A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"
In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Philosophical studies 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 91 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 69 |
| container_title | Philosophical studies |
| container_volume | 112 |
| creator | DJUKIC, George POPESCU, Vladimir B |
| description | In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1023/a:1022538609397 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196637760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4321327</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4321327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-8f51b6407c3c7e934e6d069402352c207f99b340262245f34ee8078873be94c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jr1rwzAUxEVpoWnauUsHEyid3D7p6TNbcD8h0CWdjeJIqU1iu5Iz5L-PQkKHx_G4H3dHyD2FZwoMX-w0CROoJRg06oKMqFCYg9Z4SUYASHNNqbwmNzE2ACCN4CMynWVFqIf6b-eyzmdz266j3T7FbLL4dVm6LuyPxqzvnQ11u85enXftyq0mt-TK2010d2cdk5_3t0Xxmc-_P76K2TxvqGFDrr2gS8lBVVgpZ5A7uUrlPG0WrGKgvDFLTK9kjAuffKdBaa1w6QyvGI7J5JTbhy7NjEPZdLvQpsqSGilRKQkJejxDNlZ244NtqzqWfai3NuxLypUQWhy5hxPXxKEL_z5HRpEpPABFelt2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196637760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</creator><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1022538609397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Apples ; Central nervous system ; Cosmology; matter, space, time ; General points ; Hallucination ; Hallucinations ; History of science and technology ; Instantiation ; Intrinsic properties ; Legal objections ; Mental imagery ; Ontological pluralism ; Ontology ; Perceptual experiences ; Philosophical object ; Physical sciences and techniques ; Sense datum theory ; Time</subject><ispartof>Philosophical studies, 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4321327$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4321327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14755850$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><title>Philosophical studies</title><description>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</description><subject>Apples</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Cosmology; matter, space, time</subject><subject>General points</subject><subject>Hallucination</subject><subject>Hallucinations</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>Instantiation</subject><subject>Intrinsic properties</subject><subject>Legal objections</subject><subject>Mental imagery</subject><subject>Ontological pluralism</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Perceptual experiences</subject><subject>Philosophical object</subject><subject>Physical sciences and techniques</subject><subject>Sense datum theory</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0031-8116</issn><issn>1573-0883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jr1rwzAUxEVpoWnauUsHEyid3D7p6TNbcD8h0CWdjeJIqU1iu5Iz5L-PQkKHx_G4H3dHyD2FZwoMX-w0CROoJRg06oKMqFCYg9Z4SUYASHNNqbwmNzE2ACCN4CMynWVFqIf6b-eyzmdz266j3T7FbLL4dVm6LuyPxqzvnQ11u85enXftyq0mt-TK2010d2cdk5_3t0Xxmc-_P76K2TxvqGFDrr2gS8lBVVgpZ5A7uUrlPG0WrGKgvDFLTK9kjAuffKdBaa1w6QyvGI7J5JTbhy7NjEPZdLvQpsqSGilRKQkJejxDNlZ244NtqzqWfai3NuxLypUQWhy5hxPXxKEL_z5HRpEpPABFelt2</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>DJUKIC, George</creator><creator>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Sringer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</title><author>DJUKIC, George ; POPESCU, Vladimir B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j192t-8f51b6407c3c7e934e6d069402352c207f99b340262245f34ee8078873be94c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Apples</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Cosmology; matter, space, time</topic><topic>General points</topic><topic>Hallucination</topic><topic>Hallucinations</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>Instantiation</topic><topic>Intrinsic properties</topic><topic>Legal objections</topic><topic>Mental imagery</topic><topic>Ontological pluralism</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Perceptual experiences</topic><topic>Philosophical object</topic><topic>Physical sciences and techniques</topic><topic>Sense datum theory</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DJUKIC, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>POPESCU, Vladimir B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DJUKIC, George</au><au>POPESCU, Vladimir B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended"</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>69-91</pages><issn>0031-8116</issn><eissn>1573-0883</eissn><abstract>In this paper we consider, and reject, Harold Langsam's defence of the Theory of Appearing, in this journal (1997), in the face of three standard arguments against it. These arguments are: the argument from hallucination; the argument from the same cause-same effect principle; and the argument from perceptual time-gap.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1022538609397</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0031-8116 |
| ispartof | Philosophical studies, 2003-01, Vol.112 (1), p.69-91 |
| issn | 0031-8116 1573-0883 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196637760 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Apples Central nervous system Cosmology matter, space, time General points Hallucination Hallucinations History of science and technology Instantiation Intrinsic properties Legal objections Mental imagery Ontological pluralism Ontology Perceptual experiences Philosophical object Physical sciences and techniques Sense datum theory Time |
| title | A Critique of Langsam's "The Theory of Appearing Defended" |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T01%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critique%20of%20Langsam's%20%22The%20Theory%20of%20Appearing%20Defended%22&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20studies&rft.au=DJUKIC,%20George&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=69-91&rft.issn=0031-8116&rft.eissn=1573-0883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1022538609397&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4321327%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196637760&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4321327&rfr_iscdi=true |