Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy
Despite initial intentions to better align transatlantic regulation and associated practices in the negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), this was not possible for rules concerning genetically modified organisms and data privacy. By 2016 both matters effectively f...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Business and politics 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.593-620 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 620 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 593 |
| container_title | Business and politics |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Aggarwal, Vinod K. Evenett, Simon J. |
| description | Despite initial intentions to better align transatlantic regulation and associated practices in the negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), this was not possible for rules concerning genetically modified organisms and data privacy. By 2016 both matters effectively fell off the TTIP negotiating agenda. This paper identifies the factors responsible, specifically the critical role played by independent regulatory agencies and associated bureaucratic politics, transnational coalitions of private sector organizations, and non-government organizations and contingency. These factors are not exclusive to the two salient regulations considered here, with the implication that the identification of cross-border spillovers is at best a necessary condition for the successful negotiation of binding trade rules on behind-the-border government policies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/bap.2017.17 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1967366599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_bap_2017_17</cupid><sourcerecordid>1967366599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a01f78d2418b0eae6aaf0f1d0fbca7ff1cf39aeab309f79033b2f861b15fcbf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsnXyDgUbZmNm12402K1kJLRdZzmGSTdmu7W5Ot0Lc3pT3swdP8MB__DB8h98AGwCB70rgbpDEMILsgPRgKmfCRkJedfE1uQlizCHGW9sj804YqtFW9pNquqrqk7cpS3fjSetri5jvQqqZFMf14pkXcGAw20MbRyXwRKEa-xBbpzle_aA635MrhJti78-yTr7fXYvyezBaT6fhllhieyzZBBi7Ly3QIuWYWrUB0zEHJnDaYOQfGcYkWNWfSZZJxrlOXC9AwckY74H3ycOrd-eZnb0Or1s3e1_GkAikyLsRIykg9nijjmxC8dSq-uUV_UMDU0ZeKvtTRl4o2-oSeaGuaugodFgQIMcxFRJJzIW61r8ql7dz9p_IPFu92ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1967366599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>AUTh Library subscriptions: Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Aggarwal, Vinod K. ; Evenett, Simon J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Vinod K. ; Evenett, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite initial intentions to better align transatlantic regulation and associated practices in the negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), this was not possible for rules concerning genetically modified organisms and data privacy. By 2016 both matters effectively fell off the TTIP negotiating agenda. This paper identifies the factors responsible, specifically the critical role played by independent regulatory agencies and associated bureaucratic politics, transnational coalitions of private sector organizations, and non-government organizations and contingency. These factors are not exclusive to the two salient regulations considered here, with the implication that the identification of cross-border spillovers is at best a necessary condition for the successful negotiation of binding trade rules on behind-the-border government policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1469-3569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/bap.2017.17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural biotechnology ; Agriculture ; Biotechnology ; Borders ; Bureaucracy ; Case studies ; Coalitions ; Congressional investigations ; Data ; Food ; Food safety ; Genetically altered foods ; Genetically modified organisms ; Identification ; International trade ; Internet ; Investments ; Lobbying ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Politics ; Privacy ; Private sector ; Regulation ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Regulatory agencies ; Regulatory approval ; Rules ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Business and politics, 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.593-620</ispartof><rights>Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a01f78d2418b0eae6aaf0f1d0fbca7ff1cf39aeab309f79033b2f861b15fcbf13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a01f78d2418b0eae6aaf0f1d0fbca7ff1cf39aeab309f79033b2f861b15fcbf13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1469356917000179/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,12824,27843,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Vinod K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenett, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><title>Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy</title><title>Business and politics</title><addtitle>Bus. Polit</addtitle><description>Despite initial intentions to better align transatlantic regulation and associated practices in the negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), this was not possible for rules concerning genetically modified organisms and data privacy. By 2016 both matters effectively fell off the TTIP negotiating agenda. This paper identifies the factors responsible, specifically the critical role played by independent regulatory agencies and associated bureaucratic politics, transnational coalitions of private sector organizations, and non-government organizations and contingency. These factors are not exclusive to the two salient regulations considered here, with the implication that the identification of cross-border spillovers is at best a necessary condition for the successful negotiation of binding trade rules on behind-the-border government policies.</description><subject>Agricultural biotechnology</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Borders</subject><subject>Bureaucracy</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Congressional investigations</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Genetically altered foods</subject><subject>Genetically modified organisms</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Regulatory approval</subject><subject>Rules</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1469-3569</issn><issn>1469-3569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMFKAzEQhoMoWKsnXyDgUbZmNm12402K1kJLRdZzmGSTdmu7W5Ot0Lc3pT3swdP8MB__DB8h98AGwCB70rgbpDEMILsgPRgKmfCRkJedfE1uQlizCHGW9sj804YqtFW9pNquqrqk7cpS3fjSetri5jvQqqZFMf14pkXcGAw20MbRyXwRKEa-xBbpzle_aA635MrhJti78-yTr7fXYvyezBaT6fhllhieyzZBBi7Ly3QIuWYWrUB0zEHJnDaYOQfGcYkWNWfSZZJxrlOXC9AwckY74H3ycOrd-eZnb0Or1s3e1_GkAikyLsRIykg9nijjmxC8dSq-uUV_UMDU0ZeKvtTRl4o2-oSeaGuaugodFgQIMcxFRJJzIW61r8ql7dz9p_IPFu92ew</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Aggarwal, Vinod K.</creator><creator>Evenett, Simon J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy</title><author>Aggarwal, Vinod K. ; Evenett, Simon J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a01f78d2418b0eae6aaf0f1d0fbca7ff1cf39aeab309f79033b2f861b15fcbf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Agricultural biotechnology</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Borders</topic><topic>Bureaucracy</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Congressional investigations</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Genetically altered foods</topic><topic>Genetically modified organisms</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Regulatory approval</topic><topic>Rules</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Vinod K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evenett, Simon J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Business and politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aggarwal, Vinod K.</au><au>Evenett, Simon J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy</atitle><jtitle>Business and politics</jtitle><addtitle>Bus. Polit</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>620</epage><pages>593-620</pages><issn>1469-3569</issn><eissn>1469-3569</eissn><abstract>Despite initial intentions to better align transatlantic regulation and associated practices in the negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), this was not possible for rules concerning genetically modified organisms and data privacy. By 2016 both matters effectively fell off the TTIP negotiating agenda. This paper identifies the factors responsible, specifically the critical role played by independent regulatory agencies and associated bureaucratic politics, transnational coalitions of private sector organizations, and non-government organizations and contingency. These factors are not exclusive to the two salient regulations considered here, with the implication that the identification of cross-border spillovers is at best a necessary condition for the successful negotiation of binding trade rules on behind-the-border government policies.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/bap.2017.17</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1469-3569 |
| ispartof | Business and politics, 2017-12, Vol.19 (4), p.593-620 |
| issn | 1469-3569 1469-3569 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1967366599 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; AUTh Library subscriptions: Cambridge Journals Online |
| subjects | Agricultural biotechnology Agriculture Biotechnology Borders Bureaucracy Case studies Coalitions Congressional investigations Data Food Food safety Genetically altered foods Genetically modified organisms Identification International trade Internet Investments Lobbying Negotiation Negotiations Politics Privacy Private sector Regulation Regulation of financial institutions Regulatory agencies Regulatory approval Rules Transnationalism |
| title | Resisting behind the border talks in TTIP: The cases of GMOs and data privacy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T14%3A37%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resisting%20behind%20the%20border%20talks%20in%20TTIP:%20The%20cases%20of%20GMOs%20and%20data%20privacy&rft.jtitle=Business%20and%20politics&rft.au=Aggarwal,%20Vinod%20K.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=620&rft.pages=593-620&rft.issn=1469-3569&rft.eissn=1469-3569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/bap.2017.17&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1967366599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1967366599&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_bap_2017_17&rfr_iscdi=true |