ; Electric potential ; Error analysis ; Errors ; Geophysics ; Magnetic field ; Magnetic fields ; Mathematical models ; Maxwell's equations ; Modelling ; numerical modeling ; P-waves ; Poisson equation ; quasi‐static electromagnetic approximation ; S waves ; Salinity ; Salinity effects ; Seismic wave propagation ; Seismic waves ; seismoelectric effect ; Simulation ; Solutions ; Wave propagation ; Wavelength</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2017-10, Vol.122 (10), p.8066-8106</ispartof><rights>2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3302-ccf4fa9967bfca03dcb5db7fcc2a6a8d36bbb019cdadf30e5e3c9ae14b5b0b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3302-ccf4fa9967bfca03dcb5db7fcc2a6a8d36bbb019cdadf30e5e3c9ae14b5b0b273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4302-1413 ; 0000-0002-7529-8329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JB014251$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JB014251$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hengshan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Quasi‐static electromagnetic (EM) approximation was frequently used in numerical modeling of the seismoelectric wavefields, but the computational error it brings is unclear. In this study, we investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation based on a horizontally layered model. With such an approximation we obtain a simplified set of Pride's equations and present an analytically based algorithm to solve the seismoelectric responses to an explosive source. First, we solve the seismic wavefields by ignoring the influence of the converted EM fields on the propagation of the seismic waves. Second, we simplify Maxwell equations to a Poisson equation of the electric potential, from which the EM signals are solved. The solved EM signals are compared with the solutions solved from the full Pride's equations to investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation. The result shows that the quasi‐static EM approximation causes the loss of the electric field accompanying the S waves and yields errors in modeling the coseismic magnetic fields accompanying the S waves. The errors tend to become smaller when increasing the frequency and decreasing the salinity, implying that the quasi‐static EM approximation seems to be more suitable for simulating the coseismic EM signals under high‐frequency and low‐salinity conditions. The quasi‐static EM approximation also affects the simulation of the interfacial EM waves. Only under the condition that the wavelength of the EM wave is much larger than the source‐receiver distance, the quasi‐static method is valid in simulating the EM wave.
Key Points
An algorithm with quasi‐static EM approximation is presented to solve the seismoelectric wavefields in a horizontally layered media
Seismoelectric wavefields solved with and without introducing quasi‐static EM approximation are compared to analyze the errors
Errors caused by quasi‐static EM approximation increase with the decrease of the frequency and the increase of the pore fluid salinity</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Magnetic field</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Maxwell's equations</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>P-waves</subject><subject>Poisson equation</subject><subject>quasi‐static electromagnetic approximation</subject><subject>S waves</subject><subject>Salinity</subject><subject>Salinity effects</subject><subject>Seismic wave propagation</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>seismoelectric effect</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>Wavelength</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsNTufICAW6Pzk79Z2qLVUlBE1-HOn0yZZNqZBMnOR-gz-iRGKuLKu7n3Hj4Oh4PQOcFXBGN6TTEpV3NMMpqTIzShpOApZ3lx_HsTdopmMW7wONUokWyCnha-2UKw0beJN4npnUugVcmuh2g_P_axg87KJGobG6-dll0YX2jBDaMOzg2JgKhV0nilnW3fztCJARf17GdP0evd7cviPl0_Lh8WN-sUGMM0ldJkBjgvSmEkYKakyJUojZQUCqgUK4QQmHCpQBmGda6Z5KBJJnKBBS3ZFF0cfLfB73odu3rj-zDmijXhRcXyilR8pC4PlAw-xqBNvQ22gTDUBNfftdV_axtxdsDfrdPDv2y9Wj7Pc0o5ZV9prnDz</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Gao, Yongxin</creator><creator>Huang, Feng</creator><creator>Hu, Hengshan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-1413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-8329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling</title><author>Gao, Yongxin ; Huang, Feng ; Hu, Hengshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3302-ccf4fa9967bfca03dcb5db7fcc2a6a8d36bbb019cdadf30e5e3c9ae14b5b0b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Magnetic field</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Maxwell's equations</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>P-waves</topic><topic>Poisson equation</topic><topic>quasi‐static electromagnetic approximation</topic><topic>S waves</topic><topic>Salinity</topic><topic>Salinity effects</topic><topic>Seismic wave propagation</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>seismoelectric effect</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>Wavelength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Yongxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hengshan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Yongxin</au><au>Huang, Feng</au><au>Hu, Hengshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>8066</spage><epage>8106</epage><pages>8066-8106</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Quasi‐static electromagnetic (EM) approximation was frequently used in numerical modeling of the seismoelectric wavefields, but the computational error it brings is unclear. In this study, we investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation based on a horizontally layered model. With such an approximation we obtain a simplified set of Pride's equations and present an analytically based algorithm to solve the seismoelectric responses to an explosive source. First, we solve the seismic wavefields by ignoring the influence of the converted EM fields on the propagation of the seismic waves. Second, we simplify Maxwell equations to a Poisson equation of the electric potential, from which the EM signals are solved. The solved EM signals are compared with the solutions solved from the full Pride's equations to investigate the error caused by the quasi‐static EM approximation. The result shows that the quasi‐static EM approximation causes the loss of the electric field accompanying the S waves and yields errors in modeling the coseismic magnetic fields accompanying the S waves. The errors tend to become smaller when increasing the frequency and decreasing the salinity, implying that the quasi‐static EM approximation seems to be more suitable for simulating the coseismic EM signals under high‐frequency and low‐salinity conditions. The quasi‐static EM approximation also affects the simulation of the interfacial EM waves. Only under the condition that the wavelength of the EM wave is much larger than the source‐receiver distance, the quasi‐static method is valid in simulating the EM wave.
Key Points
An algorithm with quasi‐static EM approximation is presented to solve the seismoelectric wavefields in a horizontally layered media
Seismoelectric wavefields solved with and without introducing quasi‐static EM approximation are compared to analyze the errors
Errors caused by quasi‐static EM approximation increase with the decrease of the frequency and the increase of the pore fluid salinity</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JB014251</doi><tpages>41</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-1413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-8329</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2017-10, Vol.122 (10), p.8066-8106 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1968358189 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Algorithms Approximation Computer applications Computer simulation Electric fields Electric potential Error analysis Errors Geophysics Magnetic field Magnetic fields Mathematical models Maxwell's equations Modelling numerical modeling P-waves Poisson equation quasi‐static electromagnetic approximation S waves Salinity Salinity effects Seismic wave propagation Seismic waves seismoelectric effect Simulation Solutions Wave propagation Wavelength |
title | Comparison of full and quasi‐static seismoelectric analytically based modeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T23%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20full%20and%20quasi%E2%80%90static%20seismoelectric%20analytically%20based%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Gao,%20Yongxin&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=8066&rft.epage=8106&rft.pages=8066-8106&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JB014251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968358189%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968358189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |