Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures

Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296
Hauptverfasser: Soulsby, Chris, Braun, Hannah, Sprenger, Matthias, Weiler, Markus, Tetzlaff, Doerthe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4296
container_issue 24
container_start_page 4282
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 31
creator Soulsby, Chris
Braun, Hannah
Sprenger, Matthias
Weiler, Markus
Tetzlaff, Doerthe
description Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.11351
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1967324676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1967324676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ012NzlKUVso6EEPghCy2aRNqcma7CL77912vXqaGfjeG95D6JbAjAAs5ru-mRFCc3KGJgSEyAjw_BxNgPM8K4CXl-gqpT0AMOAwQZ9rbw-d8drgYLEN0aQWK1_jtItdhbXyoXEm4eBxE412jWtV646Xiq07bs5vTwKXQjuwGie39artBqdrdGHVIZmbvzlF70-Pb8tVtnl5Xi8fNpmmgpOM6ZoQsMIaQXNhjGYiZ2WpDdeGCs2JqhkXNeXG5AyKyrIKrKLVAmqhQZR0iu5G3yaG725IIPehi354KYkoSrpgRVkM1P1I6RhSisbKJrovFXtJQB7Lk0N58lTewM5H9scdTP8_KFcfr6PiF82ocm8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1967324676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creator><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><description>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atmospheric precipitations ; boreal forest ; Canopies ; Canopy ; Chemical composition ; Composition effects ; Costs ; Environmental monitoring ; Fluxes ; forest hydrology ; Forests ; Fractionation ; Heat exchange ; Highlands ; Interactions ; Interception ; Isotope composition ; Isotopes ; Landscape ; Moorland ; Pine trees ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Spatial distribution ; Spatial variability ; Spatial variations ; Statistical analysis ; Streams ; Summer ; Temporal variations ; Throughfall</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6910-2118 ; 0000-0002-7183-8674 ; 0000-0003-1221-2767 ; 0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.11351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.11351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><description>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</description><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>boreal forest</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>forest hydrology</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Heat exchange</subject><subject>Highlands</subject><subject>Interactions</subject><subject>Interception</subject><subject>Isotope composition</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Moorland</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Spatial variability</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Throughfall</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ012NzlKUVso6EEPghCy2aRNqcma7CL77912vXqaGfjeG95D6JbAjAAs5ru-mRFCc3KGJgSEyAjw_BxNgPM8K4CXl-gqpT0AMOAwQZ9rbw-d8drgYLEN0aQWK1_jtItdhbXyoXEm4eBxE412jWtV646Xiq07bs5vTwKXQjuwGie39artBqdrdGHVIZmbvzlF70-Pb8tVtnl5Xi8fNpmmgpOM6ZoQsMIaQXNhjGYiZ2WpDdeGCs2JqhkXNeXG5AyKyrIKrKLVAmqhQZR0iu5G3yaG725IIPehi354KYkoSrpgRVkM1P1I6RhSisbKJrovFXtJQB7Lk0N58lTewM5H9scdTP8_KFcfr6PiF82ocm8</recordid><startdate>20171130</startdate><enddate>20171130</enddate><creator>Soulsby, Chris</creator><creator>Braun, Hannah</creator><creator>Sprenger, Matthias</creator><creator>Weiler, Markus</creator><creator>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-2118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-8674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1221-2767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171130</creationdate><title>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</title><author>Soulsby, Chris ; Braun, Hannah ; Sprenger, Matthias ; Weiler, Markus ; Tetzlaff, Doerthe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3981-4cd110f9fe9359eec495477ce8ce39c81ad489d38ee5406bf4b0fa3b20d9c0973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>boreal forest</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>forest hydrology</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Heat exchange</topic><topic>Highlands</topic><topic>Interactions</topic><topic>Interception</topic><topic>Isotope composition</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Moorland</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Spatial variability</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Throughfall</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soulsby, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiler, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soulsby, Chris</au><au>Braun, Hannah</au><au>Sprenger, Matthias</au><au>Weiler, Markus</au><au>Tetzlaff, Doerthe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><date>2017-11-30</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>4282</spage><epage>4296</epage><pages>4282-4296</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Over a 4‐month summer period, we monitored how forest (Pinus sylvestris) and heather moorland (Calluna spp. and Erica spp.) vegetation canopies altered the volume and isotopic composition of net precipitation (NP) in a southern boreal landscape in northern Scotland. During that summer period, interception losses were relatively high and higher under forests compared to moorland (46% of gross rainfall [GR] compared with 35%, respectively). Throughfall (TF) volumes exhibited marked spatial variability in forests, depending upon local canopy density, but were more evenly distributed under heather moorland. In the forest stands, stemflow was a relatively small canopy flow path accounting for only 0.9–1.6% of NP and only substantial in larger events. Overall, the isotopic composition of NP was not markedly affected by canopy interactions; temporal variation of stable water isotopes in TF closely corresponded to that of GR with differences of TF‐GR being −0.52‰ for δ2H and −0.14‰ for δ18O for forests and 0.29‰ for δ2H and −0.04‰ for δ18O for heather moorland. These differences were close to, or within, analytical precision of isotope determination, though the greater differences under forest were statistically significant. Evidence for evaporative fractionation was generally restricted to low rainfall volumes in low intensity events, though at times, subtle effects of liquid–vapour moisture exchange and/or selective transmission though canopies were evident. Fractionation and other effects were more evident in stemflow but only marked in smaller events. The study confirmed earlier work that increased forest cover in the Scottish Highlands will likely cause an increase in interception and green water fluxes at the expenses of blue water fluxes to streams. However, the low‐energy, humid environment means that isotopic changes during such interactions will only have a minor overall effect on the isotopic composition of NP.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.11351</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-2118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7183-8674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1221-2767</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6245-6917</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2017-11, Vol.31 (24), p.4282-4296
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1967324676
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Atmospheric precipitations
boreal forest
Canopies
Canopy
Chemical composition
Composition effects
Costs
Environmental monitoring
Fluxes
forest hydrology
Forests
Fractionation
Heat exchange
Highlands
Interactions
Interception
Isotope composition
Isotopes
Landscape
Moorland
Pine trees
Precipitation
Rain
Rainfall
Spatial distribution
Spatial variability
Spatial variations
Statistical analysis
Streams
Summer
Temporal variations
Throughfall
title Influence of forest and shrub canopies on precipitation partitioning and isotopic signatures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20forest%20and%20shrub%20canopies%20on%20precipitation%20partitioning%20and%20isotopic%20signatures&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Soulsby,%20Chris&rft.date=2017-11-30&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=4282&rft.epage=4296&rft.pages=4282-4296&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.11351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1967324676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1967324676&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true