Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response
The planar dynamic response of a cantilever metallic beam structure under combined harmonic base excitations (consisting of in-plane transverse and rotation about the out-of-plane transverse axis) was investigated experimentally. The important effect of the phase angle between the two simultaneous b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mechanical systems and signal processing 2018-02, Vol.100, p.371-383 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 383 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Mechanical systems and signal processing |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Habtour, Ed Sridharan, Raman Dasgupta, Abhijit Robeson, Mark Vantadori, Sabrina |
description | The planar dynamic response of a cantilever metallic beam structure under combined harmonic base excitations (consisting of in-plane transverse and rotation about the out-of-plane transverse axis) was investigated experimentally. The important effect of the phase angle between the two simultaneous biaxial excitations on the beam tip displacement was demonstrated. The experiments were performed using a unique six degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) electrodynamic shaker with high control accuracy. The results showed that the beam tip displacement at the first flexural mode was amplified when the phase angle between the rotational and translational base excitations was increased. The beam nonlinear stiffness, on the other hand, simultaneously: (i) decreased due to fatigue damage accumulation, and (ii) increased due to an increase in the phase angle. The results were compared to the uniaxial excitation technique, where the principle of superposition was applied (mathematical addition of the structural response for each uniaxial excitation). The principle of superposition was shown to overestimate the structural response for low phase angles. Thus, the application of the superposition vibration testing as a substitute for multiaxial vibration testing may lead to over-conservatism and erroneous dynamic and reliability predictions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1966855611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0888327017304065</els_id><sourcerecordid>1966855611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6e7438e085f58bf04d4a2f5d2642d8468102624143ba94f8e016ac77aa8a1823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB161JmqbpwoUMvmBAF7pyEdI8mJSZpibpwPx70xnXwoW7ON853HsAuMWoxAiz-7487GIcS4JwU6I8lJyBBUYtKzDB7BwsEOe8qEiDLsFVjD1CqKWILcD3x0ZGA91gt5MZlIHeQuV3nRuMhsEnmZwf5BbKQcMU5BD3JmR-77pwlCL0A0wbA2MKk0pTyGwwccyKuQYXVm6jufnbS_D1_PS5ei3W7y9vq8d1oaoKp0Iz09CKG8RrW_POIqqpJLbWhFGiOWUcI8IIxbTqZEttJjGTqmmk5BJzUi3B3Sl3DP5nMjGJ3k8hXx0Fbhnjdc0wzlR1olTwMQZjxRjcToaDwEjMLYpeHFsUc4sC5aFz9sPJZfIDe2eCiMrNRWkXjEpCe_ev_xdqjX02</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966855611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Habtour, Ed ; Sridharan, Raman ; Dasgupta, Abhijit ; Robeson, Mark ; Vantadori, Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Habtour, Ed ; Sridharan, Raman ; Dasgupta, Abhijit ; Robeson, Mark ; Vantadori, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>The planar dynamic response of a cantilever metallic beam structure under combined harmonic base excitations (consisting of in-plane transverse and rotation about the out-of-plane transverse axis) was investigated experimentally. The important effect of the phase angle between the two simultaneous biaxial excitations on the beam tip displacement was demonstrated. The experiments were performed using a unique six degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) electrodynamic shaker with high control accuracy. The results showed that the beam tip displacement at the first flexural mode was amplified when the phase angle between the rotational and translational base excitations was increased. The beam nonlinear stiffness, on the other hand, simultaneously: (i) decreased due to fatigue damage accumulation, and (ii) increased due to an increase in the phase angle. The results were compared to the uniaxial excitation technique, where the principle of superposition was applied (mathematical addition of the structural response for each uniaxial excitation). The principle of superposition was shown to overestimate the structural response for low phase angles. Thus, the application of the superposition vibration testing as a substitute for multiaxial vibration testing may lead to over-conservatism and erroneous dynamic and reliability predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-3270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-1216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cantilever beams ; Crack propagation ; Damage accumulation ; Damage precursor ; Degrees of freedom ; Dynamic response ; Excitation ; Fatigue ; Fatigue failure ; Metal fatigue ; Multiaxial ; Nonlinear dynamic ; Phase ; Phase shift ; Reliability ; Stiffness ; Structural response ; Superposition (mathematics) ; Transverse oscillation ; Vibration tests</subject><ispartof>Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2018-02, Vol.100, p.371-383</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Feb 1, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6e7438e085f58bf04d4a2f5d2642d8468102624143ba94f8e016ac77aa8a1823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6e7438e085f58bf04d4a2f5d2642d8468102624143ba94f8e016ac77aa8a1823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9047-9187 ; 0000-0002-1904-9301</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.042$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habtour, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridharan, Raman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robeson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantadori, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response</title><title>Mechanical systems and signal processing</title><description>The planar dynamic response of a cantilever metallic beam structure under combined harmonic base excitations (consisting of in-plane transverse and rotation about the out-of-plane transverse axis) was investigated experimentally. The important effect of the phase angle between the two simultaneous biaxial excitations on the beam tip displacement was demonstrated. The experiments were performed using a unique six degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) electrodynamic shaker with high control accuracy. The results showed that the beam tip displacement at the first flexural mode was amplified when the phase angle between the rotational and translational base excitations was increased. The beam nonlinear stiffness, on the other hand, simultaneously: (i) decreased due to fatigue damage accumulation, and (ii) increased due to an increase in the phase angle. The results were compared to the uniaxial excitation technique, where the principle of superposition was applied (mathematical addition of the structural response for each uniaxial excitation). The principle of superposition was shown to overestimate the structural response for low phase angles. Thus, the application of the superposition vibration testing as a substitute for multiaxial vibration testing may lead to over-conservatism and erroneous dynamic and reliability predictions.</description><subject>Cantilever beams</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Damage accumulation</subject><subject>Damage precursor</subject><subject>Degrees of freedom</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Excitation</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Metal fatigue</subject><subject>Multiaxial</subject><subject>Nonlinear dynamic</subject><subject>Phase</subject><subject>Phase shift</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Structural response</subject><subject>Superposition (mathematics)</subject><subject>Transverse oscillation</subject><subject>Vibration tests</subject><issn>0888-3270</issn><issn>1096-1216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AjcB161JmqbpwoUMvmBAF7pyEdI8mJSZpibpwPx70xnXwoW7ON853HsAuMWoxAiz-7487GIcS4JwU6I8lJyBBUYtKzDB7BwsEOe8qEiDLsFVjD1CqKWILcD3x0ZGA91gt5MZlIHeQuV3nRuMhsEnmZwf5BbKQcMU5BD3JmR-77pwlCL0A0wbA2MKk0pTyGwwccyKuQYXVm6jufnbS_D1_PS5ei3W7y9vq8d1oaoKp0Iz09CKG8RrW_POIqqpJLbWhFGiOWUcI8IIxbTqZEttJjGTqmmk5BJzUi3B3Sl3DP5nMjGJ3k8hXx0Fbhnjdc0wzlR1olTwMQZjxRjcToaDwEjMLYpeHFsUc4sC5aFz9sPJZfIDe2eCiMrNRWkXjEpCe_ev_xdqjX02</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Habtour, Ed</creator><creator>Sridharan, Raman</creator><creator>Dasgupta, Abhijit</creator><creator>Robeson, Mark</creator><creator>Vantadori, Sabrina</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1904-9301</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response</title><author>Habtour, Ed ; Sridharan, Raman ; Dasgupta, Abhijit ; Robeson, Mark ; Vantadori, Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d6e7438e085f58bf04d4a2f5d2642d8468102624143ba94f8e016ac77aa8a1823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cantilever beams</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Damage accumulation</topic><topic>Damage precursor</topic><topic>Degrees of freedom</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Excitation</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Metal fatigue</topic><topic>Multiaxial</topic><topic>Nonlinear dynamic</topic><topic>Phase</topic><topic>Phase shift</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Structural response</topic><topic>Superposition (mathematics)</topic><topic>Transverse oscillation</topic><topic>Vibration tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habtour, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridharan, Raman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasgupta, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robeson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vantadori, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habtour, Ed</au><au>Sridharan, Raman</au><au>Dasgupta, Abhijit</au><au>Robeson, Mark</au><au>Vantadori, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response</atitle><jtitle>Mechanical systems and signal processing</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>371</spage><epage>383</epage><pages>371-383</pages><issn>0888-3270</issn><eissn>1096-1216</eissn><abstract>The planar dynamic response of a cantilever metallic beam structure under combined harmonic base excitations (consisting of in-plane transverse and rotation about the out-of-plane transverse axis) was investigated experimentally. The important effect of the phase angle between the two simultaneous biaxial excitations on the beam tip displacement was demonstrated. The experiments were performed using a unique six degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) electrodynamic shaker with high control accuracy. The results showed that the beam tip displacement at the first flexural mode was amplified when the phase angle between the rotational and translational base excitations was increased. The beam nonlinear stiffness, on the other hand, simultaneously: (i) decreased due to fatigue damage accumulation, and (ii) increased due to an increase in the phase angle. The results were compared to the uniaxial excitation technique, where the principle of superposition was applied (mathematical addition of the structural response for each uniaxial excitation). The principle of superposition was shown to overestimate the structural response for low phase angles. Thus, the application of the superposition vibration testing as a substitute for multiaxial vibration testing may lead to over-conservatism and erroneous dynamic and reliability predictions.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.042</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9047-9187</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1904-9301</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-3270 |
ispartof | Mechanical systems and signal processing, 2018-02, Vol.100, p.371-383 |
issn | 0888-3270 1096-1216 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1966855611 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Cantilever beams Crack propagation Damage accumulation Damage precursor Degrees of freedom Dynamic response Excitation Fatigue Fatigue failure Metal fatigue Multiaxial Nonlinear dynamic Phase Phase shift Reliability Stiffness Structural response Superposition (mathematics) Transverse oscillation Vibration tests |
title | Phase influence of combined rotational and transverse vibrations on the structural response |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A42%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20influence%20of%20combined%20rotational%20and%20transverse%20vibrations%20on%20the%20structural%20response&rft.jtitle=Mechanical%20systems%20and%20signal%20processing&rft.au=Habtour,%20Ed&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=383&rft.pages=371-383&rft.issn=0888-3270&rft.eissn=1096-1216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966855611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966855611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0888327017304065&rfr_iscdi=true |