Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism
I will assume here the defenses of epistemic infinitism are adequate and inquire as to the variety standpoints within the view. I will argue that infinitism has three varieties depending on the strength of demandingness of the infinitist requirement and the purity of its conception of epistemic just...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2008-07, Vol.163 (2), p.175-185 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 185 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 175 |
| container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
| container_volume | 163 |
| creator | Aikin, Scott F. |
| description | I will assume here the defenses of epistemic infinitism are adequate and inquire as to the variety standpoints within the view. I will argue that infinitism has three varieties depending on the strength of demandingness of the infinitist requirement and the purity of its conception of epistemic justification, each of which I will term strong pure, strong impure, and weak impure infinitisms. Further, I will argue that impure infinitisms have the dialectical advantage. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-007-9196-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196671321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40271021</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40271021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-9472f666feb73210db8e80b63ea190aafb90d460576557799c8e7eed8835b4443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMouFZ_gAdhETxGJ5tsssGTlKqFihf1GrK7SU1pd2uSHvrvzbKlePI0A_PeNzMPoWsC9wRAPARCikLi1GJJJMf0BGWkFBSD5OwUZQBUYlGV4hxdhLACIIQzyNDjm4kaz7YuRLPp1_1yn-uuzeO3yb-0dyY6E_Le5geFa_J5Z13nogubS3Rm9TqYq0OdoM_n2cf0FS_eX-bTpwVuKBcRSyYKyzm3pha0INDWlamg5tRoIkFrW0toGYdS8LIUQsqmMsKYtqpoWTPG6ATdjtyt7392JkS16ne-SytVepULkqhJREZR4_sQvLFq691G-70ioIaI1BiRGtohIkWT5-4A1qHRa-t117hwNBbAaCXFwC5GXUijbmn8nwP-gd-MplWIvT9CGRSCQDr4Fxdzfg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196671321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Aikin, Scott F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aikin, Scott F.</creatorcontrib><description>I will assume here the defenses of epistemic infinitism are adequate and inquire as to the variety standpoints within the view. I will argue that infinitism has three varieties depending on the strength of demandingness of the infinitist requirement and the purity of its conception of epistemic justification, each of which I will term strong pure, strong impure, and weak impure infinitisms. Further, I will argue that impure infinitisms have the dialectical advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9196-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Basic beliefs ; Belief ; Coherentism ; Dialectic ; Dialectics ; Education ; Epistemic justification ; Epistemology ; Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge ; Essays ; Foundationalism ; Headache ; Inferential justification ; Justified beliefs ; Knowledge ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Phenomenological research ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science ; Theory ; Trees ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2008-07, Vol.163 (2), p.175-185</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-9472f666feb73210db8e80b63ea190aafb90d460576557799c8e7eed8835b4443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-9472f666feb73210db8e80b63ea190aafb90d460576557799c8e7eed8835b4443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40271021$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40271021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20438971$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aikin, Scott F.</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>I will assume here the defenses of epistemic infinitism are adequate and inquire as to the variety standpoints within the view. I will argue that infinitism has three varieties depending on the strength of demandingness of the infinitist requirement and the purity of its conception of epistemic justification, each of which I will term strong pure, strong impure, and weak impure infinitisms. Further, I will argue that impure infinitisms have the dialectical advantage.</description><subject>Basic beliefs</subject><subject>Belief</subject><subject>Coherentism</subject><subject>Dialectic</subject><subject>Dialectics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemic justification</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Foundationalism</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Inferential justification</subject><subject>Justified beliefs</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Phenomenological research</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMouFZ_gAdhETxGJ5tsssGTlKqFihf1GrK7SU1pd2uSHvrvzbKlePI0A_PeNzMPoWsC9wRAPARCikLi1GJJJMf0BGWkFBSD5OwUZQBUYlGV4hxdhLACIIQzyNDjm4kaz7YuRLPp1_1yn-uuzeO3yb-0dyY6E_Le5geFa_J5Z13nogubS3Rm9TqYq0OdoM_n2cf0FS_eX-bTpwVuKBcRSyYKyzm3pha0INDWlamg5tRoIkFrW0toGYdS8LIUQsqmMsKYtqpoWTPG6ATdjtyt7392JkS16ne-SytVepULkqhJREZR4_sQvLFq691G-70ioIaI1BiRGtohIkWT5-4A1qHRa-t117hwNBbAaCXFwC5GXUijbmn8nwP-gd-MplWIvT9CGRSCQDr4Fxdzfg0</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>Aikin, Scott F.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism</title><author>Aikin, Scott F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-9472f666feb73210db8e80b63ea190aafb90d460576557799c8e7eed8835b4443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Basic beliefs</topic><topic>Belief</topic><topic>Coherentism</topic><topic>Dialectic</topic><topic>Dialectics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemic justification</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Foundationalism</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Inferential justification</topic><topic>Justified beliefs</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Phenomenological research</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aikin, Scott F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aikin, Scott F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>163</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>175-185</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>I will assume here the defenses of epistemic infinitism are adequate and inquire as to the variety standpoints within the view. I will argue that infinitism has three varieties depending on the strength of demandingness of the infinitist requirement and the purity of its conception of epistemic justification, each of which I will term strong pure, strong impure, and weak impure infinitisms. Further, I will argue that impure infinitisms have the dialectical advantage.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-007-9196-3</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0039-7857 |
| ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2008-07, Vol.163 (2), p.175-185 |
| issn | 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196671321 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Basic beliefs Belief Coherentism Dialectic Dialectics Education Epistemic justification Epistemology Epistemology. Philosophy of science. Theory of knowledge Essays Foundationalism Headache Inferential justification Justified beliefs Knowledge Logic Metaphysics Phenomenological research Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science Theory Trees Truth |
| title | Meta-Epistemology and the Varieties of Epistemic Infinitism |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T10%3A36%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-Epistemology%20and%20the%20Varieties%20of%20Epistemic%20Infinitism&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Aikin,%20Scott%20F.&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=163&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=175-185&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-007-9196-3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40271021%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196671321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40271021&rfr_iscdi=true |