Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures
Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrological processes 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 24 |
container_start_page | 4282 |
container_title | Hydrological processes |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Soulsby, Chris Braun, Hannah Sprenger, Matthias Weiler, Markus Tetzlaff, Doerthe |
description | Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hyp.11351 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1967324676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1967324676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ012NzlKUVso6EEPghCy2aRNqcma7CL77912vXqaGfjeG95D6JbAjAAs5ru-mRFCc3KGJgSEyAjw_BxNgPM8K4CXl-gqpT0AMOAwQZ9rbw-d8drgYLEN0aQWK1_jtItdhbXyoXEm4eBxE412jWtV646Xiq07bs5vTwKXQjuwGie39artBqdrdGHVIZmbvzlF70-Pb8tVtnl5Xi8fNpmmgpOM6ZoQsMIaQXNhjGYiZ2WpDdeGCs2JqhkXNeXG5AyKyrIKrKLVAmqhQZR0iu5G3yaG725IIPehi354KYkoSrpgRVkM1P1I6RhSisbKJrovFXtJQB7Lk0N58lTewM5H9scdTP8_KFcfr6PiF82ocm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1967324676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creator><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><description>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric precipitations ; boreal forest ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Chemical composition ; Composition effects ; Costs ; Environmental monitoring ; Fluxes ; forest hydrology ; Forests ; Fractionation ; Heat exchange ; Highlands ; Interactions ; Interception ; Isotope composition ; Isotopes ; Landscape ; Moorland ; Pine trees ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Spatial distribution ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; Statistical analysis ; Streams ; Summer ; Temporal variations ; Throughfall</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6910-2118 ; 0000-0002-7183-8674 ; 0000-0003-1221-2767 ; 0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.11351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.11351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</description><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>boreal forest</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>forest hydrology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Heat exchange</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Isotope composition</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Moorland</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ012NzlKUVso6EEPghCy2aRNqcma7CL77912vXqaGfjeG95D6JbAjAAs5ru-mRFCc3KGJgSEyAjw_BxNgPM8K4CXl-gqpT0AMOAwQZ9rbw-d8drgYLEN0aQWK1_jtItdhbXyoXEm4eBxE412jWtV646Xiq07bs5vTwKXQjuwGie39artBqdrdGHVIZmbvzlF70-Pb8tVtnl5Xi8fNpmmgpOM6ZoQsMIaQXNhjGYiZ2WpDdeGCs2JqhkXNeXG5AyKyrIKrKLVAmqhQZR0iu5G3yaG725IIPehi354KYkoSrpgRVkM1P1I6RhSisbKJrovFXtJQB7Lk0N58lTewM5H9scdTP8_KFcfr6PiF82ocm8</recordid><startdate>20171130</startdate><enddate>20171130</enddate><creator>Soulsby, Chris</creator><creator>Braun, Hannah</creator><creator>Sprenger, Matthias</creator><creator>Weiler, Markus</creator><creator>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-2118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-8674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1221-2767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171130</creationdate><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><author>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>boreal forest</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>forest hydrology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Heat exchange</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Isotope composition</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Moorland</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soulsby, Chris</au><au>Braun, Hannah</au><au>Sprenger, Matthias</au><au>Weiler, Markus</au><au>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2017-11-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4282</spage><epage>4296</epage><pages>4282-4296</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.11351</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-2118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-8674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1221-2767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-6087 |
ispartof | Hydrological processes, 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296 |
issn | 0885-6087 1099-1085 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1967324676 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Atmospheric precipitations boreal forest Canopies Canopy Chemical composition Composition effects Costs Environmental monitoring Fluxes forest hydrology Forests Fractionation Heat exchange Highlands Interactions Interception Isotope composition Isotopes Landscape Moorland Pine trees Precipitation Rain Rainfall Spatial distribution Spatial variability Spatial variations Statistical analysis Streams Summer Temporal variations Throughfall |
title | Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20forest%20and%20shrub%20canopies%20on%20precipitation%20partitioning%20and%20isotopic%20signatures&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Soulsby,%20Chris&rft.date=2017-11-30&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4282&rft.epage=4296&rft.pages=4282-4296&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.11351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1967324676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1967324676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |