Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers
The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2017-11, Vol.44 (21), p.11,021-11,029 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11,029 |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 11,021 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Behroozmand, Ahmad A. Knight, Rosemary Müller‐Petke, Mike Auken, Esben Barfod, Adrian A. S. Ferré, Ty P. A. Vilhelmsen, Troels N. Johnson, Carole D. Christiansen, Anders V. |
description | The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typically done in the petroleum industry. However, the challenge has been obtaining high‐quality laboratory samples from unconsolidated aquifers. At a study site in Denmark, we employed sonic drilling, which minimizes the disturbance of the surrounding material, and extracted twelve 7.6 cm diameter samples for laboratory measurements. We present a detailed comparison of the acquired laboratory and logging NMR data. The agreement observed between the laboratory and logging data suggests that the methodologies proposed in this study provide good conditions for studying NMR measurements of unconsolidated near‐surface aquifers. Finally, we show how laboratory sample size and condition impact the NMR measurements.
Key Points
First detailed comparison of laboratory and logging NMR estimated parameters in unconsolidated aquifers
Proposing drilling and sampling methodologies to overcome the challenges facing laboratory and logging NMR measurements in unconsolidated aquifers
The methods employed in this study support the use of laboratory NMR to develop the interpretation of NMR logging for aquifer characterization |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2017GL074999 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1968358138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1968358138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3673-c34b57f5fe617385c882dad7c1b8fe5a2ccb1e7a363b2cf672cb71cec4a4e3b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdvfoCAr1bzp2nSxzF0ClVhc88lSZOS0TVbsir99mbMB598updzfudeOADcYvSAESKPBGG-qBDPy7I8AxNc5nkmEOLnYIJQmXbCi0twFeMGIUQRxROgVoPWJkY7dHAlt7vO9S1cHYI8mHaEs-ZL9smGlVQ-aT6MyRwalyRv4fvbEla-bY8Z18N1r30ffeealG7gbD84a0K8BhdWdtHc_M4pWD8_fc5fsupj8TqfVZmkBaeZprli3DJrCsypYFoI0siGa6yENUwSrRU2PMFUEW0LTrTiWBudy9xQhekU3J3u7oLfDyYe6o0fQp9e1rgsBGUCU5Go-xOlg48xGFvvgtvKMNYY1ccW678tJpyc8G_XmfFftl4sK1awnNIfAcl0WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968358138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Behroozmand, Ahmad A. ; Knight, Rosemary ; Müller‐Petke, Mike ; Auken, Esben ; Barfod, Adrian A. S. ; Ferré, Ty P. A. ; Vilhelmsen, Troels N. ; Johnson, Carole D. ; Christiansen, Anders V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Behroozmand, Ahmad A. ; Knight, Rosemary ; Müller‐Petke, Mike ; Auken, Esben ; Barfod, Adrian A. S. ; Ferré, Ty P. A. ; Vilhelmsen, Troels N. ; Johnson, Carole D. ; Christiansen, Anders V.</creatorcontrib><description>The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typically done in the petroleum industry. However, the challenge has been obtaining high‐quality laboratory samples from unconsolidated aquifers. At a study site in Denmark, we employed sonic drilling, which minimizes the disturbance of the surrounding material, and extracted twelve 7.6 cm diameter samples for laboratory measurements. We present a detailed comparison of the acquired laboratory and logging NMR data. The agreement observed between the laboratory and logging data suggests that the methodologies proposed in this study provide good conditions for studying NMR measurements of unconsolidated near‐surface aquifers. Finally, we show how laboratory sample size and condition impact the NMR measurements.
Key Points
First detailed comparison of laboratory and logging NMR estimated parameters in unconsolidated aquifers
Proposing drilling and sampling methodologies to overcome the challenges facing laboratory and logging NMR measurements in unconsolidated aquifers
The methods employed in this study support the use of laboratory NMR to develop the interpretation of NMR logging for aquifer characterization</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017GL074999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>advanced sampling ; Aquifers ; Data logging ; Drilling ; Groundwater ; Groundwater studies ; Hydraulic conductivity ; Laboratories ; Laboratory experiments ; Logging ; Magnetic resonance ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Petroleum ; Petroleum industry ; Porous media ; Ultrasonic machining ; Unconsolidated aquifers</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2017-11, Vol.44 (21), p.11,021-11,029</ispartof><rights>2017. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3673-c34b57f5fe617385c882dad7c1b8fe5a2ccb1e7a363b2cf672cb71cec4a4e3b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3673-c34b57f5fe617385c882dad7c1b8fe5a2ccb1e7a363b2cf672cb71cec4a4e3b13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1367-8879 ; 0000-0002-6399-8563 ; 0000-0001-6941-1578 ; 0000-0001-5829-2913 ; 0000-0002-2001-9441 ; 0000-0002-5397-4832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017GL074999$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017GL074999$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behroozmand, Ahmad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auken, Esben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfod, Adrian A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferré, Ty P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Troels N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Anders V.</creatorcontrib><title>Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typically done in the petroleum industry. However, the challenge has been obtaining high‐quality laboratory samples from unconsolidated aquifers. At a study site in Denmark, we employed sonic drilling, which minimizes the disturbance of the surrounding material, and extracted twelve 7.6 cm diameter samples for laboratory measurements. We present a detailed comparison of the acquired laboratory and logging NMR data. The agreement observed between the laboratory and logging data suggests that the methodologies proposed in this study provide good conditions for studying NMR measurements of unconsolidated near‐surface aquifers. Finally, we show how laboratory sample size and condition impact the NMR measurements.
Key Points
First detailed comparison of laboratory and logging NMR estimated parameters in unconsolidated aquifers
Proposing drilling and sampling methodologies to overcome the challenges facing laboratory and logging NMR measurements in unconsolidated aquifers
The methods employed in this study support the use of laboratory NMR to develop the interpretation of NMR logging for aquifer characterization</description><subject>advanced sampling</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Data logging</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater studies</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory experiments</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Porous media</subject><subject>Ultrasonic machining</subject><subject>Unconsolidated aquifers</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKdvfoCAr1bzp2nSxzF0ClVhc88lSZOS0TVbsir99mbMB598updzfudeOADcYvSAESKPBGG-qBDPy7I8AxNc5nkmEOLnYIJQmXbCi0twFeMGIUQRxROgVoPWJkY7dHAlt7vO9S1cHYI8mHaEs-ZL9smGlVQ-aT6MyRwalyRv4fvbEla-bY8Z18N1r30ffeealG7gbD84a0K8BhdWdtHc_M4pWD8_fc5fsupj8TqfVZmkBaeZprli3DJrCsypYFoI0siGa6yENUwSrRU2PMFUEW0LTrTiWBudy9xQhekU3J3u7oLfDyYe6o0fQp9e1rgsBGUCU5Go-xOlg48xGFvvgtvKMNYY1ccW678tJpyc8G_XmfFftl4sK1awnNIfAcl0WA</recordid><startdate>20171116</startdate><enddate>20171116</enddate><creator>Behroozmand, Ahmad A.</creator><creator>Knight, Rosemary</creator><creator>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creator><creator>Auken, Esben</creator><creator>Barfod, Adrian A. S.</creator><creator>Ferré, Ty P. A.</creator><creator>Vilhelmsen, Troels N.</creator><creator>Johnson, Carole D.</creator><creator>Christiansen, Anders V.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-8879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-8563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-1578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-2913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-9441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-4832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171116</creationdate><title>Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers</title><author>Behroozmand, Ahmad A. ; Knight, Rosemary ; Müller‐Petke, Mike ; Auken, Esben ; Barfod, Adrian A. S. ; Ferré, Ty P. A. ; Vilhelmsen, Troels N. ; Johnson, Carole D. ; Christiansen, Anders V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3673-c34b57f5fe617385c882dad7c1b8fe5a2ccb1e7a363b2cf672cb71cec4a4e3b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>advanced sampling</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Data logging</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater studies</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory experiments</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Porous media</topic><topic>Ultrasonic machining</topic><topic>Unconsolidated aquifers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behroozmand, Ahmad A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller‐Petke, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auken, Esben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfod, Adrian A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferré, Ty P. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilhelmsen, Troels N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Anders V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behroozmand, Ahmad A.</au><au>Knight, Rosemary</au><au>Müller‐Petke, Mike</au><au>Auken, Esben</au><au>Barfod, Adrian A. S.</au><au>Ferré, Ty P. A.</au><au>Vilhelmsen, Troels N.</au><au>Johnson, Carole D.</au><au>Christiansen, Anders V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2017-11-16</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>11,021</spage><epage>11,029</epage><pages>11,021-11,029</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) technique has become popular in groundwater studies because it responds directly to the presence and mobility of water in a porous medium. There is a need to conduct laboratory experiments to aid in the development of NMR hydraulic conductivity models, as is typically done in the petroleum industry. However, the challenge has been obtaining high‐quality laboratory samples from unconsolidated aquifers. At a study site in Denmark, we employed sonic drilling, which minimizes the disturbance of the surrounding material, and extracted twelve 7.6 cm diameter samples for laboratory measurements. We present a detailed comparison of the acquired laboratory and logging NMR data. The agreement observed between the laboratory and logging data suggests that the methodologies proposed in this study provide good conditions for studying NMR measurements of unconsolidated near‐surface aquifers. Finally, we show how laboratory sample size and condition impact the NMR measurements.
Key Points
First detailed comparison of laboratory and logging NMR estimated parameters in unconsolidated aquifers
Proposing drilling and sampling methodologies to overcome the challenges facing laboratory and logging NMR measurements in unconsolidated aquifers
The methods employed in this study support the use of laboratory NMR to develop the interpretation of NMR logging for aquifer characterization</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/2017GL074999</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-8879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6399-8563</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-1578</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5829-2913</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2001-9441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-4832</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2017-11, Vol.44 (21), p.11,021-11,029 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1968358138 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | advanced sampling Aquifers Data logging Drilling Groundwater Groundwater studies Hydraulic conductivity Laboratories Laboratory experiments Logging Magnetic resonance NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Petroleum Petroleum industry Porous media Ultrasonic machining Unconsolidated aquifers |
title | Successful Sampling Strategy Advances Laboratory Studies of NMR Logging in Unconsolidated Aquifers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T23%3A51%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20Sampling%20Strategy%20Advances%20Laboratory%20Studies%20of%20NMR%20Logging%20in%20Unconsolidated%20Aquifers&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Behroozmand,%20Ahmad%20A.&rft.date=2017-11-16&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=11,021&rft.epage=11,029&rft.pages=11,021-11,029&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017GL074999&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968358138%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968358138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |